Showing posts with label lawsuit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawsuit. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 22, 2016

Man Sues Ex-Fiancée For $125,000 Over Her Refusal To Return Ring

 
Bradley Moss and Amy Bzura made a cute couple
 
 New Yorker, Bradley Moss, has sued his former fiancée, Amy Bzura, for $125,000 over her refusal to return the engagement ring he gave her, prior to their relationship ending. The former couple dated for 3-years and became engaged in November 2015. After their relationship fell apart, Moss demanded Bzura return the $125,000 ring and she refused. Moss has now sued Bzura for the ring or its financial equivalent in the form of a check.

According to Findlaw.com, "If the engagement is broken, the giver gets the ring back, regardless of who or why.” Based on principle, Bzura should return the ring. It is customary for women to do so when an engagement in cancelled. Some men allow the woman to keep the ring. However, some do not. The mere fact the matter is in court must be distressing and not worth the hassle.
 
STORY SOURCE

Man Sues Ex-Fiancée for $125,000 Ring

 November 13, 2016 - By most accounts, Amy Bzura and Bradley Moss were looking forward to a happy marriage and long life together. The two were set to marry this past October with friends and family excited to attend the affair. But the two have ended up in a different type of legal arrangement, as Moss is suing Bzura for the return of the $125,000 engagement ring he gave her.

As reported in the New York Post, the New York City-based couple had been dating for more than three years when Moss proposed to Bzura on Nov. 7, 2015, according to court documents. That’s when he gave her the square emerald-cut diamond engagement ring, apparently valued at $125,000. They were set to be married on October 29...


Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Woman Voluntarily Drops Rape Case Against Donald Trump Without Settlement As It Is Discovered She Made The Whole Thing Up

 
Katie Johnson

One day before the November 8, 2016 U.S. presidential election, a Hillary Clinton supporter, Katie Johnson, dropped her rape lawsuit against Donald Trump, who is now president-elect of the United States. The lawsuit was dropped without any financial settlement or admission of guilt on Trump's part. Johnson retracted her lawsuit. The Daily Mail is stating Johnson made up the whole story.

 
Donald Trump

Johnson stated Trump raped her at age 13 at the home of convicted pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. Johnson provided no evidence regarding her claims. The lawsuit was simply filed with no corroborating receipts or evidence of any kind. Most rape victims can show how they met the alleged assailant. Johnson has failed to establish that. Epstein's victims were able to prove how they knew him and ended up in his home and on his private island for debauched, pedophilic sex parties.

 
Hillary Clinton

Johnson, a crack cocaine addict, who has two convictions for DUI, stated she came to the conclusion Trump was the man who raped her at Epstein's home in 1994, when she saw him recently on "The Apprentice" television show. Trump has constantly been on television many years prior to Johnson's claims. Since the 1990s he has been one of the most famous men in America. It is unclear why her memory was allegedly jarred recently when "The Apprentice" aired, regarding an incident she states occurred in 1994. 

 
Hillary Clinton concession speech after losing 2016 presidential election

Some are of the belief the Clinton campaign was behind Johsnon's claims. After all, Clinton used the CIA to frame Wikileaks' Julian Assange for rape. Johnson's lawsuit was a political tactic to strip votes from Trump. However, enraged by allegations of rape, Trump began to public threaten he will sue anyone who makes such claims against him.

STORY SOURCE

EXCLUSIVE: Troubled woman with a history of drug use who claimed that she was assaulted by Donald Trump at a Jeffrey Epstein sex party at age 13 MADE IT ALL UP 

On Friday, a lawsuit filed against Donald Trump by 'Katie Johnson' was dramatically dropped
Speculation that the suit was dropped because of threats or a pay-off by Trump went viral
But DailyMail.com has learned that the claims against Trump were fiction. 'Katie Johnson's' shocking allegations first emerged in a lawsuit filed in California in April. She claimed she was lured to a sex party by pedophile Jeffrey Epstein where she was forced into rough role-play sex with presidential candidate.

On Wednesday Johnson suddenly cancelled a press conference at which she was set to reveal herself for the first time. Before that, she told her story to DailyMail.com. Clinton supporters had seized on the story as a possible knock out blow.

Published: 14:53 EST, 7 November 2016 | Updated: 01:26 EST, 8 November 2016 - The woman who alleged that Donald Trump raped her at age 13 at one of billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's notorious 'sex parties' fabricated the story, DailyMail.com has learned exclusively. When the civil suit was initially filed last April, Trump's legal team branded the allegations 'disgusting at the highest level' and a 'hoax' clearly framed to 'solicit media attention or, perhaps... simply politically motivated'. 

Clinton supporters had seized on the story as a possible knock out blow. Then, last Wednesday, Katie Johnson suddenly cancelled a packed press conference at which she was set to reveal herself for the first time, saying she was 'too afraid' following a series of 'threats' against her. 

On Friday, six months after legal papers were filed, the civil lawsuit was dramatically dropped. Katie Johnson's shocking allegations first emerged in a lawsuit filed in California in April this year. She claimed she was raped by Donald Trump when she was a 13-year-old in 1994 - but now she has dramatically dropped the case as DailyMail.com learns that her story was not true.

Social media erupted with claims that the woman had been paid off by Trump or was so terrified by threats to her life from Trump supporters that she was forced to withdraw her claims. But DailyMail.com has learned that the real reason the suit was dropped is because the claims were simply NOT true.
 
The woman first sued Trump and Jeffrey Epstein under the name Katie Johnson - a name we know not to be her real identity - on April 26 in California federal court and filed an amended complaint in New York federal court in October, claiming she was subject to rape, criminal sexual acts, assault, battery and false imprisonment.
 
 







Video Exposes Hillary Clinton And The Clinton Foundation's Crimes Against The Haitian People In Haiti (Video)

Black Lives Matter Slams Hillary Clinton As A Racist Who ‘Showed Black Lives Did Not Matter’

Haiti Needs To Strengthen Legislation To Help With Earthquake Rebuilding Effort

Rolling Stone Magazine Ordered To Pay $3,000,000 Over Discredited Gang Rape Story

 
Rolling Stone's now discredited "A Rape on Campus" article caused a significant amount of damage

In 2014, Rolling Stone journalist Sabrina Erdely wrote an article entitled "A Rape on Campus" regarding a University of Virginia student identified as "Jackie" who had been gang raped at the school by several male fraternity members of Phi Kappa Psi. People were outraged over the rape. 

Based on details in the story, three members of Phi Kappa Psi were publicly outed as rapists and made the subject of terrible harassment, threats and insults. The fraternity was suspended by the university. The faculty of the University of Virginia was also brought under great public scrutiny and criticism. 

It turns out "Jackie" made up the whole thing about being raped. It never happened. Rolling Stone believed her story and ended up publishing a piece that was a lie. Journalists from newspapers unraveled the story when they began reviewing her claims. Journalists unmasked it as a lie, as it was filled with many discrepancies. It was revealed "Jackie" made up the story for sympathy from a fellow student she was in love with, Ryan Duffin. Rolling Stone retracted the story. However, significant damage had been done to the reputations of faculty at the University of Virginia and the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity.

 
Jackie Coakley made up rape story

A jury has come to a verdict in the defamation civil case brought against Rolling Stone and Sabrina Erdely by University of Virginia associate dean Nicole Eramo, awarding her $3,000,000 in damages. Eramo had been publicly slammed for not handling the rape claim properly (which turned out to be a false rape claim). Eramo and her reputation suffered as a result of the article in Rolling Stone.

Erdely was blamed for not doing enough research regarding the gang rape claims of "Jackie." Rolling Stone writer Erdely failed to properly interview people "Jackie" named in connection with the story and friends she stated came to her aid. Her friends later revealed they did not see cuts and bruises on "Jackie" and she did not appear distressed, which completely contradicts the Rolling Stone article. Phi Kappa Psi has also filed suit against Rolling stone and the case is currently pending.

People want to believe a person who states they have been raped. No one wants to believe a person stating they have been raped is lying. However, it has occurred. Some have fabricated rape claims and destroyed lives and reputations in the process. The Judiciary Report would like to implore people not to make up rape claims. When people actually get raped, the false claims others made, makes it more difficult for them to be believed by the public and juries. Rape is a very real and serious crime. Do not make a mockery of it by lying.

STORY SOURCE

In Rolling Stone Defamation Case, Magazine and Reporter Ordered to Pay $3 Million

NOV. 7, 2016 - CHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — A federal jury on Monday ordered Rolling Stone and one of its writers to pay $3 million in damages to a University of Virginia administrator over a discredited article two years ago about a supposed gang rape at the university. 

The jury in Charlottesville, Va., had already decided on Friday, after a two-week trial, that Rolling Stone; Wenner Media, its parent company; and Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the author of the article, were all liable for defamation in a case that centered on faulty reporting and a failure to apply basic fail-safes in editing. 

After deliberating for less than two hours on Monday, the jury of eight women and two men decided that Ms. Erdely was liable for $2 million of the total, and Rolling Stone and Wenner Media for $1 million. In her suit, filed in May 2015, the administrator, Nicole P. Eramo, had asked for $7.5 million in damages...

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Kim Kardashian Settles Libel Lawsuit Against Media Take Out


Kim Kardashian

Reality star, Kim Kardashian, has dropped her lawsuit against gossip website, Media Take Out, after they agreed to issue a public apology, over claims the armed burglary involving her, which occurred at a rented apartment (flat) in Paris, France, was staged and an insurance scam. Kardashian was reportedly robbed of $11,000,000 in jewelry. Kardashian has since filed an insurance claim.

In a released statement, Media Take Out wrote like a gun was pointed at them "MediaTakeOut regrettably published a series of false stories about Kim Kardashian West suggesting she faked the robbery in Paris, lied to authorities and then filed a $5.6 million fraudulent insurance claim for her stolen jewelry. MediaTakeOut knows that Mrs. Kardashian West was in fact robbed in Paris. We have permanently removed from our website any and all posts that suggested she staged the robbery, lied about it to the French police and committed an insurance crime. We sincerely apologize to Mrs. Kardashian West and her family for the false stories we published and regret suggesting that what happened to her in Paris was anything less than horrific. We are pleased that this matter has been resolved to satisfaction of all the parties." 

It's not going to change public opinion, as many still believe the robbery was staged and that is not due to what Media Take Out wrote. The minute news of the alleged robbery hit social networking, many wrote items indicating they are of the belief the theft was staged. Some comments on social networking even blamed Kardashian's husband, rapper Kanye West, stating he is in financial straits and did it for the jewels and insurance money (West was begging Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg for $50,000,000 and spoke of his financial woes on Twitter).

Mainstream entertainment news programs had security experts weighing in on the alleged theft, with one wondering out loud how Kardashian was able to free herself from the zipties used to bind her hands together, stating it is virtually impossible. Therefore, skepticism has been rampant. Peopel don't believe Kardashian, who lives just about every minute of her life on camera, in acts orchestrated by her exploitative, money hungry mom, Kris Jenner.

STORY SOURCE

Kim Kardashian Settles Lawsuit with MediaTakeOut

October 25, 2016 2:49 pm - Kim Kardashian West has settled a libel lawsuit with MediaTakeOut over three articles that suggested her robbery in Paris was a publicity stunt, a representative for Kardashian West confirmed to VF.com today. The outlet posted a retraction of its stories on Monday with the headline, “Retraction: Kim Kardashian was in fact ROBBED in Paris!” It reads: 

“MediaTakeOut regrettably published a series of false stories about Kim Kardashian West suggesting she faked the robbery in Paris, lied to authorities and then filed a $5.6 million fraudulent insurance claim for her stolen jewelry. MediaTakeOut knows that Mrs. Kardashian West was in fact robbed in Paris. We have permanently removed from our website any and all posts that suggested she staged the robbery, lied about it to the French police and committed an insurance crime. We sincerely apologize to Mrs. Kardashian West and her family for the false stories we published and regret suggesting that what happened to her in Paris was anything less than horrific. We are pleased that this matter has been resolved to satisfaction of all the parties.”...

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Black Prostitute's Son Danney Williams Hires Lawyers To File Paternity Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton's Husband Bill Clinton (Video)

Danney Williams, the 30-year-old African-American son of former prostitute Bobbie Ann Williams, has retained attorneys, George V. Gates IV of New Orleans and Bruce Fein of Washington, D.C., to initiate a paternity lawsuit in New York, against the former President of the United States, Bill Clinton. Williams' clandestine story has been around for many years, even inspiring the hit film "Primary Colors.

 
Bill Clinton and Danney Williams

In 1983, a former Arkansas State Trooper, Buddy Young, stated he was paid $400 to drive then governor Clinton and Bobbie Ann Williams to her mother's house, where they spent time together, while her mom was away. Bobbie Ann Williams revealed she had sex with Clinton over a dozen times and on occasion with other women in threesomes. 


Danney Williams also stated for years Clinton had a State Trooper drop off seven $100 bills every month and Christmas presents each year. However, when Clinton became president in 1993, the money and gifts stopped. It should be noted, Williams and her family members have passed lie detector tests regarding their claims about Clinton. 

Danney Williams and Bill Clinton

Recently, I read a troubling quote from Williams, who stated, "I always felt bad about Bill Clinton not wanting to be in my life. Was it because I was black? Was there something wrong with me? It made me think sometimes even of suicide. It's not fair and it has been hurtful." 

 

Bill And Hillary Clinton

That's sad. I don't want him to kill himself. I would like for Williams to find out the identity of his real dad. It will give him some closure and put this issue to rest once and for all. Clinton needs to do the right thing and submit to a proper DNA test (not a tabloid talk show comparative DNA analysis) and let the results speak for themselves (without tampering, unlike in the movie "Primary Colors" which is based on real events in the former head of state's life).

Alex Jones and Danney Williams

The public would not be shocked if the world discovered Clinton is indeed Williams' father, as he's had so many extramarital affairs and sex scandals, it has become common knowledge. It's time for Clinton to stop running and take the test. Even if he chooses to wait until after the November 2016 presidential election, do take the test once voting concludes and a winner is announced. It's the right thing to do.

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Boxer Adrien Broner Regrettably Threatened To Kill Himself Prompting Police To Locate Him



Adrien Broner

Troubled boxer, Adrien Broner, who is battling substance abuse issues, threatened to kill himself this week. Broner posted a photo of a gun and the caption, "I'm going home I love y'all" and shortly after, "3PM I'm doing it I'm sorry to my family and friends but I don't want to be here no more this s**t too much." However, his family and police intervened and then released statements stating they've located Broner and he is okay.


In the July 1, 2016 article Judge Should Order Adrien Broner To Rehab For His Own Good I wrote the boxer needs rehab. Not only is Broner struggling with alcoholism, he is suffering from the effects of knockdowns and blows to the head in the boxing ring, which can create depression (See "head injury" second of article: How To Reap The Benefits Of Boxing While Avoiding The Pitfalls). A good doctor and therapist could assist him with the depression. It does not help that he is being harassed by questionable people outside the boxing industry, who have no business bothering this man. He needs to extricate himself from those situations.

Broner has to keep things in perspective. As stated in previous articles, Broner has a beautiful family. He also has a great boxing career with many wins, several titles and millions in purse money under his belt, pardon the pun. There is so much Broner can do with his life. He cannot allow himself to wallow in depression, as it will bring him misery.  

Something is troubling Broner and he needs to let that thing go, because it is not worth his life. Broner has six children who don't need to be fatherless. Broner also needs to be thankful the assault case against him was resolved and dismissed, as he could have went to prison for years. There is much to be thankful for in his life.

I've stated it before and I will state it again, Broner needd to drop the negative people from his circle. He needs positivity and hope in his midst. He needs strong minded people who are trying to elevate him, not bring him down. And once again, whatever he thinks is so terrible in his life, he needs to let it go and choose to be happy. That's a general rule for everyone. If anything is making you that miserable that you want to die, it is time to reevaluate the situation and let that problem go.
  
STORY SOURCE

Adrien Broner OK, despite social media posts indicating he was contemplating suicide

2:57 AM ET  - Management for boxer Adrien Broner said the former four-division champion is OK, after he posted a series of messages on his various social media accounts that indicated he was contemplating suicide. "I spoke to [boxing manager] Al Haymon; he said there's nothing to be concerned with here," "Premier Boxing Champions" spokesman Tim Smith told USA Today. "Premier Boxing Champions" is a TV series organized by Haymon's management company. 

On Instagram on Wednesday, Broner posted a photo of a handgun with the caption, "I'm going home I love y'all." Later, he posted to Instagram a photo that read: "3PM I'm doing it I'm sorry to my family and friends but I don't want to be here no more this s--- too much." Responding to worries about the Ohio native's well-being, Cincinnati Police tweeted that Broner is safe. @CincinnatiPD is aware of concerns regarding boxer @AdrienBroner. Have looked into this and made contact. All is well. Thx for the concern! — Cincinnati Police (@CincinnatiPD) October 12, 2016... 

http://www.espn.com

Adrien Broner Posts Photo Of Gun In Car, Says He's "Going Home"

Wednesday 5:59pm - Adrien Broner suggested that he would harm himself at 3 p.m. today in images posted to his Instagram, although he is reportedly safe and okay. Broner first posted an image suggesting a new start: About an hour later, he said he was “doing it” at 3 p.m.: He then posted a photo of a pistol and wrote that he was “going home”: He had one more countdown after 2 p.m.: After 3 p.m., Broner’s fiancée Arienne Gazaway said that the boxer was “okay”: TMZ reported that “law enforcement sources” in Cincinnati said Broner had contacted them and that he was okay.
 
http://deadspin.com

Assault, robbery charges against Adrien Broner dropped

Sep 22, 2016 - Former four-division world titleholder Adrien Broner, whose trial on charges of felony assault and aggravated robbery was set to begin on Wednesday in his hometown of Cincinnati, had all charges against him dropped when the alleged victim and star witness failed to show up at the Hamilton County courthouse in Ohio.

Felony assault and aggravated robbery charges against Adrien Broner were dropped Wednesday when the alleged victim failed to show at the courthouse...  

 

Kim Kardashian Sues Blog Site Media Take Out Over Insurance Scam Claims After $11,000,000 Jewelry Theft


Kim Kardashian filed a claim for her stolen wedding ring, among other alleged pilfered pieces of jewelry
 
Reality star, Kim Kardashian, has sued gossip blog Media Take Out for libel, due to the website stating she engaged in an insurance scam, after allegedly being held at gunpoint and robbed of $11,000,000 her jewelry. Media Take Out is owned by Fred Mwangaguhunga. It is one of the most viewed sites on the internet.

Kardashian's lawyer stated Media Take Out wrote she, "Faked the robbery, lied about the violent assault, and then filed a fraudulent claim with her insurance company to bilk her carrier out of millions of dollars." The fact of the matter is many on social networking sites have written items indicating they are of the belief the Kardashian's staged the robbery. Media Take Out shares their view and published it online.

Kardashian's lawyer further stated, "Kardashian was assaulted and robbed by two masked men, who placed a gun to her head, duct-taped her hands, legs and mouth, and then left her lying helplessly on the bathroom floor of her rented apartment while the thieves absconded with millions of dollars in jewelry. As if that ordeal were not awful enough, Defendants made it worse by publishing on the Website, only hours after the assault, that Kardashian faked the robbery and then committed insurance fraud by filing a claim with her carrier."

Am I sorry for Kardashian? No, she's a thief herself (you reap what you sow) and Kim and the Kardashians have been sued repeatedly by many copyright and trademark owners all over America for stealing their intellectual property/products and slapping the family name on it like it is their own.

I will state this though, Media Take Out took a big risk writing that Kardashian staged the robbery and engaged in an insurance scam. The last part in particular about the insurance scam was risky, as it is a serious accusation and not easy to prove. Even if people online think Kardashian had the robbery staged (and many do based on comments on social networking) in order for you to write it on a website, you must have proof, lest you get sued.

You could attempt to legally compel Kardashian to submit to a lie detector test regarding the robbery. You could also depose her for 3-hours on the matter until all the details come out. While you're at it, find out how many industrial plants had workers working overtime to product her butt implants that now look like a diaper gone very wrong. 

STORY SOURCE

Kim Kardashian Sues Website Over Claims She Faked Paris Robbery

 October 11, 2016 - Kim Kardashian isn't taking a gossip site's claim that she lied about her traumatic Paris robbery lightly. The reality star is suing mediatakeout.com and its owner Fred Mwangaguhunga for libel per se. "After having been the victim of a horrific and traumatic armed robbery in France, Kim Kardashian returned to the United States only to again be victimized, but this time by an online gossip tabloid that published a series of articles in early October 2016 referring to her a liar and thief," writes Kardashian attorney Andrew Brettler in a complaint filed Tuesday in New York federal court...

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Pebbles Scores Legal Victory In Defamation Case Regarding VH1 Movie 'CrazySexyCool:The TLC Story' As Judge States Case Can Proceed


Pebbles
 
Singer/songwriter Pebbles, real name Perri Reid, scored a legal victory in her defamation case against cable network, VH1 and its parent company, Viacom, who are the makers of the 2013 television movie "CrazySexyCool: The TLC Story." The judge in the case ruled the defamation case can go forward to trial. The defendants are taking a big risk not settling with Pebbles, who has sued them for $40,000,000. 

Pebbles is the former founder and manager of the most successful female singing group in history, TLC. The VH1 network made a television movie of the group's life that drew 5,000,000 viewers in its first airing. Subsequent re-airings were viewed by millions more people. The defamation was widespread and made Pebbles the brunt of hateful, threatening comments on social networking and disparaging articles in the press and blogosphere. 


TLC, L.A. Reid and Pebbles in the 1990s

The film was told from the perspective of the group, who had fallen out with Pebbles years prior, over a contract dispute. Pebbles named the group, trademarked it, auditioned girls to be members and put hundreds of thousands of dollars into making them a success. Pebbles, who was at the top of the charts at the time, also used her music industry contacts to get TLC the best producers, songwriters, video directors and choreographers. Without Pebbles, there would not have been a TLC.   

Pebbles gave the group standard industry contracts all new artists get. However, TLC accused Pebbles of robbing them, which was demonstrably false and later denied by her ex-husband, L.A. Reid, one of the co-founders of LaFace Records, the label the group recorded for during the prime years of their collective career.


TLC's television movie "CrazySexyCool"

L.A. Reid recently stated what the Judiciary Report has maintained from 2013 regarding Clive Davis' Arista Records/BMG reaping the lion's share of the money from TLC (and other recording artists). Reid stated in February 2016, "In fairness to her (Pebbles), she doesn't collect the money from record sales. Record companies do that. At that point, we were in a joint venture with Arista and BMG. So if Pebbles is accused of not paying TLC, then that means that I didn't pay her, which means that they didn't pay me." 

The movie was billed as a true story, not the standard "based on a true story" or a fictionalized retelling of events, which would grant some poetic license and let viewers know the film contains fiction. Upon viewing the film, there were historical inaccuracies and lies. Key details unflattering to TLC were also left out of the television biopic. The 40-plus page Pebbles lawsuit listed 15 lies and inconsistencies in the movie, illustrating she was defamed. For example, lies contained in the movie are Pebbles and TLC had the same lawyer and she controlled the attorney, the group were only paid $25.00 per week, Pebbles fired Chilli, T-Boz told Pebbles she had Sickle Cell prior to signing her contract and asked her to put money before her health, Pebbles did not furnish them with a copy of their contracts, Pebbles was aware Chilli had an abortion and was involved in her decision to do so. It's crazy that they lied like this for a film.

 

Pebbles

VH1 and Viacom even made a retraction stating the film was not a true story but "fictionalized" version of events. However, to those who watched the film, it was billed as a true story. Pebbles was greatly damaged by the public hatred and illegal threats directed at her the moment the film aired. VH1 and Viacom needs to be financially penalized, via punitive damages, for being reckless in what pushed Pebbles into a deep depression. 

You shouldn't play with people's lives like that because you feel you are in a position of authority to film something that's been sensationalized and is not in keeping with the truth. Pebbles and TLC had their differences, but the movie was an inaccurate and unfair retelling of what transpired. No due diligence was done, as business records in the State of Georgia, court documents from TLC's bankruptcy and the second filing of group member Tionne Watkins (T-Boz), as well as label contracts they have in their possession could have been used to develop a clearer picture of what transpired. A deposition in Pebbles' defamation lawsuit revealed the filmmakers relied solely on T-Boz and Chilli's word on what transpired and used it wholesale in the movie without fact checking.


Clive Davis and L.A. Reid. Music industry experts know, Davis is the one who made the lion's share of the money off TLC. However, Pebbles was made the scapegoat.

The movie conveniently left out Atlanta radio station reports of an argument between TLC member Chilli and Pebbles over her cheating with then husband L.A. Reid. The film was not properly researched nor did it use independent industry insiders who could have given an accurate picture of what was the standard in the music industry at the time. 

Former TLC member, the late Left Eye, real name Lisa Lopes, went on to start her own production label, emulating what Pebbles had done with her company Pebbitone. Ironically, Lopes gave TLC look and sound alike group, Blaque, the same type of deal Pebbles had given TLC. It speaks volumes. The same type of record deal is in use in the music industry today.     


TLC today is Chilli (left) and T-Boz (right)
 
In other TLC news, the group is still being slammed over collecting nearly $500,000 in donation money on Kickstarter to make a new album, that is two years later. Many people donated to the effort and nothing had materialized (R&B Group TLC Slammed On Twitter For Collecting $430,000 In Donations For An Album That Has Not Materialized).  

Additionally, the music industry is not what it once was in many ways. It is likely difficult for TLC to get the type of material they are used to from the days at LaFace. I think TLC may have taken on too much, especially with Watkins battling Sickle Cell Anemia. It's great to make an album, but it can get stressful under the wrong circumstances. 

STORY SOURCE

Perri ‘Pebbles’ Reid to proceed with $40M Viacom suit 

September 19, 2016 | 3:48am - An Atlanta federal judge has ruled that R&B act TLC’s creator and former manager Perri “Pebbles” Reid can proceed with a case to sue Viacom for allegedly defaming her in a 2013 VH1 biopic, “CrazySexyCool: The TLC Story.” Viacom filed a motion last year stating Reid had no case, but the judge ruled against it Thursday. Reid signed the band in 1991, and TLC went on to become one of the biggest-selling female acts, with hits like “Waterfalls.” They later filed for bankruptcy, and the film claims Reid only paid the group $25 a week. Reid is seeking $40 million in damages. 

Her lawyer Stacey Godfrey Evans told us: “We are thrilled with this major win against Viacom and look forward to justice . . . Ms. Reid worked hard to ensure the success of TLC, and she is ready to present that story to a jury. The negative portrayal of her in the TLC movie is simply not the truth.”...

http://pagesix.com

RELATED ARTICLES

L.A. Reid’s Autobiography Spilled The Secrets Of Ex-Wife Pebbles, Former Partner Babyface, Whitney Houston, The Deele And David Geffen (Among Others)











 
 


Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Kabbalah Cult File Fraudulent DMCA Claim Attempting To Suppress Story About Hillary Clinton’s Parkinson’s


Hillary Clinton having a seizure after the September 11, 2016 memorial ceremony
 
The Judiciary Report was mysteriously offline for hours on Tuesday and into Wednesday morning, as it was the subject of a massive hack DDOS attack. The site was briefly restored online, then no sooner was it offline again a few hours later on Wednesday morning through to Thursday evening, due to a fraudulent DMCA filed with the site's host, by a member of crazy Madonna's Kabbalah cult.

The Kabbalah Center did the aforementioned in criminal bids at getting the site knocked offline due to the articles about Hillary Clinton having Parkinson’s disease. The idiot member of the Kabbalah Center that filed the fraudulent DCMA complaint in a bid at restricting free speech/free press is going to get sued and publicly disgraced over it in a forthcoming documentary. 

I was trying to play nice to some degree regarding my writing on the current election. However, over the aforementioned little stunt they pulled in tampering with the site, I declare I will not vote for Hillary Clinton in the election. 

As longtime Judiciary Report site readers know, I had to go to the FBI about Hillary Clinton and Madonna’s private investigator Anthony Pellicano, due to his criminal conduct in engaging in mass illegal wiretapping, identity theft, racketeering and computer hacking on behalf of famous people, who paid him in excess of $100,000 (per incident) to target innocent people. I gave the FBI documents and spoken testimony detailing his criminal behavior in tandem with people like Madonna. It resulted in his arrest on wiretapping charges 4-months later. I also broke the phone hacking case with a formal written complaint to the Metropolitan Police in London, England.

Clinton has been heavily involved in Pellicano’s crimes, having hired him to illegally stalk, wiretap, threaten, computer hack and burglarize political enemies and women her husband, Bill Clinton, was having sex with. However, as with the 2016 case regarding Clinton criminally mishandling classified documents, the FBI corruptly allowed her to skate on charges, in an outcome that outraged America (FBI Hit With Massive Backlash From Americans Labeling Them 'Corrupt' For 'Rigging' Hillary Clinton Investigation Into Mishandling Classified Information And Not Charging Her For Crimes She Committed and Members Of Congress Question FBI Director James Comey In Hearing About Hillary Clinton Lying To The Legislature And FBI Under Oath).

It’s no secret Madonna is affiliated with Hillary Clinton. The loser Madonna name drops Clinton every chance she gets. Madonna was also seen crazily slithering out of Bill Clinton’s office in New York. Madonna also insanely stated she was going to redecorate the White House [Dish Nation TV Show Slams Madonna As A 'Crazy' Madwoman For Stating She Is Moving To The White House And Can't Wait To Redecorate (Hillary Clinton)]

I can tell you from the FBI case involving Clinton and Madonna's private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, that Madonna has criminally passed to the Clintons time stamped computer documents and emails that were illegally hacked and contained original political items the Clintons' used without permission and publicly so, especially Hillary. It's very dumb to publicly reference hacked documents and emails in public, especially considering they are time stamped and predate you spewing them off attributing it to yourself like a parrot in a pantsuit. Very incriminating. This is part of how I know Clinton's mind is going. 

It is vile the manner in which they behave like America is a lawless land where one can do anything illegal thing imaginable to innocent people. America is supposed to be a country of free speech and free press, yet look what those people in Hollywood, backed by the U.S. government, keep doing in going to drastic, fraudulent lengths to suppress freedom of expression. 

Millions of people read my sites from all over the world. Many world governments of various ideologies are in the Judiciary Report’s site hits. They range from people who practice democracy to those who are socialists and communists. How do you think it looks to them that the U.S. government is touting free speech and free press, while criticizing countries like China, then insanely trying to suppress free speech and free press in America. They are calling you hypocrites and frauds for it.  


Hillary Clinton is not all there
 
Another thing, I’m sick of people trying to tell me how to vote and who to endorse on this website for government elections. I am not a puppet. I do what I want. You are not going to control what I do, say or write. You are not going to tell me how to think or do anything else in my life, where you are not wanted.

For the past 8 years I’ve been approached in America and Britain by people from the U.S. government and the Kabbalah Center trying to browbeat and bully me into voting for Barack Obama, then Hillary Clinton. At this rate I don’t like either one of them. I am going to do a forthcoming article on just how far the harassment has gone, with receipts and saved time stamped emails to accompany my claims.

Embrace this: I am not voting for Hillary Clinton. Not now. Not ever. Not in a million years. I know too much about Clinton from the Anthony Pellicano case I went to the FBI about to ever endorse such a brazen criminal, who has harmed many innocent people. Clinton has done horrible things to innocent people and is completely unfit, both mentally and physically, to be President of the United States. I would never and will never endorse Clinton. So get over it. 

I tried to play nice and not say it outright, but you tampering with my site has provoked me into publicly denouncing her. I would have preferred it if Bernie Sanders had been the nominee. We don't share the same political views (he's a liberal and I'm a conservative), but I like that he cares about poor people and was trying to improve life for the less fortunate and middle class. I also like the work he did during the civil rights era.

American voters need to take note of the kind of madness emanating from the Clinton camp. Her crazy friends in Hollywood are attacking innocent people for not endorsing her and for having an opinion critical of her behavior (Benghazi, mishandling classified information ect). One Clinton supporter, actor Wendell Pierce, punched a woman in the head over not supporting Hillary in favor of Bernie Sanders.

Free speech is allegedly covered by the Constitution, but Hollywood is proving otherwise, by outright spitting on the law of the land in verbally, physically and financially abusing people who don't support Clinton. The whole thing looks crazy and sick. You only get one vote. Leave other people and their vote alone.

 

Hillary Clinton health problems have taken over her campaign
 
To further illustrate the fact they are insanely trying to restrict free speech, the Clinton camp is busy trying to rig search results on Google and social networking websites (Obama And Hillary Clinton Tried To Use The Federal Election Commission To Silence And Punish The Conservative Media In America While Engaging In Censorship Using Google). Journalist who criticize Clinton, as with what transpired with those who disagree with President Obama's policies and behavior, Google will financially punish you by stripping away ad revenue on your websites, Blogger and You Tube.

How is that free speech or free press as promised by the U.S. Constitution? How is that a free society? How can you criticize nations like China regarding press freedoms, yet you do this. America is no longer a free and democratic society. Obama, the Clintons and their crazy cronies in Hollywood have seen to that, all while Congress snoozes on the job.

Since Clinton’s friends in Hollywood like to aggravate people, I’ll spell it out in plain English: if the public votes for Clinton, you will be getting a person who has exhibited an alarming drive to control and suppress the press, which would spell a gross lack of personal and social freedoms for the public. You would also be getting a person too sick and incapacitated to carry out the duties of president, who would be routinely sidelined due to blackouts, fainting spells and other symptoms of her neurological disorder. 

RELATED READING

YouTube Has Quietly Begun "Censoring" Journalists Who Criticize Government
 
Sep 15, 2016 4:23 PM - Earlier this month, YouTube, the behemoth video-sharing website was accused of censoring users. Claiming some of their videos had been barred from making money through the company’s ad services, YouTube hosts like Philip DeFranco spoke out against the policy, claiming over “a dozen of his videos had been flagged as inappropriate for advertising, including one dinged for ‘graphic content or excessive strong language.'"

While YouTube has already confirmed its policy regarding what it considers unfit for monetization hasn’t changed, the issue might lie elsewhere now that the company seems more efficient in enforcing its own rules. As a matter of fact, the content policy changed in 2012, when YouTube first introduced its “ad-friendly” guidelines.

But while an algorithm is allegedly used to spot and “de-monetize” videos that break the company’s rules, many continue to accuse the company, currently owned by Google, of having “vague” descriptions of what its leadership considers ad-friendly... 

To Luke Rudkowski, the man behind the popular channel We Are Change, YouTube’s policy of nixing monetization on some of his most popular videos has been a problem for a long time. “For years,” he told The Anti-Media, “I have monetized and still get f*cked from it.” Especially, he continued, “[when I launch a video about] Hillary, or war and foreign policy.” When his videos touch on drugs or guns, however, he says ads remain in place. “When the videos only have ‘Hillary Clinton’ they do fine,” he added, “however, when we add ‘FBI’, that’s when YouTube” springs into action...

http://www.zerohedge.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Obama And Hillary Clinton Tried To Use The Federal Election Commission To Silence And Punish The Conservative Media In America While Engaging In Censorship Using Google

'Dr. Drew Show' Cancelled Because Hillary Clinton Became Angry He Exposed Her Serious Health Problems Making Her Unsuitable To Be President





Hillary Clinton Parkinson's Confirmed By An Accomplished Neurologist (Video)