Leonardo Dicaprio Denies Rihanna

Rihanna and Leonardo Dicaprio

The publicist of actor Leonardo Dicaprio has come forward to slam rumors the star is dating singer music model, Rihanna. Dicaprio's publicist stated to the Los Angeles Times he is, "Single and has been for sometime now." Once again, Rihanna has been denied, kept like a side chick and given no credit.

Leonardo Dicaprio

It's not like Dicaprio is dating someone prestigious like Lupita Nyong'o, whom he was seen flirting with (but she was already taken). Dicaprio is sexing Rihanna, a known industry mattress, in exchange for career advancement on her end. The ironic thing is Dicaprio has bedded more people than Rihanna, who has slept with many as well.

Rihanna being common as usual

Rihanna is being used up by men and women in the industry, as she's being passed around by the Kabbalah sect, for career advancement (money, exposure, promotional and marketing, music, films). Rihanna's music career has hit the skids and her turn at becoming an actress failed miserably. Dicaprio means publicity and movie work. However, Dicaprio, like Ashton Kutcher and male executives in Hollywood, will not own up to Rihanna, due to her bad reputation.

STORY SOURCE

Despite Rihanna-Leonardo DiCaprio rumors, actor is single, rep says

Rihanna and Leonardo DiCaprio keep sharing birthday cake -- and we're not even using any euphemisms right now. The "Birthday Cake" singer and the "Wolf of Wall Street" star keep fueling dating rumors by attending the same birthday parties -- but his rep said Tuesday that he's single and has been "for some time."
The two were was first linked in the tabloids in January when they both hit a birthday bash at the Playboy Mansion, according to several reports. They were spotted at another birthday party at a West Hollywood hotel shortly after.

The latest b-day fiesta to kick up romantic speculation was the Barbadian beauty's own -- her 27th -- on Feb. 21 at Jim Goldstein's mansion in Beverly Hills. On Monday, a photo surfaced showing them together for the first time, E! News reported...

A rep for DiCaprio told the Los Angeles Times that the actor "is single and has been for some time," adding that he's "been focused shooting" Oscar-winning director Alejandro G. Inarritu's adventure drama "The Revenant" in Canada "for months."...

http://www.latimes.com

Aaliyah's Family Release Statement On Unauthorized Lifetime Biopic Slamming The Planned Movie While Lead Actress Zendaya Coleman Says She's Black Enough To Play The Singer

Aaliyah

Fans of the late R&B singer, Aaliyah, who died in a plane crash in 2001, continue to protest the Lifetime network's choice of casting Disney actress, Zendaya Coleman, in the lead role, as she is mixed race and the vocalist is not. However, Coleman stated she is suitable to play the part, "A lot of people say I’m not black enough. Half black is just enough. It doesn’t matter what color you are, it’s about how you portray the character. For those that don’t know, Angela Bassett and Tina Turner, they look nothing alike but she was that character so I think that’s what it’s all about." 

The Judiciary Report is of the belief Coleman is not right for the part and it's nothing to do with her skintone. She is a pleasant comedic actress, but she simply doesn't resemble Aaliyah and isn't a dramatic actress to make one forget that while she's onscreen. The facial features and bone structure are quite different between the two women.  

Zendaya Coleman (left) and Aaliyah (right)

Aaliyah's uncle, Jomo Hankerson, also released a statement on the film on behalf of the family, strongly disapproving of the unauthorized film, "Aaliyah was more than a singer, she was -and is still – an American music icon whose legacy continues to live on and influence today’s music culture, just as Ray Charles, Notorious B.I.G., Selena and Johnny Cash. Considering the magnitude of her fans’ affection alone, she deserves to have a tribute much more grand than a television network debut that won’t even consider the perspectives of those who were closest to Aaliyah." 

 

Zendaya Coleman (left) and Aaliyah (right)

"Disregarding the families and dishonoring the legacies of celebrated figures who have passed on, big networks want to exploit their stories for a buck. We’re here to make it clear that it’s not okay! Lifetime Television is trying to dictate the status of our heroes, our heroines and – in this case – our beloved Aaliyah. We implore everyone to call Lifetime Television, send emails and bombard social media so they know we demand respect for our cultural icons. We will not sit idly by while they misrepresent and reap profits from our luminaries. There is more at stake than the public could imagine." 

Last week the Judiciary Report stated the same regarding the current Lifetime movies on Aaliyah and Whitney Houston, writing the biopics will "dishonor their legacies" (Family And Fans Of The Late Singer Aaliyah Vocally Oppose Lifetime's Unauthorized Biopic Of Her Life Starring Zendaya Coleman). 

STORY SOURCE

 

Aaliyah's Family Releases Statement On Lifetime Movie

Movie Review: The Bling Ring

Title: The Bling Ring

Year Of Release: 2013

Review Date: May 31, 2013

Rating: R

Running time: 90 minutes

Box Office Gross: $15,553,563

Site Rating: 7 out of 10 stars

"The Bling Ring" is based on the true story of a group of people who broke into the homes of Hollywood stars. The rash of burglaries that occurred were mostly concentrated on mansions in the Hollywood Hills sections of Los Angeles, home to many celebrities. Among the victims of the Bling Ring were Paris Hilton, Lindsay Lohan, Megan Fox, Orlando Bloom and wife Miranda Kerr.

Lindsay Lohan was particularly upset by the burglaries, but as she has a habit of stealing things from many people and stores, it was just desserts. For a time, some wondered if Lohan was involved in the Bling Ring, as she had given a thief access to a Los Angeles mansion in another incident, where valuable property was stolen, some of which was found in her possession. She returned it and apologized.

Though breaking an entry is a felony, as is stealing valuable possessions of others exceeding $500 in value, parts of this movie was unintentionally funny. For example, when police began arresting members of the Bling Ring, one in particular, Nicki Moore (real name Alexis Neiers) played by actress Emma Watson, started semi-crying for her mommy. I’m sorry, but I laughed during this part of the film. Committing crimes like they’re big and bad, but when the cops show up to bust them it's, "I want my mommy" time is hysterical.

Members of the Bling Ring were sentenced to 1-4 four years behind bars. However, Neiers was sentenced to one year and only served one month in jail, due to overcrowding in Los Angeles jails. Members of the Bling Ring, such as masterminds Nick Prugo and Rachel Lee served more time in prison, due to having been sentenced to four-years behind bars. Hopefully their stint behind bars will keep the entire Bling Ring out of trouble.

The ironic thing about the Bling Ring is they were taking cues from some of the pop culture celebrities they robbed. Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton are very materialistic and have stolen other people's property. Both women have gotten involved in shady business dealings, some of which landed them in civil court, to support their vain lifestyles, while branding themselves successful business women (which neither of them are in any fashion). This is the template they and others in their set have given impressionable people to follow. Then, they were victimized by their own villainy and greed courtesy of the Bling Ring.
 

http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com/the_bling_ring.htm

Movie Review: World War Z

Title: World War Z

Year Of Release: 2013

Review Date: May 31, 2013

Rating: R

Running time: 116 minutes

Box Office Gross: $539,478,858

Site Rating: 1 out of 10 stars

"World War Z" starring Brad Pitt was a disappointing film about a United Nation's employee caught up in a zombie war. Upon seeing the flick, one can tell why the project had so many re-shoots with an ever escalating budget that stumbled in at $250,000,000.

"World War Z" was not a good film and dragged too much at points it need to, well, make a point. I found the film boring. Pitt was also looking haggard in this movie and for an actor who made his name on being pretty, not acting ability, this was a risk.

First off, I had no idea this movie was about zombies until I popped it in the machine. Secondly, the zombies weren’t even very convincing. The CGI work was poor. The medical and scientific premise behind this film was also risky and downright dangerous (but never mind some will take it seriously - even though it is a zombie film). Don‘t laugh, the government has a preparedness plan in place in the event zombies try to take over. Yea, your tax dollars hard at work.

http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com

Movie Review: Thunderstruck

Title: Thunderstruck

Year Of Release: 2012

Review Date: January 31, 2013

Rating: G

Running time: 94 minutes

Box Office Gross: N/A 

   Site Rating: 6 out of 10 stars

Thunderstruck is the funny, entertaining basketball comedy starring NBA star Kevin Durant. Due to a freak occurrence, Durant loses his basketball abilities to a teenage boy, who takes full advantage of it. Durant, who is first unaware of why his game has gone bad, comically struggles to regain his basketball abilities, providing some of the best laughs in the film.

http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com/thunderstruck.htm

Movie Reviews: Ted

Title: Ted

Year Of Release: 2012

Review Date: January 31, 2013

Rating: R

Running time: 106 minutes

Box Office Gross: $515,015,487

   Site Rating: 1 out of 10 stars

"Ted" has got to be one of the crudest, most disgusting films I have ever seen. Originally it was sold as a slightly off the wall comedy about a boy and his mouthy teddy bear as they grow up. However, the movie is filthy, sacrilegious and mocks the disabled. It features scenes such as the teddy bear Ted having sex with a woman, which is sick.

In another scene the foul mouthed teddy bear, who works in a grocery store, brags to his boss, he violated a woman with a cucumber, then sold the vegetable to the public - a family of four with kids. It never ceases to amaze me how many lines some in Hollywood will cross when making movies, in trying to be shocking and irreverent. 

Movie Review: Fire With Fire

Title: Fire With Fire

Year Of Release: 2012

Review Date: January 31, 2013

Rating: G

Running time: 97 minutes

Box Office Gross: N/A 

   Site Rating: 2 out of 10 stars

"Fire With Fire" is a very violent action drama about a firefighter, Jeremy, who is pursued by a terrible, racist gangster, Hagan, as he witnessed the death of a black father and son. As Jeremy tries to protect himself, Hagan begins targeting the people in his life, in a brutal crime spree. This movie has far too much violence and of a very graphic nature, to be enjoyed. It's just too much and it swallows up the storyline.

http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com/fire-with-fire.htm

Movie Review: The Dark Knight Rises

Title: The Dark Knight Rises

Year Of Release: 2012

Review Date: February 28, 2013

Rating: R

Running time: 135 minutes

Box Office Gross: $1,081,041,287

   Site Rating: 4 out of 10 stars

I did not like this film at all and largely due to the Colorado theatre massacre it inspired. "The Dark Knight Rises" is a dark, tedious film with a convoluted storyline. Bruce Wayne, also known as Batman, is again engaged in battle against those seeking to destroy him. This time around the villain is Bane, a masked madman determined to destroy Gotham City. This film dragged too much for my taste and is quite morbid.

Movie Review: The Bourne Legacy

Title: The Bourne Legacy

Year Of Release: 2012

Review Date: February 28, 2013

Rating: R

Running time: 135 minutes

Box Office Gross: $276,144,750

   Site Rating: 4 out of 10 stars

"The Bourne Legacy" is the fourth film in the franchise which originally starred Matt Damon as Jason Bourne, a former soldier given medicine which gave him increased strength. The latest Bourne film stars Jeremy Renner in the same role Damon once occupied. 

Rachel Weisz and Jeremy Renner in "The Bourne Legacy"

"The Bourne Legacy" is a continuation of the same, with Bourne remaining in hiding, whilst trying to unravel what has been done to him, via the medicines he has been repeatedly given by the government, who are now out to get him. "The Bourne Legacy" is a very violent film with a story line that meanders too much, taking away from parts of its message.

http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com/the_bourne_legacy.htm

Movie Review: Pitch Perfect

 

Title: Pitch Perfect

Year Of Release: 2012

Review Date: February 28, 2013

Rating: PG-13

Running time: 112 minutes

Box Office Gross: $108,997,015

   Site Rating: 3 out of 10 stars

"Pitch Perfect" is the gross out acappella comedy about a group of university students with a penchant for singing cheesy pop songs without musical accompaniment. While many of the singing voices in the film were up to scratch, the characters were all kinds of nutty. This film scared me and it wasn't even a horror movie - due to the cheesy singing and dancing.

The groups vie to win the national singing competition held in New York. "Pitch Perfect" does have its funny moments, the funniest being the Tonechangers performance. However, the crude sexual references and situations also limited the film's audience.

http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com/pitch_perfect.htm

Ashton Kutcher's Performance In Steve Jobs Biopic Being Slammed

Ashton Kutcher as Steve Jobs

Hate to say I told you so, no I don't, I told you so. I know movies, having written and copyrighted many scripts. I have complimented films (previews) on my sites that went on to do very well at the box office and slammed others that flopped shortly after. Months ago the Judiciary Report insisted superficial actor Ashton Kutcher making a Steve Jobs biopic was a bad idea (Ashton Kutcher Is A Poor Choice To Play Steve Jobs In Biopic). Well, critics and audiences saw a preview of the movie this past weekend and many of the reviews are negative. Even Jobs' former partner at Apple, Steve Wozniak, slammed it as inaccurate. Critics are also slamming Kutcher's performance.

The only reason Kutcher was allowed to do this foolishness is because he is in Hollywood's Illuminati, who are running the entertainment industry into the ground. Now they've messed up Jobs' life story. Jobs of all people. How could they let Kutcher and Kabbalah mess up Jobs' life story and legacy like this. Crazy cults shouldn't be allowed to do such things, especially with historical pieces that need proper attention and the right talent for accurate, compelling cinema.

Look at the horrible job Kutcher's fellow cult member Madonna did with "W.E." attempting to rewrite British history, as critics noted, with her madness and adding copyright infringing items to it (from my copyrights) that didn't even happen in the Royal Family's history, foisting her mental illness on the public (Madonna Booed In London At The Premiere Of Her Copyright Infringing Film “We” and Boycott Madonna's Rip-Off "We" Movie - Part 2 ). Thanks to the Judiciary Report's public boycott the film flopped, was scrapped and sent straight to DVD where it flopped some more. Leave the filmmaking to the professionals who actually have a talent for it and are insane.

STORY SOURCE

Ashton Kutcher Gets Mixed Reviews as Steve Jobs

January 27, 2013, 4:30 am - The actor gets some kudos, but early reviews say his movie bio is an over-polished Apple. The new biopic of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs starring Ashton Kutcher in a nerdy beard premiered at the Sundance Film Festival Friday to an early round of mixed reviews.

The Two and a Half Men star won respectful praise for tackling such an iconic role in jOBS, but indications are that this apparently adulatory portrait of the techno-genius is not The Social Network for computers. The Hollywood Reporter reviewer Justin Lowe calls the film - directed by Joshua Michael Stern and covering the rise, fall and rise of the brilliant innovator in the years leading up to the introduction of the iPod - "passably entertaining," but closer to a "two-hour commercial" than a real interpretation of a life. Kutcher manages to re-create Jobs' mannerisms and is at his best in speeches "haranguing his employees or board of directors."

If "the movie avoids outright hagiography," says Variety critic Justin Chang, it "more or less embodies the sort of bland, go-with-the-flow creative thinking Jobs himself would have scorned." Kutcher's performance is "carefully judged," but despite "an impressive attempt at vocal mimickry. the illusion never fully seizes hold."
Indiewire admires "Kutcher's committed performance, certainly his most impressive turn in years, which conveys the character's focused, manipulative intentions in each calculated look." But the tone of the movie, which critic Eric Cohn grades a "C plus," is so worshipful at times it borders on "creepy.

CNET's Casey Newton also praises Kutcher for his determination to capture the physical essence of the man, not to mention having to handle "fully 40 percent of the lines," but the movie fails to create any supporting characters to share the screen. "The viewer spends two hours watching cardboard cutouts lose arguments to Ashton Kutcher." Finally, according to Vince Horiuchi in The Salt Lake Tribune, Kutcher is "not the casting disaster that some thought he might be." However, "he is much too tall." ...

http://au.lifestyle.yahoo.com

Wozniak Turned Down Involvement in "jOBS" Due to "Crap" Script

5:48 AM EST, Jan. 28th, 2013 - The independent biopic jOBS, which premiered Friday at the Sundance Film Festival, was not produced with the help of Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak due to a highly inaccurate script which Mr. Wozniak described to The Verge as "crap." Mr. Wozniak previously told Gizmodo that an interaction between Steve Jobs and Mr. Wozniak depicted in the film’s first pre-release promotional scene was "totally wrong."

jOBS stars Ashton Kutcher and Josh Gad as Mr. Jobs and Mr. Wozniak, respectively, and opened to mixed reviews over the weekend. While most reviewers found the story entertaining overall, historical inaccuracies and a "shallow" approach left many disappointed with the first film about Apple and Steve Jobs since his death in 2011.

That disappointment was shared by Mr. Wozniak, who was approached by the film’s producers early in the development of the movie. Finding the film’s script to be "crap," however, Mr. Wozniak turned down the producers’ offer and instead became involved in the Sony-backed and Aaron Sorkin-directed film about Steve Jobs that is still in production.

http://www.pcr-online.biz

RELATED ARTICLE

 

Ashton Kutcher Is A Poor Choice To Play Steve Jobs In Biopic

Megan Fox Slams Lindsay Lohan As A Negative, Uninteresting, Unreliable Actress Squandering Her Opportunities

Megan Fox: beat it Lohan!

Hollywood actress, Megan Fox, did a revealing interview with Esquire magazine and in it she slammed fallen star Lindsay Lohan. Fox spoke about Lohan in the past tense, like the drug addicted actress had already overdosed and died. She basically branded Lohan a failure, due to the many high profile train wrecks that comprises her personal and professional career.

Fox stated regarding Marilyn Monroe and Lindsay Lohan, "I started reading about her and realized that her life was incredibly difficult. It's like when you visualize something for your future. I didn't want to visualize something so negative. She wasn't powerful at the time. She was sort of like Lindsay [Lohan]. She was an actress who wasn't reliable, who almost wasn't insurable.... She had all the potential in the world, and it was squandered. I'm not interested in following in those footsteps. Ava Gardner. She had power. She was a broad. She got what she wanted and said what she needed."

Megan Fox

Oh snap! After Fox went off and upset Lohan, she tried to pretty up what she had stated. Fox issued a new quote on the matter via her Facebook page stating, "I attempted to draw parallels between Lindsay and Marilyn in order to illustrate my point that while Marilyn may be an icon now, sadly she was not respected and taken seriously while she was still living. Both women were gifted actresses, whose natural talent was lost amongst the chaos and incessant media scrutiny surrounding their lifestyles and their difficulties adhering to studio schedules etc."

Fox further stated, "I intended for this to be a factual comparison of two women with similar experiences in Hollywood. Unfortunately it turned into me offering up what is really much more of an uneducated opinion. It was most definitely not my intention to criticize or degrade Lindsay. I would never want her to feel bullied, as she does not deserve that. I was not always speaking eloquently during this interview and this miscommunication is my fault."

 

Lindsay Lohan: what, does she think she's hotter than me or something

Megan, it was more fun when you'd slapped Lindsay with your comments. Apart of the discord between the women originates with the fact they both starred in "Confessions Of A Teenage Drama Queen" where Lohan was mean to Fox. Ironically, Fox went on to become the more famous actress.

The two later vied for the same role in the now failed "Liz & Dick" television movie that was released last year. Fox withdrew her name from contention after public friction with Lohan, who was given the job to the project’s detriment. Critics and audiences ended up savaging the film. Fox better be careful. When Lindsay gets drunk she likes popping people in the face.

Lindsay Lohan's Performance In New Film The Canyons Being Panned

Lindsay Lohan

The producers of Lindsay Lohan's new low budget film "The Canyons" released a clip from the forthcoming turkey today and it stunk. A lingerie clad Lohan is pictured sneaking around a Malibu mansion bedroom in a film called the Canyons, based on the area in the Hollywood Hills. She is then physically attacked by her boyfriend, porn star, James Deen.

Lohan's 26-year-old face looks unattractive, weathered and worn out, from bad plastic surgery, retaining liquid from pharmaceutical drug abuse and the ingestion of copious amounts of narcotics and alcohol. Her acting was forced and slow, with her reaction time behind cue.

One look at the clip and it becomes even more obvious why the Sundance Film Festival shot it down, rejecting the low budget $250,000 film. Once again, had the writer and director followed the Judiciary Report's blanket warning about Lohan, they wouldn't be in the predicament they face today. Either way the movie is disgraceful. It is basically porn hiding behind an indie label. That is not an arthouse film and it marks Lohan's dubious entry into the world of pornography, a move bloggers stated for years was coming.

The Site Is Again Proven Right About Lindsay Lohan's Horrible Habits Behind The Scenes

Lindsay Lohan. Wow, what is her beauty secret. She totally needs to tell Megan Fox (LOL).

The New York Times proverbially ripped Lindsay Lohan a new one this month, exposing her terrible behavior behind the scenes, which has rendered her a nightmare to work with. Lohan is involved in the yet-to-be-released low budget film "The Canyons" and the New York Times witnessed the making of the film for weeks and saw the actress behave like a complete terror.

Her publicist wisely tried to have the journalist removed from the set, knowing what Lohan is truly like, but failed. Hence the article destroying the little that was left of her career. And believe me, it is a good read. It took me a couple hours to read, re-read and absorb the 11 pages of insanity that is Lindsay and my left eye started twitching a little bit, but it was worth it.

The derivative film Lohan managed to disrupt and distort also features a porn star named James Deen (watch Harvey Levin at TMZ stalk him for personal reasons). Lohan kept showing up for work late, trying to change script lines (not just coke lines) and was terrified of getting close to Deen during their orgy scene, reportedly due to him being well-endowed.

What's ironic is Deen has reportedly slept with thousands of women, but he is the one that probably caught something from Lindsay. Oh how the mighty have fallen. Lohan is doing pornography now. She needs to take a good look at what she's done to her life, to go from big budget studio films to low budget porn that can't even find a film festival or distributor.

The New York Times article confirmed many things the Judiciary Report has stated about Lohan for years, warning people to be careful of employing her if they value their film projects. I wasn't trying to be mean. I was being practical. I know what I'd heard about Lohan and what I've witnessed regarding her as well for the past few years. There's no prettying it up. Therefore, I couldn't understand why anyone would hire her. Inviting someone with her proclivities into your work or life would be very unwise. Now you see it for yourself via the New York Times piece on the one time hit actress.

Lindsay Lohan on the set of The Canyons (Photo Credit: Jeff Minton/The New York Times) 

When you write and or direct a project, you want things to go well, with only positive memories attached to it. After all, you will remember the experience for life. Hiring Lohan will turn it into a nightmare full of bad memories, stress and frustration. Why would you want that.

Lohan's name recognition is not enough to fix the trouble associated with her and she has been losing her acting ability as well. There are hundreds of professional actresses in Hollywood, the British and Canadian film industries, who can act better than Lohan can now. Why not choose one of them - and they'll actually show up on time and not try to play writer and mess up your script.

I was also right about the Liz & Dick project (As Predicted Lindsay Lohan’s Elizabeth Taylor Biopic 'Liz And Dick' Bombs). A year before the film was released, I stated it was a mistake hiring her. However, they did it anyway and went on to suffer for it with poor ratings and reviews.

Once people saw the movie, they gave it horrible reviews and branded it a laughingstock. Lifetime, who is good with television dramas, wasted money on a interesting project made with the wrong actress - Lindsay. I stick to my original assessment. "Liz & Dick" should have been made with Megan Fox. The resemblance is there and she can act well enough to have pulled it off without the film turning into a joke, as it has with Lohan.

But there is a reason some keep hiring Lohan. She is in the Hollywood "Illuminati" as they call themselves. They are the ones, who have been pulling strings to get Lohan work, as she sexually services their male and female members and parties and has kept quiet about the twisted stuff they get up to behind closed doors.

Django Unchained Causing Offense Among Black People For Its Repetitive Use Of The N-Word

 

Django Unchained

 

Director Quentin Tarantino, who reads this site, is being slammed for his latest movie "Django Unchained" which is a slave film that repetitively uses the n-word, much to the offense of black people. Tarantino, who uses extreme violence and crudeness in his film, is being criticized for going to far in a racial matter.

African-American filmmaker Spike Lee denounced the film, calling it an offense to his ancestors. While I have not seen the film, I'm not comfortable with any movie repetitively using the n-word. It doesn't contain shock value, just offense. Releasing it on Christmas Day was a bad touch as well.

RELATED ARTICLE

 

Fox News Did Not Start Off Racist But Took A Terrible Turn Into Racial Divisiveness

The Government Does Not Want Me To Make My Movie

 

Attorney General Eric Holder and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

I've been back in Miami for a bit to shoot scenes for my forthcoming film "Justice And Truth" on the phone hacking case that I broke first and the copyright and human rights angle of it, as seen in the Aisha v. FBI case. In short, the government does not want me to make the movie.

Three weeks into the project, 20 scenes done (about 10% of the film) and a U.S. Marshall interrupted shooting yesterday (a little too late though). It had to do with unobtrusive filming outside two courthouses in Miami and the U.S. attorney's office (the one that represented the FBI in the Aisha v. FBI case).

I told him flat out, about six weeks ago, I wrote a letter to the FBI/DOJ and sent a copy of said item along with a subpoena to the Miami U.S. attorney that represented them (in the Aisha v. FBI Freedom of information Act case) in forming them that I am about to start making the movie. I sent the aforementioned letter along with a subpoena, giving them the option of releasing the Freedom of Information files they've been hiding for several years in trying to cover up misconduct by criminals in Hollywood and Rupert Murdoch.

Therefore, I assumed unobtrusively filming places related to the case in a manner others have done for other films, would not be a problem, as neither the FBI or U.S. Attorney sent a response stating I could not (legally they couldn't anyway, as America is a free country). The U.S. Marshals are affiliated with the FBI.

When the stone-faced U.S. Marshall, who looked like an extra from the movie "Die Hard" approached my first thought was, "Uh oh Rodney King." He asked that the camera be turned off and started asking me questions about the filming, saying they are "upset" about it, whilst pointing to his badge/tag. I uncharacteristically started speaking slower than Mountain Main from "Duck Dynasty." It wasn't fear, but more trying to process the fact, scores of news teams and filmmakers have filmed the same old building many times and nothing came of it.

When talking slower than Mountain Main didn't work, as he kept asking about the film, I tried reverse psychology and told him "the building isn't pretty anyway, because it needs power washing." Surprisingly, he agreed with me, saying he was just telling someone today the building needs to be power washed, so I ran with it and said because of the economy "but you can't afford it, right" and he agreed.

Then he said he would "not review" what had been filmed, but it was clear someone was trying to send me a message via the interruption (the FBI and the U.S. attorney). But as I see it, the FBI, DOJ and Miami U.S. Attorney should stand behind and own up to the despicable things they did in the case that are now in the film script. Why try to hide it now - after being so cocky, arrogant and corrupt in court before a judge you own that worked for the FBI/DOJ - that millions around the world will see it on film. Like the Bible says, what you do in the dark will come to light.

You have a U.S. Attorney making racist statements in court papers claiming the Civil Rights Act did not give black people equal rights in America, as criminal justification for obstruction of justice and dereliction of duty (the FBI's congressional mandate) in an offensive bid at getting out of a case and the fact you violated the aforementioned historic legislation.

Own up to it on film as well. Better yet, the U.S. Attorney should send me her photo to put in the movie so the world can connect her racist words with her vile face. If you are going to be cocky, racist and nasty in court papers, while violating the Freedom of Information Act and Civil Rights Act as well as your oath of office, own it on film too for the whole world to see. Curiously, I've found everyone else's picture in the case but hers, to put in the film.

In closing, in a document bearing a time stamp of November 7, 2012, the day after the presidential election, in response to the subpoena and letter I sent the FBI weeks prior, they responded by sending me a letter and a privacy release form to and return to them, in order to receive the Freedom of Information Act files. But don't hold your breath they will finally come clean and tell the truth about Madonna, Murdoch or anything else in the case. I expect redacted documents and stonewalling, which as seen in Congress, is the FBI's way.

Either way, it doesn't matter, as I am giving them one last chance to do the right thing, BUT I have enough digital and physical evidence from private sources to clearly illustrate in the film what happened, who did what and when...including the subsequent cover-up by the FBI/DOJ and those affiliated with them in government.

RELATED ARTICLE

Leveson Judicial Report Into Phone Hacking Slams Rupert Murdoch And News Corp's Criminal Conduct    

Movie Review: Christmas In Compton

Title:  Christmas In Compton

Year Of Release: 2012

Review Date: November 30, 2012

Rating: PG

Running Time: 95 minutes

Box Office Gross: N/A

Site Rating: 5 out of 10 stars

"Christmas In Compton" is the funny, but somewhat cliché film about the holidays in the city, Compton,  made famous by the Williams sisters, among others. Derrick, a budding music industry manager with an eye for talent is defrauded by an unscrupulous record company CEO to the tune of $300,000.

In fact, the CEO repeatedly rips him off to the point he becomes so desperate that Derrick risks his father's business and real estate...

For the rest of this review please click the following link: http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com/christmas-in-compton.htm

Is Matt McConaughey Risking Organ Failure With Starvation Diet

Matthew McConaughey

Poor Matt McConaughey is looking very hungry these days, as he has dropped 40 pounds from his well chiseled frame for a role in the movie "Dallas Buyer's Club.' McConaughey is playing an AIDS sufferer and sought to match the physical look of the character.

The role may place McConaughey in contention for an Oscar, as the committee favors such dramatic transformations when playing a character. However, sadly McConaughey is damaging his health and risking organ failure. Here's hoping he will be okay and recover.

As Predicted Lindsay Lohan’s Elizabeth Taylor Biopic 'Liz And Dick' Bombs

Lindsay Lohan in "Liz & Dick"

Earlier in the year, the Judiciary Report rubbished the idea of Lindsay Lohan playing the late actress Elizabeth Taylor in the biopic “Liz & Dick.” Well, the reviews are in from this past Saturday’s airing of the Lifetime made for TV movie and the reviews and ratings aren’t pretty. Lohan is reportedly devastated at the failure of the much hyped project.

Had Lifetime listened to me, Taylor’s legacy would be better off and the network would have more money in its pocket via advertisers. It was a bad idea casting Lohan. There are more deserving actresses out there who would not have brought the taint Lohan did to the project.

Megan Fox, who's not the best actress, would have done better in the project and resembles Taylor far more than Lohan, who doesn’t look like her at all. Lohan has lost much of her acting abilities (you would think lying to police so much would have kept Lohan’s acting skills intact, unlike her virginity - Lohan has been smashed more than scrap metal).

RELATED ARTICLES

Lindsay Lohan Beat Megan Fox For The Role Of Elizabeth Taylor In Biopic

Megan Fox Wants To Bump Troublesome Lindsay Lohan From Elizabeth Taylor Biopic

Is It A Coincidence That Robert Pattinson And Kristen Stewart Reunited Just In Time For New 'Twilight' Film's Release

 

Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart

As much as the Judiciary Report enjoying annoying Kristen Stewart with tormenting articles about her boyfriend Robert Pattinson deserving better than what she did in cheating on him with a married man, the site had its doubts the two would stay apart with the new "Twilight" film coming up.

As the Judiciary Report stated months ago before the couple reunited, the studio behind the "Twilight" films want them back together to promote the movie, not because they care about their relationship, but for sales purposes. Well, they got their wish.

However, model Liberty Ross is still left with a damaged marriage to cheating director, Rupert Sanders, who got intimate with Stewart. Hollywood only cares about money and fame, but real people, including children of people in broken marriages, do end up hurt.