Showing posts with label judge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label judge. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

The FBI Announce They Have Closed Brad Pitt Child Abuse Investigation

 
Angelina Jolie

This is a follow up to the November 17, 20-16 article "Angelina Jolie's Claims Of Child Abuse Regarding Husband Brad Pitt Being Heavily Scrutinized." The FBI have closed their criminal investigation into actor Brad Pitt, after his wife, actress Angelina Jolie, accused him of child abuse. The couple had an argument on a private jet. When their oldest son Maddox Jolie-Pitt, tried to intervene on behalf of his mother, it was stated Brad lunged at and struck the 15-year-old boy.

Due to the fact the FBI has jurisdiction over aviation cases, they investigated the matter. It was reported the FBI interviewed both Jolie and Pitt regarding the incident. This week the FBI released a statement on the case, "The FBI has conducted a review of the circumstances and will not pursue further investigation. No charges have been filed in this matter.

 
Brad Pitt

Jolie was adamant Pitt committed an act of child abuse. So much so, she decided to divorce him over it, with her representative stating, "For the health of the family." The FBI has not disclosed what transpired on the airplane. Neither has the estranged, drug addicted couple, who are not scheduled to spend thanksgiving together.  

Some continue to hold the view Jolie made these claims against Pitt to ruin him for cheating on her, with other women. However, some insist Jolie is telling the truth about Pitt being an angry, violent person. Either way, none of this can be good for their children.

RELATED ARTICLES






Thursday, August 18, 2016

Swimmer Ryan Lochte Flees Rio 2016 Olympics After Police Discover His Wallet Was Not Stolen Nor Did He Catch A Cab At A Gas Station Where He Alleges He Was Robbed At Gunpoint


Ryan Lochte
 
Social networking is questioning the integrity of swimmer, Ryan Lochte, regarding inconsistencies in his story regarding being allegedly robbed at gunpoint, by men dressed as police, during the 2016 Rio Olympics in Brazil. The story hit the news after Lochte’s mother revealed to Fox News that he was allegedly robbed during the Olympics in Rio. Lochte made headlines due to a television interview with U.S. network NBC, on location in Rio to cover the Olympics. 

During the interview with NBC’s Matt Lauer, Lochte stated a group of men wearing police clothing stopped the cab he and U.S. Olympic swim team members, Jimmy Feigen, Gunnar Bentz and Jack Conger, caught after a party outside the Olympic village. For years Lochte has been known for his wild partying and landed on pop culture blogs as a result of it. 


Ipiranga gas station in Rio (Photo Credit: the Daily Mail)

Lochte stated on television that one of the men dressed as a police officer pointed a gun at his forehead demanding his wallet and other valuables. Lochte stated his wallet was stolen during the alleged robbery. However, inconsistencies have since cropped up after Brazilian authorities began subpoenaing CCTV camera footage at multiple locations in Rio to backtrack Lochte’s movements and that of his team mates who were present in the cab, to ascertain exactly what transpired. 

Brazilian judge, Kayla Blank, ordered Lochte, Bentz, Conger and Feigen to stay put while authorities complete their investigation, as the inconsistencies that have surfaced in their story needs clarification. For example, Lochte told police he caught the cab at a specific gas station. Authorities subpoenaed the CCTV footage from the station and discovered Lochte and his teammates were never there. 


From NBC: (Clockwise from top left) Jimmy Feigen, Ryan Lochte, Jack Conger and Gunnar Bentz
 
Lochte told police his wallet was stolen during the alleged robbery in the cab. However, authorities subpoenaed CCTV footage of the swimmers returning to the Olympic village hours later than they stated they arrived at the athletics facility and the video shows Lochte, Bentz, Conger and Feigen placing their wallets in the containers, to be scanned in the x-rays machine that inspects the contents of one‘s belongings, in search of weapons or other incendiary devices. People have now come to the conclusion their wallets were not stolen, though Lochte previously made claims to the contrary.

Lochte told authorities he left a party held by Club France at 4AM and caught a cab at the Ipiranga gas station in the immediate vicinity of the venue. However, Brazilian authorities subpoenaed CCTV footage from the Club France party and discovered Lochte, Feigen, Conger and Bentz left hours later than they claimed. 

 
Lochte, Feigen and Bentz checking in at the Olympic village at 6:56AM. Authorities state they checked in with their belongings they stated were stolen and did not look distressed on the tape or to witnesses, after the alleged robbery at gunpoint.
 
After news began to filter out about the inconsistencies in their stories, Lochte fled Brazil and was able to make it back to America. The U.S. Olympic committee has refused to divulge Lochte’s location, though he is wanted for questioning in Rio under the suspicion he filed a false police report in Brazil. The New York Times stated Lochte, Feigen, Conger and Bentz's claims of robbery at gunpoint brought “embarrassment“ on the Rio Olympics committee that has "turned to anger." 

Lochte did not return to his home in Florida. However, DrudgeReport.com is stating he is in North Carolina. Lochte’s teammates Bentz and Conger attempted to flee as well, in defiance of the Judge Blank’s orders and were removed from a plane in Rio that was headed for America. Their passports have now been confiscated until they testified, as they previously gave "conflicting reports" to police. People online are wondering if Lochte, Bentz and Feign were truly robbed or if they were drunk/high and hallucinated the whole thing. 

STORY SOURCE

What robbery? Brazilian police say Ryan Lochte's wallet was detected in X-ray scan AFTER he claims it was seized at gunpoint as officers launch probe into star's dramatic hold-up story
Published: 10:38 EST, 17 August 2016 | Updated: 18:24 EST, 17 August 2016 - Police arrived to the Olympic Village on Wednesday to seize the passports of Ryan Lochte and Jimmy Feigen. The two men are under investigation for allegedly lying about the robbery they claimed happened Sunday in Rio.

The swim team had already moved out of the Village but Feigen may still be in Brazil while Lochte flew home to the US on Tuesday. The judge's order came after seeing video obtained by DailyMail.com of the laughing men returning to the Village after the robbery.

Investigators claim that the X-ray machine at the Village showed the men were in possession of all belongings they said were stolen on Sunday. The video footage also seems to show both Feigen and Gunnar Bentz carrying what look to be wallets when they return to the Village. The two men will now be investigated for the false communication of a crime, which carries a maximum sentence of three years in jail in Brazil.

Police in Brazil arrived at the Olympic Village on Wednesday to seize the passports of Ryan Lochte and Jimmy Feigen in an attempt to keep them in the country for further questioning about the robbery they claim occurred early Sunday. A judge gave authorities the go ahead after doubts began to grow over the claims made by the swimmers in light of the surveillance video obtained by DailyMail.com earlier this week showing the group laughing and smiling as they returned to the Olympic Village. 

Lochte's mother later broke the news of the alleged robbery later that day while speaking with Fox Sports. The athletes are now accused of lying about the incident after the publication of the video Tuesday led investigators to change their line of inquiry. A formal request for their passports to be seized reveals that the two men will now be investigated for the false communication of a crime, which carries a maximum sentence of three years in jail in Brazil. 

Records retrieved by investigators from the X-ray machine through which the athletes passed in the Village also showed that the men were carrying all the belongings which they had claimed in sworn statements to police had been stolen. Lochte, 32, had already flown out of the country and is home in the US while Feigen's whereabouts are still not known. Feigen, 26, had been in Rio all day Tuesday but it is unclear if he took a flight home before the judge's order.

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Judge Should Order Adrien Broner To Rehab For His Own Good

 
Adrien Broner's Instagram page requesting the public write to him in jail

Former four time world champion boxer Adrien Broner was arrested for drunk driving last year. He was temporarily detained, then bailed. This year, Broner was sentenced to 10-days in jail for the offense. Broner is now in jail again, for contempt of court, as he showed up 3-hours late to a court hearing on an assault case, as he had a terrible hangover.

Broner unquestionably has a substance abuse problem, as something so serious as court and he still could not get himself together and show up sober and on time. It speaks volumes. The judge should order Broner to rehab for his own good. It is not getting better. It is getting worse. Something is troubling Broner that he is drinking to the point of total inebriation. He has become addicted. When people reach the point they can't stop themselves through their own willpower, it is time for an intervention. The court is in a position to do that.

Broner needs medical help and treatment for addiction. It's way past the point of recreational drinking, where you have a drink with dinner or at an event. Broner is at the point that he drinks until he is impaired. And sometimes gets behind the wheel of a sports car, which could turn fatal. The cop that stopped Broner for driving while intoxicated did him a favor, because who knows, he was speeding and driving so poorly, an accident could have happened.

Broner is a boxer and alcohol consumed to excess is very damaging to athletes. And the end of the day, Broner is a human being first and foremost. He needs to take care of his life and health, so he can live a good life and enjoy his family.

RELATED ARTICLES

 
 


 








Friday, July 15, 2016

Appeals Court Rejects Tom Brady Deflategate Case


Tom Brady

An Appeals Court in America has rejected the appeal of New England Patriots football star,  Tom Brady, who was handed a 4-game suspension over a scheme to deflate footballs to make them easier to catch and throw. It created an undue advantage in play on the grid iron. Brady sued and fawning judge, Richard M. Berman, inappropriately tossed out the suspension. An appeals court reinstated it. Brady appealed the decision regarding the reinstatement of the 4-game suspension, but the appeals court has rejected it this week. The final legal rung Brady can appeal this matter to is the U.S. Supreme Court
 
Brady signed legally binding contracts with the New England Patriots and by default the NFL. This meant he agreed to abide by league rules and procedures. This was an internal matter at the NFL. It did not belong in the court system. However, Brady brought it there. No one deprived Brady of his rights. The NFL has treated Brady and others in the league quite well. I can't imagine the NFL is happy at being sued by someone they went to great lengths to please.

The new NFL season begins on September 11th, 2016 and Brady's backup quarterback, Jimmy Garoppolo, is set to take his place during the 4-game suspension.

STORY SOURCE

US appeals court refuses to reconsider QB Tom Brady's 'Deflategate' case
 
38 Mins Ago - A federal appeals court has rejected Tom Brady's attempt to get a new hearing on his "Deflategate" suspension. Brady was asking for the full 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to hear the case. In April, a three-judge panel said that NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was within his powers when he suspended the star quarterback four games for his role in a scheme to doctor the footballs used in a Jan. 18, 2015, playoff game... 

Thursday, July 7, 2016

Oscar Pistorius Sentenced To 6-Years In Prison On The Shooting Death Of Girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp


Former Olympian, Oscar Pistorius, was today sentenced to 6-years in jail over the shooting death of girlfriend, law student and model, Reeva Steenkamp, whom the athlete shot and killed at his home in Pretoria, South Africa in 2013. In 2014 Pistorius was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to 5-years in jail. However, he was placed on house arrest during the prosecution's appeal in the case.

Public outcry over the well publicized sentence led to the appeal and the high court subsequently overturning the original verdict by Judge Thokozile Masipa. In December 2015, the high court ruled Pistorius must be tried in court again again, but on the more severe charge of murder, as oppose to manslaughter.

 
Reeva Steenkamp and Oscar Pistorius

Pistorius was convicted again today, as a result of the high court remanding the case back to heavily criticized Judge Thokozile Masipa. There is public outcry again regarding the case, as under the law, the judge should have given Pistorius the 15-year statutory minimum for murder. However, she has given Pistorius less than half the mandatory. This has created anger on social networking and among women's rights groups. Comments are flooding website stating Masipa continues to show bias in her rulings regarding "fallen hero" Pistorius. Many are stating Pistorius was given a slap on the wrist and could be released from prison in 2-years, whereas other South Africans who committed lesser crimes, such as theft, were given 12-15 years in prison.

The African National Congress Women's League spokesperson, Jacqui Mofokeng, slammed the sentence, "The judgment is an insult to women. It's an insult we saw coming a mile off and an increasingly mundane insult to which we have all become accustomed. We owe Reeva Steenkamp and women everywhere our outrage today, however subdued and demoralized we might feel. Because we known, deep down, that six years for murder isn't just insulting. It's dangerous."

PUBLIC FEEDBACK FROM TWITTER:



 
STORY SOURCE
 
Oscar Pistorius sentencing: Live updates as six-year sentence is dubbed an 'insult to women' by equality campaigners

Updated 16:31, 6 Jul 2016 - Oscar Pistorius has been jailed for six years for the murder of girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp this morning. The Olympic and Paralympic icon repeatedly shot the 29-year-old model after she barricaded herself in the bathroom of his home in Pretoria on February 2013. He appeared at North Gauteng High Court this morning after a three-and-a-half year legal battle.

During sentencing Judge Thokozile Masipa said there was no evidence that Ms Steenkamp and Pistorius had rowed on the night he gunned her down. “Counsel for the defence correctly submitted that there was an unfortunate perception in the minds of some people that on the night of the murder there was an argument between the accused and the deceased and that this is what led to the murder of the deceased,” she said.

“The existence of such a perception was inadvertently confirmed by the father of the deceased Barry Steenkamp‚ who‚ during the course of his evidence‚ let slip this very perception.” “The unfortunate part of it is that there is not a shred of evidence placed before this court that supports such a perception.”...
http://www.mirror.co.uk

African National Congress spokesperson: Oscar Pistorius sentence 'insulting'

11:53 a.m. EDT July 6, 2016 - South African Judge Thokozile Masipa said “there is no indication at all” that former Olympic sprinter Oscar Pistorius and the girlfriend he murdered were in an abusive relationship. African National Congress Women’s League spokesperson Jacqui Mofokeng, however, called the Valentine’s Day 2013 murder of Reeva Steenkamp a clear case of gender violence shortly after Masipa found “substantial and compelling circumstances” to levy Pistorius with a six-year prison term, a fraction of the mandatory 15-year prison sentence.

“The judgment is an insult to women,” Mofokeng said in a statement. “It’s an insult we saw coming a mile off (and an) increasingly mundane insult to which we have all become accustomed. “We owe Reeva Steenkamp and women everywhere our outrage today, however subdued and demoralized we might feel. Because we know, deep down, that six years for murder isn’t just insulting. It’s dangerous.”...

Saturday, June 11, 2016

Public Demands U.S. Judge On Stanford Rape Case Be Removed From Office For Giving Rapist Lenient 6-Months In Jail


Brock Turner
 
Judge Aaron Persky, is a corrupt judge, who is the source of outrage in America, for giving rapist, Brock Turner, only 6-months in jail, well below the sentencing guidelines and the 6-years in prison prosecutors demanded. Judge Persky is a Stanford alumni, the university Turner attends, which many Americans believe is how corruption crept into the case. Judge Pesky showed special treatment to a student from his alma mater during sentencing, which is inappropriate. 

In America, rapists are often given 5-15 years in jail. Therefore, giving Turner 6-months for raping an unconscious woman, looks very suspect and is a miscarriage of justice. A group of men saw Turner forcefully penetrating the victim and told him to stop, which caused Turner to flee the scene. One of the men who went after Turner stated of the victim, "She was unconscious. The entire time. I checked her and she didn't move at all."

 
Judge Aaron Persky
 
A petition has been launched to have Judge Persky removed from the bench. Over 100,000 people have signed the petition. Perksy has a history of questionable behavior from the bench. A report stated he allowed "revealing photos of a gang-rape victim" into court record. The disgraceful and ugly implication is she was a slut who deserved to be raped.

A new report indicates jurors are refusing to serve under Judge Persky branding him corrupt. It has been revealed over 20 jurors have refused to serve under Judge Persky, due to his corrupt decision in the Brock Turner case. Judge Persky is disrupting the function of the court in behavior that has and will further to hold up cases. As such, Judge Persky should be removed. 

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Court Shuts Down The Mother Of Chris Brown's Child For Requesting Restricted Visits And $16,000 Monthly In A Tough Lesson On Trapping Men With An Unplanned Pregnancy

 


Chris Brown and Nia Guzman, the mother of his child, Royalty Brown, squared off in court today. Guzman demanded the court restrict Brown's access to their daughter, citing his drug and alcohol use, as well as that of his friends, OHB. The judge rejected Guzman's request. Brown and Guzman will continue to share joint custody of their daughter.  Guzman's request was hypocritical, as she has drug and alcohol issues as well. They both need rehab for the sake of their child. Their daughter needs court supervision while in the care of both parents, due to drug and alcohol issues on each side of the dispute.

Guzman also requested $16,000 in child support, which would be a massive increase from the $2,500 per month Brown has been giving her, for taking care of their daughter 2-weeks out of each month (and has rented a home for them to live in). The judge again sided with Brown, rejecting Guzman's request for increased child support. $16,000 is excessive under the circumstances. 

 
Beautiful little Royalty deserves to be properly taken care of in the financial realm. However, Nia does not deserve $16,000 per month for ruining Brown's relationship with his then long term girlfriend, Karrueche Tran, costing him some of his fans, who sided with her and others who were upset with him for concealing the fact he had become a father.

Guzman was not Brown's wife (it's not alimony). She wasn't even his girlfriend. She is a woman he had sex with while under the influence, leading to a pregnancy that came as a total surprise to him. He trusted her and she betrayed him. It's ironic, as he's known her for years. People tend to think the ones they've known for years or before fame can be trusted, where newer friends or acquaintances can't be. However, when fame and money enter the picture, some people start scheming and will take advantage of you. They will trap you with a pregnancy thinking they'll get a big support check every month, lavish home and force your hand into marriage.

  

Brown does not want a relationship with Guzman, as he is not in love and feels betrayed. Guzman was just sex for Brown. Nothing more. She was one of several women he had sex with at the time. She put herself in a bad situation cheating with a man and one who does not love her. Women, don't do that to yourselves. Don't ruin someone else's chance at happiness in trying to trap them into something they don't want for their life, then costing them the one they love (Brown losing Tran). 

There's no honor or decency in that. You are setting yourself up for a world of pain. Brown's fans don't like Guzman and neither does his mother, who wanted him to marry Rihanna.
Women who trap famous men with pregnancies they weren't ready for, open themselves up to so much embarrassment when the male does not commit to them in a relationship or marriage and all the acrimony goes public. A baby will not make a man love you.  

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Crazy Stalker Arrested For Targeting Fox News Host And Her Brother


Catherine Pavlich
 
33-year-old stalker, Charles Moreland, has been targeting Townhall.com journalist and Fox News commentator, Catherine “Katie” Pavlich, whom he is in love with, resulting in the FBI indicting him on criminal charges, such as cyberstalking. Previously, Morelanad was jailed for cyberstalking and making threats against U.S. congressional senator, Harry Reid. 

Moreland, sent Palvich a barrage of unwanted and threatening emails at the online address posted on her website articles. Such email addresses are meant for public feedback, which includes compliments, constructive criticism or requests regarding what people would like to see on a website. Said email addresses are not meant for threats and abuse. Writers don't mind emails that criticize their writing and written opinions. You can even tell a writer via email that their work stinks or is biased. However, when it crosses the line into threats, that's when it becomes illegal.

Moreland used fake names and various email addresses to submit a multitude of harassing, threatening and abusive items to Palvich, in conduct psychologists attribute to stalkers. Moreland took his conduct even further in sending threatening and crazy items to Palvich's brother on social networking. Papers in psychiatric journals by psychologists do state, stalkers often target the family members, spouses and or love interests of their victims. It is a crazy means of indirect contact with a victim they are stalking and getting no response from, leading to greater restlessness. However, it is unwise to respond to a stalker. 


Harry Reid
 
Moreland became so obsessed with Palvich, everything she or her brother posted online, he crazily misinterpreted it as something directed to and written about him. Moreland made statements that reveal he is in love with pretty Palvich and wanted to marry her. Many people have crushes on public figures, post comments to that effect on social networking and even send fan email. That's no crime. However, once again, Moreland veered into completely illegal territory in sending threatening items via email, where Palvich and her brother began to reasonably fear for their safety.

Moreland was jailed and given court orders not to use a computer, laptop, tablet or any other device to cyberstalk and harass people. However, the minute he got out of jail in the Reid case, he began targeting Palvich to greater degrees, sending more and more threatening emails. This case further alarmingly proves many stalkers cannot be rehabilitated. It is a serious mental disorder that not even shock therapy can fix. 

Stalkers are not harmless. Many of them engage in criminal violence against innocent people. Their minds are gone, believing they own and or are in a romantic relationship with their victim, who wants nothing to do with them. The justice system needs to take a hard line with stalkers. Too many of them have killed innocent people. Stalkers belong behind bars indefinitely or in a mental institution to protect the public.

Fore more information on this case, please visit the Smoking Gun website, to view the full indictment: http://thesmokinggun.com
STORY SOURCE

FBI Probing Stalking Of Fox Commentator

Suspect was convicted for death threats against Sen. Harry Reid
 
MAY 19--The Oklahoma man convicted of threatening to kill U.S. Senator Harry Reid is now the target of an FBI investigation into his alleged online stalking of a prominent conservative journalist and frequent Fox News Channel contributor, court records show. According to an FBI affidavit, Charles Moreland, 33, has spent most of the last year harassing Catherine “Katie” Pavlich, a Townhall.com editor. Pavlich, 27, has received more than 250 e-mails from Moreland, a barrage that left the journalist “in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury,” federal agents allege. 

Moreland, a Tulsa resident, pleaded guilty in January 2015 to sending Reid messages stating that the politician was a “dead man.” One e-mail warned Reid that if he did not resign his Senate seat he and his family members would “face stern, harsh, unimaginable consequences.” In another message, Moreland wrote that if the Democratic power “opens his mouth again, we will take action against him and his family immediately.” 

In a misdemeanor plea deal, Moreland was sentenced to a month in jail and five months of home detention. He was also placed on probation for a year. Beginning last May, investigators charge, Moreland inundated Pavlich with creepy and menacing e-mails. While claiming in one e-mail, “I am not going to harm anyone,” Moreland stated in a later communication, “If I come to DC you will ignore me and say you have no idea who I am.” 

Upon receiving some of Moreland’s initial e-mails, Pavlich told a colleague that, “I think this guy…is a serious harm to himself and possibly a legitimate stalker of me.” Pavlich, identified as “CP” in the FBI affidavit, did not respond to TSG e-mails seeking comment about the federal probe. 

In other e-mails, Moreland appeared infatuated with Pavlich, asking, “When are you going to seduce me?” and “Does that mean you are going to kill me if I don’t marry you?” When Pavlich solicited reader questions in advance of an interview with Carly Fiorina, Moreland wrote, “Ask her if she thinks I should marry you.” 

Moreland, the FBI affidavit notes, even monitored an Instagram account maintained by Pavlich’s brother. When Pavlich’s sibling uploaded video of himself shooting at a Tulsa gun range, Moreland interpreted the clip as a direct threat. “I have no interest in harming you or anyone you care about. I honestly do not,” Moreland wrote to Pavlich in a September 2015 e-mail. “However, if you have interest in harming me, please make sure you follow through on the implied.” 

Moreland’s e-mails to Pavlich stopped after he was arrested in November for violating terms of his probation. He was cited for failing to disclose his use of a tablet and laptop that were capable of accessing the Internet. Additionally, court records show, Moreland sent “threatening” e-mails to the White House, Hillary Clinton, and other public officials. The Clinton e-mail, forwarded to the Secret Service by the campaign’s correspondence director, prompted agents to confront Moreland about his unhinged communications...

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Ciara And Future Custody Battle Takes New Twist


Ciara, her son Future and Russell Wilson
 
The custody battle between singer, Ciara and ex-fiancée, rapper Future, over their 1-year-old son, Future, just took a new twist. Future applied for joint custody. The legal application was made in a California court, a state that promotes such arrangements. As a result, Future was awarded joint custody of their son, in what is customary in California. Ciara opposed the request in court papers, but did not prevail. 


Ciara
 
 Previously, Future made false claims online regarding Ciara’s parenting skills and his alleged inability to spend time with his son. However, Ciara’s attorney presented emails that disputed his claims. Future is angry at Ciara for calling off their engagement over his cheating, then a year later becoming engaged to handsome, wealthy NFL star, Russell Wilson. 


Future and Ciara in 2014 before they broke up in 2015

The public has been trolling Future stating Wilson is raising his child, while he is out messing with promiscuous women, neglecting his duties as a father. Future has been too busy chasing groupies and promiscuous female celebrities that want to use him to get songs and publicity, to spend time an adequate amount of time with his son. Future tried to blame Ciara, but records revealed she made time for him to be with his son. His priorities are all wrong and that's the problem. Future keeps knocking up women (5) then neglecting his duties as a father, in favor of trashy women he meets in the industry and on tour (groupies).

STORY SOURCE

Future, Ciara Custody Battle: Judge Rules ‘Body Party’ Singer Must Allow Future To See His Son

05/17/16 AT 2:15 PM  - Ciara’s going to have to switch up her custody battle strategy if she hopes to win against ex-fiancé Future in court. The pair faced off over their son Monday, and it’s not looking good for the mother-of-one. TMZ reported that the Ciara initially set out to gain full custody of the son she and Future share. The singer, 30, claimed her former beau has been absent through much of Future Zahir Wilburn’s life. She and her lawyers slammed him for being a bad father and an even worse person. Still, the publication notes that California state courts tend to gravitate toward joint custody, and this case is no different. The judge rejected the arguments of both Ciara and her legal counsel...

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Prince's Estate States Anyone Making Claims As A Relative Must Pay For Their DNA Test


Prince
 
This is a follow up to the May 10, 2016 Judiciary Report article "Over 700 People Have Come Forward Claiming To Be Related To Or The Mother Of The Children Of The Late Singer Prince" where the site stated, "These claims are costly and outrageous. Lawyers for Prince's estate and the administrator need to put their foot down, via making it plainly clear, if anyone files a fraudulent claim, they will be arrested and prosecuted. If they fail to get serious regarding these fraudulent claims, the estate will lose millions of dollars in trying to sort out baseless paternity and DNA claims." 


On Monday, May 16, 2016, the Bremer Trust, the court appointed administrators of the estate of the late recording star, Prince, has asked the judge in the case for approval, to order all individuals attempting to make a DNA claim as potential relatives of the singer, pay for their own genetic testing. This makes sense. Only people who have been lied to by a promiscuous parent or are mentally ill opportunists will pursue DNA claims when they realize they have to pay for it. This will weed out many false claims, saving the estate time and money.


In closing, just because you went to a Prince concert doesn't mean you are related to him. Just because your mama slept with a man that looked like Prince (probably an impersonator), doesn't mean he is your daddy. Please spare his family the harassment and emotional distress.  

STORY SOURCE

Prince No Free Rides for Wannabe Family ... If Estate Gets Its Way
 
5/16/2016 8:59 AM PDT - All the so-called "long lost" relatives of Prince should have to pay to prove they're truly the singer's blood ... according to the bank running his estate. TMZ obtained docs filed by Bremer Trust Bank ... and it's asking a judge to sign off on getting anyone who's "claiming a genetic relationship" to fork over the dough to cover DNA testing costs...

Monday, May 16, 2016

Chris Brown’s Stalker Strikes Again And Is Arrested At His House And Ordered To Undergo Psychiatric Evaluation


Chris Brown: you don't know me!

The Judiciary Report published the March 17, 2016 article “Chris Brown Hit With Restraining Order From His Stalker.” The Judiciary Report also did the self-explanatory follow up article on March 31, 2016 “Restraining Order Obtained Against Chris Brown By His Stalker Thrown Out Of Court.” 


Chris Brown: Ooh no she didn't.
 
Last week, the Judiciary Report was proven right again, as Danielle Patti, the woman some press outlets, such as TMZ, initial thought was Brown’s girlfriend, just slipped up in a massive way, by outright trespassing at his home in Los Angeles. She was arrested and the presiding judge in the case ordered her to undergo an involuntary psychiatric evaluation. Patti has now firmly shown she was not Brown’s girlfriend, but a stalker who lied to the court about having a relationship with him, when none existed or exists, obtaining a restraining order in the process against her victim (Brown). I think Patti is mentally unwell and actually believes she is Brown's girlfriend and that his mansion is where she lives and has a right to be, when those are delusions. 


Danielle Patti got more than she bargained for stalking and harassing Chris Brown a second time, as she has been arrested and forced to undergo a mental evaluation.
 
Having felt empowered by going to the court and filing a fraudulent restraining order against Brown, lying to a judge stating they dated, the singer wouldn’t permit her leave his home and sent her death threats via text messages (none of which she could produce in court), she believed she had gotten away with it, then went too far (again) trespassing on his property once more. Someone who is a victim of a stalker, would not trespass on the alleged stalker’s property…not to mention, doing so twice. Victims avoid stalkers. Stalkers strangely crave attention of any kind from their victims, as they are mentally deranged and view trespassing or even rejection as validation, which is unbalanced and weird. They want attention and to be close to their victim at all costs, who does not want a relationship with them, even if it means breaking the law. 

STORY SOURCE

Chris Brown I Can't Shake Obsessed Fan ... Another Arrest at His Home

4/29/2016 3:36 PM PDT - Chris Brown's unwanted guest can't take the hint, 'cause cops say she showed up AGAIN at his home and got busted for trespassing. According to law enforcement sources, Danielle Patti waited until the gate to Brown's home opened before walking onto the property around 3 AM Thursday. She was caught by security and held until police arrived. She was charged with two counts of trespassing to which she pled not guilty on Friday. Brown was home at the time, and we're told his attorney will file for a temporary restraining order..



Chris Brown Alleged Stalker Judge Orders Mental Evaluation
 
5/6/2016 12:23 PM PDT BY TMZ STAFF - Chris Brown's alleged stalker Danielle Patti will undergo a mental evaluation after her latest arrest at the singer's home. Danielle Patti was in court Friday for a bail hearing when the judge gave the order. You can see in the video, Patti tried to speak directly to the judge -- declaring she wanted to dump her attorney and represent herself -- but the judge wasn't having it. Danielle's been in jail since last week after she was arrested for trespassing at Chris' home for the second time since December. Chris currently has a 100 yard restraining order against her. 

Sunday, May 8, 2016

Stripper Turned Judge Died Of Pharmaceutical Drug Overdose

 

Diana Hampton

This is a follow up to the March 22, 2016 Judiciary Report article "Stripper Turned Judge Found Dead In Nevada." Former stripper turned municipal court judge, Diana Hampton, died this past March under unexplained circumstances. The jurist was found dead in her Henderson, Nevada townhouse.

The 50-year-old mother of two was a stripper in university to pay for admission to law school. She became a lawyer, city attorney, then a prominent local judge in Nevada. She was an intelligent woman. However, like many who are struggling with pain, Hampton exceeded the recommended dosage of the opioid painkiller Fentanyl, which created a serious reaction that led to her death.

Hampton had developed an infection in her arm and was suffering from sepsis, which is painful and can become excruciating. I stayed with my friend's mom in the hospital when she had sepsis and had to undergo dialysis as well and she was in a significant amount of pain. I asked the doctor to give her a painkiller and he obliged. The nurse then monitored her condition and at correct intervals gave her painkillers during her stay in the hospital. However, for someone like Hampton, who was in pain at home, it is not difficult to overdose when sepsis is present. People have to follow recommended medication guidelines carefully to prevent overdose.

STORY SOURCE

Henderson Judge's Death Ruled Accidental

April 25, 2016 - 9:22amUpdated April 27, 2016 - 12:15pm - The March death of Henderson Municipal Judge Diana Hampton was caused by an infection in her lower right arm, but the Clark County coroner’s office said Monday that a toxic level of a synthetic opioid pain reliever was a contributing factor. Her death was ruled accidental.

Officially, Hampton died from “sepsis due to necrotizing cellulitis of the lower right arm,” according to a statement from Clark County spokesman Dan Kulin. Clark County Coroner Jon Fudenburg said his office was unable to determine the cause of the infection. But the coroner’s office found two additional factors that contributed to the judge’s death: granulomatous lung disease and toxic levels of the drug fentanyl in her system.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid used as a pain reliever. The drug is considered 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Granulomatous lung disease is inflammation of the lungs, often caused by an infection or the injection of a foreign substance. Deaths caused by infection are typically ruled natural, Fudenburg said. “What made this an accident was the fentanyl intoxication,” he said. “Absent the fentanyl, it would have been ruled natural.”...
 

RELATED ARTICLE
 

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Court Appoints Administrator For Prince’s Estate While Police Seek DEA Help In His Death



Prince
 
Tyka Nelson, the sister of the late music legend Prince, who died last week, informed the court the late singer has no will for his vast estate. As such, the court appointed an administrator and established a trust today, which the Judiciary Report suggested yesterday (Reports Indicate Singer Prince Left No Will). Nelson states she and Prince’s half siblings should share the estate. They need to be careful, as Prince’s former label Warner Bros, is not to be trusted and will try to take what they are not entitled to in any measure. 

Local police in Minnesota are also requesting the assistance of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as prescription painkillers were found in Prince’s home, Paisley Park, where he died. Sites such as TMZ are speculating Prince died from a prescription pill overdose. I don’t think Prince meant to overdose. Sometimes when people are sick or in pain from injury, they take more and more painkillers or flu medicine in trying to feel better and end up accidentally overdosing (leading to heart attack, respiratory failure or deadly seizure). 

A friend of my family died a few years ago from a heart attack. He was a famous producer with two recording studios, a label, homes, a store and a copyrighted catalog of works. My dad, a musicologist and radio personality, used to tell him to get a will, as he knew so many people in the music industry that passed away from old age, disease, accidents ect. The producer died without a will. It led to a fierce legal battle in two countries, mainly in Britain, as his heirs retained attorneys regarding his assets. So much money has gone to legal fees. It’s a very difficult process when there is no will. 

Many label owners, producers and songwriters do not have wills. It’s a bad habit in our trade. Many label owners, producers and songwriters keep much of their business dealings and practices in their heads. If one dies, it can create protracted legal battles in trying to sort out matters concerning their estate. I would advise company owners, production talent, entertainers and athletes to maintain a proper will. Yes, it is morbid and a pain in the backside, but necessary to protect the ones you love after you are gone and will save your heirs additional legal fees and court related distress.


 
STORY SOURCE

Prince's Death: Local Investigators Ask for DEA's Help on Case

The county sheriff investigating the death of Prince is asking for help from the Drug Enforcement Administration, federal law enforcement officials told NBC News on Wednesday. The officials say prescription painkillers were found in his possession when he died and in his house near Minnesota, though officials have yet to say what role, if any, those medications may have played in his death. 

An autopsy was conducted last week, but the medical examiner said it would take weeks before the cause of death would be disclosed. The DEA's role, officials say, will be to determine such things as where the medications came from, and what prescriptions Prince had obtained. DEA agents often check those records in death investigations. Some of his friends have said he took the painkiller Percocet to relieve pain in his hips — the result of years of jumping during performances... 


Court appoints Prince estate administrator, sets first hearing date

Maria Puente, USA TODAY 3:10 p.m. EDT April 27, 2016 - The legal machinery assigned to figure out what to do about the late Prince's estate started up Wednesday: A judge assigned a special administrator to the case and set a first probate hearing date for next week. Acting on a petition from Prince's sister, Tyka Nelson, Judge Kevin Eide, a district court judge in Carver County, Minn., signed orders appointing Prince's longtime bank, Bremer Trust, National Association, as a special administrator to secure and preserve the estate until a "personal representative," or executor, is appointed by the court.

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Appeals Court Overturns Tom Brady's NFL Football Suspension Being Lifted By Fawning Judge




Tom Brady
 
The NFL scored a victory against one of its top football players, New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady, who has been convincingly accused of engaging inappropriate behavior that is tantamount to cheating on the grid iron. Brady was accused of having teammates and Patriots' staff deflate footballs, making them easier for him to handle, which gave him an undue advantage in play.



Tom Brady in court last year smiling after questionable judicial ruling

Brady was handed a four game suspension for this misconduct. Brady filed a lawsuit and a biased judge, Richard M. Berman ,questionably and mysteriously tossed the suspension. The NFL filed a case with the appeals court to have the improper judicial ruling overturned. Yesterday the appeals court sided with the NFL and reinstated Brady's suspension. 


Tom Brady
 
This reallly was not a matter that should have been brought before the courts. Sports leagues around the world have internal systems athletes agree to abide by and process decisions through. For Brady to have taken it to a partial judge, who is a fan of the sports star was inappropriate and brought the judiciary into disrepute due to the corrupt, fawning decision that was issued. 

STORY SOURCE

Federal court has reinstated the NFL's four-game suspension of Tom Brady

11:54 a.m. EDT April 25, 2016 -Round 2 – unlike the first – goes to the NFL – and Tom Brady’s four-game suspension has been reinstated. A panel of three judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has ruled in favor of the league in the ongoing Deflategate case against the Patriots quarterback and the NFL Players Association. 

The court announced the decision on its website Monday to reverse the decision by a U.S. District Judge, and reinstate Brady’s four-game suspension. This comes as a drastic momentum swing in the case, after the players union secured a significant victory last September, when District Judge Richard M. Berman vacated Brady’s four-game suspension for his alleged role in intentionally deflating footballs prior to the 2015 AFC Championship Game against the Indianapolis Colts... 

http://www.usatoday.com

RELATED ARTICLE
 
Tom Brady's Suspension Being Lifted By Judge Sends The Wrong Message About Cheating In Sports

Friday, April 15, 2016

Boxer Adrien Broner Facing 3-10 Years In Jail Over Assault And Robbery Due To Gambling Incident


Adrien Broner (center) and fiancée Arie Nicole (left)
 
In the April 13, 2016 Judiciary Report article "Adrien Broner Arrested And Jailed For Probation Violation And Trouble Strikes In His Personal Life With Claims He Cheated On His Fiancée" the site implored troubled boxer Adrien Broner to "throw yourself on the mercy of the court" regarding an assault and robbery incident that took place while he was gambling outside a bowling alley in Madisonville, Ohio and inflicted grievous bodily injury on a man at gunpoint. The next day, April 14, 2016, prosecutors in his home state of Ohio formally indicted Broner and he faces 3-10 years in jail, on charges of aggravated robbery as well as felonious assault and robbery. 

The charges Broner faces is serious. Cincinnati.com is reporting that a special prosecutor, Michael Tranter, has been appointed to the case in Hamilton County. The judge presiding over the case is Robert Ruehlman. Broner is currently in jail on a probation violation stemming from an unrelated case for driving under the influence, then engaging in reckless driving months later. Broner was given 6-months probation on July 25, 2016. He was arrested again on January 21, 2016 for the aforementioned assault. The cases appear to have overlapped. However, prosecutors are keeping the cases separate, which is beneficial to Broner.


Adrien Broner's mug shot
 
As stated in the April 7, 2016 Judiciary Report article "Boxer Adrien Broner Pleads Not Guilty To Assault And Robbery" Broner needs to make peace with the victim and pay compensation (the victim has filed a lawsuit against Broner over the assault). The court may have more mercy on him if he does so. Broner's pride got him into trouble. He is a millionaire and is facing serious charges over losing $10,000 in a gambling incident. His legal fees will total far more than that in relation to this matter. 

It's a shame it has come to this. Since 2014 the Judiciary Report has been running a series of articles on Broner, which implored him to changes his ways, lest he ended up in serious trouble [How To Reap The Benefits Of Boxing While Avoiding The Pitfalls and Floyd Mayweather Tells Adrien Broner To Quit Partying And Making So Much Music (Video) and Boxer Adrien Broner Has Been Suspended By The WBC For Racist Remarks About Fellow Pugilist Carlos Molina]. However, young and famous stars sometimes have to figure out things the difficult way in life, via consequences of unwise choices that could have been avoided.  

STORY SOURCE

Special prosecutor to handle Adrien Broner case

7:37 p.m. EDT April 14, 2016 - A special prosecutor has been appointed to handle the case against local boxer Adrien Broner, who is accused of knocking a man unconscious and then robbing him outside a Madisonville bowling alley. Hamilton County Prosecutor Joe Deters said he requested a special prosecutor because one of his friends, described by officials as a businessman, has tried to be a mentor to Broner. 

“He’s just a very good friend of mine,” said Deters, who declined to name the man. Deters said he wanted to avoid any perception of impropriety. Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Robert Ruehlman on Thursday appointed Cincinnati-based attorney, Michael Tranter, to handle the case. Also Thursday, Broner, 26, was formally indicted on robbery and felonious assault charges. 

Court documents say Broner on Jan. 21 pointed a handgun at a West Chester man during a betting dispute, knocked him unconscious and robbed him of $10,000. The incident has also led to a lawsuit against Broner, who lives in Westwood, according to court records...

 

Boxer Adrien Broner indicted on assault, robbery charges

April 14, 2016 2:45 PM - CINCINNATI (AP) -- Boxer Adrien Broner was indicted Thursday on assault and robbery charges, the next step in prosecutors' case against the former WBA super lightweight champion. The charges arise from a lawsuit filed by a man who accuses Broner of pointing a handgun at him during a dispute over gambling in January and knocking him unconscious. 

Broner was indicted on an aggravated robbery charge, a first-degree felony that carries a maximum sentence of three to 10 years. He also was indicted on second-degree charges of felonious assault and robbery, which carry sentences of two to eight years. Bond was set at $100,000. No date has been set for a pretrial hearing...