Showing posts with label invasion of privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label invasion of privacy. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Doctors Discover Kanye West Is Much Sicker Than They Initially Realized And Extend Hospital Hold


Kanye West and Kim Kardashian
Doctors have been discovering the true extent of rapper Kanye West's mental illness, which has resulted in his 48-hour psych hold being extended. West is currently under an  involuntary psychiatric hold at UCLA Medical Center in Los Angeles, California. West missed Thanksgiving as a result of being committed to the mental ward of the hospital. The rapper experienced a psychotic break while performing on stage during his Saint Pablo music tour. 

Some are stating it is an insurance scam, but that is not true. West could have completed the tour if he was in a better frame of mind. However, his mind snapped due to the things he has experienced. The Judiciary Report has consistently maintained for well over a year that West has become mentally ill due to joining the sick Kabbalah Center cult.

The Kabbalah Center terrorizes, spies on, hounds and abuses its members, under the direction of deranged pop star Madonna, whom West produced music for a few short years ago. This onslaught of abuse has induced schizophrenia in the cult's members such as Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, Steve-O, Rosie O'Donnell, Amanda Bynes, Solange Knowles, Chris Brown and Blu Cantrell, among others. 

Spears is currently on a regimen of 10 powerful anti-psychotic medicines to keep her schizophrenia at bay, after she experienced a psychotic break in 2008 due to Kabbalah. Spears shaved her head bald and began expressing rage, which are standard expressions of cult members. Spears also bit and shook her toddler while holding him and his brother hostage from their dad and police. Spears also attacked photographers and engaged in other criminally insane behavior, under the direction of the Kabbalah Center. 

 
Kanye West and Kim Kardashian

West was not mentally ill before joining Kabbalah. They abused him and others to such degrees that their minds snapped. Some Kabbalah members have snapped and committed acts of violent assault and murder. They spy on members 24-hours a day via illegal wiretaps, phone hacking, web cam hacking, GPS tracking and sometimes hidden cameras in their homes. Then they text, telephone and email members telling them the details of what privately goes on in their homes, over their phones and in their computers, which creates feelings of depression, anger, anxiety, aggravation, irritation, rage and being perversely violated. It is quite sick. 

It is done in an effort to spy on and control members, as well as induce the mental disorder paranoia, which if continued, often leads to schizophrenia. These are very abusive and serious privacy crimes that are extremely sick and depraved in nature. The FBI has criminally failed in its duty to maintain law and order in America and have allowed the Kabbalah Center to continue to commit these sick crimes due to bribery. In the process, many young lives have been destroyed and people killed due to this satanic cult

Members of Kabbalah are also bombarded with many text messages, emails and phone calls, telling them what to do, wear, say and post on social networking. They maintain tight reins on members, whom they exploit for financial gain and fame. Many members snap due to the satanic rituals the cult holds at Kabbalah Centers, in hotels and private homes, known as "spirit cooking" involving blood, semen and food, disgustingly consumed as meals. Members are also forced into homosexuality, as a pledge of loyal to the cult that promises them fame and fortune. 

They bombard members' minds with negative, ghastly and evil imagery involving the abuse of adults and children alike, items featuring pentagrams and other imagery associated with the occult are also shown in repetition. Members are told to repeatedly chant phrases during these meetings, which is tantamount to brainwashing. The human mind is not meant for such negativity, evil and darkness. It creates depression, suicidal thoughts and violent tendencies.

 
Kim Kardashian and daughter North West

The cult also preys on people's worst fears, by trying to make them happen as a way to break them down and make them subservient. Using illegal surveillance items (wiretaps, phone hacking, computer and email hacking, audio and video bugs) whatever is said or written as an undesirable outcome the person does not want to happen, the Kabbalah Center works towards creating in the person's life, using minions they label "chevre" to bring about said negative situations. 

The constant abuse and realizing their worst fears induces schizophrenia in Kabbalah Center members. The Kabbalah Center actually touts what they call "inducing schizophrenia" as a greater state of mind or spiritual achievement, but it is simply a way for the cult to control its members and their bank accounts via mentally damaging them. This is known as "mind control."

Kabbalah members are forced to give the cult huge chunks of their income. Items leaked to the press by third parties, regarding multi-millionaires Alex Rodriguez, Mick Jagger and Jerri Hall, among others, revealed this fact. Kabbalah is nothing but an evil, abusive money making scam. 

Meanwhile, the cult's owners, Madonna and the Berg family, have made upwards of $400,000,000 scamming charities and members of the public into giving donations and tax breaks that have gone to maintaining their lavish lifestyles in Beverly Hills, New York and London, rather than to poor Africans, whom the money was intended to help. This has resulted in lawsuits against Madonna and Kabbalah. It is this ugly greed that is damaging people in ways medical science currently cannot fix.

There is no cure for schizophrenia. Doctors have unsuccessfully grappled with curing it for years. I am of the belief severe mental and or physical abuse releases dangerous levels of toxins in the brain of previously mentally healthy people, leading to deterioration of the organ. There are brain scans of schizophrenics that reveal perforation - small holes in the brain. If the brain is not sound, the individual's behavior will not be either. It can be equated to brain damage. 

This is what West's doctors are grappling with and the best they can hope for at this time through medical science is to medicate him with powerful anti-psychotic drugs. It is a solution to the problem, with the hope he does not hurt himself or anyone else.

STORY SOURCE

Kanye West Dr. Says He Tried to Assault Staff ... Warned of Violence Against Cops

11/22/2016 7:53 AM PST BY TMZ STAFF - Kanye West's personal physician is the one who called 911, warning the dispatcher Kanye was not violent but would become violent when police arrived to help him. Law enforcement sources tell us, the call came in as a male with mental illness. Dr. Michael Farzam said his patient's name was "Jim Jones, 39 years old, 5'8", 175 lbs ... suffers from temporary psychosis due to sleep deprivation and dehydration."...


 Kanye West's condition 'way worse than sleep deprivation and dehydration' following breakdown... as he prepares for Thanksgiving in hospital with Kim Kardashian

Published: 05:13 EST, 24 November 2016 | Updated: 12:53 EST, 24 November 2016 - Kanye West's condition is worse than first feared according to new reports. Although he was initially reported to be suffering from a temporary psychosis brought on by sleep deprivation and extreme dehydration, TMZ suggest that the rapper's problems 'go deeper'. 

The 39-year-old was rushed to UCLA Medical Center after a reported breakdown on Monday and is currently being assessed with wife Kim Kardashian by his side. The website reports Kanye is in such a 'bad mental state' that his insurance policy for his 21 cancelled U.S. concerts is likely to cover him for lost profits due to illness...


RELATED ARTICLE


Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Muhammad Ali’s Former Mistress Trying To Sell Secret Sex Tapes Of The Boxer And Says He Fathered Her Child Who Grew Up Without Him


Muhammad Ali
Boxing legend Muhammad Ali passed away this month at the age of 74. Millions of people all over the world extended their condolences on his death. However, it also brought opportunistic people out of the woodwork and disgraceful behavior has surfaced. A former mistress of the boxer from the 1970s, Barbara Mensah, has come forward stating Ali fathered her child while he was married and she is offering sex tapes of the boxer for sale. It is being stated she wants $100,000 for the sex tapes of Ali and herself at sex parties. 

Mensah wants money and is willing to disgrace Ali to get it. That’s vile. There is no honor in selling out someone like this. Mensah should be legally enjoined in a court of law from exhibiting or selling said sex tapes in any way. The tapes should be destroyed, as it violates the rights of another human being, who did not consent to them being released. She is exploiting the dead as well. Mensah is selling Ali out in a major way. 


Muhammad Ali and Barbara Mensah
 
Ali really appears to be the father of Mensah’s child. You would think for that reason she would have some sympathy for him. However, she is betraying him by telling the world the private things that occurred in her presence that he would not want public knowledge. She is exposing the father of her child to the press for attention and money, pitching sex tapes he would not have wanted made public. 

As he got older, Ali stated he regretted giving into the desires of the flesh, naming it one of his biggest regrets in life, as it hurt people he loved via cheating and later adultery. Ali regretted not sticking to a committed relationship (marriage) which would have spared himself and others emotional pain. Younger men need to heed that warning, as some of you are making a mess of your personal lives, in what will have a long lasting impact on yourself and others.

Muhammad Ali and his daughter he sired in an affair with Barbara Mensah in the 1970s 
I don’t understand the conduct of women who meet famous men, get knocked up for said multi-millionaire celebrities, then run to the press selling them out when they don’t get what they want and or are trying to force their hand into marriage. What’s the sense of running to the press to claim a famous man as the father of your child when he wanted nothing to do with you after you trapped him with a pregnancy he did not agree to in any measure, stemming from a fling he wasn’t serious about. 

It could not feel good to get pregnant for a famous man (or any man for that matter under bad circumstances), have your child, but then he is off with another woman and in clear sight of the public. Women need to think before they get themselves into those situations. 


Barbara Mensah, 70 and her daughter Kiiursti, 35, who she states was fathered by Muhammad Ali who died this month at age 74

Some women get knocked up for famous men, trying to trap them into marriage, then get vindictive when things don‘t turn out how they had planned, leaving them feeling embarrassed and cast aside. When the man doesn’t want to marry them, they become bitter and resentful. The bitterness is compounded when their child grows up without their dad in their life on a regular basis, as he is married to someone else, seriously dating someone else or ends up marrying another woman and having kids with her. 

STORY SOURCE

Muhammad Ali 'sex tapes' scandal as ex who claims he fathered her daughter tries to cash in 22:32, 11 Jun 2016 - Updated 07:00, 12 Jun 2016 - Barbara Mensah, who claims her daughter Kiiursti is the lovechild of the boxing icon, wants a six-figure sum for the sleazy footage. A former girlfriend of Muhammad Ali has made a sick bid to cash in on his death by ­offering for sale tapes she claims show him at sex parties. Barbara Mensah, who alleges her daughter Kiiursti is the lovechild of the three-times world heavyweight champion, wants a six-figure sum for the footage. 

Just two days after The Greatest was buried at a funeral attended by world leaders and celebrities, grasping Barbara told the Sunday People : “I know the value of the footage. “No one has anything like this. I’d like to get as much as I can for it.” The scheming mum said she is looking for more than $100,000 ­ – about £70,000. Barbara, 70, has already made inquiries to get the old cine film ­transferred on to CD to make her sordid deal easier to clinch. 

She claimed the footage was shot at “gumbo parties” arranged after his fights. She said: “There would be Ali and a few of his guys and then about a dozen or more girls. “All of them were stunning. Muhammad couldn’t keep away from a pretty girl whether he was married or not. “The tapes show them having sex. “They used to call them gumbo parties – it was a mix of everything.” Gumbo is a ­traditional Louisiana stew... Barbara also claims to have written a “blockbuster” book about her life with Ali which eight publishers are ­competing for. Kiiursti, 35, who looks remarkably like the ­ex-world heavyweight champ, is said to be the result of a 20-year affair Barbara had with Ali in his heyday...  
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Erin Andrews Settles Hotel Peeping Tom Lawsuit With Marriott Hotels


Erin Andrews in court recounting the terrible ordeal
 
A settlement has been reached in the lawsuit filed by sports analyst, Erin Andrews, filed against the Marriott Hotel, after poor security led to a stalker invading her privacy. Stalker, Michael Barrett, was able to obtain Andrews' suite number from a Marriott Hotel staff member and booked a room right next to it. This enabled him to watch her movements and hack off the hotel room peephole, placing his mobile phone camera up to it and film her naked in the suite, while she was getting ready to make television appearances. Barrett caused Andrews tremendous emotional and mental trauma by uploading the secretly made video from the peephole, to the internet, where millions watched Andrews naked in her hotel room, without her permission.


Michael Barrett
 
The Marriott Hotel has settled with Andrews for an undisclosed sum of money, after jurors threw the book at them for their poor security practices. Jurors informed the media they were very dismayed by the case and want greater assurances their privacy will be protected in places such as hotels. Contrary to what a handful of crazy people like to think, particularly in Hollywood, the world is not headed in the direction that it is permissible or appropriate to spy on people in their homes, hotels and public toilets, to satisfy someone's sick sexual urges, in behavior psychiatrists denounce as the mentally ill sexual disorder known as voyeurism. It is depravity of the highest order associated with sexual predators and pedophiles.

 
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 31, 2016

The FBI Finally Admits It Did Not Need Apple To Unlock Terrorist's iPhone In Power Grab


New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller
 
The Judiciary Report has been proven correct in its assertion the FBI lied about needing Apple to unlock the iPhone of the terrorist ringleader in the San Bernardino terrorist attack. In the March 11, 2016 article "FBI Using San Bernardino Terrorist Attack As A Power Grab At Apple" the site stated, "As the phrase goes, "Give them an inch and they will take a mile." Once the FBI gets a foothold, they will keep imposing and perversely go further each time. Furthermore, the FBI does not need Apple to unlock the phone. Others have unlocked iPhones. The FBI just wants to illegally control Apple in a bid to further spy on the masses. They are grossly overstepping their congressional mandate. It is arrogant, out of order and totalitarian in nature."
Two weeks later, on Monday, March 28, 2016, in an evening announcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and its parent agency the Department of Justice (DOJ) stated they are backing of Apple in the court case and have found an outside company to unlock the terrorist's iPhone. Yea, you do that (sarcasm). I told you guys the FBI was lying. They are a deceitful, treacherous, corrupt, lying agency, who are not to be trusted under any circumstances (they've caused innocent people's deaths, including children and separately framed innocent people New Evidence Reveals The FBI Sent Innocent People To Death Row and Man Wrongfully Imprisoned For 28-Years Due To FBI and The FBI Still Framing People For Crimes and Wives Of Men Framed By The FBI Speak).

The FBI was about to greatly damage Apple, a company that legitimately employs thousands of people and actually makes America money, unlike the Federal Bureau Of Investigation, who keeps going to Congress with its hands outstretched accompanied by concocted stories and fake cases they've created, to demand more taxpayer money to spy on Americans and international citizens, in violation of the Constitution. 

The public does not believe the FBI as evidenced by tweets on social networking site Twitter
 
If the power grab had gone ahead through the courts, the public would have simply associated Apple with the FBI, branding them snitches controlled by the Feds, having embedded themselves in the company's products to spy on the masses and began avoiding their products. Apple makes good products and should be free from government interference of that nature. 

Hackers are nosy. The minute tech companies put out new products, hackers do their level best to take them apart and would brag online about any backdoors they've discovered. Congress was negligent in allowing the FBI and DOJ to file the court case against Apple, trying to take over a company they weren't smart enough to build. It was pure arrogance. Revelations of widespread National Security Agency (NSA) spying is proof federal law enforcement cannot be trusted with the public's privacy.  

There is something deeply perverted with people, government or civilian, who believe they are to be secretly spying on others. There is something mentally wrong in their brains to be doing this. Psychologists have written many papers on the subject. It is perverted, mentally ill voyeurism. Government officials have been forced to admit under oath and in Congress that all this spying has not stopped even one terrorist attack. It's just an excuse to spy on people.

Select members of government are using illegal spying for undue enrichment to commit insider trading, financial theft, corporate theft, gain information of political rivals to get in office and secure lucrative jobs and in some cases spy on their significant others (an exclusive the Judiciary Report broke first).

STORY SOURCE

Read Apple's response to the FBI's San Bernardino iPhone hack

From the beginning, we objected to the FBI's demand that Apple build a backdoor into the iPhone because we believed it was wrong and would set a dangerous precedent. As a result of the government's dismissal, neither of these occurred. This case should never have been brought. We will continue to help law enforcement with their investigations, as we have done all along, and we will continue to increase the security of our products as the threats and attacks on our data become more frequent and more sophisticated. 

Apple believes deeply that people in the United States and around the world deserve data protection, security and privacy. Sacrificing one for the other only puts people and countries at greater risk. This case raised issues which deserve a national conversation about our civil liberties, and our collective security and privacy. Apple remains committed to participating in that discussion. 

http://www.theverge.com/2016/3/28/11321700/apple-responds-fbi-iphone-hack

The Fight Between Apple And The FBI Is Just Getting Started

March 30, 2016 00:19 IST - Apple isn't the only company that is aiming to install greater encryption around products. Washington: The Justice Department has called off a high-profile legal battle with Apple after it was able to unlock an iPhone used by one of the San Bernardino shooters without the company's help. But rather than resolve the fight, this latest development is likely to motivate Apple and other companies to strengthen the security of their devices even more and force the government to keep up with any new security measures, technology executives and security analysts said. 

"They're in an arms race," said Matthew Blaze, a cryptography researcher and professor at the University of Pennsylvania. "The FBI is trying to find new ways in and Apple is trying to find new ways to defend against that." Apple isn't the only company that is aiming to install greater encryption around products, which makes intrusions by hackers and government investigators alike much more difficult. 

The FBI case appears to have intensified efforts among tech companies such as Snapchat and Facebook to employ better encryption - a trend that began after Edward Snowden's revelations of government spying in 2013 and a massive wave of cyber-hacking in recent years. 

Cloud computing company Box, which filed a legal brief supporting Apple in the San Bernardino case, is one of the many tech firms rushing to offer new encryption-related security features. It recently launched a product, Keysafe, that allows corporate customers to hold on to their own encryption keys -- a move co-founder and chief executive Aaron Levie said was as much about fighting off hackers and cybercriminals as it was about fending off government surveillance. The implementation of Keysafe means the company cannot collect and hand over the private information of a customer even when the authorities have a warrant. 
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Los Angeles Laker D'Angelo Russell Criminally Violated The Privacy Of Teammate Nick Young In Secretly Videotaping Him In Hotel Room Talking About Cheating On Iggy Azalea (Video)

Los Angeles Laker D'Angelo Russell is being slammed on television and online for secretly videotaping teammate Nick Young in his hotel room without his knowledge, permission or consent. On the tape, Russell sets Young up with a series of questions to extract damaging information about his sex life. Young is engaged to rapper Iggy Azalea and Russell got him to admit on camera that he cheated on her with a 19-year-old. This will undoubtedly cause problems in the couple's relationship and could cause a break-up. 



The secretly recorded tape D'Angelo Russell made of Lakers teammate Nick Young disclosing he cheated on his fiancée, Iggy Azalea, is thought to be the reason the team experienced a historic 48-point defeat this week, losing to the Utah Jazz. Russell's teammates no longer trust him and are isolating him.
 
In California it is unlawful to secretly record someone without their consent. If the recording occurred in California, it is a criminal violation of the California Penal Code Section 632, punishable by a financial fine and imprisonment. Russell disclosed the fact he was recording at the end of taping, to which Young stated "Huh?" That does not make it legal. You must seek consent prior to recording. Under California law the only time you can secretly record a phone call or a conversation is if you are being blackmailed or extorted. That was not the case with Russell and Young. Russell betrayed his friend's trust in a manner that is unkind. A true friend would encourage you not to cheat and certainly not secretly record you and or disclose the contents to the public. He should not have been recording him at all. Real friends don't do that.



Nick Young and Iggy Azalea
 
This is what the Judiciary Report keeps complaining about in privacy articles. People secretly watching and or taping people without their consent, in situations privacy is to be expected, as defined by law (homes, hotel rooms, public toilets ect). It is highly inappropriate and a betrayal of trust. Society is going in the wrong direction that some, especially those in the entertainment world, think they are to secretly watch and or record others. It is sick. This voyeurism needs to stop. It is disgraceful. Life is not a reality show. And people on reality shows know and consent to being watched and recorded. Others not consenting or even knowing they are secretly being watched and or recorded are criminally breaking the law.  





Cryptic tweets issued by D'Angelo Russell and Nick Young


 It was also morally wrong for Russell to secretly tape Young and disclose the contents of the unlawfully made tape in what will damage his engagement. I don't agree with cheating, but there have been many times where I've found out about a famous person cheating on their significant other or spouse and kept it to myself, despite the fact it would create more website hits (I knew about Tiger Woods, Shaq and others affairs before it went public, but I like them as athletes and they've done nothing to me, so I didn't say anything). At the end of the day, you really don't want to hurt nice people or destroy their relationships. That's their personal life.  



Iggy Azalea tweet in response to the leaked video


If it is your family member or close friend being cheated on by someone else, you tell them privately. If you found out your parent, sibling or best friend was being cheated on, you would privately tell them. However, you don't secretly tape people and put it online as Russell did to Young. There's nothing legal, moral or kind about that. I don't want to make Russell feel bad, as he's young and made a very poor choice. However, in future he need not do things like that.
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

The FBI Seeks To Take Over Apple In What Will Damage The Trillion Dollar Company If The Courts Allow It


New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller. Comey was recently slammed in the legislature partly due to the fact "Congress is disturbed by his lack of tech knowledge"
Richard Clarke, a former senior counter-terrorism official who served under George W. Bush, is siding with Apple against the Federal Bureau Of Investigation (FBI), who have dragged the trillion dollar company into court for dubious, dishonest reasons. The FBI is seeking a court ruling to force Apple to unlock the iPhone of the main terrorist behind the San Bernardino attacks that occurred in December 2015.

Apple has resisted, as it would set a legal precedent allowing the FBI constant access to their computer systems, software and future innovations, for surreptitious spying purposes. This would greatly damage Apple, as the public would associate it with the FBI, an agency Americans historically hate and are rightfully suspicious of in many ways. Many articles and online comments reveal Americans hate the FBI. From the injustices of the civil rights era to the present, public contempt for the FBI has only grown.  

On March 14, 2016 counterterrorism official Clarke and others stated the same thing the Judiciary Report previously wrote days prior on March 11, 2016 in the "FBI Using San Bernardino Terrorist Attack As A Power Grab At Apple" article, revealing that the FBI does not need Apple to crack the iPhone of the terrorist. The reason I knew the FBI is lying about this matter regarding Apple is there is a mobile phone/internet shop in London I have used since 2012 to quickly access the internet while on the road and for 15 British pounds sterling, they unlock mobile phones in a few minutes to a half an hour. I've seen them do it. They ask a series of questions to ascertain ownership, then unlock the phone for the fee. It is not some clandestine shop. It is a licensed company providing many legal phone and internet services. 

There are other companies like it. There are similar companies in America as well. So, in short, the FBI is lying about being unable to unlock the mobile phone of the San Bernardino terrorist ringleader. There are companies who do these things. Not that many, but they exist and are not hard to find.

The FBI just wants an illegal foothold at Apple to violate the privacy of American and global citizens, ranging from everyday folks to billionaires to influential domestic and international politicians all over the world, who have Apple products such as iPhones. The FBI would then share this illegal stranglehold and spying foothold with the NSA and CIA (among others). Essentially, it would damage Apple beyond repair, harming a viable U.S. business that employs many people and accounts for a significant amount of revenue in America. 

The irony of it all is the arrogant psychopaths running the FBI and CIA are envious, ill willed, paranoid people resentful of those with valuable assets. The FBI and CIA can't replace the value of Apple once they damage and potentially destroy it with this madness. The FBI did not create Apple. The FBI are not intelligent enough to have done so, yet arrogantly think they should be in control of this company above their intelligence level and paid grade.

Exactly who do they think they are to be meddling in such an innovative, valuable company they do not even understand the inner workings of in any manner. Does the FBI realize how dumb they look to the public when they do such things. It's like watching a hyperactive, restless monkey take a paintbrush to a Picasso. You just know the painting is going to be irretrievably ruined and devalued.

But that's just it with the FBI, they are in their own strange world, detached from reality. Remember when the FBI arrogantly announced to the world they had come up with a new form of science to explain the anthrax case they stitched up and framed innocent scientist Bruce Ivins for, who ended up committing suicide due to severe FBI bullying, harassment and crazy threats from them against him, his family and friends (The FBI has been framing people for crimes: New Evidence Reveals The FBI Sent Innocent People To Death Row and Man Wrongfully Imprisoned For 28-Years Due To FBI and The FBI Still Framing People For Crimes and Wives Of Men Framed By The FBI Speak). 

When the FBI tried to explain the insane garbage they came up with that the agency branded a new type of science, every credible scientist in the world worth their salt pronounced it nonsensical garbage and idiocy. And it should alarm everyone that a crazy federal agency went that far, spending tens of millions of dollars of taxpayer money, to justify framing up an innocent man for a crime he did not commit, to meet an arrest quota. But here they go charging into Apple with their deranged behavior, "Like a bull in a China shop." And make no mistake, the brainless bull is going to destroy some fine China.  


The FBI at Apple is the equivalent of a "Bull In A China Shop"
 
In a similar case, the FBI insanely destroyed a man's multi-million dollar internet company, Lavabit, when he had done nothing wrong, all in a crazy attempt at getting at NSA whistle blower, Edward Snowden. The FBI is constantly engaging in crazy, damaging behavior that is stripping a fortune in value from companies it meddles in. It is one of the stupidest things I have ever witnessed and Congress is negligent to let their Frankenstein agencies such as the FBI and CIA run loose with such terrible behavior destroying innocent people's valuable businesses. It certainly isn't in the name of national security, as all this invasive spying the FBI, CIA and NSA has been doing has not prevented a single act of terrorism. The federal government had to admit this in Congress. 

They are destroying America with this madness. What kind of federal idiots do such a thing. It is an arrogant fool who thinks he or she is to play games with other people's valuable companies, property and assets they were not smart enough to build and earn themselves. There ought to be a law that if a government employee, including the head of state, engages in conduct that financially damages or destroys a valuable company, he or she should be promptly prosecuted, slapped with staggering fines equaling the financial loss/damage created by their arrogant conduct and sent to prison. 

STORY SOURCE

Congress is disturbed by the FBI director’s lack of tech knowledge
 
Mar 14, 2016 at 7:45 PM - A couple of weeks ago, the FBI and Apple faced off in a Congressional hearing and answered various questions fielded by members of the House Judiciary Committee. Now it appears that members of the committee, from both sides of the aisle, aren’t happy with FBI Director James Comey’ grasp of technology. 

According to Fast Company’s sources, members of the committee were unpleasantly surprised by Comey’s apparent unpreparedness to answer some of the more technical questions. On one hand, it’s great to see the chief of one of the most relevant law enforcement agencies in the world admit he’s not fully aware of all the technical aspects of encryption. On the other hand, Comey could have brought in aides to help him out with these questions, but he decided not to do it. 

Comey declined to answer several questions, explaining he lacked the technical understanding to do it. But he also proved he knows less than some of the members of the committee. Congressman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), who has a security background, asked Comey about the FBI’s attempts to crack the iPhone 5c that belongs to Syed Farook. Issa knew there are two ways to do it, one involving Apple’s help (disabling the security features of iOS), and one that can be done by removing the flash memory chip from the phone and mirroring its contents. 

Issa wanted to find out if Comey knew for certain the FBI can’t break into the iPhone by itself, and Comey’s answers were not satisfactory. “We have engaged all parts of government to see if anybody has a way of doing this on an iPhone 5c running iOS 9, and we don’t,” Comey said. When asked about the mirroring technique, Comey seemed not to understand the question. 

“If you haven’t asked that question, how can you come before this committee and before a federal judge and demand that somebody else invent something if you can’t answer the questions that your people have tried this?” he asked Comey.  “First, I’m the director of the FBI. If I could answer that question there’d be something dysfunctional with my leadership,” Comey said. 

“I only asked you if your people have tried that, not whether or not it would work,” Issa continued. “Who did you go to to find out if you could do it yourself?” “I did not ask the questions you’re asking here today, and I’m not sure I even understand the questions,” Comey replied. “I have reasonable confidence, in fact, I have high confidence, that the federal government has reviewed all the options.”
“I’ve heard about mirroring, maybe that’s what you’re talking about. Hopefully, my folks are watching this, and if they hear any good ideas in what you’re talking about, we’ll let you know.” Democratic Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren admitted that Comey’s lack of knowledge is problematic for the entire debate. 

“It’s clear he’s not up to speed on some of the technical issues, which he conceded during the hearing,” Lofgren told Fast Company. “And that might be part of the problem as to why they are pursuing the course of action they are pursuing.” “The director can’t be expected to be an expert on every subject but I didn’t see him [bring any help into the meeting], which I thought was interesting,” she said. 

Other committee members did not comment on the matter. But committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) told the site that “the House Judiciary Committee will soon announce its next steps on the encryption debate.” “As we move forward, the goal is to find a solution that allows law enforcement to effectively enforce the law without harming the competitiveness of U.S. encryption providers or the privacy and security protections of U.S. citizens,” Goodlatte added. 


Counterterrorism expert says FBI isn’t being honest about iPhone hacking

By Buster Hein • 12:11 pm, March 14, 2016 - The guy that warned George Bush about an imminent al-Qaida attack before 9/11 is taking Apple’s side in the company’s fight against the FBI over whether it can be compelled to break into the San Bernardino terrorist’s iPhone. 

Richard Clarke, who served as the senior counterterrorism official in the US for nine years, sat down for an interview this morning regarding encryption and the FBI’s efforts to hack the iPhone. Despite FBI Director James Comey’s insistence that the FBI has tried everything, Clarke says all it would take to hack the device is a call to Fort Meade. 

“If I were in the job now, I would have simply told the FBI to call Fort Meade, the headquarters of the National Security Agency, and NSA would have solved this problem for him,” Clarke told NPR’s David Green on Morning Edition Monday. “They’re not as interested in solving this problem as they are in getting a legal precedent.” 

This is not the first time Director Comey has been accused of trying to set a legal precedent for forcing Apple to weaken security on iOS. Apple’s top lawyer Bruce Sewell argued the same thing before the House Judiciary committee earlier this year, while CEO Tim Cook has made numerous public statement on why the FBI’s demands put all citizens at risk. 

The FBI has insisted that it has no means to hack the iPhone 5c in question and that is only requesting help for one device. Apple has been asked to create a new version of iOS that would make it easier for the FBI to guess the terrorist’s passcode without the device auto-deleting its memory after too many failed attempts. Congress grilled Comey during his committee appearance about whether the agency has exhausted all its resources first. Clarke claims they’re not even trying to unlock it. 

“You really have to understand that the FBI director is exaggerating the need for this and is trying to build it up as an emotional case, organizing the families of the victims and all of that,” Clarke said. “It’s Jim Comey, and the attorney general is letting him get away with it. Every expert I know believes that NSA could crack this phone. They want the precedent that the government can compel a computer device manufacturer to allow the government in.” ...

A Government Error Just Revealed Snowden Was the Target in the Lavabit Case

Date of Publication: 03.17.16. - Time of Publication: 5:30 pm. - It’s been one of the worst-kept secrets for years: the identity of the person the government was investigating in 2013 when it served the secure email firm Lavabit with a court order demanding help spying on a particular customer. Ladar Levison, owner of the now defunct email service, has been forbidden since then, under threat of contempt and possibly jail time, from identifying who the government was investigating. In court documents from the case unsealed in late 2013, all information that could identify the customer was redacted. 

But federal authorities recently screwed up and revealed the secret themselves when they published a cache of case documents but failed to redact one identifying piece of information about the target: his email address, Ed_Snowden@lavabit.com. With that, the very authorities holding the threat of jail time over Levison’s head if he said anything have confirmed what everyone had long ago presumed: that the target account was Snowden’s.

The documents were posted on March 4 to the federal court system known as Pacer as part of Levison’s long battle for transparency in the case that ruined his business. They were spotted this week by the transparency site Cryptome and published online.  Here’s a quick recap of that case: On June 28, 2013, shortly after newspapers published the first NSA leaks from Snowden, FBI agents showed up at Levison’s door in Texas and served him with a pen register order requiring him to give the government metadata for the email activity of one customer’s account. 

The case was initially sealed and the public didn’t learn about it and the fight over Levison’s customer until after he had shuttered his email service in defiance of the government. But even after he closed Lavabit and there was no hope of the government obtaining information about the account that it had been seeking, the target was never identified. When some of the documents in the case were finally unsealed in redacted form in October 2013, however, the unredacted parts left little doubt that the Lavabit case was about Snowden, who was known to be using a Lavabit account in the spring of 2013 when his first NSA leaks were published and when he was hiding in a safe house in Hong Kong. It was still an educated guess, however... 
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, March 25, 2016

Jury Awards Hulk Hogan $25 Million More In Damages In Gawker Secret Sex Tape Case As Editor Reveals He Would Publish Child Porn On The Site


Hulk Hogan

Last week a Florida jury awarded wrestler Hulk Hogan $115,000,000 in a leaked sex tape case he filed against the Gawker website. Gawker, owned by Nick Denton, was given a secretly filmed sex tape of Hogan, shot without his permission or that of his sex partner. Gawker lawlessly decided to publish the voyeuristic tape and was hit with a $100,000,000 lawsuit for this misconduct. The jury has now awarded Hogan an additional $25,000,000 in damages. Jurors revealed seeing the tape during trial made up their minds to throw the book at Gawker for this egregious misconduct. 


Heather Clem
 
The jury's verdict in this case and others, such as Erin Andrews v. Marriott Hotels and separately Lastonia Leviston v. 50 Cent, is the American people sending the media and Hollywood a clear message that the public is not agreement with secretly spying on people in their homes, hotels and public toilets - and to make it worse, publishing the contents of the illegal voyeurism. The media and Hollywood are in their own world where anything goes, but the American public and the world as a whole are not in agreement with this perversion that is criminally violating people's rights to privacy.


Gawker owner Nick Denton and his boyfriend/civil partner
 
What's also alarming is Gawker's editor, A.J. Daulerio stating celebrity sex tapes are newsworthy, meaning they should be made public with or without the subject's consent. When asked what would constitute going too far, Daulerio answered, "If they were a child." Hogan's attorney asked "Under what age" to which Daulerio perversely and troubling replied "Four." That means Gawker would publish child porn if the subject is 5-years old and up. These are the kind of perverts Gawker has on staff. Is there any wonder those perverts at Gawker gleefully and illegally published the secretly filmed Hogan sex tape. 


Gawker's A.J. Daulerio
 
The whole thing is sick, stomach turning and deserves to be slapped down in every legal venue possible. Adults and separately children's rights are being violated, by perverts who are deviants and sexual predators desperate and hard up for any form of sexual stimulation they can find. This is not legal porn where of age actors are paid and know they are being filmed. This is secretly watching and filming people in private places, such as their bedrooms, hotel rooms and public toilets and it has to stop. It's disgusting, sick and denotes serious mental problems in people engaging in this criminal behavior. Anyone engaging in such depraved behavior belongs in a mental institution, as they are a danger to the public.

STORY SOURCE
 
Where Gawker editor draws the line: A sex-tape of a 4-year-old
 
March 9, 2016 | 11:29am - Jurors in Hulk Hogan’s sex video trial on Wednesday heard a videotaped deposition of Gawker’s former editor in chief — saying he’d draw the line at posting the sex tape of a celebrity who is under 4 years old. A.J. Daulerio, 41, was sitting ramrod straight in the Florida courtroom during the awkward moment when he was asked on video by Hogan’s lawyer, “Can you imagine a situation where a celebrity sex tape would not be newsworthy?” 

Daulerio answered flatly, “If they were a child.” 

“Under what age?” attorney Charles Harder asked. 

“Four,” he said. 

“No four-year-old sex tapes, OK,” Harder said...  
Hulk Hogan jurors said seeing Gawker sex tape solidified their decision to award wrestler more than $100m including ANOTHER $25m in punitive damages 

Published: 22:40 EST, 21 March 2016 | Updated: 01:09 EST, 22 March 2016 - The jurors in the Hulk Hogan sex tape case against Gawker said seeing the video 'solidified' their decision to hand the wrestler the winning verdict. Salina Stevens, a 35-year-old college-campus safety agent from St. Petersburg, Florida, told reporters once she saw the video she knew Hogan's privacy had been violated. 

'The video was worse than I expected in some ways. 'Not so much the sex part of it but just the conversation. 'I just feel like if he knew that he was being videotaped, he would not have spoke about the things he spoke about,' Salina said. She said the conversation between Hogan and the woman in the video was 'very human' and proved to her the wrestler didn't know he was being recorded. 

'I understand that we have a First Amendment, and I stand behind the First Amendment but I don’t want that to be used improperly. 'I think that it is used improperly way too often, and we also have privacy laws, and I hope those will be taken into more consideration when stories are being ran,’ Salina said. 

Hogan was awarded an additional $25million in punitive damages - three days after the jury ruled in his favor with a $115million judgment. That $25million will be covered by both the site and its owner Nick Denton, who jurors ordered to pay $10million of the punitive damages out of his own pocket. The jury's decision came just hours after Judge Pamela Campbell informed the four women and two men deciding the case that Denton is worth $121million while the site is valued at $83million. 

Judge Campbell also informed the jury that the former editor of the site who posted the video, 41-year-old AJ Daulerio, has no assets and owes $27,000 in student loans. He was hit even harder than Denton by jurors Monday, who ordered him to pay $100,000 of his own money despite being told about his financial status earlier in the day...
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Hulk Hogan Takes The Stand In $100,000,000 Leaked Sextape Lawsuit Against Gawker Website



Hulk Hogan

WWE and WWF wrestler, Hulk Hogan, real name Terry Bollea, took the stand today in his $100,000,000 lawsuit against the website Gawker, owned by Nick Denton. Hogan was conducting an extramarital affair with the wife of his then best friend, radio host, Bubba The Love Sponge Clem, with his knowledge and permission, in what is an unwise and unethical open marriage. Hogan states he was unaware Bubba The Love Sponge Clem was using a hidden camera to make a sex tape of Hogan and his wife. Bubba The Love Sponge Clem then leaked the video to Gawker.

Hogan stated in court, "I was embarrassed by what it did to me as a person, but it was even embarrassing as a character. Hulk Hogan was embarrassed." Denton argued his parents saw during the Holocaust "First hand what happens when free speech is suppressed." Firstly, this is exactly why Denton should have more respect for the human rights of others and not criminally aide in the violation of their privacy. The Jews were treated very badly, denied all privacy and human rights in general. Secondly, don't invoke the horrible Holocaust, something so serious that is a terrible human atrocity where people were murdered, as a legal defense for violating the rights of others. It is insulting. Thirdly, leaked a secretly made sex tape has nothing to do with free speech. You criminally violated Hogan's human rights. 

 

Bubba The Love Sponge Clem and wife Heather

So, Denton, following your illogical, defective defense, another blogger would have the right to secretly install a hidden camera in your bedroom and bathroom, then unbeknownst to you record you in states of undress and engaging in sexual activity, then publish it to their blog? You would sue them into poverty if you were disgustingly violated in that manner, so stop pretending.

As a writer and blogger, who has respect for the law and people's rights, I am of the belief, Gawker had absolutely no right to post the secretly made sex tape of Hogan. What Gawker did was unkind, cruel and criminal. There is a depravity that exists today among some in society, emanating from Hollywood, where select people think they have the right to secretly spy on others in their homes and hotel rooms. It is perverted, sick and demonic. It is a sign of serious mental illness that is a threat to society. 


Nick Denton and his boyfriend/civil partner

They keep pushing the envelope with this vile behavior, moving the goalpost each time in trying to get the public to accept the unacceptable as normal behavior and next thing you know, they will are going to try to excuse secretly spying on underage children in their homes and bathrooms in states of undress. Some are already engaging in this abominable conduct and deserve to be locked up for a long stretch of time over it, as they are a danger to society. Some are already under indictment and in prison for the aforementioned behavior. 

Congress has not done enough to protect the public from mentally deranged voyeurs. Psychiatry lists voyeurism as a mental disorder. It is nasty. They are also sexual predators. It is not something to be celebrated or encouraged. Many U.S. states have criminal laws against it, but serious, sweeping federal legislation that would cover the entire country needs to be passed to protect the public.  
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Erin Andrews Wins $55,000,000 In Case Against Marriott Hotels Over Being Stalked And Secretly Filmed In Her Room By Sick Voyeur Who Disseminated The Video Online


Erin Andrews in court

ESPN sportscaster and "Dancing With The Stars" television host, Erin Andrews, was victorious in court this week, with a jury awarding her $55,000,000 in damages against the Marriott chain of hotels (and her stalker), for allowing her deranged voyeuristic stalker, Michael David Barrett, to obtain her hotel room information and booking him a suite next to her, enabling him to secretly record her naked, then upload it to the internet like a depraved pervert and sexual predator. As the damages are split 51/49, Marriott Hotels is liable for $27,000,000 in damages. Barrett, who is not wealthy, is liable for the remaining damages. As such his wages will be garnished, as will any existing bank account in his name, likely for the rest of his life, in attempts to financially repay his victim. Barrett was also sentenced to 5-years in prison in a separate criminal case. 


Erin Andrews

Andrews sued for $75,000,000, but the jury awarded her $20,000,000 less than requested. Previously, the Judiciary Report alluded to the fact the damages requested would be considered high for the crime in question, as usually cases that resulted in death for the victim (filed by heirs) or extreme medical misconduct, are awarded such high damages (Erin Andrews Seeks $75,000,000 In Hotel Voyeurism Case). The Judiciary Report's figure of $20,000,000 in damages is in line with what Andrews is likely due to receive, regarding the $27,000,000 verdict. The $27,000,000 damage award could be reduced on appeal, but hopefully the verdict regarding said figure will stand. Nonetheless, it is a sizeable sum of money for such a case. 


Michael Barrett
Andrews deserves the money. What was done to her is cruel and inhumane. It was meant to degrade and humiliate. Regrettably, the Marriott's negligence facilitated the sick conduct of a sexual predator. Under the law, they are liable for the severe mental and emotional trauma Andrews sustained. Hotels are not supposed to release the information of their guests to unauthorized parties. It is an invasion of privacy and security risk. What if Barrett had been a killer.

RELATED ARTICLES
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)