Robert S. Mueller
The Guardian newspaper did a sensational piece this past weekend on the FBI
stonewalling Freedom of Information Act requests and targeting Occupy Wall
Street protestors. The Guardian stated regarding the Freedom of Information Act
documents the FBI continually lied to requester about stating they did not
exist, have been released and dispels, "what was once dismissed as paranoid
fantasy" confirming people's worst fears that the FBI planned to murder Occupy
Wall Street protestors on behalf of banks. From the Guardian:
"Banks sat down with FBI officials to pool
information about OWS protesters harvested by private security; plans to crush
Occupy events, planned for a month down the road, were made by the FBI – and
offered to the representatives of the same organizations that the protests would
target; and even threats of the assassination of OWS leaders by sniper
fire.
Jason Leopold, at Truthout.org, who has sought
similar documents for more than a year, reported that the FBI falsely asserted
in response to his own FOIA requests that no documents related to its
infiltration of Occupy Wall Street existed at all. But the release may be
strategic: if you are an Occupy activist and see how your information is being
sent to terrorism task forces and fusion centers, not to mention the
'longterm plans' of some redacted group to shoot you, this document is quite
the deterrent."
The Guardian revealed something the Judiciary Report has maintained for years
about the FBI, they work
with the corporate sector against the average citizen in America, all in the
name of profits, no matter how illegal the conduct (see:
Aisha v. FBI lawsuit where the FBI criminally worked with Hollywood via aiding and abetting criminal
copyright infringement, phone
hacking, hacking and wiretapping for undue financial profit, while hiding
Freedom of Information Act documents chronicling said criminality, at the
expense of AIDS and cancer sufferers, who have been paying the price for the
aforementioned industry's greed).
According to the Guardian newspaper, the FBI organized the brutal crackdown
on Occupy Wall Street protestors, in conjunction with Wall Street banks and
CEOs, with options such as bankrupting and if need be using snipers to kill
leaders of the peaceful protests across America. Yes, you read that right. The
Constitution guarantees Americans the right to peacefully assemble and protest,
but the FBI in another outrageous power grab placed the option of cold-blooded
murder on the table, to protect the banks' profits.
The Judiciary Report is not ignorant of the law and knows protestors can be lawfully
arrested, but murdering them is evil and unthinkable. That is domestic terrorism
against U.S. citizens. The problem is the head of the FBI, Robert S. Mueller, by
his own admission, does not apply the law evenly and believes he has "sovereign
immunity" to commit any unthinkable, unconscionable crime he sees fit, even if
it violates the Constitution and U.S. Code.
He believes Congress has given him
the authority to spy on anyone in any manner he deems fit, criminally take
people's assets he is not entitled to and redistribute it to his cronies and
murder those that oppose his demonic agenda.
When you outrageously decide as the head of a law enforcement agency that
murdering peaceful protestors by sniper fire is an option, just know the devil
owns your soul. You should be excommunicated from the Catholic Church for being
the spawn of the devil. You're worst than Hoover. You are also the worst thing
that ever happened to America as time will illustrate, when Americans find out
all the terrible things you've done.
The article by the Guardian also confirms what the Judiciary Report has
stated for years regarding the FBI (
Aisha v. FBI).
The FBI lies in violation of the Freedom of Information Act, denying the
existence of files it possesses, but does not want to release to the public, as
they contain extensive criminal conduct on their part and or corporate entities
they are trying to protect for financial reasons.
The first time I applied for files regarding me and the phone hacking
scandal, which I broke first online in 2005, invoking the Freedom of
Information Act as legal grounds to obtain said documents, the FBI lied in a
letter to me stating the files didn't exist. However, one of my well-connected
reputable sources informed me they
were lying and a massive set of files regarding me, my very valuable copyrights
and Madonna and Rupert Murdoch's criminal theft thereof, exists at the agency,
in regular storage as well as being hidden in the
FBI's secret file room, in
another story I broke first that was later confirmed by the Boston Herald.
Therefore, I appealed the FBI's decision (to the agency). When I appealed,
the FBI realized I knew more than I was telling them about their criminal
obstruction of justice in the matter and finally admitted in writing the files
exist, but wrote they are not releasing them to me unless I sue them. They
believed I wouldn't sue, but I did. I sued them and they placed a judge on the
case, Jose E. Martinez, who worked for the FBI/DOJ for many years and he
corruptly and illegally asserted in a court ruling that the FBI has "sovereign
immunity" and can break the law however it pleases, once again, refusing to
release the documents.
Congress is unable to regulate the monster it created via Mueller at the FBI,
as according to one of my
reputable sources,
he routinely blackmails and bullies them, via illegally obtained surveillance
items. There is no way I could be head of state anywhere and have someone so
evil as Mueller running loose. I'd have indicted him and placed on death row for
the crimes against humanity he has been committing at the FBI. He has cost many
people their lives in another (forthcoming) scandal.
This corruption cannot continue. The agency needs to be shutdown by Congress,
because mark my words, a terrible scandal is coming regarding Mueller and the
nation and the world will not tolerate anything less than a closure when they
discover the full extent of what he has done at the FBI.
As stated in a previous article, Mueller has foolishly, inadvisably and
lawlessly made serious enemies in the world of hardcore, ruthless people in
different nations, who are counting the days until he is no longer head of the
FBI. No other FBI director was so arrogant and wantonly reckless in this regard,
being power mad and making that many enemies and of that caliber. Did you not
think ahead to the time when you would be out of that job.
STORY SOURCE
Revealed: how the FBI coordinated the crackdown on
Occupy
Guardian.co.uk, Saturday 29 December 2012 09.58 EST - New documents prove
what was once dismissed as paranoid fantasy: totally integrated corporate-state
repression of dissent. Police used teargas to drive back protesters following an
attempt by the Occupy supporters to shut down the city of Oakland. Photograph:
Noah Berger/AP
It was more sophisticated than we had imagined: new documents show that the
violent crackdown on Occupy last fall – so mystifying at the time – was not just
coordinated at the level of the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and
local police. The crackdown, which involved, as you may recall, violent arrests,
group disruption, canister missiles to the skulls of protesters, people held in
handcuffs so tight they were injured, people held in bondage till they were
forced to wet or soil themselves –was coordinated with the big banks
themselves.
The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, in a groundbreaking scoop that should
once more shame major US media outlets (why are nonprofits now some of the only
entities in America left breaking major civil liberties news?), filed this
request. The document – reproduced here in an easily searchable format – shows a
terrifying network of coordinated DHS, FBI, police, regional fusion center, and
private-sector activity so completely merged into one another that the monstrous
whole is, in fact, one entity: in some cases, bearing a single name, the
Domestic Security Alliance Council. And it reveals this merged entity to have
one centrally planned, locally executed mission. The documents, in short, show
the cops and DHS working for and with banks to target, arrest, and politically
disable peaceful American citizens.
The documents, released after long delay in the week between Christmas and
New Year, show a nationwide meta-plot unfolding in city after city in an
Orwellian world: six American universities are sites where campus police
funneled information about students involved with OWS to the FBI, with the
administrations' knowledge (p51);
banks sat down with FBI officials to pool
information about OWS protesters harvested by private security; plans to crush
Occupy events, planned for a month down the road, were made by the FBI – and
offered to the representatives of the same organizations that the protests would
target; and even threats of the assassination of OWS leaders by sniper fire
– by whom? Where? – now remain redacted and undisclosed to those American
citizens in danger, contrary to standard FBI practice to inform the person
concerned when there is a threat against a political leader (p61).
As Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the PCJF, put it, the
documents show that from the start, the FBI – though it acknowledges Occupy
movement as being, in fact, a peaceful organization – nonetheless designated OWS
repeatedly as a "terrorist threat":
"FBI documents just obtained by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF)
… reveal that from its inception, the FBI treated the Occupy movement as a
potential criminal and terrorist threat … The PCJF has obtained heavily redacted
documents showing that FBI offices and agents around the country were in high
gear conducting surveillance against the movement even as early as August 2011,
a month prior to the establishment of the OWS encampment in Zuccotti Park and
other Occupy actions around the country."
Verheyden-Hilliard points out the close partnering of banks, the New York
Stock Exchange and at least one local Federal Reserve with the FBI and DHS, and
calls it "police-statism": "This production [of documents], which we believe is
just the tip of the iceberg, is a window into the nationwide scope of the FBI's
surveillance, monitoring, and reporting on peaceful protestors organizing with
the Occupy movement … These documents also show these federal agencies
functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of Wall Street and Corporate
America."
The documents show stunning range: in Denver, Colorado, that branch of the
FBI and a "Bank Fraud Working Group" met in November 2011 – during the Occupy
protests – to surveil the group. The Federal Reserve of Richmond, Virginia had
its own private security surveilling Occupy Tampa and Tampa Veterans for Peace
and passing privately-collected information on activists back to the Richmond
FBI, which, in turn, categorized OWS activities under its "domestic terrorism"
unit.
The Anchorage, Alaska "terrorism task force" was watching Occupy Anchorage.
The Jackson, Michigan "joint terrorism task force" was issuing a
"counterterrorism preparedness alert" about the ill-organized grandmas and
college sophomores in Occupy there. Also in Jackson, Michigan, the FBI and the
"Bank Security Group" – multiple private banks – met to discuss the reaction to
"National Bad Bank Sit-in Day" (the response was violent, as you may recall).
The Virginia FBI sent that state's Occupy members' details to the Virginia
terrorism fusion center. The Memphis FBI tracked OWS under its "joint terrorism
task force" aegis, too. And so on, for over 100 pages.
Jason Leopold, at Truthout.org, who has sought similar documents for more
than a year, reported that the FBI falsely asserted in response to his own FOIA
requests that no documents related to its infiltration of Occupy Wall Street
existed at all. But the release may be strategic: if you are an Occupy activist
and see how your information is being sent to terrorism task forces and fusion
centers, not to mention the "longterm plans" of some redacted group to shoot
you, this document is quite the deterrent.
There is a new twist: the merger of the private sector, DHS and the FBI means
that any of us can become WikiLeaks, a point that Julian Assange was trying to
make in explaining the argument behind his recent book. The fusion of the
tracking of money and the suppression of dissent means that a huge area of
vulnerability in civil society – people's income streams and financial records –
is now firmly in the hands of the banks, which are, in turn, now in the business
of tracking your dissent.
Remember that only 10% of the money donated to WikiLeaks can be processed –
because of
financial sector and DHS-sponsored targeting of PayPal data. With
this merger, that crushing of one's personal or business financial freedom can
happen to any of us. How messy, criminalizing and prosecuting dissent. How
simple, by contrast, just to label an entity a "terrorist organization" and
choke off, disrupt or indict its sources of financing.
Why the huge push for counterterrorism "fusion centers", the DHS militarizing
of police departments, and so on? It was never really about "the terrorists". It
was not even about civil unrest. It was always about this moment, when vast
crimes might be uncovered by citizens – it was always, that is to say, meant to
be about you.
