Hillary Clinton And Huma Abedin's Lesbian Relationship

 
Hillary to Huma: I'll email you tonight for a booty call

An email published by the U.S. government as a part of their criminal investigation into presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, revealed she invited her top assistant and lesbian lover, Huma Abedin, into her bedroom. The email was sent by Hillary at 12:21AM, which is well outside of normal office hours. In the email Hillary states to Huma, "Sorry--I'm up now so come when you are able. Just knock on the door to the bedroom if it's closed." Straight women don't send each other such messages. That was a lesbian booty call. 

Years ago, Rupert Murdoch's newspapers, famous for obtaining information via illegal wiretaps, phone hacking, computer hacking, stalking and bribery, exposed the fact Hillary and Huma are sex partners. Murdoch's employees were arrested and convicted in the phone hacking scandal in Britain, for illegally spying on others. 

 

 
Hillary Clinton's email to lover Huma Abedin released by the U.S. government as a part of a criminal probe

Another published report revealed Hillary massaged Huma's shoulders in an affectionate way. Straight female friends usually don't do that. The Daily Mail reported, "She (Hillary) placed both hands on Huma's neck and began massaging her shoulders. 'Huma smiled, but looked embarrassed,' recalled one of Hillary's oldest friends."

Huma and Hillary even went to the gay pride parade in New York without Bill Clinton. Straight female friends usually don't do that. Gay couples do. Hillary Clinton is a hypocrite for speaking to the American people about honesty and integrity, while living a double life behind closed doors in an open, corrupted marriage full of adultery and deceit on both sides.

Side Bar: All I know is the Saudi Arabian terrorists Huma has ties to better pay her extra for having sex with Hillary Clinton. Ain't no job worth that (LOL).

STORY SOURCE

HILLARY TO HUMA: ‘Just knock on door to the bedroom if it’s closed’

August 31, 2016 - Now that Huma Abedin is a single lady, her close relationship with Hillary Clinton is only likely to grow, given all the extra time she now has. Evidence of that appears in Clinton’s emails, including this one from 2009: Hillary Huma sleeping. “Checked on you but you were sleeping,” Abedin wrote to Clinton at 7:44 p.m. on Sunday, November 1. “I’m up now so come when you are able,” Clinton replied later that night at 12:21 a.m. “Just knock on the door to the bedroom if it’s closed.”

 

The full extent of their relationship is not known, but Abedin is with Hillary virtually everywhere she goes. The two even appeared together at the New York City Pride parade, while Bill Clinton was nowhere to be found.

http://www.theamericanmirror.com

EXCLUSIVE: How Hillary Clinton massaged 'embarrassed' Huma Abedin's shoulders at an intimate Chappaqua get-together and jealous Chelsea treats Huma with undisguised contempt (when her mother isn't around) 

New York Times bestselling author Ed Klein has just published his fourth book about the Clintons since 2005, Guilty as Sin. Huma Abedin becomes a 'shy little girl' when 'Hillary displays interest in her.'

Chelsea Clinton's relationship with Abedin is 'remote and cold' and they have what appears to be a sibling rivalry. Clinton once called FBI director James Comey an 'a**hole', saying he'd 'been after' her for years. Said Bernie Sanders 's**t' all over her presidential nomination. She also called Sanders a 'weasel' after he vowed to take the fight for a socialist 'revolution' all the way to the DNC in late July.

Published: 09:30 EDT, 1 November 2016 | Updated: 10:32 EDT, 1 November 2016 - New York Times bestselling author Ed Klein has just published his fourth book about the Clintons since 2005, Guilty as Sin. Klein had told how Bill Clinton enjoyed foot rubs, massages and romps in his presidential library with female interns and has described new details about Hillary's medical crises. In this exclusive excerpt he explains Hillary's relationship with top aide Huma Abedin. Guilty as Sin is available in bookstores and for order from Amazon.

Huma Abedin came down the stairs in Chappaqua, rubbing her puffy eyes and looking a bit disheveled. 'Did you get your power nap?' Hillary asked. She placed both hands on Huma's neck and began massaging her shoulders. 'Huma smiled, but looked embarrassed,' recalled one of Hillary's oldest friends, who had been invited along with a group of women to spend the afternoon with Hillary, and who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the Chappaqua get together was private. 'Huma's tough, but there are times when she can look like a shy little girl, especially when Hillary displays an interest in her in front of other people.'... 

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Oliver Stone Slams Obama Administration As The Worst Privacy Invaders In American History

...And He Is Correct

 

Barack Obama

The Obama Administration is the most invasive in U.S. history. They are the worst privacy invaders America and the world has ever known. The levels they spy on people is astonishing. The spying includes wiretapping, computer and email hacking, webcam hacking to watch targets in their homes, audio bugs, hidden cameras and the misuse of GPS satellites, among other things.

 

 

"Snowden" film

Film director Oliver Stone, recently released the film "Snowden" about brave NSA whistleblower, Edward Snowden, who leaked documents that confirmed what the Judiciary Report has stated for years - the Obama Administration is illegally spying on many people for political advantage and financial gain. This illegal, fruitless spying has cost America a fortune.

 

Oliver Stone

Stone recently stated people are disillusioned by Obama, whom the public thought was "a man of integrity." He is anything but, which time will show. Stone also stated, "Obama has doubled down on the (George W.) Bush administration policies. He has created... the most massive global security surveillance state that's ever been seen, way beyond East Germany's Stasi, way beyond that. In the name of one thing -- terrorism -- to change all the rules is not a marginal response, it's an extreme response. Let's beware of fascists and tyrants who tell us 'we are going to protect you'. I don't want that."

STORY SOURCE

Obama-era surveillance worse than Stasi, says Oliver Stone

September 22, 2016 - US film director Oliver Stone on Thursday accused President Barack Obama's administration of implementing a surveillance system worse than that of the feared Stasi secret police in East Germany. Speaking at the San Sebastian film festival in northern Spain, where he presented his film "Snowden," Stone said many in the US had grown disillusioned with a president they once saw as "a man of great integrity."...

https://www.yahoo.com

The Obama Administration Is Interfering In Civil And Criminal Court Cases In Violation Of The Law Corruptly Ordering Judges How To Rule And Bugging Trees And Rocks At Courthouses

And To Think Obama Is A Lawyer! Go Figure! #Crooked

Barack Obama

The Obama Administration, on President Barack Obama's orders, has been criminally interfering in civil and criminal court cases, in a brazen violation of the "Separation of Powers" also known as Checks and Balances, under the United States Constitution. America's "Separation of Powers" broke the U.S. government up into three branches: the Executive (President, Vice President), the Judicial (court system) and the legislative (Congress). However, President Obama is autocratically and criminally functioning as all three and very poorly might I add. 

However, Obama's FBI and CIA have been criminally meddling in civil cases, as well as criminal cases, illegally telling judges how to rule in violation of the law and citizens rights, clerks to engage in abusive behavior and file tampering, which all constitutes completely corrupt and illegal conduct worthy of imprisonment. It's bad enough Obama has corrupted Congress and to the point they rammed through ObamaCare, the president's dodgy health plan that has led to patient deaths via doctors and hospitals cutting corners, without even reading its 10,000 pages of legislative national financial disaster and debt. 

Obama has been criminally meddling in the court system, in some cases having the White House personally calling judges to order them to rule in the manner Emperor Obama states, which is illegal. Why are FBI and CIA agents skulking around select U.S. courthouses and having private conversations with judges. It has a horrible look of impropriety (much like Bill Clinton meeting with Loretta Lynch). It is all disgustingly corrupt. 

There were report in the news recently about the FBI skulking around courthouses and other public places in America and installing hidden listening devices on trees and under rocks, among other locations, hiding the surveillance items to secretly spy on innocent people. This is a criminal violation of "Attorney Client Privilege" as some of the cases being heard in said courts involve President Obama, his policies, his cronies and campaign donors, as well as the FBI and CIA. The Obama Administration is insane and paranoid to be doing this. 

RELATED READING

Hidden Microphones Exposed As Part of Government Surveillance Program In The Bay Area
 

May 13, 2016 6:24 PM - OAKLAND (CBS SF) — Hidden microphones that are part of a clandestine government surveillance program that has been operating around the Bay Area has been exposed. Imagine standing at a bus stop, talking to your friend and having your conversation recorded without you knowing. It happens all the time, and the FBI doesn’t even need a warrant to do it. 

Federal agents are planting microphones to secretly record conversations. Jeff Harp, a KPIX 5 security analyst and former FBI special agent said, “They put microphones under rocks, they put microphones in trees, they plant microphones in equipment. I mean, there’s microphones that are planted in places that people don’t think about, because that’s the intent!” 

FBI agents hid microphones inside light fixtures and at a bus stop outside the Oakland Courthouse without a warrant to record conversations, between March 2010 and January 2011. Federal authorities are trying to prove real estate investors in San Mateo and Alameda counties are guilty of bid rigging and fraud and used these recordings as evidence. Harp said, “An agent can’t just go out and grab a recording device and plant it somewhere without authorization from a supervisor or special agent in charge.” 

The lawyer for one of the accused real estate investors who will ask the judge to throw out the recordings, told KPIX 5 News that, “Speaking in a public place does not mean that the individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy…private communication in a public place qualifies as a protected ‘oral communication’… and therefore may not be intercepted without judicial authorization.” 

Harp says that if you’re going to conduct criminal activity, do it in the privacy of your own home. He says that was the original intention of the Fourth Amendment, but it’s up to the judge to interpret it.

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com

RELATED ARTICLES

New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims

FBI Agent Arrested For Accepting A $200,000 Bribe To Derail A Criminal Case The FBI Was Supposed To Be Investigating

Human Rights Activists Slam The FBI After It Is Discovered They Became The World's Top Distributor Of Child Porn

NSA Admits Employees Illegally Spied On Love Interests And Significant Others Confirming Site’s Previous Claims

NSA Workers Admit To Reading The Emails And Listening To The Calls Of Americans In Violation Of The Law

The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right

Judge Rules The NSA Illegally Spied On Americans Confirming The Site's Previous Claims (Video)

IRS Says Sorry For Targeting Conservatives As Obama Denies All Knowledge Of Misconduct

Another FBI Agent Caught Taking Bribes To Derail Serious Cases (Video)

News Report: The IRS Targeted Christians

Heads Of State Should Act Moderately And In A Conciliatory Manner While In Office

 

Gopher hiding in his hole cautiously surfaces...like some former heads of state

 

Some have referred to power as a drug (and a few heads of state have literally been on drugs). Some politicians take office and go on massive power trips after being elected. They engage in egregious, harmful behavior, abusing their authority to hurt the financial, social, emotional and sometimes physical safety of others. Some behave like tyrants, indulging in abusive, mean spirited behavior, fully believing the hype of being elected. However, at the end of the day, being elected head of state just means you won a popularity contest. It is what you do with it during your time in office that determines whether you will go down in history as a hero or villain, human rights activist or human rights abuser.

What I always find ironic is some, not all, heads of state having a total inability to think ahead. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to know choices have consequences. You won't always be head of state. What happens when you are out of office, a new government is elected and you, your family and former government employees have to deal with real life outside the confines of being head of state. When it's over you and yours have to deal with enemies you've made and people you abused while on a power trip when in office. Hence some former heads of state retiring to heavily guarded private homes and rarely surfacing (for further reference: see George W. Bush).

RELATED ARTICLES

Why Is The Obama Administration Contacting The Family And Friends Of Journalists And Bloggers Harassing Them On His Behalf Over His Press Clippings

New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims

Obama Criminally Targeting The Guardian Newspaper In London With No Legal Mandate Or Jurisdictional Right

Obama’s War On Journalists Evident In The Case Of CBS News Journalist Sharyl Attkisson Among Others

World Leaders Blaming Obama For Brexit

Russia:Obama Is Protecting ISIS

Obama Criminally Targeting The Guardian Newspaper In London With No Legal Mandate Or Jurisdictional Right

Barack Obama

U.S. President, Barack Obama, has been illegally operating in Britain, targeting employees of the Guardian Newspaper, among other people, over exposés they published regarding the crimes he has been committing from office in the United States. Obama has criminally sent the FBI and CIA into Britain, to illegally engage in vindictive, adverse conduct against employees of the Guardian Newspaper, having no legal mandate to do so. 

The Obama Administration has been criminally spying on employees of the Guardian, viciously targeting them and their families for harassment and "neutralization" constituting criminal violations of British and international law. Meddlesome, imperialistic Obama has violated his oath of office in America in doing so, in conduct that brought harm to Britons.

Obama is criminally abusing and spying on Britons and his behavior that is completely criminal and disgusting in this regard. It's called Great Britain, not Great Barack and there's nothing great about your behavior Obama. Get out of their country and stop behaving like a criminal. It is very unbecoming to do such things. Exactly who do you think you are to be engaging in this illegality and arrogance. It's bad enough when you abuse American journalists in the United States, but attacking foreign writers over their right to free speech is despicable as well and even more illegal due to jurisdictional issues. 

Failing to think ahead beyond one's time in office is a weak point of some heads of state. Some arrogantly and recklessly engage in egregious behavior in office, not thinking ahead to a time they will no longer be in charge. The Obama name is so muddied all over the world due to his behavior in a number of international countries, it is passing on a terrible legacy to his family members, who will have to live with that name and the negative sentiments now attached to it. People do and further will remember the abuses Obama has committed against innocent people in America and the world and associate it with his family.

RELATED ARTICLES

Why Is The Obama Administration Contacting The Family And Friends Of Journalists And Bloggers Harassing Them On His Behalf Over His Press Clippings

 

 The Obama Administration Plans To Give The NSA The Ability To Spy On Americans And Global Citizens To Greater Degrees For Illegal Reasons 

 

  Barack Obama Curses And Slams British Prime Minister David Cameron As 'Distracted' But He Is The Biggest Distraction Of All

Obama's FBI Is Engaging In A Vicious Criminal Pattern Of Abuse And Brutalization Against Innocent Jamaicans - Part 2 (MURDER)

Obama's FBI Is Engaging In A Vicious Criminal Pattern Of Abuse And Brutalization Against Innocent Jamaicans

Obama’s War On Journalists Evident In The Case Of CBS News Journalist Sharyl Attkisson Among Others

CBS News Hacks U.S. Congressman's Phone Confirming Previous Site Claims

Congressman Ted Lieu
 

In the May 7, 2010 Judiciary Report article "The FBI And Mobile Phone Spying" and the April 28, 2011 article "Rupert Murdoch Compromised National Security With Illegal Phone Hacking And Wiretapping" the site stated:

"The U.S. Congress has failed to stop this criminal misconduct, which some of them have benefited from and illegally so. However, whether they realize it or not, the aforementioned misuse of technology, poses a severe danger to national security. If a non-government worker or foreign entity, secretly uses the aforementioned tactics on members of Congress, they could listen into high ranking, classified, closed session meetings, simply by targeting a senator's mobile phone, with inexpensive malware and spyware. 

If they target the mobile phones belonging to the family members of Congress people, they could also spy on the entire family in their home, by default and eventually hear and see things they are not entitled to under the law, which could also damage national security. After all, many people take their work home."

 
Congressman Ted Lieu on his mobile phone
 

Years after the Judiciary Report's aforementioned 2010 and 2011 articles, in April 2016 the CBS News program "60 Minutes" hacked the mobile phone of Congressman Ted Lieu of California, with his consent, to show him it could be done. They were able to secretly listen into his calls, conversations and track him everywhere he went. Lieu, who has a degree in computer science was astonished. 

Lieu stated of the hacking and GPS stalking via his mobile phone, "It was really creepy that they knew where I was even though the GPS was turned off. I always sort of thought that whatever I say on my phone or type in my computer … other people will potentially see it. Now it’s very real to me. This flaw affects everybody. It affects daily life. There are just thousands of ways this flaw affects commerce … and national security. I’m sure the Donald Trump campaign would love to know what the Ted Cruz campaign manager is saying on his cellphone." 

STORY SOURCE

Congressman Calls for Cellphone Hacking Investigation After CBS Program

Tuesday, April 19, 2016 at 5:41 pm  - WASHINGTON (Los Angeles Times/TNS) - U.S. Rep. Ted Lieu (D-California) is asking for a congressional investigation after an episode of a CBS program in which his phone was hacked to show how easy it is. In a segment that aired Sunday night, the news program purchased an iPhone in New York and sent it to Lieu in California. Lieu, who has a computer science degree from Stanford, agreed to use the phone as his personal device for a week. 

CBS then gave the phone’s number to a German company that looks for security flaws in technology, and two German hackers were able to easily listen to Lieu’s phone calls. Lieu said that when he showed up to tape the segment in Washington, the hackers had told producers which hotel he’d stayed at the night before.“It was really creepy that they knew where I was even though the GPS was turned off,” he said by phone Monday. 

The segment also shows different hackers demonstrating a technique that allowed them to access reporter Sharyn Alfonsi’s emails, ride-sharing account and credit card information when she got onto a fake wireless internet network made to look like it belonged to the hotel where she was staying. 

Lieu said he’s always tried to be careful what he writes and says, but the experience has him thinking about how many elected officials are using phones that might have been hacked. He also has been using encrypted messaging systems. “I always sort of thought that whatever I say on my phone or type in my computer … other people will potentially see it,” he said. “Now it’s very real to me.”...

http://hamodia.com

Supreme Court Unconstitutionally Grants The FBI The Right To Hack Any Computer Anywhere In The World

 

FBI Director James Comey, former FBI Director Robert Mueller and U.S. President Barack Obama

 

Privacy advocates have slammed the Supreme Court's decision to grant the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) the right to hack any computer anywhere in the world without a warrant (they've been doing this for years anyway, now they're trying to make it legal). This means there will be no accountability and scores of violations of international law, when the hacking extends into foreign countries in an imperialistic manner. This is a massive overreach that is unconstitutional. 

The Obama administration has destroyed the American people's privacy to terrible degrees. Obama has used the NSA, FBI and CIA, to spy on Americans in egregious, illegal ways that constitute awful privacy violations. If Obama's family were subjected to the same privacy violations he has rubberstamped as president, he would be outraged. 

Newsweek stated of the decision, "These amendments will have significant consequences for Americans’ privacy and the scope of the government’s powers to conduct remote surveillance and searches of electronic devices...these are complex issues involving privacy, digital security and our Fourth Amendment rights, which require thoughtful debate and public vetting."

The Judiciary Report is of the opinion, with the FBI openly allowed to hack computers domestically and internationally, you will see a massive increase in retaliatory hacks from foreign governments, angry the agency is stepping on their toes, running roughshod over fellow sovereign nations via computer intrusion. 

STORY SOURCE

Supreme Court Allows FBI to Hack Any Computer Anywhere With a Warrant

By Seung Lee On 5/1/16 at 10:02 AM - Thanks to a Supreme Court decision on Thursday, law enforcement agencies including the FBI may end up with broad powers to hack any computer, regardless of its physical location—but the expansion of power hinges upon congressional approval. 

With a new rule change in the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedures, which covers search and seizure protocols, federal judges would be able to issue warrants to search computers located anywhere in the world. Before the Supreme Court’s alteration, federal magistrate judges were allowed only to issue warrants within their own jurisdictions. The Supreme Court submitted the changes to Congress as a part of the court’s annual review of the procedures, which were passed by Congress in 1938 for a more uniform way of dealing with criminal cases across the country.

At least one senator and several privacy rights organizations called the decision an affront to civil rights and a doorway to unchecked government hacking. Congress has until December 1 to amend or block the Supreme Court decision. Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon has publicly slammed the decision on Twitter and said he will propose a bill to reverse it. 

“These amendments will have significant consequences for Americans’ privacy and the scope of the government’s powers to conduct remote surveillance and searches of electronic devices,” Wyden says in a statement. “These are complex issues involving privacy, digital security and our Fourth Amendment rights, which require thoughtful debate and public vetting.”... 

http://www.newsweek.com

RELATED ARTICLES
 
New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims
 
NSA Admits Employees Illegally Spied On Love Interests And Significant Others Confirming Site’s Previous Claims
 
NSA Workers Admit To Reading The Emails And Listening To The Calls Of Americans In Violation Of The Law
 
Judge Rules The NSA Illegally Spied On Americans Confirming The Site's Previous Claims (Video)
 
News Report: The IRS Targeted Christians (Confirming Previous Site Claims)

Barack Obama Curses And Slams British Prime Minister David Cameron As 'Distracted' But He Is The Biggest Distraction Of All

Barack Obama
 

The Judiciary Report has broken a number of time-stamped stories that later proved 100% true and correct, among them are exclusives on the Obama Administration such as:

NSA Workers Admit To Reading The Emails And Listening To The Calls Of Americans In Violation Of The Law
Judge Rules The NSA Illegally Spied On Americans Confirming The Site's Previous Claims (Video)
NSA Admits Employees Illegally Spied On Love Interests And Significant Others Confirming Site’s Previous Claims
New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims
News Report: The IRS Targeted Christians (Confirming Previous Site Claims)

Here's another exclusive. U.S. President, Barack Obama, has slammed British Prime Minister, David Cameron as “distracted” on Libya, claiming he turned it into a “s**t show” in what is profane speech, not befitting any head of state. Bear in mind, Britain is America’s top ally. Yet, Obama thinks this disgraceful public characterization is appropriate. Obama must be smoking and sniffing something...again. 

Maybe if Obama and his psychopathic FBI and CIA, with his knowledge and consent, would stop sending the British government shocking, deranged, demented requests, asking them to spy on and harm the interests and well being of select Britons and international citizens living in Britain, Cameron wouldn't be "distracted" as you put it. 

The Obama Administration’s strange, vindictive, vengeful vendettas against his outspoken critics is quite appalling and a gross and egregious abuse of his position as President of the United States. This criminal misconduct from Obama and his Administration is also a serious abuse of the special relationship the U.S. and U.K. governments have long shared. 

Obama’s seething hatred for Britain, stemming from his militant father, Barack Obama Sr, who resented the United Kingdom’s presence in his native Kenya, is the source of this unrelenting madness (parents need to be careful of what they teach their offspring, as hatred can go a far way and end up harming innocent people, when your hateful spawn decides to act out in hatred as Obama has been doing, in what is poor parenting on his father's part). 

Obama and his father resent Britain for colonizing Kenya, yet, Obama is hypocritically and autocratically trying to maintain an illegal and abusive presence in Britain at the British people’s expense and that of the U.S. government’s name in the world, to target his perceived enemies in the United Kingdom. Lawsuits have been filed against Obama in America regarding his deranged "enemies list" of people he is unconstitutionally and illegally targeting in America and the world, in acts of criminal mischief from the White House.

David Cameron (center)
 

Obama has been harassing and haranguing the British government (and select other world governments) into doing his criminal bidding regarding abusing innocent people he deems enemies for the things they have publicly said and or written about him on television, in newspapers and online. When Obama does not get his way regarding foreign politicians who are appalled and do not wish to break the law perversely targeting innocent people, he maliciously issues threats against them, via the State Department, to expose private failings the FBI, CIA and NSA discovered via illegal spying, such as extramarital affairs or other embarrassing secrets.

In the case of third world countries America gives financial aid, Obama has threatened to cut off all financial aid if foreign politicians in said territories of the world do not break the law as he asks them to, demanding assistance in committing egregious human rights abuses against innocent people. This criminal misconduct is extraordinarily arrogant and wicked on the president's part, as it is U.S. taxpayer money, not his personal funds as he couldn't afford it, regularly given to help the poor and suffering in the third world.

If Obama still does not get his way after issuing numerous threats, he simply runs roughshod over other world governments in illegally sending the FBI and CIA to their nations to engage in criminal activity against innocent people, who publicly criticize or lawfully oppose him on television, in print or online. This is a criminal misuse of U.S. taxpayer money at the hands of a vindictive, malicious president. These lawbreaking FBI and CIA agents are given lavish spending accounts as compensation for going into foreign nations and criminally breaking the law.

Obama’s abusive conduct in the international community in this regard is no secret to a number of world governments and select citizens. People are talking about it. Obama is deluding himself to think it will remain secret, as he has engaged in egregious misconduct that harmed innocent people, both young and old in Britain and other nations, with this appalling behavior. Anyone engaging in acts that endangered and or harmed the young and elderly is truly evil. It is abominable, disgusting and despicable. In another sick twist, many of the people being targeted by Obama, his FBI and CIA, are foreign women, which is very misogynistic and evil. This is not conduct worthy of praise.

New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller

 

Obama and his FBI and CIA have threaten people in foreign nations to fire folks from their jobs. He has sent the FBI and CIA to attack their families. They have threatened people in foreign nations over the medical treatment of their children if Obama doesn't get his unlawful way regarding human rights abuses against their parents or their parent's relatives he is targeting like a madman. He has demanded world governments get abusive with his outspoken critics in a manner the citizens of said foreign nations would openly condemn. He is selfish, cruel, mean-spirited and arrogant to make such sick requests of foreign governments, placing them in jeopardy with their own constituents. 

Obama has engaged in this criminal activity in America and narcissistically expects foreign governments to follow him in this madness. American politicians, Dr. Ben Carson referred to Obama as "a psychopath" and Dr. Alan Keyes referred to him as “abusive“ and they are both right. His behavior is very alarming and indicates a serious underlying problem.

Rational people will see Obama’s conduct for what it is - criminal - as he has no legal mandate to operate in these foreign nations he is intrusively demanding unlawful conduct from, ordering them to abuse innocent people he deems enemies. However, brainwashed sycophants clinging to his post as the first black President of the United States will try to reason it away. And time will show them they were wrong. 

At the end of the day, no matter what color you are, you should not be sending vile requests to foreign nations asking them to harm innocent people in their domain to satisfy your narcissistic, vengeful urges and evil streak. It does not serve the greater good. It causes division in the world. It is also an embarrassment to the United States government. 

CIA Director John Brennan

As a Jamaican whose nation was apart of the slave trade conducted by Britain, we have tried to move forward from past hurts in an effort to maintain a good relationship with Britain. Many Jamaicans visit Britain and vice versa, in the spirit of brotherhood and sisterhood. If we can do this after slavery, how is it Obama, a supposedly civil man of Kenyan extraction, can’t do so. 

Obama's first act as President of the United States was to rudely remove a Churchill bust from the Oval Office in the White House and send it back to Britain, a nation that had sent it as a gift to America, not Obama, who took it upon himself to do this. Let that sink in. Obama's first act in office was to spit in the British people's face. It was ill-mannered and very low brow. I expect more from an educated man whose mother tried to teach him right from wrong in lessons that clearly didn't stick. Obama’s recent comments about the British government and Cameron shows he is still seething in that hatred his father sowed to his detriment. 

Once again, why is Obama sending the British government (and other world governments) harmful, divisive requests that if the contents ever went public, the U.S. Congress would do one of two things from sheer public shame, outcry, humiliation and embarrassment - indict or institutionalize him (and they do know about Obama's behavior in this regard, but as it is secret, they've negligently allowed it). The American people don’t deserve such piss poor representation in the world. Stop trying to settle your ancestral scores and narcissistic vendettas over your bad press at the expense of the American government's name in the world. Show some decorum and integrity.

STORY SOURCE 

Peace out, fools! Obama plays the clown by flashing the peace sign for nuclear security summit 'team photo'... and gets a very unimpressed look from David Cameron and bemused world leaders

Published: 13:55 EST, 1 April 2016 - All eyes were on Obama as 54 other presidents and prime ministers joined him in Washington, DC, for crunch talks on Iran and terrorist threats involving nuclear weapons. There was one set of eyes, however, that was particularly focused on the President - those of Prime Minister David Cameron. 

Relations between Cameron and Obama have been strained since the President criticized the Prime Minister for getting 'distracted' during the crisis in Libya and turning it into a 's**t show'. There was more than metaphorical distance between the pair at today's summit, with Cameron only able to glare at Obama from across the podium as he was elbowed out to the edge of the stage...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Presidential candidate Ben Carson: Obama will look at the unemployment rate and then lie to you like a 'psychopath'

May 8, 2015, 9:31 AM - In a new CNBC interview published Friday, Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson explained why he thought the president acts like a "psychopath." Carson, a retired neurosurgeon and conservative author, pointed to what he called President Barack Obama's comfort in lying to the public. He cited the unemployment rate as an example of this. 

"I said he reminds you of a psychopath, because they tend to be extremely smooth, charming people who can tell a lie to your face with complete — it looks like sincerity, even though they know it's a lie," Carson told CNBC's John Harwood. "I think he knows full well that the unemployment rate is not 5.5%. He knows that."...

Carson, repeating an argument he has previously made, said Obama's administration was willing to manipulate the unemployment number to paint a more positive portrait of the economy. "He knows that people who are not well informed will swallow it hook, line, and sinker — even though they are sitting there in the city and can't find a job," Carson said. 

http://www.businessinsider.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Obama Administration’s War On Journalists, Bloggers And Whistleblowers Reaches Criminal Levels Reviving COINTELPRO With The Help Of The FBI, NSA And CIA

Why Is The Obama Administration Contacting The Family And Friends Of Journalists And Bloggers Harassing Them On His Behalf Over His Press Clippings

 

Obama Administration Speech Writers Illegally Spying On Reporters, Journalists And Bloggers Then Unlawfully Using The Data In The President's Speeches

New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims

NSA Admits Employees Illegally Spied On Love Interests And Significant Others Confirming Site's Previous Claims

NSA Workers Admit To Reading The Emails And Listening To The Calls Of Americans In Violation Of The Law

Obama's FBI Is Engaging In A Vicious Criminal Pattern Of Abuse And Brutalization Against Innocent Jamaicans

Judge Rules The NSA Illegally Spied On Americans Confirming The Site's Previous Claims (Video)

News Report: The IRS Targeted Christians

The FBI Finally Admits It Did Not Need Apple To Unlock Terrorist's iPhone In Power Grab

New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller

 

The Judiciary Report has been proven correct in its assertion the FBI lied about needing Apple to unlock the iPhone of the terrorist ringleader in the San Bernardino terrorist attack. In the March 11, 2016 article "FBI Using San Bernardino Terrorist Attack As A Power Grab At Apple" the site stated, "As the phrase goes, "Give them an inch and they will take a mile." Once the FBI gets a foothold, they will keep imposing and perversely go further each time. Furthermore, the FBI does not need Apple to unlock the phone. Others have unlocked iPhones. The FBI just wants to illegally control Apple in a bid to further spy on the masses. They are grossly overstepping their congressional mandate. It is arrogant, out of order and totalitarian in nature."

Two weeks later, on Monday, March 28, 2016, in an evening announcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and its parent agency the Department of Justice (DOJ) stated they are backing of Apple in the court case and have found an outside company to unlock the terrorist's iPhone. Yea, you do that (sarcasm). I told you guys the FBI was lying. They are a deceitful, treacherous, corrupt, lying agency, who are not to be trusted under any circumstances (they've caused innocent people's deaths, including children and separately framed innocent people New Evidence Reveals The FBI Sent Innocent People To Death Row and Man Wrongfully Imprisoned For 28-Years Due To FBI and The FBI Still Framing People For Crimes and Wives Of Men Framed By The FBI Speak).

The FBI was about to greatly damage Apple, a company that legitimately employs thousands of people and actually makes America money, unlike the Federal Bureau Of Investigation, who keeps going to Congress with its hands outstretched accompanied by concocted stories and fake cases they've created, to demand more taxpayer money to spy on Americans and international citizens, in violation of the Constitution. 

The public does not believe the FBI as evidenced by tweets on social networking site Twitter

 

If the power grab had gone ahead through the courts, the public would have simply associated Apple with the FBI, branding them snitches controlled by the Feds, having embedded themselves in the company's products to spy on the masses and began avoiding their products. Apple makes good products and should be free from government interference of that nature. 

Hackers are nosy. The minute tech companies put out new products, hackers do their level best to take them apart and would brag online about any backdoors they've discovered. Congress was negligent in allowing the FBI and DOJ to file the court case against Apple, trying to take over a company they weren't smart enough to build. It was pure arrogance. Revelations of widespread National Security Agency (NSA) spying is proof federal law enforcement cannot be trusted with the public's privacy.  

There is something deeply perverted with people, government or civilian, who believe they are to be secretly spying on others. There is something mentally wrong in their brains to be doing this. Psychologists have written many papers on the subject. It is perverted, mentally ill voyeurism. Government officials have been forced to admit under oath and in Congress that all this spying has not stopped even one terrorist attack. It's just an excuse to spy on people.

Select members of government are using illegal spying for undue enrichment to commit insider trading, financial theft, corporate theft, gain information of political rivals to get in office and secure lucrative jobs and in some cases spy on their significant others (an exclusive the Judiciary Report broke first).

STORY SOURCE

Read Apple's response to the FBI's San Bernardino iPhone hack

From the beginning, we objected to the FBI's demand that Apple build a backdoor into the iPhone because we believed it was wrong and would set a dangerous precedent. As a result of the government's dismissal, neither of these occurred. This case should never have been brought. We will continue to help law enforcement with their investigations, as we have done all along, and we will continue to increase the security of our products as the threats and attacks on our data become more frequent and more sophisticated. 

Apple believes deeply that people in the United States and around the world deserve data protection, security and privacy. Sacrificing one for the other only puts people and countries at greater risk. This case raised issues which deserve a national conversation about our civil liberties, and our collective security and privacy. Apple remains committed to participating in that discussion. 

http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/28/11321700/apple-responds-fbi-iphone-hack

The Fight Between Apple And The FBI Is Just Getting Started

March 30, 2016 00:19 IST - Apple isn't the only company that is aiming to install greater encryption around products. Washington: The Justice Department has called off a high-profile legal battle with Apple after it was able to unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters without the company's help. But rather than resolve the fight, this latest development is likely to motivate Apple and other companies to strengthen the security of their devices even more and force the government to keep up with any new security measures, technology executives and security analysts said. 

"They're in an arms race," said Matthew Blaze, a cryptography researcher and professor at the University of Pennsylvania. "The FBI is trying to find new ways in and Apple is trying to find new ways to defend against that." Apple isn't the only company that is aiming to install greater encryption around products, which makes intrusions by hackers and government investigators alike much more difficult. 

The FBI case appears to have intensified efforts among tech companies such as Snapchat and Facebook to employ better encryption - a trend that began after Edward Snowden's revelations of government spying in 2013 and a massive wave of cyber-hacking in recent years. 

Cloud computing company Box, which filed a legal brief supporting Apple in the San Bernardino case, is one of the many tech firms rushing to offer new encryption-related security features. It recently launched a product, Keysafe, that allows corporate customers to hold on to their own encryption keys -- a move co-founder and chief executive Aaron Levie said was as much about fighting off hackers and cybercriminals as it was about fending off government surveillance. The implementation of Keysafe means the company cannot collect and hand over the private information of a customer even when the authorities have a warrant. 

http://www.ndtv.com

RELATED ARTICLES

The FBI Seeks To Take Over Apple In What Will Damage The Trillion Dollar Company If The Courts Allow It

FBI Using San Bernardino Terrorist Attack As A Power Grab At Apple

The FBI Seeks To Take Over Apple In What Will Damage The Trillion Dollar Company If The Courts Allow It

New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller. Comey was recently slammed in the legislature partly due to the fact "Congress is disturbed by his lack of tech knowledge"

Richard Clarke, a former senior counter-terrorism official who served under George W. Bush, is siding with Apple against the Federal Bureau Of Investigation (FBI), who have dragged the trillion dollar company into court for dubious, dishonest reasons. The FBI is seeking a court ruling to force Apple to unlock the iPhone of the main terrorist behind the San Bernardino attacks that occurred in December 2015.

Apple has resisted, as it would set a legal precedent allowing the FBI constant access to their computer systems, software and future innovations, for surreptitious spying purposes. This would greatly damage Apple, as the public would associate it with the FBI, an agency Americans historically hate and are rightfully suspicious of in many ways. Many articles and online comments reveal Americans hate the FBI. From the injustices of the civil rights era to the present, public contempt for the FBI has only grown.  

On March 14, 2016 counterterrorism official Clarke and others stated the same thing the Judiciary Report previously wrote days prior on March 11, 2016 in the "FBI Using San Bernardino Terrorist Attack As A Power Grab At Apple" article, revealing that the FBI does not need Apple to crack the iPhone of the terrorist. The reason I knew the FBI is lying about this matter regarding Apple is there is a mobile phone/internet shop in London I have used since 2012 to quickly access the internet while on the road and for 15 British pounds sterling, they unlock mobile phones in a few minutes to a half an hour. I've seen them do it. They ask a series of questions to ascertain ownership, then unlock the phone for the fee. It is not some clandestine shop. It is a licensed company providing many legal phone and internet services. 

There are other companies like it. There are similar companies in America as well. So, in short, the FBI is lying about being unable to unlock the mobile phone of the San Bernardino terrorist ringleader. There are companies who do these things. Not that many, but they exist and are not hard to find.

The FBI just wants an illegal foothold at Apple to violate the privacy of American and global citizens, ranging from everyday folks to billionaires to influential domestic and international politicians all over the world, who have Apple products such as iPhones. The FBI would then share this illegal stranglehold and spying foothold with the NSA and CIA (among others). Essentially, it would damage Apple beyond repair, harming a viable U.S. business that employs many people and accounts for a significant amount of revenue in America. 

The irony of it all is the arrogant psychopaths running the FBI and CIA are envious, ill willed, paranoid people resentful of those with valuable assets. The FBI and CIA can't replace the value of Apple once they damage and potentially destroy it with this madness. The FBI did not create Apple. The FBI are not intelligent enough to have done so, yet arrogantly think they should be in control of this company above their intelligence level and paid grade.

Exactly who do they think they are to be meddling in such an innovative, valuable company they do not even understand the inner workings of in any manner. Does the FBI realize how dumb they look to the public when they do such things. It's like watching a hyperactive, restless monkey take a paintbrush to a Picasso. You just know the painting is going to be irretrievably ruined and devalued.

But that's just it with the FBI, they are in their own strange world, detached from reality. Remember when the FBI arrogantly announced to the world they had come up with a new form of science to explain the anthrax case they stitched up and framed innocent scientist Bruce Ivins for, who ended up committing suicide due to severe FBI bullying, harassment and crazy threats from them against him, his family and friends (The FBI has been framing people for crimes: New Evidence Reveals The FBI Sent Innocent People To Death Row and Man Wrongfully Imprisoned For 28-Years Due To FBI and The FBI Still Framing People For Crimes and Wives Of Men Framed By The FBI Speak). 

When the FBI tried to explain the insane garbage they came up with that the agency branded a new type of science, every credible scientist in the world worth their salt pronounced it nonsensical garbage and idiocy. And it should alarm everyone that a crazy federal agency went that far, spending tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer money, to justify framing up an innocent man for a crime he did not commit, to meet an arrest quota. But here they go charging into Apple with their deranged behavior, "Like a bull in a China shop." And make no mistake, the brainless bull is going to destroy some fine China.  

The FBI at Apple is the equivalent of a "Bull In A China Shop"
 

In a similar case, the FBI insanely destroyed a man's multi-million dollar internet company, Lavabit, when he had done nothing wrong, all in a crazy attempt at getting at NSA whistle blower, Edward Snowden. The FBI is constantly engaging in crazy, damaging behavior that is stripping a fortune in value from companies it meddles in. It is one of the stupidest things I have ever witnessed and Congress is negligent to let their Frankenstein agencies such as the FBI and CIA run loose with such terrible behavior destroying innocent people's valuable businesses. It certainly isn't in the name of national security, as all this invasive spying the FBI, CIA and NSA has been doing has not prevented a single act of terrorism. The federal government had to admit this in Congress. 

They are destroying America with this madness. What kind of federal idiots do such a thing. It is an arrogant fool who thinks he or she is to play games with other people's valuable companies, property and assets they were not smart enough to build and earn themselves. There ought to be a law that if a government employee, including the head of state, engages in conduct that financially damages or destroys a valuable company, he or she should be promptly prosecuted, slapped with staggering fines equaling the financial loss/damage created by their arrogant conduct and sent to prison. 

STORY SOURCE

Congress is disturbed by the FBI director’s lack of tech knowledge
 

Mar 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM - A couple of weeks ago, the FBI and Apple faced off in a Congressional hearing and answered various questions fielded by members of the House Judiciary Committee. Now it appears that members of the committee, from both sides of the aisle, aren’t happy with FBI Director James Comey’ grasp of technology. 

According to Fast Company’s sources, members of the committee were unpleasantly surprised by Comey’s apparent unpreparedness to answer some of the more technical questions. On one hand, it’s great to see the chief of one of the most relevant law enforcement agencies in the world admit he’s not fully aware of all the technical aspects of encryption. On the other hand, Comey could have brought in aides to help him out with these questions, but he decided not to do it. 

Comey declined to answer several questions, explaining he lacked the technical understanding to do it. But he also proved he knows less than some of the members of the committee. Congressman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who has a security background, asked Comey about the FBI’s attempts to crack the iPhone 5c that belongs to Syed Farook. Issa knew there are two ways to do it, one involving Apple’s help (disabling the security features of iOS), and one that can be done by removing the flash memory chip from the phone and mirroring its contents. 

Issa wanted to find out if Comey knew for certain the FBI can’t break into the iPhone by itself, and Comey’s answers were not satisfactory. “We have engaged all parts of government to see if anybody has a way of doing this on an iPhone 5c running iOS 9, and we don’t,” Comey said. When asked about the mirroring technique, Comey seemed not to understand the question. 

“If you haven’t asked that question, how can you come before this committee and before a federal judge and demand that somebody else invent something if you can’t answer the questions that your people have tried this?” he asked Comey.  “First, I’m the director of the FBI. If I could answer that question there’d be something dysfunctional with my leadership,” Comey said. 

“I only asked you if your people have tried that, not whether or not it would work,” Issa continued. “Who did you go to to find out if you could do it yourself?” “I did not ask the questions you’re asking here today, and I’m not sure I even understand the questions,” Comey replied. “I have reasonable confidence, in fact, I have high confidence, that the federal government has reviewed all the options.”

“I’ve heard about mirroring, maybe that’s what you’re talking about. Hopefully, my folks are watching this, and if they hear any good ideas in what you’re talking about, we’ll let you know.” Democratic Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren admitted that Comey’s lack of knowledge is problematic for the entire debate. 

“It’s clear he’s not up to speed on some of the technical issues, which he conceded during the hearing,” Lofgren told Fast Company. “And that might be part of the problem as to why they are pursuing the course of action they are pursuing.” “The director can’t be expected to be an expert on every subject but I didn’t see him [bring any help into the meeting], which I thought was interesting,” she said. 

Other committee members did not comment on the matter. But committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) told the site that “the House Judiciary Committee will soon announce its next steps on the encryption debate.” “As we move forward, the goal is to find a solution that allows law enforcement to effectively enforce the law without harming the competitiveness of U.S. encryption providers or the privacy and security protections of U.S. citizens,” Goodlatte added. 

http://bgr.com

Counterterrorism expert says FBI isn’t being honest about iPhone hacking

By Buster Hein • 12:11 pm, March 14, 2016 - The guy that warned George Bush about an imminent al-Qaida attack before 9/11 is taking Apple’s side in the company’s fight against the FBI over whether it can be compelled to break into the San Bernardino terrorist’s iPhone. 

Richard Clarke, who served as the senior counterterrorism official in the US for nine years, sat down for an interview this morning regarding encryption and the FBI’s efforts to hack the iPhone. Despite FBI Director James Comey’s insistence that the FBI has tried everything, Clarke says all it would take to hack the device is a call to Fort Meade. 

“If I were in the job now, I would have simply told the FBI to call Fort Meade, the headquarters of the National Security Agency, and NSA would have solved this problem for him,” Clarke told NPR’s David Green on Morning Edition Monday. “They’re not as interested in solving this problem as they are in getting a legal precedent.” 

This is not the first time Director Comey has been accused of trying to set a legal precedent for forcing Apple to weaken security on iOS. Apple’s top lawyer Bruce Sewell argued the same thing before the House Judiciary committee earlier this year, while CEO Tim Cook has made numerous public statement on why the FBI’s demands put all citizens at risk. 

The FBI has insisted that it has no means to hack the iPhone 5c in question and that is only requesting help for one device. Apple has been asked to create a new version of iOS that would make it easier for the FBI to guess the terrorist’s passcode without the device auto-deleting its memory after too many failed attempts. Congress grilled Comey during his committee appearance about whether the agency has exhausted all its resources first. Clarke claims they’re not even trying to unlock it. 

“You really have to understand that the FBI director is exaggerating the need for this and is trying to build it up as an emotional case, organizing the families of the victims and all of that,” Clarke said. “It’s Jim Comey, and the attorney general is letting him get away with it. Every expert I know believes that NSA could crack this phone. They want the precedent that the government can compel a computer device manufacturer to allow the government in.” ...

http://www.cultofmac.com

A Government Error Just Revealed Snowden Was the Target in the Lavabit Case

Date of Publication: 03.17.16. - Time of Publication: 5:30 pm. - It’s been one of the worst-kept secrets for years: the identity of the person the government was investigating in 2013 when it served the secure email firm Lavabit with a court order demanding help spying on a particular customer. Ladar Levison, owner of the now defunct email service, has been forbidden since then, under threat of contempt and possibly jail time, from identifying who the government was investigating. In court documents from the case unsealed in late 2013, all information that could identify the customer was redacted. 

But federal authorities recently screwed up and revealed the secret themselves when they published a cache of case documents but failed to redact one identifying piece of information about the target: his email address, Ed_Snowden@lavabit.com. With that, the very authorities holding the threat of jail time over Levison’s head if he said anything have confirmed what everyone had long ago presumed: that the target account was Snowden’s.

The documents were posted on March 4 to the federal court system known as Pacer as part of Levison’s long battle for transparency in the case that ruined his business. They were spotted this week by the transparency site Cryptome and published online.  Here’s a quick recap of that case: On June 28, 2013, shortly after newspapers published the first NSA leaks from Snowden, FBI agents showed up at Levison’s door in Texas and served him with a pen register order requiring him to give the government metadata for the email activity of one customer’s account. 

The case was initially sealed and the public didn’t learn about it and the fight over Levison’s customer until after he had shuttered his email service in defiance of the government. But even after he closed Lavabit and there was no hope of the government obtaining information about the account that it had been seeking, the target was never identified. When some of the documents in the case were finally unsealed in redacted form in October 2013, however, the unredacted parts left little doubt that the Lavabit case was about Snowden, who was known to be using a Lavabit account in the spring of 2013 when his first NSA leaks were published and when he was hiding in a safe house in Hong Kong. It was still an educated guess, however... 

http://www.wired.com