Another Break-In To Plaintiff’s Home And Attempted Robbery
1. Another break-in occurred to Plaintiff’s home on Thursday May 27, 2010. It is related to the civil rights and copyrights case the Plaintiff formally reported to the FBI in 2005 and was subsequently interviewed by two Miami FBI agents at their North Miami Beach field office.
2. The May 27, 2010 break-in was to Plaintiff’s den that she converted into a home office and recording studio.
3. Plaintiff’s aunt, Juliet H. (last name redacted), who is sick and suffered congestive heart failure last year, was quietly resting in Plaintiff’s home at about 10:00 PM, while Plaintiff and her mother, Millicent H. (last name redacted), were out shopping at Wal-Mart for household items and groceries.
4. Plaintiff‘s aunt, Juliet H. (last name redacted), heard a loud bang against the window in Plaintiff’s home recording studio and rushed to ascertain the source of the noise.
5. She began yelling “who's there“ which caused the intruder to scramble in the bushes underneath the window and run to his car, a beige 4-door sedan that was parked in the back alley. The intruder then drove around to the front of the house, came out of his car and leered at Plaintiff’s aunt, who had gone to the front step of the house. He then drove away.
6. The intruder had smashed one of the left side windows of Plaintiff’s home studio, at the bottom left corner that has the lever to open and close the window.
7. He smashed the window at the bottom left corner, with the intent of opening the window, sliding into the home studio and stealing more copyrighted CD-ROM and DVD-ROMs with newer, original, copyrighted, unpublished music, lyrics, movie scripts and television show scripts, among other things, located on the discs that Plaintiff authored and registered with the Library of Congress.
8. Plaintiff has authored these newer, unpublished copyrighted works on a laptop that only went online once, to protect the copyrights from being hacked, illegally copied and used, as has happened in the past, as attested by two computer companies, for which Plaintiff went to the FBI in 2005. The FBI promised they would investigate the case and produce a report on the matter, that has yet to be sent to the Plaintiff.
9. Plaintiff called the police about the recent break-in that occurred on May 27, 2010 and they came to the property, inspected the damage and documented the incident in a report, attached to this exhibit.
10. Plaintiff paid $70 to have the window repaired shortly after the incident, to shore up her home’s safety.
11. During past break-ins to Plaintiff’s former home, no electronics, jewelry or appliances were stolen. The thieves walked past thousands in electronics and jewelry, to go into Plaintiff’s home studio and steal copyrighted CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs with Plaintiff’s unpublished copyrighted music, lyrics, video scripts, movie scripts, television scripts and book manuscripts, among other things, which was their true agenda in breaking into the home. The copyrights are very valuable, but the discs they are stored on are generic, costing a few cents each, which illustrates the intruders specifically broke into Plaintiff’s home in acts of corporate theft, to steal the discs with the unpublished, very valuable copyrights on them and know exactly who the Plaintiff is in great detail, to be targeting her in this manner.
12. Copyrighted, preexisting items from Plaintiff’s Library of Congress registered CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs then began appearing in the marketplace attributed to others, in acts of criminal copyright infringement.
13. The latest break-in foiled by the presence of Plaintiff’s aunt, was another attempt to steal more off-line copyrighted CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs, as it is quite telling which room the intruder broke into once again - Plaintiff’s home office/recording studio.
14. The FBI/DOJ know who is commissioning and committing these crimes. Plaintiff gave them credible evidence to support her claims, backed up by independent computer and investigative analysts, internet data and other comparative digital computer evidence.
15. Additionally, based on information furnished to the Plaintiff by an unimpeachable source, very familiar with the FBI/DOJ, the FBI has done an investigation into the matter and discovered who has been stealing Plaintiff’s copyrights, staging break-ins to her home and commissioning acts of stalking and harassment against the Plaintiff when she leaves her home for business appointments or to run errands.
16. However, according to the unimpeachable international source, very familiar with government matter, the FBI has been sitting on the FOIA investigative files regarding the misconduct being committed against the Plaintiff, in acts of nationality and race based discrimination and malice, that is unprovoked and undeserved.
16. The U.S. Code and Constitution does not make allowances for such misconduct, as it flies in the face of every ideal America stands for in the world.
17. The matter is compounded by the fact, the Plaintiff is in danger, as during two of seven past break-ins, she was at home and during one incident, her mother was present and was terrified, screaming for Plaintiff to call the police. Plaintiff’s mother could have had a heart attack.
18. These repeated break-ins to Plaintiff’s home, while the FBI stonewalls regarding the Freedom of Information files she requested, in acts of discrimination, could lead to violence against Plaintiff or one of the occupants of her home, if one of these break-ins goes awry with the intruder coming face to face with an occupant of the home, not able to run away.
19. It is absolutely unjust that in a country like America, prized for its freedoms, a family cannot live in peace in their own home, without a greedy corporate entity, known to the FBI, affiliated with a crazy religious cult gone wild, Kabbalah, commissioning acts of burglary, to steal intellectual property from an independent author and playwright.
20. Kabbalah members are constantly stalking and coming up to Plaintiff in public, identifying themselves as members of the religious cult, then communicating threats and spewing invasive speech at Plaintiff, in acts of aggravated stalking and harassment.
21. In another terrible incident, a few days after Plaintiff’s home was broken into, Plaintiff was to meet up with her neighbor to help said neighbor have a document notarized and mailed, due to her neighbor not speaking and reading English well.
22. Plaintiff and her neighbor made arrangements regarding this over the telephone, which has been illegally wiretapped, in the manner of Hollywood private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, for which Plaintiff’s formal complaint to the FBI in 2005 and her articles, were used in his criminal trial, verbatim, to obtain a conviction.
23. Other Hollywood private investigators known to the FBI have carried on the tradition of wiretapping misconduct, during Pellicano‘s incarceration, enabling them to know where the subject of surveillance will be and when. This matter was covered in the New York Times in relation to Anthony Pellicano and the extensive stalking and harassment he commissioned of innocent people.
24. Due to a last minute change in her neighbor’s plans, Plaintiff did not accompany her neighbor to the notary, as was originally planned. Sadly, her neighbor was robbed in the parking lot of the post office, her purse stolen by two men, one on foot and the other in a getaway car.
25. Had Plaintiff been there as was originally planned, her briefcase with her laptop and unpublished copyrights would have been stolen.
26. In another odd twist, shortly before this incident transpired, Plaintiff received a threatening email from a Kabbalah hacker, containing veiled threats of violence and an attack on a public street.
27. Plaintiff received similarly threatening emails in the past, then shortly after, what was stated in the email, happened at the hands of different Kabbalah members, against the Plaintiff.
28. In closing, Plaintiff’s life and safety are in demonstrable danger. It is a poor reflection of Defendant FBI that these criminal acts continue against Plaintiff, as the world is watching this case online aghast and appalled, with the Defendants’ criminal negligence endangering Plaintiff’s life in more ways that one, in violation of US and international law.
Submitted by Aisha Goodison (pro se):___________________ Date: 6-29-10
AISHA GOODISON
P.O. Box 11375
Miami, Florida 33101
Plaintiff certifies a copy of this document has been sent to the Defendants via their local counsel:
U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Carol Fernandez
99 N.E. 4th Street, Suite 300
Miami, Florida 33132
