Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts

Monday, November 7, 2016

U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch Pleads The Fifth In Congress Keeping Silent About Why President Barack Obama Gave Iran $1.7 Billion Dollars In Violation Of American Government Policy


Barack Obama
 
It was recently revealed that U.S. President Barack Obama, gave Iran $1.7 billion dollars of taxpayer money, in violation of the American government policy. The Iranian government, who has nuclear ambitions, has repeatedly threatened to blow America off the map. Iran has made no secret of its contempt and hatred for America and wish to see the nation out of existence via nuclear strikes. Yet, Barack Obama took taxpayer money, and may I add, money he did not earn, and gave it to the Iranian government. 

The U.S. Congress pressed Obama's Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, on the matter and she suspiciously and incriminatingly pled the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment in America is apart of the U.S. Constitution one can invoke to prevent stating something that could lead to one's imprisonment. 
 

 
Loretta Lynch

I'm not even Attorney General and I want to discuss the matter as it is serious and alarming. Obama just outrageously gave $1.7 billion dollars, not even million, billion dollars, to a world government who has openly expressed it wants to use nuclear weapons to destroy America. Well, thanks to Obama, now they have the money to do so. This has got to be one of the stupidest, most sinister and corrupt things I have ever seen in my life. Obama needs to be held accountable for his behavior.
 
STORY SOURCE

Lynch ‘Pleads Fifth’ on Secret Iran ‘Ransom’ Payments

Obama admin blocking congressional probe into cash payments to Iran

October 28, 2016 11:22 am - Attorney General Loretta Lynch is declining to comply with an investigation by leading members of Congress about the Obama administration’s secret efforts to send Iran $1.7 billion in cash earlier this year, prompting accusations that Lynch has “pleaded the Fifth” Amendment to avoid incriminating herself over these payments, according to lawmakers and communications exclusively obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R., Fla.) and Rep. Mike Pompeo (R., Kan.) initially presented Lynch in October with a series of questions about how the cash payment to Iran was approved and delivered. In an Oct. 24 response, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kadzik responded on Lynch’s behalf, refusing to answer the questions and informing the lawmakers that they are barred from publicly disclosing any details about the cash payment, which was bound up in a ransom deal aimed at freeing several American hostages from Iran. 


RELATED ARTICLES
 
'Clinton Cash' Documentary Exposes Hillary Clinton And Bill Clinton Going From Broke To $2 Billion Dollars In Bribe Money From Global Dictators And Businesspeople Stealing From The Poor And Harming The Environment (Video)
The Obama Administration Is Interfering In Civil And Criminal Court Cases In Violation Of The Law Corruptly Ordering Judges How To Rule And Bugging Trees And Rocks At Courthouses

Attorney General Loretta Lynch Dodged 74 Questions In Congress About The Corruption That Led To Hillary Clinton Not Being Criminally Charged For Mishandling Classified Information

FBI Hit With Massive Backlash From Americans Labeling Them 'Corrupt' For 'Rigging' Hillary Clinton Investigation Into Mishandling Classified Information And Not Charging Her For Crimes She Committed

Obama Administration Loses $500 Million Dollars In Taxpayer Money As Rebels They Trained Give U.S. Weapons And Equipment To Al Qaeda In Syria

Members Of Congress Question FBI Director James Comey In Hearing About Hillary Clinton Lying To The Legislature And FBI Under Oath

Wikileaks To Drop More Damning Documents On Hillary Clinton Such As Arming Murderous ISIS Terrorists

Obama Is Giving Iran 1.7 Billion Dollars In Taxpayer Money In Violation Of Longtime U.S. Policy

Declassified Documents Reveal Barack Obama Ordered The U.S. Government To Train ISIS

The Obama Administration Trained ISIS Military Commander
 
Russia: Obama Is Protecting ISIS

Sunday, August 14, 2016

Donald Trump Denies He Was Inciting Violence With Second Amendment Comment About Hillary Clinton And The Secret Service Did Not Visit Him

 

Donald Trump: I wish someone would just pop a cap in her butt!
 
U.S. Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, caused a firestorm of controversy this week after he made comments about political rival, Hillary Clinton, being taken care of by "the Second  Amendment people." The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms (guns) in America ("the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed). Some interpreted Trump's statements to mean that Americans would kill Clinton if she chose Supreme Court judges they did not like, in the event she is elected President of the United States. 
 
Trump stated," Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, if she gets to pick, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know." Trump later stated his comments were to motivate gun owners to vote against Clinton, not shoot her.

 
   
Hillary Clinton: Yea, keep playing with me Donald and you and your combover are gonna end up on the Clinton kill list (and boy does it have a lot of names). Bernie just got off the list last month (LOL).
 
 CNN reported the Secret Service formally interviewed Trump about his statements. The Trump campaign stated CNN lied. The Secret Service backs up their statement in also denying CNN's claims. Trump slammed CNN for the story stating, "No such meeting or conversation ever happened. A made up story by low ratings CNN." 
 
I can see how some could interpret Trump's statements as dangerous. It sounded like he was joking and hoping regarding gun owners lighting up Hillary like a Christmas tree. There are always fanatics who are unbalanced and will hear or read items and act upon it in an illegal manner. Trump needs to be careful of what he says, because if someone pops a cap in Hillary's butt, some will blame him.
 
   
Bernie Sanders (left) sweating bullets, pardon the pun and Hillary Clinton (right)
 
Side Bar: Two months ago, a Democrat writer indirectly called for Donald Trump's assassination and the mainstream press said nothing (weeks after, someone did actually try to kill Trump). This week Trump makes a statement that is interpreted by some as violent and it lands on all the mainstream outlets. That's quite uneven. Both stories should receive the same amount of attention. 

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Obama Administration’s War On Journalists, Bloggers And Whistleblowers Reaches Criminal Levels Reviving COINTELPRO With The Help Of The FBI, NSA And CIA


U.S. President Barack Obama

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” - First Amendment Of The U.S. Constitution

The Judiciary Report has broken a number of time-stamped stories that later proved 100% true and correct, among them are exclusives on the Obama Administration such as:

NSA Workers Admit To Reading The Emails And Listening To The Calls Of Americans In Violation Of The Law
Judge Rules The NSA Illegally Spied On Americans Confirming The Site's Previous Claims (Video)
NSA Admits Employees Illegally Spied On Love Interests And Significant Others Confirming Site’s Previous Claims
New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims
News Report: The IRS Targeted Christians (Confirming Previous Site Claims)

Well, here’s another one for you. The administration of U.S. President Barack Obama has revived COINTELPRO against political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers, who expose the government’s criminal conduct. COINTELPRO is a heinous program the FBI created in the 1950s to disrupt, discredit and destroy people and groups its disliked for having too much influence over the populace.

People, particularly outspoken black people, who sought equal rights and justice in society, saw their business and personal lives destroyed in sick ways at the FBI's hands. Some were even murdered in cold blood as a means of silencing them. As a black man, Obama should be ashamed to have rebooted this terrible tool in modern times that was previously used against great men such as the late Martin Luther King Jr. and Medgar Evers.

Under the Obama Administration, relatives, (romantic) partners and friends of political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers are being illegally contacted by the feds and told their loved one has gone crazy, is making up stories on the government, who needs help reining them in, to help them for their own good. However, it is a load of crap, as it is meant to irreparably damage and destroy the target (political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers).

Relatives, partners and friends are unwittingly fed invasive items about the person and told to repeat it back at them verbatim as the government texts, emails and phone calls state, not realizing it came directly from criminally placed FBI, CIA and NSA wiretaps, roving bugs (audio and video), email hacking, phone hacking, webcam spying and other means of surveillance not permitted under law against innocent people or for the aforementioned purposes. Court orders for wiretaps, the collection of emails and phone records, as well as computer contents, must be done via a judicial process and cannot be done to silence writers and whistleblowers.

Many political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers have had their phone service and internet tampered with by the Obama Administration, via the FBI, CIA and NSA, seeking to thwart stories being publishing exposing their criminal conduct. The Obama Administration via the via the FBI, CIA and NSA, is also illegally intercepting and opening the mail of political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers. The Obama Administration has also engaged in incidents of criminal harassment, threats, bullying and gaslighting, against political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers. These are criminal offenses being committed by the Obama Administration worthy of federal imprisonment.

Relatives, partners and friends are asked to search their loved one’s computers, home and personal belongings for specific information and items. They are asked to steal items and give it to the government agents handling the respective cases. Political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers are also being subjected to illegal tampering and intrusions of their bank accounts, business accounts, credit accounts and credit reports. The Obama Administration is going around unlawfully trying to get political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers fired from their jobs so they will have no means of supporting themselves, which is an economic crime.

Additionally relatives, partners and friends of political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers who do not go along with the sick program, are fired from their jobs, subjected to malicious, baseless tax audits and in some cases fake, trumped up charges are brought against them for things they did not do (arrested for phony DUIs when they were not drunk, accused of financial crimes they did not commit ect…).

In many of these cases the Obama Administration’s conduct are not just criminal, they also constitute hate crimes. For example, one journalist being targeted is an gay American man. His boyfriend, most of his friends and some of his family are gay as well. The government unleashing the rebooted COINTELPRO against them in illegal bids at stopping the journalist’s lawful stories exposing Obama Administration criminal activity, is targeting gays and as such is a hate crime, deemed worse under existing U.S. statutes.

In other cases, some of the law abiding political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers being criminally targeted by the Obama Administration are Christians and so are the people in their circle who are being subjected to the government sponsored abuses as well, under the president‘s bids at illegally silencing them from publishing articles exposing his criminal behavior. Once again, these are hate crimes by the Obama Administration, as it is targeting a specific group of people, in order to harm a political journalist, blogger or whistleblower.

There are cases under this rebooted COINTELPRO where the Obama Administration has inexcusably interfered with the medical care of political journalists, bloggers and whistle blowers in criminal violation of HIPA. The Obama Administration has illegally contacted doctors and other medical providers demanding they engage in conduct counterproductive to the health and well being of political journalists, bloggers and whistle blowers targeted under their vile reboot of COINTELPRO.

This criminal misconduct is done to cause division in families and relationships, in order to isolate and damage political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers from their loved ones, in a psychological maneuver psychiatrists label a targeted plan to emotionally and mentally abuse, then destroy the victim as a means of neutralizing them.

The Obama Administration has taken its COINTELPRO reboot so far as to engage in deceptive, underhanded and vile conduct to break up marriages and families of political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers, as was previously done in repeated efforts to destroy the home life of Martin Luther King Jr. The reasoning is a person will lose their will to live under such circumstances. The FBI is after all the agency that sent civil rights hero Martin Luther King Jr a letter demanding he kill himself.

The COINTELPRO reboot has a psychological component of the program aimed at applying pressure with the intent of driving targets to suicide and was designed with the assistance of psychiatrists. The psychiatrists who designed this aspect of the rebooted COINTELPRO program were told it would be used on terrorists. However, the Obama Administration is using it on political journalists, bloggers and whistleblowers (as well as political rivals) in criminal violation of the law.

What type of insidious evil is this coming from the Obama Administration. You do realize this type of invasive, criminal conduct is associated with psychotics, sociopaths and perverted voyeurs. Not to mention, nowhere in U.S. or U.N. law is it legal to do such sick things to people. Just because you’re the government doesn’t make the conduct you’re exhibiting, which is found in books on mental illness and abnormal psychology, acceptable or okay. If civilians did any of the sick crap the Obama Administration is doing they would be thrown in federal prison and fed a steady stream of anti-psychotic medication.

This is what the Obama Administration is wasting American taxpayer dollars on in criminal violation of United States and United Nations laws. This criminal misconduct against members of the press and whistleblowers constitutes serious felonies and human rights abuses (and there's proof). Congress is giving them billions of dollars in taxpayer money and this is the contemptible evil they are doing with it (then hypocritically lecturing America and the world on human rights, equality, democracy and free society).

Chairman/Emperor/Dictator Obama is violating the rights of political journalists and whistleblowers in conduct condemned by domestic and international laws, as well as noted human rights groups. It’s pretty sad when the public can’t tell the administration from the criminals.

RELATED ARTICLES
 
 
 
 
 
 

Thursday, October 22, 2015

Drudge Report Writer Matt Drudge Threatened By Supreme Court Justice Seeking To Shut His Site Down


Matt Drudge

Recently, one of the internet's top bloggers, Miami's Matt Drudge (I'm still a better and cuter blogger than you - deal with it LOL), who is the owner and author of the news aggregation website, Drudge Report, stated he fears his site will soon be shut down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Congress is reviewing copyright law and Drudge fears it may negatively impact his site. Drudge stated, "I had a Supreme Court Justice tell me it’s over for me. They’ve got the votes now to enforce copyright law, you’re out of there. They’re going to make it so you can’t even use headlines."

This unwarranted attack on Drudge has nothing to do with protecting the rights of copyright holders. This attack on Drudge is politically motivated, as he has broken stories in that realm and posts links on Drudge Report the establishment fears sways voters in congressional and presidential elections.
As a copyright holder of over 23-years, who has written and copyrighted thousands of (published and unpublished) songs, many film scripts and synopses, music video treatments, books and photographs, as well as being a blogger who has authored and published over 14,000 articles online that broke many stories that turned into global scandals, I am not in favor of the Supreme Court enacting new laws to shut down sites like the Drudge Report.

I don't agree with all the links Drudge posts, but find many of them quite useful. Drudge Report also drives traffic to sites, increasing ad revenue for website holders he links, putting money in their pockets. The problem is the narcissistic, thin-skinned Obama administration, who are Democrats, have desperately tried to control the press and failed to completely do so.

Drudge's site is a widely read page that posts story links that also include the Republican point of view, which Democrats dislike. Drudge also posts links to articles that excoriate Democrats (and Republicans) politicians and the former are not used to that (the Republicans are used to being bashed by the mainstream media and Hollywood, who are liberals). However, Democrats in office are used to glowing articles from the left leaning mainstream media and Hollywood, with their lips firmly planted on their backsides.

So when Drudge posts links to articles that do not kiss the administration's backside, they throw a temper tantrum and their toys out the crib in protest. Drudge Report is also read by many bloggers, who write stories about the contents in the links he posts. The fact Drudge is one of the bloggers helping to shape the national discourse, is also ticking off some in the establishment.

It is an established precept of U.S. intellectual property law that titles cannot be copyrighted. This means you cannot copyright a book, movie or song title ect. Therefore, it stands to reason, Drudge who posts article titles containing hyperlinks, is not in violation of existing copyright law. To change the law to silence a popular voice online, whose work is read by millions in America and around the world, is petty, juvenile and spiteful. Not to mention, it would also criminally violate the U.S. Constitution that guarantees free speech and free press.

Not to mention changing the law could also burn Hollywood, full of criminals the U.S. court system keeps corrupting the law for and bringing the Judiciary into domestic and global disrepute over. This would mean Hollywood would have one heck of a time trying to secure titles for their projects.
I've spent thousands on copyright fees since I was 15-years-old. I've written more songs than any living human being, in what was and continues to be a labor intensive job. However, I can attest it made me a target of thieves in Hollywood and due to that disgusting experience, I've found registering one's copyrights with the Library of Congress, is a worthless process, as Hollywood routines steals copyrights from people all over America and the world, then bribes judges in U.S. courts to get away with it, via quietly issuing jurists corporate stocks, cash and other assets to throw out valid cases. They have disgraced the U.S. judiciary to the watching world with this appalling conduct.

America is signatory to the international Berne Convention (Treaty) which established the global law that a copyright is automatically created the moment a person authors an item. No payment or additional protection is need. However, Congress enacted the Copyright Act in America in what has become a money making scam that states you must pay the Library of Congress/US Copyright Office a fee to register your work and they will issue you a copyright certificate. If you fail to do so and Hollywood steals your work (and make no mistake those dirty criminals will) you will not be able to sue in an American court to recoup your financial losses and obtain credit for your work, regarding the illegally made infringing items. 

However, as stated above, U.S. copyrights are worthless trash, because Hollywood routinely bribes federal judges into dismissing cases, in what is ugly, foul, vile, corrupt criminal conduct. The U.S. federal court system has shown itself to be irredeemably corrupt in matters of copyright cases to the point litigants and lawyers are foregoing suing in America, opting for other places in the world.

 

Matt Drudge

I have done a thorough study of copyright infringement cases in America for a forthcoming movie and book ("Justice And Truth") and these cases do not make it to trial 99% of the time, as Hollywood bribes federal judges to throw them out. In 2005, I experienced this myself, where a Miami federal judge, Cecilia Altonaga, had to admit in a ruling regarding me formally requesting she recuse herself for corruption, that her child was given stock in the defendant's company (and she corrupted the case due to that and the fact her husband's law firm makes a fortune in legal fees from the defendants as well).

In another case in 2009 where I tried to obtain Freedom of Information Act files from the FBI/DOJ regarding the aforementioned stolen copyrights, the judge, a former employee of the FBI/DOJ with current ties to them, sat on the case, did not recuse himself though judicial cannons indicate he should have, then gave the FBI/DOJ "sovereign immunity" in what was a massive criminal cover up of theft of property worth billions (that idiots in Hollywood managed to devalue with their incompetence). 

I've had lawyers tells me that federal judges are busy accepting bribes left, right and center and suing is U.S. court is an exercise in futility and they are right. I've seen it with my own eyes and the paper trail proves it. However, here's where this mess is going. The public is fed up with Hollywood's stealing and have greatly withdrawn their support from Hollywood's music industry that is collapsing with record low sales that keep getting worse. The public is also spending significantly less money on the film industry.

So this unmitigated greed, bribery and corruption is headed in the direction of more and more Hollywood music and film companies closing down (which is happening now), while others will merge and merge and merge until there's just one left and it will financially struggle. You've ripped off copyright holders and gouged the public with crazy prices and it is leading towards something very terrible.

So continue with the arrogant stealing and corruption (sarcasm) and see where it is going to take you. The future is not looking good at all for Hollywood and you brought it on yourselves by being so damned evil, abominable, greedy and disgraceful. I've never encountered a group of people so evil and sick in all my life, willing to "rob, kill, steal and destroy" to get what they want...even if it doesn't belong to them.

Regarding the Supreme Court, they keep rendering decisions poll show the American people overwhelmingly do not approve of and here's where that's going. Less and less people will petition the Supreme Court and it is on the road to becoming an antiquated, outdated, unpopular model very few people will use in the future. So, continue with the corruption (sarcasm) and see where it is going to take you. This so-called power you think you wield and keep abusing will be gone. State Courts will become more popular, where judges can be voted out at regular intervals, when found to be corrupt. Mediation services will also rise in popularity, as people find alternate ways of resolving legal disputes.

You are wrecking America and damaging the world with this corruption and the American people and the world will never forget it or forgive it when all is said and done. You've gone too far.

STORY SOURCE

Congressional Review Of Copyright Law May Threaten Drudge Report

5:20 PM 10/13/2015 - WASHINGTON — Congress may update digital copyright law affecting aggregator sites, like the Drudge Report and Real Clear Politics, along with news sites in the near future. “Two years ago, the House Judiciary Committee launched a comprehensive review of our nation’s copyright laws, which have not been updated since 1976. As technology continues to rapidly advance, we have a responsibility to ensure that our laws are keeping pace with these developments,” Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte said in a statement.

Since March of 2013, the House Judiciary Committee has conducted 20 hearings, which included testimony from 100 witnesses on the subject of copyright law in the digital age. The topics range from fair use to scope of copyright protection to music licensing.

“The committee has been conducting a comprehensive review of U.S. copyright law to ensure that the law keeps pace with the digital age in which we live. The goal of the listening tour is to step out of Washington, D.C. to hear from creators and innovators in terms of what is and is not working for them in their various fields,” a committee staffer told The Daily Caller.

The committee staffer would not say how the laws would affect aggregators and news sites and said that only “all stakeholders are invited to come in and meet with staff in order to give their thoughts or express concerns. Those meetings are ongoing.”

Drudge Report site owner Matt Drudge told Alex Jones of InfoWars last week that copyright laws could very well end his popular site. I had a Supreme Court Justice tell me it’s over for me,” said Drudge. “They’ve got the votes now to enforce copyright law, you’re out of there. They’re going to make it so you can’t even use headlines.”

He explained, “To have a Supreme Court Justice say to me it’s over, they’ve got the votes, which means time is limited,” he added, noting that a day was coming when simply operating an independent website could be outlawed. That will end [it] for me – fine – I’ve had a hell of a run,” said Drudge, adding that web users were being pushed into the cyber ‘ghettos’ of Twitter, Facebook and Instagram.” Drudge added, “This is ghetto, this is corporate, they’re taking your energy and you’re getting nothing in return – nothing!"...

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Edward Snowden Joins Twitter And Has More Followers In One Day Than The NSA


Edward Snowden

National Security Agency (NSA) whistle blower, Edward Snowden, has joined the social networking website Twitter. In under a day, Snowden has amassed more followers on the site than his former employer, the NSA, whom he blew the whistle on for mass spying and left America. Snowden has over 724,000 followers and counting (pretty impressive numbers considering his profile picture is not a booty shot - yea, that was a diss to all you women flashing your bare butts and other body parts in your avi).

This news has upset some people. For example, presidential candidate George Pataki is demanding Twitter close Snowden’s account. However, that would be unconstitutional. Snowden has not tweeted out anything that can be deemed illegal. Snowden is not tweeting out nuclear codes (LOL). He is not in breech of Twitter’s terms of service. Therefore, he should have a voice on social networking. And Twitter has already welcome Snowden to the site anyway.


This is one of the things I dislike regarding the government these days. The U.S. Constitution states people are entitled to free speech and free press, yet Pataki and others such as Obama, are trying to censor people via roping in corporations, who could face financial collapse, via offending the public in following their terrible orders.

Google has taken an online beating from being the Obama Administration’s puppet, via financially abusing and harassing bloggers and vloggers into removing content not flattering to the egomaniac-in-chief. Google’s name is so battered online, with the public mocking them as “Big Brother” for the Obama Administration, they’ve had to change their name to Alphabet. Google has also lost money from people choosing their rivals, due to the bad publicity.


Edward Snowden

The sad part is Obama doesn’t have the first billion to replace the corporate value of Google. Pataki doesn’t have the first billion to cover the value of Twitter, yet is demanding they do something that would be detrimental to their business. The government didn’t create these companies but are meddling in their businesses, essentially interfering in commerce, trying to restrict free speech via censorship. I hope you know, encouraging companies to financially punish others if they do not do your bidding is blackmail and coercion. People who do such things are not fit for any public office.

So many journalists and bloggers are publicly complaining of the Obama Administration harassing them over free speech and free press. How can you lecture Americans about the Constitution when you are violating it at the people‘s expense. How can you lecture Russia and China about your perceived ills of communism when you are practicing it. You think about that.

There are many people with social networking pages that I do not agree with and do you know what I do? The grown up thing by leaving them alone and not reading their social networking pages. It’s quite simple and it’s free. You should try it sometime instead of violating the Constitution, federal and state laws regarding harassment, bullying and blackmail (in trying to get people to take down truthful but unflattering statements about you lest you destroy their ability to earn a living and support their families in what can only be described as disgraceful).

Note to the government: no one likes a bully...especially voters.

STORY SOURCE

George Pataki Wants Twitter To Shut Down Edward Snowden's Account

September 29, 2015, 5:29 PM EDT - Republican presidential candidate and former New York Gov. George Pataki called for Twitter to shut down Edward Snowden's account — hours after the former National Security Agency contractor posted his first tweet. Snowden made his presence known Tuesday on the social media website...But the co-founder and CEO of Twitter, Jack Dorsey, had already welcomed Snowden to the social media site...
 

RELATED ARTICLE
 

Friday, May 8, 2015

New York Appeals Court Slams NSA Spying In Ruling Labeling It Illegal


National Security Agency (NSA)

New York's Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled against the National Security Agency's blanket spying on Americans, stating the Patriot Act did not allow the agency to engage in said misconduct. Former National Security Agency contractor, Edward Snowden, bravely exposed the agency's lawbreaking in indiscriminately spying on Americans.

This confirms what the site previously stated several years ago regarding illegal spying at the NSA and FBI (
Judge Rules The NSA Illegally Spied On Americans Confirming The Site's Previous Claims (Video) and NSA Workers Admit To Reading The Emails And Listening To The Calls Of Americans In Violation Of The Law).

STORY SOURCE

NSA's phone spying program ruled illegal by appeals court

A U.S. spying program that systematically collects millions of Americans' phone records is illegal, a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday, putting pressure on Congress to quickly decide whether to replace or end the controversial anti-terrorism surveillance. Ruling on a program revealed by former government security contractor Edward Snowden, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said the Patriot Act did not authorize the National Security Agency to collect Americans' calling records in bulk.

Circuit Judge Gerard Lynch wrote for a three-judge panel that Section 215, which addresses the FBI's ability to gather business records, could not be interpreted to have permitted the NSA to collect a "staggering" amount of phone records, contrary to claims by the Bush and Obama administrations.

"Such expansive development of government repositories of formerly private records would be an unprecedented contraction of the privacy expectations of all Americans," Lynch wrote in a 97-page decision. "We would expect such a momentous decision to be preceded by substantial debate, and expressed in unmistakable language. There is no evidence of such a debate."

The appeals court did not rule on whether the surveillance violated the U.S. Constitution. It also declined to halt the program, noting that parts of the Patriot Act including Section 215 expire on June 1. Lynch said it was "prudent" to give Congress a chance to decide what surveillance is permissible, given the national security interests at stake.  
 

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Europe Lays Out Plan For Breaking Up Tech Giant Google Which Is A Monopoly Violating Anti-Trust Laws Worldwide



Google 

The European parliament is on the verge of calling for the break-up of tech giant Google. The company has essentially become a monopoly, engaging in abusive anti-trust behavior and financially fraudulent conduct, believing they are above the law. The Judiciary Report has personally witnessed and experienced Google unconstitutionally punishing this site (and others) for engaging in the right to free speech, against those the company is aligned with politically and financially.

Many bloggers have complained that Google financially punished them in canceling ad revenue accounts via their company Ad Sense, for publishing articles criticizing President Obama (among others), who has hired executives from the tech company to work in his administration in well paying jobs being underwritten by taxpayers. It is their reward and payment for unconstitutional behavior.

Google has unlawfully engaged in financially and socially abusive conduct towards those, who do not shower with praise, its high paying allies, such as the Obama Administration and select stars, who spend large sums with Ad Sense. This conduct is fraudulent, illegal and un-American. Only in communist nations are people punished for expressing their opinions that criticize the government and others with ties to them. However, if you live in a communist nation, you know the rules and what can happen.


 
Google's Larry Page

Living in a western nation such as America, that espouses free speech, one does not expect a liberal, conservative hating administration to spit on the U.S. Constitution and people's right to free speech and free press. Yet so many conservatives in America have been burned by the Obama administration and spoke out about it online and in the press (see "Related Articles" below for stories the Judiciary Report broke first about the Obama administration, such as the NSA spying scandal and IRS harassing conservatives).

Furthermore, where has it gotten the administration? The public has witnessed the scandals, abusiveness and violations of people's rights and in a historic vote, sent Obama's allies out of office this month. Democrats rushed to distance themselves from the president prior to the election, fearing they would hemorrhage votes. If the administration doe not desist with the corrupt conduct, the 2016 election results will be the same. The public is tired of the corruption.

There are some who espouse views I don't agree with, but I respect their right to voice their lawful opinions. I'm a grown woman, so I understand, people have the right to independent thought and contrasting opinions. Therefore, whatever I don't agree with, I simply read and move on from or ignore. However, I'm being harassed by an immature imbecile at Google hell-bent on destroying people for their opinions, when most people learn in Kindergarten to respect other people's rights. More harassment occurred last week.



Barack Obama

Google has reached the point that they violate their own terms of service via the contracts they sign with bloggers on millions of websites, as well as those with YouTube accounts that have the tech company's advertising. It not a matter of them paying people their fair share. Google is now using sites to run ads, then reneging on paying them to punish people for expressing their right to free speech against the company's allies. When people sue, Google corrupts the legal system in conduct that is going to firmly embed them in world history in a shameful and disgraceful place.

After I filed the case Aisha v. Google, where the company owes me over $25,000 for ads it ran on my sites, as well as additional money in damages over a sick website the mentally deranged Kabbalah Center, headed up by crazy pop star, Madonna,  fraudulently erected in my name as a means of destroying my name and endangering my safety, other came forward with stories of being cheated out of ad revenue by Google as well. Recently, a man sued Google stating they owe him $40,000 in ad revenue for Google Ad Sense ads they ran on his site. A consumer law firm has also since filed a class action lawsuit against Google for defrauding bloggers out of Ad Sense revenue. However, so arrogant and abusive is overblown monopoly Google that they decided they are not going to pay him, in conduct they have unethically done to others.

I am going to make a prediction about Google. If they continue this abusive anti-trust behavior in America and the world, deeming they are so big people have to deal with them and take any garbage they dish out, the company is going to be severely weakened and go the way of other collapsed tech giants, who decided they were above the law. There is such a thing as going too far and Google firmly has its foot on that line. Be careful of corruptly winning the battle, then losing the war (your company). Google are behaving like the nerdy kids in school, who got picked on and were overlooked by the cool kids and now that they're all grown up and have made money, they think they can hypocritically abuse everyone else as revenge. Grow up before your company goes belly up.

STORY SOURCE

Google break-up plan emerges from Brussels

November 21, 2014 6:23 pm - Google is celebrating its 15th anniversary as the company reaches $290 billion market value. The European parliament is poised to call for a break-up of Google, in one of the most brazen assaults so far on the technology group’s power. The gambit increases the political pressure on the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, to take a tougher line on Google, either in its antitrust investigation into the company or through the introduction of laws to curb its reach.

A draft motion seen by the Financial Times says that “unbundling [of] search engines from other commercial services” should be considered as a potential solution to Google’s dominance. It has the backing of the parliament’s two main political blocs, the European People’s Party and the Socialists.

 A vote to effectively single out a big US company for censure is extremely rare in the European parliament and is in part a reflection of how Germany’s politicians have turned against Google this year. German centre-right and centre-left politicians are the dominant force in the legislature and German corporate champions, from media groups to telecoms, are among the most vocal of Google’s critics.

Since his nomination to be the EU’s digital commissioner, Germany’s Günther Oettinger has suggested hitting Google with a levy for displaying copyright-protected material; has raised the idea of forcing its search results to be neutral; and voiced concerns about its provision of software for cars.

Google has become a lightning rod for European concerns over Silicon Valley, with consumers, regulators and politicians assailing the company over issues ranging from its commercial dominance to its privacy policy. It has reluctantly accepted the European Court of Justice’s ruling on the right to be forgotten, which requires it to consider requests not to index certain links about people’s past...



Thursday, August 21, 2014

CNN Reports The National Guard In Ferguson Threw Gasoline On The Fire Of Racial Tensions During Mike Brown Protests By Calling Black Protesters N*ggers


Don Lemon

CNN television news reporter Don Lemon is reporting, while attending protests in Ferguson, Missouri, regarding the police murder of 18-year-old unarmed, university bound student, Michael Brown, he and his television producer heard the National Guard refer to protestors as "n*ggers." The National Guard attempting to corral peaceful protestors, exercising their constitutional right to assemble (freedom of assembly) called the crowd "n*ggers" when they would not disburse and go home. 


What was that? Was that really necessary calling people n*ggers? And some wonder why people believe Brown's murder was racial profiling and racially motivated. Explain that! The National Guard brought race into it confirming people's worst suspicions. Some want the case to quickly go away, but there are issues that need to be discussed to prevent this from happening again. It needs to be formally brought out in the open in appropriate venues, so there can be peaceful dialogue with meaningful answers and effective solutions. Racial unity is needed.

STORY SOURCE

CNN’s Don Lemon: National Guard Used ‘N-Word’ to Describe Ferguson Protesters

10:55 pm, August 19th, 2014 - CNN’s Don Lemon was back in the CNN studio Tuesday night after several days on the ground in Ferguson, Missouri. The anchor was hosting a town hall called “Black and White in America,” when one questioner asked what “safeguards” police departments could put in place to prevent shootings like the one that killed Michael Brown in the future. 

When one of Lemon’s panelists brought up the idea of putting cameras on officers to make them more accountable, Lemon said that measure might also affect the types of people who decide to become cops...He then shared this story from his time in Ferguson last night: 

“I’m just going to be honest with you. Last night, one of my producers said that they — I won’t say if it’s a he or she, because I don’t want to give anyone away — said they came in contact with one of the members of the National Guard and that they said, ‘You want to get out of here because you’re white, because these n-words, you never know what they’re going to do.’ True story. I kid you not. 2014, a member of the National Guard. And my producer doesn’t lie. It is a true story.” Watch video below, via CNN...

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Dr. Ben Carson States President Obama Should Protect Christians From Persecution But The IRS Scandal Reveals President Obama Is Persecuting Christians

 

Barack Obama

In a well circulated article public this month on a number of websites "Dr. Ben Carson says President Obama should protect Christians from persecution" accomplished neurosurgeon, Dr. Ben Carson, stated of President Obama, "We have an obligation as Americans to denounce these acts of persecution. Even those who do not worship a higher deity should be concerned. For when we stand up to such intolerance, we are defending the root of freedom. We are defending choice — the ability to worship and call on the name of a heavenly being without fear of torture and abandonment." However, sadly, President Obama is persecution Christians.

As many of you know who read the Judiciary Report on a regular basis, I have broken a number of stories regarding corruption in government and its negative impact on the public. One of the government stories I broke first was on August 11, 2011 (The FBI And Ethics) regarding President Obama using the FBI and IRS, among other agencies, to harass and punish those who engage in the constitutional right to free speech, to question and or criticize his decisions as head of state. 

Illegal tactics the Obama Administration utilized includes stressful, discriminatory and distressing audits from the IRS, denial of tax status and illegal withholding of tax refunds - in addition to criminally engaging the FBI into contacting business and personal associates of targets, harassing and threatening them into harassing and violating the rights and interests of people who publicly speak out against the overly sensitive, vindictive, narcissistic, petty, thin-skinned head of state. 

Two years later on May 11, 2013, the IRS made a public admission of guilt confirming my previous exclusive, regarding the agency targeting, harassing and discriminating against Christians in violation of U.S. law, attacking outspoken critics of the president, particularly Christians. The Judiciary Report articles regarding the IRS scandal later hitting the mainstream press, confirming my previous site exclusives are IRS Says Sorry For Targeting Conservatives and News Report: The IRS Targeted Christians.


Barack Obama

As much as Mr. Obama claims he is a Christian, his deeds say otherwise. He has engaged in conduct that has undermined the rights and finances of Christians. I can attest to this. Well after I made my claims online in the aforementioned, time stamped, copyrighted articles read by millions, the IRS scandal broke in the mainstream press and ended up in Congress. Other Christians, who had also criticized Obama online or in the press, then came forward stating they were harassed by the IRS and other government agencies on Obama's orders.

They range from well known preachers to journalists, who had publicly and constitutionally criticized the president. Among them, well known American pastor, James Dobson, who has been preaching for decades to an audience of millions, being illegally told by the IRS they will not approve his tax application because he "had been critical of the president."

The Obama Administration ordering the deletion of emails at the IRS to cover up the crimes his cabinet ordered against innocent Americans, is corrupt. The Obama Administration spitefully attacked Christians' finances through the IRS, getting employees of the agency into trouble by demanding they follow corrupt orders or face the boot. If one is going to be arrogant and corrupt in wrongdoing, be enough of a person to own up to it before Congress and the courts. Anything less is cowardly. 

The president should own up to what he and high ranking members of his cabinet did and face the legal consequences in court. Regardless of what they would have the public believe, IRS employees didn't pop up and do this on their own. The Obama Administration ordered them too in a petty, vindictive vendetta, politically designed to harm the rights and finances of Christians. Obama has also granted his presidential support to people in Hollywood attacking and undermining the rights of Christians, in conduct that is brazenly unlawful.

The fact of the matter is Obama only stated he is a Christian to get elected and it worked, but in his heart, speech and conduct, he is not so. While the president, just like everyone else has the right to choose any religion, he does not have the right to waste taxpayer money misusing government funds to attack Americans and international citizens, trying to erode people's finances, privacy rights and personal freedoms, for constitutionally stating they do not agree with his policies or actions. This conduct is wholly un-American and not befitting the head of state. 


Ben Carson 

If I were a head of state, I would not be engaging in conduct that undermines the rights, freedoms and finances of any law abiding citizens of any religion. I'm not juvenile and petty. I'm an adult and grasp the basic principle of life that people are entitled to their opinion and free speech. People are allowed to speak their minds, write their views and exchange thoughts and ideas. That's what a free society is on paper and in practice. For anyone to disrupt or degrade that process is criminal in the eyes of the law. 

Obama's abuses of executive privilege has also led to a lawsuit against him from members of the U.S. Congress. The lawsuit is not without merit, but look for a judge to be corrupted to state otherwise. America is a democracy and the constitution should be followed, as it is a great document. However, Obama is on a power trip, running up the national debt and arrogantly punishing his law abiding foes for constitutionally speaking their mind in conduct that is ugly and very unbecoming. 

History is watching and recording the truth. At this rate he is going to go down in American and world history as a despot (only George W. Bush has done worse in the White House). Obama has forsaken that which is good and replaced it with tyranny, corruption and autocratic rule, eroding innocent people's rights, privacy and finances. That is inexcusable and deserves the strongest legal rebuke possible under the law. 

Now the president and leading Democrats are alarmed and terrified throwing around the word "impeachment" around as a possible development they don't want. Really? If you don't want to get impeached, it's simple, don't do illegal things that can lead to impeachment. It's not rocket science.

STORY SOURCE

Dr. Ben Carson says President Obama should protect Christians from persecution

By admin in Christian News · August 8, 2014 - According to the retired neurosurgeon, Ben Carson, if the current U.S. administration keeps ignoring religious persecution in other countries, it may soon find itself in a similar position of intolerance and violence within its own walls. 

Carson goes on to state that, since President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize earlier in his career, he has the opportunity to help those who are being persecuted around the world. He adds, however, that although Obama is a self professed Christian, he has declared that the U.S. is not a Judeo-Christian nation. 

The surgeon who is credited with being the first to successfully separate conjoined twins joined at the head, believes that it is the duty of the U.S. to show those who are committing murder for religious reasons, that it will not be tolerated. Although he firmly believes that the U.S. should not try to be the world’s police, he is adamant that if they allow this violence against Christians to continue, they will be opening the doors to further persecution within their own borders. 

The murder of Christians by religious zealots, some of whom are being beheaded for their faith, and the slaughter of innocent children and r@pe of women, must not be allowed to continue, states the 62-year-old recipient of the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2008. 

After becoming a popular conservative figure in the political media, when he publicly criticized President Obama at the 2013 National Prayer Breakfast, Carson has often spoken out on religious persecution and his firm belief in the return to old Christian values. He believes that American people should show how compassionate they are by defending the rights of those who are being persecuted for their religious freedom beliefs. 

“We have an obligation as Americans to denounce these acts of persecution. Even those who do not worship a higher deity should be concerned,” wrote Carson. He continued, “For when we stand up to such intolerance, we are defending the root of freedom. We are defending choice — the ability to worship and call on the name of a heavenly being without fear of torture and abandonment.” 

However, the potential candidate for the 2016 Presidential election also believes that the U.S. needs to start showing more tolerance for the views and beliefs of others. He adds that for a few people to complain about a Christmas tree being erected in a community that has done so for countless generations, is showing that we have no respect for the majority wishes of others.
 

Eric Bolling: I Was Audited After Criticizing Obama

May 16, 2013 - FOX NEWS INSIDER - Press Secretary Jay Carney defended the Obama administration as it faces scrutiny for the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups. Today on The Five, Eric Bolling voiced his concern, saying, "2011, I was pretty vocal against four more years of President Obama. […] I don’t know if it’s coincidence or not but I did get an IRS audit in 2012 for my 2011 tax returns. I’m not sure if there’s any correlation." Andrea Tantaros commented, "It’s the Chicago way. [Obama] said he would change D.C. and the way they do business. Boy, has he ever."
 

Reporter: IRS Pressured Me After I Asked Obama Tough Questions

KMOV’s Larry Conners says "the IRS has been pressuring me" since his April, 2012 interview with the president. "Can I prove it? At this time, no." Update: Corporate says Conners allegations are "" posted on May 14, 2013 at 11:43am EDT. WASHINGTON — A Missouri reporter is wondering if the IRS came after him after he asked President Obama tough questions in a White House interview last year.From the Facebook page of KMOV’s Larry Conners: 

Shortly after I did my April 2012 interview with President Obama, my wife, friends and some viewers suggested that I might need to watch out for the IRS. I don’t accept "conspiracy theories", but I do know that almost immediately after the interview, the IRS started hammering me.

At the time, I dismissed the "co-incidence", but now, I have concerns … after revelations about the IRS targeting various groups and their members. Originally, the IRS apologized for red-flagging conservative groups and their members if they had "Tea Party" or "patriot" in their name.

Today, there are allegations that the IRS focused on various groups and/or individuals questioning or criticizing government spending, taxes, debt or how the government is run … any involved in limiting/expanding government, educating on the constitution and bill of rights, or social economic reform/movement. 

In that April 2012 interview, I questioned President Obama on several topics: the Buffet Rule, his public remarks about the Supreme Court before the ruling on the Affordable Care Act. I also asked why he wasn’t doing more to help Sen. Claire McCaskill who at that time was expected to lose. The Obama interview caught fire and got wide-spread attention because I questioned his spending. I said some viewers expressed concern, saying they think he’s "out of touch" because of his personal and family trips in the midst of our economic crisis. The President’s face clearly showed his anger; afterwards, his staff which had been so polite … suddenly went cold. That’s to be expected, and I can deal with that just as I did with President George H. Bush’s staff when he didn’t like my questions. Journalistic integrity is of the utmost importance to me. My job is to ask the hard questions, because I believe viewers have a right to be well-informed. I cannot and will not promote anyone’s agenda - political or otherwise - at the expense of the reporting the truth.

What I don’t like to even consider … is that because of the Obama interview … the IRS put a target on me. Can I prove it? At this time, no. But it is a fact that since that April 2012 interview … the IRS has been pressuring me. Update: Conners said his bosses don’t want him to talk about the Facebook post." I’m sorry, but I just was told … Corporate does not want me to do any interviews," he said in an email to BuzzFeed. "Sorry."
 
 
IRS Rep Told Dr. James Dobson They Wouldn’t Approve His Application Because He Had Been “Critical Of President”

May, 18, 2013 — Dr. James Dobson was a guest on the Hannity show Friday night to talk about the run-around his Christian, pro-family, group, Family Talk Action got from the IRS when they applied for a 501(c)(4), a process he said “went on and on and on” for 19 months. 

When his lawyer called the IRS to find out what the problem was, an IRS rep named Medley told him, “we don’t think we’re going to approve your application.” And when he asked, “why not? She answered, because you’re a right wing organization, and you’re political, and you’ve been critical of the President and we don’t think you give other people an opportunity to express their views, and besides that – you’re not educational.” An answer Dr. Dobson took great umbrage at. 

“Do you want to rewrite your application and resubmit it?” she asked. He answered, “no, we’ll just have to litigate”, and about eight days later they gave them their 501(c)(4).  Obama definitely set the tone for these abuses. “Punish your my enemies”, he ordered from on high. The only question is whether he was ever more explicit, or personally aware that his minions in the IRS was doing his bidding. 

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Obama's National Security Agency Rejects German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Request To See Her NSA File


President Barack Obama

For several years the Judiciary Report has maintained that the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the latter an agency I’ve interacted with thanks to moronic Madonna and Rupert Murdoch’s unlawful conduct, have been illegally spying on Americans and global citizens (NSA Admits Employees Illegally Spied On Love Interests And Significant Others Confirming Site’s Previous Claims). Years after my sites made said claims, scandals broke in the mainstream press confirming my websites’ previous claims. 

As mentioned on the site last year, months before the National Security Agency's PRISM spying scandal broke regarding former computer contractor, Edward Snowden, bravely releasing documents and digital files confirming illegal spying activity by the government, I’d applied to the NSA for a copy of my file under the Freedom of Information Act. The NSA politely declined to give me my file. However, now I don’t feel so bad, because German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, was just denied a copy of her file as well. If she can't get her file there was next to no chance I would be getting mine.


Angela Merkel

Merkel is an ally of President Obama, but that didn’t stop him  from spying on his foreign counterpart, wiretapping her phones and hacking her emails. To honor the Freedom Of Information Act enacted by Congress and release her file to Chancellor Merkel, would confirm what Obama has questionably done, regarding her and others. 

The part I dislike about this and have from the start is when the government declines Freedom of Information Act requests, it gives the public the false impression you’ve done something you shouldn’t have for the government to have spied on you. However, as has been shown by the PRISM scandal, the government has been amassing illegal files on writers such as myself, whose websites or newspapers release articles with exclusives that breaks stories exposing unlawful conduct or items critical of the government violating the Constitution. 

The Judiciary Report also broke the news that connected writers, who receive tips the government would like to use before said items hit the internet and becomes public knowledge via articles, are also being spied on, which has since been confirmed (New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims).

STORY SOURCE

Angela Merkel denied access to her NSA file

Thursday 10 April 2014 13.31 EDT - Frustration with US government rises over failure to clear up questions about surveillance of German chancellor's phone. Angela Merkel, the German chancellor. The US government's refusal to allow Merkel access to her own NSA file contrasts with the ease with which Germans can see files relating to the activities of the Stasi. The US government is refusing to grant Angela Merkel access to her NSA file or answer formal questions from Germany about its surveillance activities, raising the stakes before a crucial visit by the German chancellor to Washington. 

Merkel will meet Barack Obama in three weeks, on her first visit to the US capital since documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA had been monitoring her phone. The face-to-face meeting between the two world leaders had been intended as an effort to publicly heal wounds after the controversy, but Germany remains frustrated by the White House's refusal to come clean about its surveillance activities in the country.

In October, Obama personally assured Merkel that the US is no longer monitoring her calls, and promised it will not do so in the future. However, Washington has not answered a list of questions submitted by Berlin immediately after Snowden's first tranche of revelations appeared in the Guardian and Washington Post in June last year, months before the revelations over Merkel's phone...  

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

The Guardian Newspaper And Washington Post Receive Pulitzer Prize For Work With Edward Snowden On NSA Spying



Edward Snowden

The Guardian newspaper in London, England and the Washington Post in America have won the prestigious Pulitzer Prize for their insightful coverage of the NSA Prism scandal, as revealed by former National Security Agency contractor, Edward Snowden. Congrats! It is well deserved. The American people needed to receive confirmation of the vast spying network both the Bush and then Obama administrations have utilized in violation of the Constitution. 

The Judiciary Report and its sister site the Sound Off Column first reported of it in 2006 and 2007, from personal experience in dealing with the FBI, regarding Anthony Pellicano (who is now in prison) and the phone hacking scandal, which I broke first, after being target by media maggot, Rupert Murdoch and his fellow Kabbalah Center member Madonna. 

At the end of the day, privacy is paramount. The American people and citizens of the world as a whole, deserve privacy and to be afforded dignity in not being spied on. The innocent should not suffer because of those doing wrong in society. There exists a better way to patrol criminal activity.

RELATED ARTICLES