Sunday, July 10, 2016

The Obama Administration Is Interfering In Civil And Criminal Court Cases In Violation Of The Law Corruptly Ordering Judges How To Rule And Bugging Trees And Rocks At Courthouses

And To Think Obama Is A Lawyer! Go Figure! #Crooked


Barack Obama

The Obama Administration, on President Barack Obama's orders, has been criminally interfering in civil and criminal court cases, in a brazen violation of the "Separation of Powers" also known as Checks and Balances, under the United States Constitution. America's "Separation of Powers" broke the U.S. government up into three branches: the Executive (President, Vice President), the Judicial (court system) and the legislative (Congress). However, President Obama is autocratically and criminally functioning as all three and very poorly might I add. 

However, Obama's FBI and CIA have been criminally meddling in civil cases, as well as criminal cases, illegally telling judges how to rule in violation of the law and citizens rights, clerks to engage in abusive behavior and file tampering, which all constitutes completely corrupt and illegal conduct worthy of imprisonment. It's bad enough Obama has corrupted Congress and to the point they rammed through ObamaCare, the president's dodgy health plan that has led to patient deaths via doctors and hospitals cutting corners, without even reading its 10,000 pages of legislative national financial disaster and debt. 

Obama has been criminally meddling in the court system, in some cases having the White House personally calling judges to order them to rule in the manner Emperor Obama states, which is illegal. Why are FBI and CIA agents skulking around select U.S. courthouses and having private conversations with judges. It has a horrible look of impropriety (much like Bill Clinton meeting with Loretta Lynch). It is all disgustingly corrupt. 

There were report in the news recently about the FBI skulking around courthouses and other public places in America and installing hidden listening devices on trees and under rocks, among other locations, hiding the surveillance items to secretly spy on innocent people. This is a criminal violation of "Attorney Client Privilege" as some of the cases being heard in said courts involve President Obama, his policies, his cronies and campaign donors, as well as the FBI and CIA. The Obama Administration is insane and paranoid to be doing this. 

RELATED READING

Hidden Microphones Exposed As Part of Government Surveillance Program In The Bay Area
 
May 13, 2016 6:24 PM - OAKLAND (CBS SF) — Hidden microphones that are part of a clandestine government surveillance program that has been operating around the Bay Area has been exposed. Imagine standing at a bus stop, talking to your friend and having your conversation recorded without you knowing. It happens all the time, and the FBI doesn’t even need a warrant to do it. 

Federal agents are planting microphones to secretly record conversations. Jeff Harp, a KPIX 5 security analyst and former FBI special agent said, “They put microphones under rocks, they put microphones in trees, they plant microphones in equipment. I mean, there’s microphones that are planted in places that people don’t think about, because that’s the intent!” 

FBI agents hid microphones inside light fixtures and at a bus stop outside the Oakland Courthouse without a warrant to record conversations, between March 2010 and January 2011. Federal authorities are trying to prove real estate investors in San Mateo and Alameda counties are guilty of bid rigging and fraud and used these recordings as evidence. Harp said, “An agent can’t just go out and grab a recording device and plant it somewhere without authorization from a supervisor or special agent in charge.” 

The lawyer for one of the accused real estate investors who will ask the judge to throw out the recordings, told KPIX 5 News that, “Speaking in a public place does not mean that the individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy…private communication in a public place qualifies as a protected ‘oral communication’… and therefore may not be intercepted without judicial authorization.” 

Harp says that if you’re going to conduct criminal activity, do it in the privacy of your own home. He says that was the original intention of the Fourth Amendment, but it’s up to the judge to interpret it.

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com

RELATED ARTICLES

New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims