Lindsay Lohan. Wow, what is her beauty secret. She totally needs to tell Megan Fox (LOL).
The
New York Times
proverbially ripped Lindsay Lohan a new one this month, exposing
her terrible behavior behind the scenes, which has rendered her a nightmare
to work with. Lohan is involved in the yet-to-be-released low budget film "The
Canyons" and the New York Times witnessed the making of the film for
weeks and saw the actress behave like a complete terror.
Her publicist wisely tried to have the journalist removed from the set,
knowing what Lohan is truly like, but failed. Hence the article destroying
the little that was left of her career. And believe me, it is a good read.
It took me a couple hours to read, re-read and absorb the 11 pages of
insanity that is Lindsay and my left eye started twitching a little bit,
but it was worth it.
The derivative film Lohan managed to disrupt and distort also
features a porn star named James Deen (watch
Harvey Levin at TMZ stalk him for personal reasons). Lohan kept
showing up
for work late, trying to change script lines (not just coke lines)
and was terrified of getting close to Deen during their orgy
scene, reportedly due to him being well-endowed.
What's ironic is Deen has reportedly slept with thousands of
women, but
he is the one that probably caught something from Lindsay. Oh how
the mighty have fallen. Lohan is doing pornography now. She needs to
take a good look at what she's done to her life, to go from big
budget studio
films to low budget porn that can't even find a film festival or
distributor.
The New York Times article confirmed many things the Judiciary Report
has stated about Lohan for years, warning people to be careful of
employing her if they value their film projects. I wasn't trying to be mean. I
was being practical. I know what I'd heard about Lohan and what I've
witnessed regarding her as well for the past few years. There's no
prettying it up. Therefore, I couldn't
understand why anyone would hire her. Inviting someone with her
proclivities into your work or life would be very unwise. Now you see it
for yourself via the New York Times piece on the one time hit actress.
Lindsay Lohan on the set of The Canyons (Photo Credit:
Jeff Minton/The New York Times)
When you write and or direct a project, you want things to go well, with
only positive memories attached to it. After all, you will remember the
experience for life. Hiring Lohan will turn it into a nightmare full of bad
memories, stress and frustration. Why would you want that.
Lohan's name
recognition is not enough to fix the trouble associated with her and she
has been losing her acting ability as well. There are hundreds of
professional actresses in Hollywood, the British and Canadian film
industries, who can act better than Lohan can now. Why not choose one of
them - and they'll actually show up on time and not try to play writer and
mess up your script.
I was also right about the Liz & Dick project (
As
Predicted Lindsay Lohan’s Elizabeth Taylor Biopic 'Liz And Dick' Bombs). A year before the
film was released, I stated it was a mistake hiring her. However, they did it
anyway and went on to suffer for it with poor ratings and reviews.
Once people saw the movie, they gave it horrible reviews and
branded it a laughingstock. Lifetime, who is good with television
dramas, wasted
money on a interesting
project made with the wrong actress - Lindsay. I stick to my
original assessment.
"Liz
& Dick" should have been made with Megan Fox. The resemblance
is there and she can act well enough to have pulled it off without the
film turning into a joke, as it has with Lohan.
But there is a reason some keep hiring Lohan. She is in the Hollywood "Illuminati"
as they call themselves. They are the ones, who have been
pulling strings to get Lohan work, as she sexually services their
male and female members and parties and has kept quiet about the twisted
stuff they get up to behind closed doors.
