Showing posts with label San Bernardino. Show all posts
Showing posts with label San Bernardino. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Obama Slams Trump Over Orlando Gay Club Terrorist Attack And Trump Slams Him Back As Being Angrier At Him Than The Terrorist


Donald Trump
 
The war of words between U.S. President Barack Obama and presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has escalated to new, vitriolic heights. Trump has publicly proclaimed Obama soft on terrorism and a terrorist sympathizer, for his refusal to acknowledge “radical Islam” as the cause of the San Bernardino, California and Orlando, Florida terrorist attacks that have occurred in America over the past 6-months, leaving many people dead. 

Trump demanded Obama step down as President of the United States for his refusal to state "radical Islamic terrorism" caused the terrorist attacks in America, which based on the words and deeds of the attackers, was their motivation for the killing sprees. Many Americans have openly slammed Obama in the press and on social networking for refusing to state this (Obama Administration Being Slammed By Americans For Refusing To Label San Bernardino Killings Terrorism).

Obama, head of the Democrat party, became enraged at Trump's widely read statements on Monday proclaiming him a terrorist sympathizer and decided to angrily rebut the Republican presidential nominee, who wants to succeed him as president. This only served to stir up the hornets nest as Trump, who has repeatedly exhibited he doesn't give a damn, ripped Obama even more.


Barack Obama
 
Trump stated of Obama's response to the Orlando, Florida terrorist attack, "I watched President Obama today and he was more angry at me than he was at the shooter." I hate to admit it, but yes, Obama was snarling with rage at Trump yesterday, showing more emotion. Obama really hates Trump and it showed in the press conference. Trump's statements regarding Obama brought even more publicity, drawing domestic and international attention to their political brawl, which is what he wanted to make his case for the presidency. Obama played right into Trump's hands. Trump also slammed rival Hillary Clinton stating, "We can't be led by weak, ineffective people." 

No one is saying blame all Muslims. In fact, don’t do that. As stated in the column yesterday, it is unfair to blame non-violent Muslims, who do not espouse the views of terrorist, Omar Mateen or the San Bernardino attackers. Muslims should not be banned from America either, as it is unkind and highly discriminatory. The problem at the heart of the matter is extremism/radicalism, which Obama refuses to call by its name. 

Being in denial never solved a problem. To confront a conflict that has become a conundrum, one must accurately identify it for what it is, in order to effectively address it. It is similar to someone having a medical problem. If you do not correctly identify the malady, you will not know the correct treatment course to heal it.


STORY SOURCE

Trump: Obama more angry at me than the Orlando shooter
 
Tuesday, June 14, 2016 - Donald Trump responded Tuesday to a fierce scolding by President Obama by questioning why the president was more outraged with him than with the terrorist gunman responsible for the Orlando massacre. “I watched President Obama today and he was more angry at me than he was at the shooter,” the GOP’s presumptive presidential nominee said in a speech in Greensboro, North Carolina. “That’s the kind of anger he should have for the shooter and these killers that shouldn’t be here.”...

Thursday, March 31, 2016

The FBI Finally Admits It Did Not Need Apple To Unlock Terrorist's iPhone In Power Grab


New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller
 
The Judiciary Report has been proven correct in its assertion the FBI lied about needing Apple to unlock the iPhone of the terrorist ringleader in the San Bernardino terrorist attack. In the March 11, 2016 article "FBI Using San Bernardino Terrorist Attack As A Power Grab At Apple" the site stated, "As the phrase goes, "Give them an inch and they will take a mile." Once the FBI gets a foothold, they will keep imposing and perversely go further each time. Furthermore, the FBI does not need Apple to unlock the phone. Others have unlocked iPhones. The FBI just wants to illegally control Apple in a bid to further spy on the masses. They are grossly overstepping their congressional mandate. It is arrogant, out of order and totalitarian in nature."

Two weeks later, on Monday, March 28, 2016, in an evening announcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and its parent agency the Department of Justice (DOJ) stated they are backing of Apple in the court case and have found an outside company to unlock the terrorist's iPhone. Yea, you do that (sarcasm). I told you guys the FBI was lying. They are a deceitful, treacherous, corrupt, lying agency, who are not to be trusted under any circumstances (they've caused innocent people's deaths, including children and separately framed innocent people New Evidence Reveals The FBI Sent Innocent People To Death Row and Man Wrongfully Imprisoned For 28-Years Due To FBI and The FBI Still Framing People For Crimes and Wives Of Men Framed By The FBI Speak).

The FBI was about to greatly damage Apple, a company that legitimately employs thousands of people and actually makes America money, unlike the Federal Bureau Of Investigation, who keeps going to Congress with its hands outstretched accompanied by concocted stories and fake cases they've created, to demand more taxpayer money to spy on Americans and international citizens, in violation of the Constitution. 

The public does not believe the FBI as evidenced by tweets on social networking site Twitter
 
If the power grab had gone ahead through the courts, the public would have simply associated Apple with the FBI, branding them snitches controlled by the Feds, having embedded themselves in the company's products to spy on the masses and began avoiding their products. Apple makes good products and should be free from government interference of that nature. 

Hackers are nosy. The minute tech companies put out new products, hackers do their level best to take them apart and would brag online about any backdoors they've discovered. Congress was negligent in allowing the FBI and DOJ to file the court case against Apple, trying to take over a company they weren't smart enough to build. It was pure arrogance. Revelations of widespread National Security Agency (NSA) spying is proof federal law enforcement cannot be trusted with the public's privacy.  

There is something deeply perverted with people, government or civilian, who believe they are to be secretly spying on others. There is something mentally wrong in their brains to be doing this. Psychologists have written many papers on the subject. It is perverted, mentally ill voyeurism. Government officials have been forced to admit under oath and in Congress that all this spying has not stopped even one terrorist attack. It's just an excuse to spy on people.

Select members of government are using illegal spying for undue enrichment to commit insider trading, financial theft, corporate theft, gain information of political rivals to get in office and secure lucrative jobs and in some cases spy on their significant others (an exclusive the Judiciary Report broke first).

STORY SOURCE

Read Apple's response to the FBI's San Bernardino iPhone hack

From the beginning, we objected to the FBI's demand that Apple build a backdoor into the iPhone because we believed it was wrong and would set a dangerous precedent. As a result of the government's dismissal, neither of these occurred. This case should never have been brought. We will continue to help law enforcement with their investigations, as we have done all along, and we will continue to increase the security of our products as the threats and attacks on our data become more frequent and more sophisticated. 

Apple believes deeply that people in the United States and around the world deserve data protection, security and privacy. Sacrificing one for the other only puts people and countries at greater risk. This case raised issues which deserve a national conversation about our civil liberties, and our collective security and privacy. Apple remains committed to participating in that discussion. 

http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/28/11321700/apple-responds-fbi-iphone-hack

The Fight Between Apple And The FBI Is Just Getting Started

March 30, 2016 00:19 IST - Apple isn't the only company that is aiming to install greater encryption around products. Washington: The Justice Department has called off a high-profile legal battle with Apple after it was able to unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters without the company's help. But rather than resolve the fight, this latest development is likely to motivate Apple and other companies to strengthen the security of their devices even more and force the government to keep up with any new security measures, technology executives and security analysts said. 

"They're in an arms race," said Matthew Blaze, a cryptography researcher and professor at the University of Pennsylvania. "The FBI is trying to find new ways in and Apple is trying to find new ways to defend against that." Apple isn't the only company that is aiming to install greater encryption around products, which makes intrusions by hackers and government investigators alike much more difficult. 

The FBI case appears to have intensified efforts among tech companies such as Snapchat and Facebook to employ better encryption - a trend that began after Edward Snowden's revelations of government spying in 2013 and a massive wave of cyber-hacking in recent years. 

Cloud computing company Box, which filed a legal brief supporting Apple in the San Bernardino case, is one of the many tech firms rushing to offer new encryption-related security features. It recently launched a product, Keysafe, that allows corporate customers to hold on to their own encryption keys -- a move co-founder and chief executive Aaron Levie said was as much about fighting off hackers and cybercriminals as it was about fending off government surveillance. The implementation of Keysafe means the company cannot collect and hand over the private information of a customer even when the authorities have a warrant. 

Friday, March 11, 2016

The FBI Using San Bernardino Terrorist Attack As A Power Grab At Apple


New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has hauled Apple into court, over their refusal to unlock the iPhone 5 belonging to one of the San Bernardino terrorists, who killed 17 people at a community center in California (14 Dead And 17 Wounded In Shooting By 3 Jihadis At A California Disability Center). Apple is resisting, as the tech company states it will lead to more requests from the FBI, which will lead to mass spying on the American people and international citizens.

While it would be great for the phone to be unlocked to aid in the case of compiling a report on the matter, the terrorists are dead. Therefore, no prosecution is at stake. What Apple is concerned about is the FBI's reputation. As the phrase goes, "Give them an inch and they will take a mile." Once the FBI gets a foothold, they will keep imposing and perversely go further each time. Furthermore, the FBI does not need Apple to unlock the phone. Others have unlocked iPhones. The FBI just wants to illegally control Apple in a bid to further spy on the masses. They are grossly overstepping their congressional mandate. It is arrogant, out of order and totalitarian in nature.

The FBI, NSA and CIA are always looking for ways to illegally spy on people. It is ingrained at the agencies. The FBI, NSA and CIA are always looking for people and companies to conscript into invasive, illegal activity. All this illegal spying the FBI, NSA and CIA have been engaging in has not stopped any act of terrorism. It is being done for reasons that are politically and financially motivated. It has nothing to do with national security.

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Obama Administration Policy Led To Homeland Security Not Checking Social Networking Pages Of Terrorists Coming Into America


Barack Obama

A policy implemented by U.S. President Barack Obama, barred Homeland Security from searching social media in vetting visa applications. In the wake of the San Bernardino terrorist shooting that left 14 defenseless, innocent people dead and 20 injured, questions are being asked regarding why Obama banned Homeland Security from accessing the social media pages of immigrants, such as Tashfeen Malik, who with her husband, Syed Farook, went on to commit the San Bernardino terrorism based killings.


Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook

Malik’s social networking pages bore the signs of radicalization. According to reports, there are others seeking entry into the United States who harbor pro-terrorism leanings, as evidenced by posts on their social networking pages espousing sport for terrorists and extremism. However, Homeland Security is claiming its hands are tied due to Obama’s policy.

STORY SOURCE

Secret US Policy Blocks Agents From Looking at Social Media of Visa Applicants, Former Official Says 

Dec 14, 2015, 7:18 AM ET - Fearing a civil liberties backlash and "bad public relations" for the Obama administration, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson refused in early 2014 to end a secret U.S. policy that prohibited immigration officials from reviewing the social media messages of all foreign citizens applying for U.S. visas, a former senior department official said.

"During that time period immigration officials were not allowed to use or review social media as part of the screening process," John Cohen, a former acting under-secretary at DHS for intelligence and analysis. Cohen is now a national security consultant for ABC News. One current and one former senior counter-terrorism official confirmed Cohen's account about the refusal of DHS to change its policy about the public social media posts of all foreign applicants.

A spokesperson for the DHS, Marsha Catron, told ABC News that months after Cohen left, in the fall of 2014, the Department began three pilot programs to include social media in vetting, but current officials say that it is still not a widespread policy. A review of the broader policy is already underway, the DHS said.

The revelation comes as members of Congress question why U.S. officials failed to review the social media posts of San Bernardino terrorist Tashfeen Malik. She received a U.S. visa in May 2014, despite what the FBI said were extensive social media messages about jihad and martyrdom.
Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., demanded Sunday that the U.S. immediately initiate a program that would check the social media sites of those admitted on visas." "Had they checked out Tashfeen Malik," the senator said, "maybe those people in San Bernardino would be alive."...


RELATED ARTICLES


Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Defiant Donald Trump Stands By His Call To Ban Muslims From America (Video)

 
U.S. presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has defiantly stood by his demand that all Muslims be barred from entering America for safety reasons, in the wake of the San Bernardino terrorist attack. Trump stated in reference to the backlash, "I don't care." There exists historical precedent that would legally allow Trump to do such a thing, if he were in a governmental position to do so.

No other politician in the Democrat or Republican party running for office in the U.S. Presidential election agrees with Trumps extreme, severe statements on banning all Muslims from America. However, since making the comment, Trump has shot up in the New Hampshire presidential polls, doubling his lead. He is playing on the fears of the public for publicity and it has created a poll surge. Trump has also made very disparaging remarks about Mexicans, blacks, the disabled and veterans. He keeps adding more and more groups to his hate list.

I am a black, female, Christian heterosexual, who subscribes to the ways of democracy and conservatism. I don't hate and discriminate against others. I am non-violent. I don't own a gun, never have, as I don't want one. I am against racism, police brutality and domestic violence. I believe in traditional values and human rights for everyone. Therefore, I am very saddened at the tone some in society have adopted and are publicly espousing. It's downright depressing to see all this hatred and malice on television and in the news. Trump and a few others have taken things to a terrible low.


Donald Trump

People need to keep the peace and not do anything irrational or illegal. Today, I read about someone placing a severed pig's head outside a mosque in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. I also read about a Muslim man, who is a migrant trying to enter Germany, biting a female police officer and grabbing her gun after yelling, "allah hu akbar." Both stories, in addition to others I have read, reveals some non-Muslims and some Muslims are attacking each other, which is regrettable. It all needs to stop.

Today I also read about State Assemblywoman Michele Fiore stating in a radio interview, "He's like, 'the Syrian refugees.' I'm like, what, are you kidding me? I'm about to fly to Paris and shoot'em in the head myself! I mean, I am not OK with Syrian refugees. I am not OK with terrorists. I'm OK with putting them down (killing). Blacken them out. Just put a piece of brass in their ocular cavity and end their miserable life. I'm good with that."

Fiore's statements encourages violence against all Syrian refugees, when all of them are not terrorists. ISIS is exploiting the migrant crisis to send terrorists in among the Syrian refugees, but to make such a blanket statement about shooting them all in the head is wrong. Some Syrian refugees are children. Fiore tried to back track on her statements from the radio interview, but people had already heard it.


Poll posted by CNN

Last week I read an article about immigrant hating Arizona sheriff, Joe Arpaio, calling on 250,000 armed Americans to take the fight to the streets against terrorists and mass shootings in America. To a mentally disturbed mind that can be a call to terrible violence against people who have not broken the law, but will be illegally profiled by vigilantes. I thought his statements were highly irresponsible.

Jihad, which is based in Islamic extremism, is a serious problem that must be tackled by world governments. However, in the proper manner and not through citizens becoming vigilantes.
Things are escalating and no good can come from that. The world doesn't need more violence. The world needs peace and understanding. I am of the belief society is moving in the wrong direction and people need to calm down. You should not let hatred and fear consume you. Just because someone does something wrong, does not mean you should do the same as well. Hate is toxic to the health and soul. 

STORY SOURCE

Fiore Says She Does Not Want to Shoot Refugees

She had previously said in an interview that she wanted to kill Syrian refugees.

December 8, 2015 - State As­semb­ly­wo­man Michele Fiore (R) “said Monday that while she does not want Syr­i­an refugees in the United States, she is not go­ing to shoot them.”

Fiore had pre­vi­ously said in a ra­dio in­ter­view: “He’s like, ‘the Syr­i­an refugees.’ I’m like, what, are you kid­ding me? I’m about to fly to Par­is and shoot ‘em in the head my­self! I mean, I am not OK with Syr­i­an refugees. I am not OK with ter­ror­ists. I’m OK with put­ting them down. Black­en them
out. Just put a piece of brass in their ocu­lar cav­ity and end their miser­able life. I’m good with that.”

Des­pite walk­ing back her state­ment, Fiore ad­ded, “If I say something I own it and I go for it. I double down, I don’t back down.” (Las Ve­gas Re­view-Journ­al)
 

Trump gains ground in New Hampshire

So another Trump controversy and round of condemnation, followed by a new poll showing how the strategy appears to be paying off. This time it is a CNN/WMUR poll conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey, which shows him extending his lead among likely primary voters in the state.

Some 32% of respondents say they support Trump (up 6 points since September), with Rubio a distant second place with 14% (up 5 points). That 18-point lead is almost double the 10-point lead Trump held in September over businesswoman Carly Fiorina...


Woman Police Officer Sustains ‘Massive’ Injury, Bitten By ‘Rampaging’, Gun-Grab Migrant Screaming ‘Allah Hu Akbar’

7 Dec 2015 - German police were forced to pepper-spray a fare dodging Islamist on Sunday after he reacted badly to having his ticket checked, attacking officers, trying to snatch a police handgun and screaming “Allah hu Akbar”. The 23-year-old Moroccan ‘asylum seeker’ spoke no German and savagely attacked police on Sunday in Osnabrück station, hospitalising two and injured a third.
A railway employee decided to call in police on this occasion as after attempting to check the migrant’s ticket, the man began to act “strangely”, reports Focus.de.

Events took a turn for the violent as police arrived, and the man immediately flew into a fury. Attacking a female police officer, the man kicked and bit while screaming in Arabic the Islamist war-cry “Allah hu Akbar” and crying out the name of the Islamic State.

In the end it took three federal police officers to pepper spray and cuff the man. The female police officer was left with a “massive” knee injury and another officer was treated at hospital for a broken rib and bites on his forearm. Both are now off duty to recover from their wounds.

Despite being kept in hand-cuffs, the man even tried to “repeatedly” grab the service pistol of a police officer, reports NOZ.de. Once at the Osnabrück police station the man continued to give trouble by spitting at officers. Despite the man crying out the name of the Islamic State in Arabic and shouting that ‘god is great” as he attacked, a search of the individual of his arrest found no evidence to suggest he was directly affiliated to the Islamic State itself... 
 

Severed pig’s head thrown at Philadelphia mosque door

December 8 at 2:36 PM - Authorities are investigating an incident at a Philadelphia mosque after early-morning prayers Monday were disrupted by the discovery of a severed pig’s head on the mosque’s doorsteps. A spokesman for the Al-Aqsa Islamic Society said surveillance cameras captured video of a red pickup truck that drove by the building twice Sunday night; during its second pass, an item was seen thrown out of the vehicle’s window and landing at the door of the mosque.

Philadelphia police told The Washington Post that the object was thrown from the passenger side of the truck, and that the vehicle’s occupants are not visible in the video footage. A worker opening the mosque — which is in the same building as an Islamic school and the Arab American Development Corp. — found the pig’s head around 6 a.m. Monday...
 

RELATED ARTICLES
 
 

Saturday, December 5, 2015

Obama Administration Being Slammed By Americans For Refusing To Label San Bernardino Killings Terrorism



Barack Obama

Initially, when news broke in the press and online on December 2, 2015, of people being shot and killed by three masked gun wielding criminals at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, California, most automatically assumed it was another mass shooting, as it has sadly become common place in America. Many liberals blamed the conservatives for the shooting, stating it was due to a lack of gun control laws. However, the incident was not what they initially thought.

As stated in the column on December 2, 2015, a few hours after the shooting, before the suspects were publicly identified, the Drudge Report website posted the titled link "America Burning" to a foreign news site that contained tweets on Twitter with the strange hashtag "#America_Burning" glorifying the "three lions" for engaging in Jihad (three lions alluded to the three killers in San Bernardino). The tweets were connected to ISIS. This is where I saw the link and labeled the San Bernardino killings an act of "Jihad" in my December 2, 2015 article (14 Dead And 17 Wounded In Shooting By 3 Jihadis At A California Disability Center).

The Drudge Report is one of the most read websites in the world, that many liberals, such as those in the Obama Administration, complain about (as it doesn't kiss their backsides on the subject of politics). The Obama Administration (the FBI included) reads the Drudge Report every day. Yet for two whole days refused to label the killings in San Bernardino an act of terrorism.

Call it what it is. How are you going to lawfully fight a problem you refuse to identify. That's called being in denial. As a result, over the past two days, Americans have been slamming the Obama Administration for refusing to admit it was an act of terrorism. Items on social networking and in the feedback columns of websites have excoriated the Obama Administration for not labeling the attack terrorism.
RELATED ARTICLE
 

ISIS Keeps Embarrassing President Obama Every Time He Says He Has Defeated Them


Obama on CBS News addresses public fears of a terrorist attack in America by stating the nation is "safe" from it

On November 13, 2015, U.S. President Barack Obama did a television interview proclaiming his administration had the terrorist group ISIS "contained." Roughly 12 hours later, ISIS struck in Paris, killing 130 people (ISIS Launch Several Attacks On Paris Leaving 130 People Dead In Retaliation For Jihadi John's Death).

Fast-forward to December 2, 2015, Obama does another television interview telling the American people the country is safe from terrorism. Roughly 8 hours later, another terrorist cell is activated and an attack occurs in San Bernardino, California at a disability help center, killing 14 and wounding 20 people (14 Dead And 17 Wounded In Shooting By 3 Jihadis At A California Disability Center).  

These incidents reveal a patter of ISIS challenging and daring Obama each time he states he has them under control, when he clearly does not. The president needs to choose his words wisely as they are acting as a trigger for a dangerous, vicious, bloodthirsty terror group that hates the west. 


STORY SOURCE

President Obama Asserted America Was Safe from Islamic State Right Before California Attack

3 Dec 2015 - Right before the attack in California happened, President Obama explained to CBS’s Norah O’Donnell that America was safe from the Islamic State and urged Americans to feel safe. “ISIL is not going to pose an existential threat to us,” he said, insisting that although they were a “dangerous organization,” the country had strengthened national security under his administration.

Obama taped his interview with O’Donnell on Wednesday, right before the attacks occurred. The interview was aired on CBS this morning. “[W]e have hardened our defenses, our homeland has never been more protected by more effective intelligence and law enforcement professionals at every level than they are now,” he said, prior to the attack in San Bernardino later that day.
 


RELATED ARTICLE
 

FBI Knew About One Of The San Bernardino Terrorists In Advance But Allowed Her To Roam Free In America


Tweet from Reuters' Twitter page indicates the FBI had terrorists under surveillance, who were in telephonic communication with, Tashfeen Malik, who is one of the terrorists from the San Bernardino terrorist attack that occurred on December 2, 2015 at a disability center, killing 14 and wounding 20

The FBI has again let a radicalized person communicating with terrorists roam free in America, to terrible results, leading to the deaths of innocent people. Previously, the FBI watched as Nidal Hasan became radicalized in email exchanges with a terrorist cleric. Hasan then murdered innocent people at the Fort Hood military base in Texas. The FBI also had advance information on terrorists Anwar Al Awlaki and Umar Farouk AbdulMutallab (among others), but engaged in negligent conduct that allowed them to commit acts of terrorism.


Tashfeen Malik

Press reports on Reuters today reveals, the FBI was aware of one of the shooters in the San Bernardino terrorist attack, prior to the massacre occurring, as having communicated with terrorists. Tashfeen Malik, the 29-year-old wife of fellow terrorist Sayed Farook, was in America on a marriage visa and actively communicating with terrorists in her native Pakistan, over the phone. Malik has been linked to Pakistan's most notorious cleric, Maulana Aziz of the Red Mosque. On the day of the terrorist attack, Malik pledged her allegiance to ISIS on her Facebook page.


Maulana Aziz (left) and Syed Farook (right)

Farook met Malik when he spent many months in Pakistan. It is now also believed he received terrorist training while there. Over the past several years, in reading U.S. and international legal indictments by western governments, to write articles for this column on news events, the charging documents in terrorism cases reveal the criminals leaving their home nation in the west, going to the Middle East for many months, then returning to commit acts of jihad. There exists a pattern of behavior in this regard.

RELATED ARTICLE

Thursday, December 3, 2015

14 Dead And 17 Wounded In Shooting By 3 Jihadis At A California Disability Center


Syed Farook

14 were killed and 17 wounded by 3 masked shooters in a vicious shooting at the Inland Regional Center, located in San Bernardino, California, during their annual Christmas party. The 44-year-old non-profit organization provides support and assistance to 35,000 disabled people in the area. 10 of the 17 people wounded in the incident are listed in "critical condition" at local hospitals. The shooters wore combat style clothing and used automatic weapons.

 

Hours before the shooters were identified, ISIS began celebrating the shooting using the Twitter hashtag #America_Burning. This coupled with the religion of the shooters leads many to believe the incident is a terrorist attack. One of the shooters has been identified as Syed Farook, a married man with children, who is an environmental inspector and American citizen, who worked for the state of California. Farook is being described as a devout Muslim.


Another of the shooters has been identified as Farook's brother. A third shooter was described on police scanners as an "Arabic woman." Two of the three suspects, one of them the woman, has been killed in a shoot out with police, as the left Farook's house in Redlands, California. A police officer was wounded during the battle. The police did a quick and thorough job in identifying, finding and cornering the shooters, who tried to flee in a black SUV.

STORY SOURCE

EXCLUSIVE: ISIS Adherents Praise San Bernardino Massacre, "America Burning"

By James King and Adi Cohen on Dec 02, 2015 at 6:34 PM - ISIS extremists began celebrating the mass shooting in San Bernardino hours after the massacre, creating the hashtag #America_Burning, Vocativ discovered. The Islamic State, however, did not take credit for the shootings in the ghoulish postings. Vocativ deep web analysts discovered the ISIS posts on web forums where the extremists frequently share information. More San Bernardino Shooting Is The Deadliest Since Sandy Hook
“Three lions made us proud. They are still alive,” one ISIS adherent tweeted in Arabic after the shootings at Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino. “California streets are full with soldiers with heavy weapons. The Unites States is burning #America_Burning #Takbir”...

“God is great and he the one to be praised for that,” another supporter posted in the forum in Arabic. “This is hell with god’s will.” But the hashtag was primarily used on Twitter where one ISIS extremist taunted the United States with a tweet that read “Let America know a new era #California #America_burning.”

Another ISIS supporter posted in reference to the shooting on Twitter, “God is the greatest. May god spread fear in the homes of the Crusaders.”... One of the suspects was identified by multiple sources as Syed Farook. He’s believed to have worked at the San Bernardino County Public Health Department, which held a holiday party at the center where the shooting took place on Wednesday...
 

Suspect ID'd in San Bernardino Massacre as Syed Farook - Killer?

12.02.159:26 PM ET - Syed Farook is one of three suspected gunmen who attacked a center for the disabled, killing 14 and injuring more on Wednesday. Law enforcement officials have identified Syed Farook as one of the suspected shooters who attacked a center for the disabled in San Bernardino, California, according to NBC News. The Daily Beast has learned that the police have just executed a search warrant at a Redlands, California address—an address that belongs to Farook’s family.

Police pursued a car leaving from the Redlands address, Chief Jarrod Baraugan said at a Wednesday evening press conference. A male and female suspect were inside the car, and both of them have been killed. Both of the suspects were armed with assault rifles and handguns, Baraugan said. Police have apprehended a third man, but have not identified his relation to the attacks yet...
 

RELATED ARTICLES