Kim Kardashian Settles Libel Lawsuit Against Media Take Out

Kim Kardashian

Reality star, Kim Kardashian, has dropped her lawsuit against gossip website, Media Take Out, after they agreed to issue a public apology, over claims the armed burglary involving her, which occurred at a rented apartment (flat) in Paris, France, was staged and an insurance scam. Kardashian was reportedly robbed of $11,000,000 in jewelry. Kardashian has since filed an insurance claim.

In a released statement, Media Take Out wrote like a gun was pointed at them "MediaTakeOut regrettably published a series of false stories about Kim Kardashian West suggesting she faked the robbery in Paris, lied to authorities and then filed a $5.6 million fraudulent insurance claim for her stolen jewelry. MediaTakeOut knows that Mrs. Kardashian West was in fact robbed in Paris. We have permanently removed from our website any and all posts that suggested she staged the robbery, lied about it to the French police and committed an insurance crime. We sincerely apologize to Mrs. Kardashian West and her family for the false stories we published and regret suggesting that what happened to her in Paris was anything less than horrific. We are pleased that this matter has been resolved to satisfaction of all the parties." 

It's not going to change public opinion, as many still believe the robbery was staged and that is not due to what Media Take Out wrote. The minute news of the alleged robbery hit social networking, many wrote items indicating they are of the belief the theft was staged. Some comments on social networking even blamed Kardashian's husband, rapper Kanye West, stating he is in financial straits and did it for the jewels and insurance money (West was begging Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg for $50,000,000 and spoke of his financial woes on Twitter).

Mainstream entertainment news programs had security experts weighing in on the alleged theft, with one wondering out loud how Kardashian was able to free herself from the zipties used to bind her hands together, stating it is virtually impossible. Therefore, skepticism has been rampant. Peopel don't believe Kardashian, who lives just about every minute of her life on camera, in acts orchestrated by her exploitative, money hungry mom, Kris Jenner.

STORY SOURCE

Kim Kardashian Settles Lawsuit with MediaTakeOut

October 25, 2016 2:49 pm - Kim Kardashian West has settled a libel lawsuit with MediaTakeOut over three articles that suggested her robbery in Paris was a publicity stunt, a representative for Kardashian West confirmed to VF.com today. The outlet posted a retraction of its stories on Monday with the headline, “Retraction: Kim Kardashian was in fact ROBBED in Paris!” It reads: 

“MediaTakeOut regrettably published a series of false stories about Kim Kardashian West suggesting she faked the robbery in Paris, lied to authorities and then filed a $5.6 million fraudulent insurance claim for her stolen jewelry. MediaTakeOut knows that Mrs. Kardashian West was in fact robbed in Paris. We have permanently removed from our website any and all posts that suggested she staged the robbery, lied about it to the French police and committed an insurance crime. We sincerely apologize to Mrs. Kardashian West and her family for the false stories we published and regret suggesting that what happened to her in Paris was anything less than horrific. We are pleased that this matter has been resolved to satisfaction of all the parties.”...

http://www.vanityfair.com

RELATED ARTICLE
 
Kim Kardashian Sues Blog Site Media Take Out Over Insurance Scam Claims After $11,000,000 Jewelry Theft

Kim Kardashian Sues Blog Site Media Take Out Over Insurance Scam Claims After $11,000,000 Jewelry Theft

Kim Kardashian filed a claim for her stolen wedding ring, among other alleged pilfered pieces of jewelry
 

Reality star, Kim Kardashian, has sued gossip blog Media Take Out for libel, due to the website stating she engaged in an insurance scam, after allegedly being held at gunpoint and robbed of $11,000,000 her jewelry. Media Take Out is owned by Fred Mwangaguhunga. It is one of the most viewed sites on the internet.

Kardashian's lawyer stated Media Take Out wrote she, "Faked the robbery, lied about the violent assault, and then filed a fraudulent claim with her insurance company to bilk her carrier out of millions of dollars." The fact of the matter is many on social networking sites have written items indicating they are of the belief the Kardashian's staged the robbery. Media Take Out shares their view and published it online.

Kardashian's lawyer further stated, "Kardashian was assaulted and robbed by two masked men, who placed a gun to her head, duct-taped her hands, legs and mouth, and then left her lying helplessly on the bathroom floor of her rented apartment while the thieves absconded with millions of dollars in jewelry. As if that ordeal were not awful enough, Defendants made it worse by publishing on the Website, only hours after the assault, that Kardashian faked the robbery and then committed insurance fraud by filing a claim with her carrier."

Am I sorry for Kardashian? No, she's a thief herself (you reap what you sow) and Kim and the Kardashians have been sued repeatedly by many copyright and trademark owners all over America for stealing their intellectual property/products and slapping the family name on it like it is their own.

I will state this though, Media Take Out took a big risk writing that Kardashian staged the robbery and engaged in an insurance scam. The last part in particular about the insurance scam was risky, as it is a serious accusation and not easy to prove. Even if people online think Kardashian had the robbery staged (and many do based on comments on social networking) in order for you to write it on a website, you must have proof, lest you get sued.

You could attempt to legally compel Kardashian to submit to a lie detector test regarding the robbery. You could also depose her for 3-hours on the matter until all the details come out. While you're at it, find out how many industrial plants had workers working overtime to product her butt implants that now look like a diaper gone very wrong. 

STORY SOURCE

Kim Kardashian Sues Website Over Claims She Faked Paris Robbery

 October 11, 2016 - Kim Kardashian isn't taking a gossip site's claim that she lied about her traumatic Paris robbery lightly. The reality star is suing mediatakeout.com and its owner Fred Mwangaguhunga for libel per se. "After having been the victim of a horrific and traumatic armed robbery in France, Kim Kardashian returned to the United States only to again be victimized, but this time by an online gossip tabloid that published a series of articles in early October 2016 referring to her a liar and thief," writes Kardashian attorney Andrew Brettler in a complaint filed Tuesday in New York federal court...

https://www.yahoo.com

Be Careful Of What Your Kids Post Online As Parents Are Being Sued And Losing In Court

Parents are suing the teenage (and adult) bullies, who use the internet to harass and terrorize their children. Due to the fact some of said flagrant harassers are minors, their parents are being sued by default in courts of law. These lawsuits have proven successful in test cases around the country.

As a blogger I like others in my genre, scour the internet for the latest news. This entails reading news sites, social networking pages and internet forums for information and public feedback and relevant topics of the day. I’ve seen social networking pages and online forums containing incendiary and threatening items by minors, who are obsessed with celebrities or engaged in activities targeting people they go to school with. The statements are not only inappropriate and sometimes illegal (threats), but actionable in a court of law. Parental supervision is needed regarding these minors.

Monitor what your children are posting on social networking. They may think its uncool that you are watching their social network pages and internet forum posts. However, there’s nothing cool about getting sued, having to hire a lawyer for thousands of dollars and pay out tens of thousands of dollars more in financial damages in court, because your child decided to play a bully or gangster from behind the alleged safety of their computer. No such thing. Everything online is traceable, no matter how anonymous you may think your actions are online.

El Debarge Shuts Down Rumors He Has A Secret Child With Pebbles

  

El Debarge

This is a follow up to the July 29, 2014 Judiciary report article "Pebbles Shuts Down Rumors She Has A Secret Son With El Debarge." El Debarge has also spoken out about the lies a stalker has been feeding unsuspecting bloggers, regarding an alleged secret child with Pebbles, stating the same thing she has, it's a complete lie.

 

Pebbles

Pebbles and El Debarge have never met and it must be hurtful to see someone lie to the people in that manner, playing on public sympathy for attention and ill-gotten gains, via a so-called-tell all book due for release next month, that everyone should boycott. Don't waste your money on the fraudulent forthcoming tell all by "Tian McKissack" which isn't even his real name, as it is a pack of lies. 

El Debarge shuts down rumors regarding secret a child with Pebbles

Pebbles shuts down rumors regarding secret a child with Pebbles

The book should not even be published, as it constitutes "willful malice" (knowingly publishing deceitful, defamatory, libelous material) which is a litigable offense. He should do himself a favor and call off the fraudulent book, before he loses his shirt in court and ends up embarrassed all over the internet.

  

Sebastian "Tian" McKissack has fraudulently taken Pebbles' maiden name and is going around stating he is her son and that of El Debarge, when neither singer has met the other. Sebastian's facial features does not resemble either singer. He looks like an extra from a Bone Thugs video.

No real judge is going to sympathize with someone making up such outlandish, scandalous lies and publishing them, regarding two people he claims are his parents, who've never even met each other. He'll be on the hook for a financial judgment in the six figures that can be enforced against any assets he owns and his monthly wages. He should while he's ahead. 

RELATED ARTICLE

Judge Slaps Woman With $10,000 Fine For Lying In Stating Michael Jordan Is The Father Of Her Son

Dawn Robinson's Ex-Husband Says He Got Her Kicked Off The Show 'R&B Divas LA' But Backs Off Suing Me And Others

Dawn Robinson and Dre Allen when they were still together

This is a follow up to the September 5, 2013 article 'R&B Divas LA Reunion Show Part 1' Was Explosive. In the article I mentioned being contacted online on August 15, 2013 by someone stating they are music producer Dre Allen, who was married to 'R&B Divas LA' star, Dawn Robinson, formerly of the girl group En Vogue.

Allen tweeted, "Out of respect I have to warn printing or reprinting lies can easily involve you in a future libel/slander action against TV One" who broadcast the show "R&B Divas LA." He tweeted this in response to my article on the show expressing sympathy for his ex-wife, Robinson, who on the air, accused him of beating and cheating on her and fathering three children outside of the marriage.

R&B Divas LA

I tweeted back to him on Twitter, "Current case law/legal precedents state bloggers can write about" items broadcast on television or reported in the press, without being successfully sued in a court of law for republishing the claims contained therein.

Hours after I published the post 'R&B Divas LA Reunion Show Part 1' Was Explosive to the Judiciary Report and my blog, Allen released a statement to the Media Take Out website about the lawsuit, stating he dropped the potential legal action, as TV One kicked Dawn off the show. Robinson was strangely absent from the reunion show, hosted by Wendy Williams, who would have asked her probing questions about Allen.

https://twitter.com/aishamusic/status/368119256770039809

Clearly he saw the sense in what I was stating regarding not suing, as such cases do not prevail against bloggers. However, I will state this, as he is now claiming Robinson defamed him on TV in stating he had three children outside their 5-year marriage that ended 6-years ago, phrasing it in a manner like he fathered them during their union, when he states his children are 20, 17, 4 and 2, something is not adding up.

Dre Allen's Facebook post https://www.facebook.com/RBDivasLA/posts/10151907787218274

However, if Robinson was not truthful he should sue for a retraction or correction of some kind. Allen's name is still in tatters judging by numerous website feedback sections, as the show was broadcast to millions and some still believe Robinson. Allen has not made reference to the allegations he beat Robinson. The truth needs to come out about all the allegations made by both Robinson and Allen.

I'm not out to destroy innocent people. I've done a handful of follow up articles to clear up misinformation in the mainstream press on individuals reported on, who were libeled or defamed by other outlets or members of government.

STORY SOURCE

You Wanna Know The Real Reason Dawn Robinson Was Not At The reunion Show

"I wanted to personally inform you and the media that I am suing Thinkfactory, TV One, Dawn Robinson, Phil Thornton, and anyone else that has ANYTHING to do with mentioning DAWN’S EX HUSBAND out of their mouth having 3 kids outside of the marriage and beating her.

[They] should have done [their] homework. Dawn was the only individual arrested for domestic violence while we were married. And it would be IMPOSSIBLE for my 20, 17, 4 and 2 year olds to have been born during a 5 year marriage that ended 6 years ago.

Two of my clients brought up concerns after watching [the show R&B Divas] and my company nets over $3mil a year collectively from both. DAMAGES! And [they] slandered a man with AMPLE resources so expect a good fight."

http://cdn.mediatakeout.com

Stars Who Gossip

Stars often complain about bloggers posting their business on blogs. Some bloggers like Perez Hilton have become celebrities, which complicates things, regarding being in the same circles as the folks one reports on. Some celebrities like to pretend they are above it all, but are the worst gossips in industry circles.

Stars email and DM (each other) gossip on folks in the industry and sometimes outside it. They ask for the scoop on other celebrities and up and coming ones as well (mainly those they have a romantic interest in or want to work with or both). There's nothing wrong with talking, emailing or DMing a friend to find out about what they know regarding someone one is interested in. It can be helpful.

Where it gets really messy is when celebrities start getting into other people's personal family business and love lives in trying to sabotage others. Say what you want about bloggers, but when a blogger does something, at least it's out in the open, online for all to read.

 

The average bloggers isn't talking dirty about people behind their backs in trying to bring them down, quietly defaming others, spreading lies in assassinating their characters with an ulterior motive behind it all. Some entertainers are jealous of newly established or up and coming ones and will lie to and deceive others about them.

There's an incident regarding an established female star lying to an established male star about an up and coming female artist he privately inquired about. Girlfriend flat out lied to and deceived him out of jealousy. But the question is, what would her HUSBAND say if he found out and he will (it doesn't look good). She's not going to like what her husband or the guy she has been feeding lies will have to say to her. She's already married. Why mess up someone else's chance at happiness. What kind of friend are you.

Then there's the case of a male artist lying to his famous male collaborator about a woman the latter fell in love with. The male artist said he slept with the woman, when by all accounts, it is not true. He deemed the famous collaborator has become too attached to the young starlet he too is interested in, but didn't bother to tell his collaborator.  

Charges Dropped Against Elvis Impersonator Accused Of Sending Ricin To President Obama

 

Charges have been dropped against Memphis, Tennessee Elvis impersonator, Paul Kevin Curtis, who was arrested for allegedly sending the poison ricin to U.S. President Barack Obama, via the U.S. mail. The FBI made an error in detaining him, accusing him of said crime.

His attorney spoke about the incident ruining his life, as someone is said to have imitate him in the ricin laced letters. Once again, the FBI got it wrong (The FBI Under Scrutiny For Failing To Act On Tip Two Years Ago About Boston Marathon Bomber).

David Beckham Loses Appeal In Prostitute Libel And Defamation Case

The Beckhams

 

This is a follow up to the February 15. 2011 article Judge Questionably Throws Out David Beckham Case. Beckham’s libel appeal against prostitute Irma Nici, over claims she had sex with him, breaking his marriage vow, was recently denied by the appeals circuit.

Irma Nici

It’s not surprising, as many cases regarding people like Murdoch (and separately in this case the publishers behind In Touch) are mysteriously dismissed, having been corrupted by him in illegal ways. Beckham was able to prove he was not at the hotel or the country at the time Nici claimed the two had sex. Hotel management also denied Nici was at the hotel on the day in question. The article also contained factual errors, regarding Beckham’s hairstyle at the time, as photographic evidence revealed his hair looked nothing like she described. There are too many holes in her story.

Irma Nici

 

A person should not be able to make such allegations in print regarding someone’s conduct without proof (travel documents, passport stamps, receipts - all of which the accuser lacks) and it prevail in a court of law. It undermines the court system. Free speech does not give one the right to defamation. 

Basketball Wives Star Evelyn Lozada Suing Over Damaging Blog Rumor She Slept With Fiancé's Teammate

Evelyn Lozada

"Basketball Wives" reality star, Evelyn Lozada, is suing mad over online claims she cheated on fiancé, football player, Chad "Ochocinco" Johnson, with his former Cincinnati Bengals teammate, Terrell Owens. So much so, she has filed a libel and defamation lawsuit in court against the originator of the online rumor, the frequently read website, Media Take Out, which was spooled into other blogs. Lozada filed suit in Miami, stating Media Take Out's claims about her are false.

Johnson now plays for the New England Patriots and Lozada has accompanied him to Boston. Media Take Out should not be surprised that Lozada is angry. After all, she told off her own best friend on television, Jennifer Williams, over being unsupportive on a radio show, over her relationship with Johnson, so what did you think she would do over a blogger she doesn't know.

Evelyn Lozada and Chad "Ochocinco" Johnson

Lozada is not playing when it comes to milk dud (translation: milk dud is slang for a bald black man, named after the delicious chocolate candy of the same name). Ironically, I don't think their relationship will last, for different reasons, but that's their business.

This is why you have to make sure you can back up claims on your blogs and websites or it can lead to legal trouble. I do not publish anything online unless I know I can back it up. This has led to a solid, reliable and bountiful exclusives page. I know for a fact Media Take Out has printed stories it did not fact check. I've seen items on their website I knew to be untrue based on what I personally know, saw or was told.

Evelyn Lozada

One of their biggest blunders came courtesy of an obsessed fan of rapper Jay-Z (girl, you must have a thing for camels) who sent in a story to them, which she later admitted on the Dr. Phil television show, was packed with lies, but they printed it as truth.

Publicists also routinely send them items to print and Media Take Out does not verify where the information came from, publishing claims that have been derived from criminal wiretapping, hacking and phone hacking, which is a serious set of felonies. You have to know what you are publishing or the legal consequences can get quite high.

RELATED ARTICLES

Shaunie O’Neal Gives Impression She Is Clueless About Lozada’s Announced Departure From Basketball Wives

Evelyn Lozada Questions Boston's Flavor

Meeka Claxton Has Left Basketball Wives And Is Suing

Basketball Wives Season Ends On A Bad Note

Will Kim Kardashian Join Basketball Wives

Eric Williams Throws Drink In His Wife's Face (Video)

Shaunie O'Neal Slams Her Show Basketball Wives

Did Evelyn Lozada Leave Her Fiancé Because He Lost His Money

Has "Basketball Wives" Topped "The Real Housewives Of Atlanta"

Shaunie O'Neal Addresses "Basketball Wives" Departure Claims

Evelyn Lozada To Basketball Wives: Show Me The Money

Sarah Palin Threatens To Sue Author Of Book That Alleged She And Her Husband Take Cocaine

Todd Palin and Sarah Palin

Former Alaska Governor and Vice Presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, is threatening to sue author, Joe McGinniss, over the salacious book he has written and released about her entitled, "The Rogue: Searching For The Real Sarah Palin." Palin stated McGinniss may be sued for "Knowingly publishing false statements."

Sarah Palin and beautiful little Trig

The book alleges she and her husband Todd Palin, are wild cocaine users. It also makes disparaging claims about their disabled toddler Trig. Sales of the biography have been bad, leading McGinniss to blame the mainstream press for running with the tawdry bits.

Sarah Palin

McGinniss took the unconventional and creepy step of moving all the way to Alaska, right next door to the Palins, while writing the book, prompting her to state he had a view right into her daughter's bedroom. The Palins erected a privacy fence as a result.

Parabolic Microphone

The danger of such a move to the target is, some have been known to employ the use of a parabolic microphone, which has a range of 300 feet. This enables one to listen to those in the structure next door, in addition to monitoring their comings and goings (Parabolic microphone and Parabolic Mic and Monocular).

RELATED ARTICLES

Sarah Palin Gaining On Obama In The Polls

Report: Sarah Palin Slept With Glen Rice

Report: Sarah Palin Took Cocaine And Marijuana

STORY SOURCE

Sarah Palin Threatens to Sue 'Rogue' Book Publisher

Sarah Palin's biographer: not happy with mainstream media

Joe McGinniss' book on Sarah Palin not among top sellers

Rupert Murdoch Defames Australia’s Prime Minister Then Retracts It After Legal Threat

I Told You He Was Going To Do That

Rupert Murdoch and Wendi Murdoch

Several weeks ago, the Judiciary Report warned that News International/News Corp CEO, Rupert Murdoch, would attack, Julia Gillard, the prime minister of his homeland Australia, for publicly and correctly stating his company’s conduct in the phone hacking scandal is wrong.

On July 22, 2011, in the article Australian Prime Minister Slams Rupert Murdoch And News Corp the Judiciary Report wrote of Murdoch, "Of course, now Murdoch will lie about and smear Gillard in his papers, online and on television, with estimates placing his share of the newspaper market in Australia at 73 percent."

Well, this week Murdoch's done just that - viciously and vindictively attacked Gillard in one of his newspapers, via a defamatory, baseless article, he could not prove, as it was fabricated to malign her out of revenge for denouncing his unlawful conduct.

As a result of the defamatory piece, Gillard, took the unprecedented step of threatening to sue Murdoch in court for making up a damaging story about her and publishing it in his newspaper. This scared Murdoch, which forced him to issue a public retraction and an apology to Gillard in the newspaper.

Julia Gillard

Yea, he should be tired of court cases against him by now and if he has any brain cells left, view it as an indication the public is tired of his foolishness that continues to greatly damage News International/News Corp. Things have arrived at a point that the general public ceases to believe him anymore. How can you after what he's done.

Murdoch is mental. I’ve warned on website that he is bipolar. The levels of mental illness he is carrying, makes him a danger to the public, as he has exhibited a penchant for unlawful behavior, undertaking harmful activities, such as obstruction of justice via phone hacking murdered minors, contracting violent private investigators to stalk and threaten people he crazily deems enemies, due to their hard earned business and personal assets he wants to pillage.

Not to mention, Murdoch has destroyed countless marriages via unlawful spying, then for profit illegally divulging to the world, the contents of his staff's criminal invasion of privacy, in violation of the law. The man is a public menace with mental problems, which is made worse by the fact he has access to billions to commission terrible crimes against the public.

RELATED ARTICLES

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp Broke British Law

Another Prominent Journalist Exposes Rupert Murdoch And News Corp For Stalking

Renewed Outrage In Britain Over Rupert Murdoch's News Corp Phone Hacking Mom Of Murdered Missing Girl

Fox News Has A Secret Phone Hacking Department In The Building Says Former Employee

Prominent Editor Accuses News Corp Of Stalking And Bullying People

Senator Demands FBI Investigate Rupert Murdoch For Hacking Rival & Stealing Their Copyrights

News Corp Employees State James Murdoch Lied In Parliament About The Phone Hacking Scandal

Rupert Murdoch Illegally Accessed The Medical Records Of The Prime Minister's Sick Child

The Head Of The Wall Street Journal Resigns Due To Rupert Murdoch Phone Hacking Scandal

Privacy Invader Rebekah Brooks Resigns From Rupert Murdoch's News Company

Rupert Murdoch Executive Admitted To Bribing The Metropolitan Police (Video)

News Corp And Insider Trading In The Phone Hacking Scandal

Delusional Rupert Murdoch Thinks The Public Adores Him

Rupert Murdoch Finally Admits His Company's Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Crimes

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Madonna's Connection To Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Scandal

A Second News Corp Whistleblower Died

STORY SOURCE

‎Rupert Murdoch's daily paper angers Australian government

Judge Questionably Throws Out David Beckham Case

The Beckhams

U.S. District Judge Manuel Real has thrown out a $25,000,000 libel case, filed by British football player, David Beckham. He sued In Touch magazine for printing a knowingly false sex story by drug addicted prostitute Irma Nici, who claimed she had a threesome with the football player behind his wife's back, which Beckham denies. There are many discrepancies in her story, leading many to believe it is a lie concocted for fame, money and magazine sales.

Nici's physical description of Beckham during the incident was incorrect, as that was not the hairstyle he was sporting at the time, based on time stamped paparazzi photos. The hotel where the affair allegedly took place, flatly denies Beckham or Nici were ever there. Additionally, Nici has no passport stamps, travel receipts or bills to prove she traveled from her native Europe to Los Angels in America, where her shameful story placed them at the time. Her story has so many holes in it, people realized it is undeniably false.

Judge Manuel Real, threw out the case, stating in his ruling, In Touch did not act with malice, which is the American criteria for bringing such a case. What a load of rubbish. Someone prints a defamatory, deceitful story that does not check out, jeopardizing another person's marriage, causing their family "emotional distress and mental anguish" opening their small children up to public ridicule and that is not based in malice. Have you taken leave of your senses. Of course that is based in malice. I'm not vouching for Beckham, but in a case with so many lies against him, it should not have been thrown out.

Irma Nici

Decisions such as Real's opens the judicial system up to intense international and domestic scrutiny, disgrace and cries of corruption, as many newspapers and websites are questioning the lunacy of the decision. To bring the point home, the same legal action against In Touch, succeeded in Germany, while failing in America.

What does that tell the nation and the world. You think about that the next time you and other judges with your corrupt mindset decide to write foolishness on paper and disgrace the judiciary to the watching world. People aren't stupid. They can think for themselves and are tired of witnessing miscarriages of justice come out of the court system, where it is still the litigant who can spend the most money, in more ways than one (hint hint) that wins in court.

RELATED ARTICLES

Prostitute Countersues David Beckham

Beckham States He Is Not Cheating On His Wife, But...

David Beckham Tracked Down Deceitful Prostitute

David Beckham's Hunt For Prostitute Gets Vicious

David Beckham Sues In Touch And Prostitute

Beckham Marriage In Crisis Again

Prostitute Countersues David Beckham

Victoria and David Beckham

Prostitute, Irma Nici, who was sued by David Beckham, for defamation and libel, over claims she made in In Touch magazine, stating she had a threesome with the British football player, has countersued.

The countersuit is without merit and frivolous. She is suing Beckham for abridging her right to free speech. However, she is incorrect. She's had her say via In Touch magazine and Beckham did not block the issue from being published. He has not gagged her in any fashion. She is correct in stating each person is entitled to free speech in America. However, one can be sued over it as a consequence, if one's words are libelous, slanderous or threatening, with the latter leading to arrest.

Nici also claims in legal papers, due to Beckham's process server aggressively pursing her, she somehow sustained damage. I warned this would happen, days before she filed suit or made announcements regarding her intent to do so. Process service need not be aggressive, as it can open the door to other legal claims. However, Nici has failed to state what these physical injuries are, only claiming she was kicked out of the W Hotel in New York, after being served Beckham's legal papers.

Irma Nici

Getting kicked out of the hotel was most likely due to her profession, which, as mentioned previously, is prostitution. Respectable hotels dislike women of ill repute patronizing their establishments, as there is a concern the premises will be used for prostitution, which is a crime.

Under the circumstances, Beckham can't be blamed for that. The more plausible reason for the ejection is the hotel discovering, via press articles, when the story exploded in the mainstream press worldwide, a prostitute is ensconced in one of their rooms. That's usually a no-no for an upscale hotel.

Once again, Nici has failed to produce any proof of an affair with Beckham. She has simply restated items other individuals have written online, regarding his physical characteristics and used press articles to pinpoint where he was located on specific dates, which she has now mysteriously placed herself as well, with no passport stamps to show for it. What Irma Nici has is a story with nothing to back it up. It's hard enough to prove claims against a celebrity, due to government corruption, bribery and Hollywood blacklisting, but to make claims with no proof, is unwise and hard to take seriously.

David Beckham Tracked Down Deceitful Prostitute

Photos have been released, of process servers, hired by British footballer, David Beckham, to locate and deliver a $25,000,000 lawsuit, on prostitute, Irma Nici, for libel, defamation and malice, in conjunction with In Touch magazine.

Victoria Beckham and David Beckham

They located her in New York and twice attempted to serve her the suit. During the second attempt, process service was completely executed at her lawyer's office. Nici smiled, why I don't know, as the legal papers were handed to her, ordering the prostitute to respond to claims she lied about Beckham in In Touch.

Irma Nici

The Judiciary Report read excerpts of the article Nici did with In Touch and it does greatly insult the footballer's wife, Victoria Beckham. Nici poked fun at his anorexic wife, stating she is too skinny and unattractive, whilst giving Beckham a 7 1/2 for sexual prowess. Maybe if you'd given him a 10, he wouldn't have sued you (sarcasm).

In all seriousness, it is disturbing that someone made such sweeping allegations that could have destroyed a marriage and family of five (you know his wife threw pots and pans at him) and it went to print with no proof. Nici also made allegations Beckham paid her $10,000 for sex, which is a crime, that could launch him into criminal trouble.

RELATED ARTICLES

David Beckham's Hunt For Prostitute Gets Vicious

David Beckham Sues In Touch And Prostitute

Beckham Marriage In Crisis Again

Jamaican PM Suing ABC News For Defamation

Bruce Golding

Jamaican Prime Minister, Bruce Golding, has initiated legal action against ABC News, stating they have defamed him in a widely disseminated broadcast, accusing him of being associated with drug fugitive, Christopher Michael Coke A/K/A "Dudus."

The FBI/DOJ's poorly handled extradition request for the drug suspect, has resulted in the deaths of 73 Jamaican police officers, military and civilians.

ABC has been left stranded in the lurch, as the anonymous U.S. State Department source they cited in their article, has abandoned them, as it has been reported in the Jamaica Observer newspaper, "US State Department officials later denied knowledge of such a document saying instead they were working with the Jamaican prime minister in crime prevention in the island."

If Golding files suit against ABC News in Britain, as the article was carried there as well, it will be much easier to prove damages, due to the fact libel laws in the United Kingdom are more favorable to Plaintiffs. Many high profile people in a variety of cases, have filed suit in Britain as a result.

Bruce legal action over ABC 'Dudus' story

Wednesday, June 09, 2010 - LAWYERS representing Prime Minister Bruce Golding have written to United States-based news network ABC seeking redress for a recent newscast referring to Golding as a ‘criminal affiliate’ of Christopher ‘Dudus’ Coke.

"It is being pursued as we speak," Information Minister Daryl Vaz told journalists at today’s post cabinet press briefing held at Jamaica House. Vaz added that a statement was issued by the prime minister this week and legal action was being pursued by him “on a personal basis”...

Golding subsequently dismissed the ABC report as "extremely offensive", and charged that efforts to link him personally with the alleged drug kingpin, were “clearly part of a conspiracy to undermine the duly elected government of Jamaica”...

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com