Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Obama Slammed For Ordering The FBI And DOJ Not To Indict Hillary Clinton For Breaking The Law In Email Scandal

Tweet on Twitter.com by documentary filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza, regarding Obama corruptly meddling in the FBI/DOJ criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton with the intent of corruptly destroying it.

Many experts have revealed their view the FBI is too corrupt to indict Hillary Clinton. Mainstream global and U.S. newspapers have published their view Clinton has broken the law but is, "Too big to jail." The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Justice (DOJ) tend to not arrest well known people, which is why many Hollywood celebrities behave so terribly, harming members of the public. It's absolutely corrupt.


Tweets on Twitter.com by documentary filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza

As it stands, Clinton willfully violated government rules in keeping a private email server and had it maintained with such poor security, she clearly believed she is "too big to" hack. However, that's exactly what happened. American national secrets were hacked by the communist block and passed around among them.
 

Hillary Clinton tweet on Twitter.com has been thoroughly mocked by the public and the press, as hypocritical in light of her unlawful behavior, condemned by the State Department's Inspector General
 

Public feedback calling Clinton a hypocrite
 
Clinton was really reckless to think the communist block wouldn't hack her computers. After all, she has ordered the computers and telephones of domestic and foreign officials be hacked on a regular basis. She has repeatedly received illegal surveillance data, from the time she hired crooked, now incarcerated private investigator, Anthony Pellicano to unlawfully spy on people in sick ways, to her time at the State Department when she arrogantly spied on the United Nations (in what became a global scandal) and members of Congress.

STORY SOURCE

Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?

Friday 10 June 2016 06.00 EDT - Did Hillary Clinton do the wrong thing when she used a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013? Yes. She herself has admitted that it was a mistake. A recent report by the state department inspector general found that she broke multiple rules despite repeated warnings to use official communications methods that would ensure her emails were stored and kept safe from hackers. 

Did she break the law? As an FBI investigation continues, expert opinion is divided. Some offer a view reminiscent of Bill Clinton’s famous remark that he experimented with marijuana but “didn’t inhale”. “I believe Clinton did break the law but at the same time I don’t think there’s evidence she committed a crime,” says Douglas Cox, associate professor at City University of New York School of Law.

It is a violation of federal records law to remove or destroy material, Cox notes, although Clinton “in part” fixed this by returning thousands of emails. More important in assessing whether a crime was committed is the question of intent, Cox says. “While there were warnings and memos that she should have been aware of, from a prosecution side they would need to prove her knowledge and intent and have evidence of that to bring before a jury.”... 

 
State Department Inspector General Slams Hillary Clinton For Violating Government Rules In Email Hacking Scandal And Covering Up Hacks








Tuesday, February 9, 2016

U.S. FBI And Affiliates In Hollywood Hacking And Removing Exposé Articles From The Site


New FBI Director James Comey, U.S. President Barack Obama and former FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller

The U.S. government likes to tell Americans and the world that there is free speech in the United States, under the U.S. Constitution, but that is a blatant lie. This website has been repeatedly hacked by the deranged U.S. FBI and Madonna's Kabbalah Center, to delete articles that pertain to their unethical and criminal conduct. The Judiciary Report has never done a retraction. The site has been offered illegal incentives and inducements by people in Hollywood, as well as a demonic threat from the FBI. They got so desperate they insanely began stalking and contacting people I am related and others I know, harassing them and demanding they tell me to write what they want on the site. What a bunch of psychotics.

What I find most deranged about their behavior is the fact many of the topics written about on the Judiciary Report are documented on mainstream sites such as the Associated Press and in newspapers such as the New York Times. However, the Judiciary Report does have nearly 300 exclusives that later proved true and correct.

I noticed last night while working on the site that the following articles were hacked and removed from the website (there may be more, I'm still checking): Human Rights Activists Slam The FBI After It Is Discovered They Became The World's Top Distributor Of Child Porn and Report: The FBI Has Been Beating, Torturing And Threatening To Kill American Citizens If They Will Not Become Snitches (Informants). I have now republished the articles to the site, using back up copies.

Madonna's Kabbalah Center hackers also hacked this website and deleted online copies of the following articles: News Corp's Andy Coulson From The Phone Hacking Scandal Is Struggling With Mental Illness, regarding him walking up the street, staring at me and angrily muttering. Coulson was later arrested and sentenced to prison in the phone hacking scandal I first reported to police. Madonna's hackers have also deleted Aisha's Affidavit  |  Aisha's Mom's Affidavit  | Kabbalah Center's Yehuda Berg Following Aisha On Twitter. I have since republished these articles using offline back-up copies of the site. 

Exactly who do these people think they are to be criminally hacking and editing this website to remove what they don't want. They are such arrogant trash to be doing such a thing. They also aren't very bright, as each time I discover such conduct, I simply take to the internet and write something even more revealing and damning about them and it works its way through other sites that reference it, then ends up in the mainstream press, then Congress as a scandal. Even Pavlov's dogs had more sense than them. Each time they hack the site and or remove anything from it, I write a worse exposé, but they are that dim they haven't made the connection yet.

They expect me, a God fearing Christian, to applaud and promote the FBI harassing and torturing people Report: The FBI Has Been Beating, Torturing And Threatening To Kill American Citizens If They Will Not Become Snitches (Informants). They expect me, a God fearing Christian, to applaud and promote the FBI becoming the world's largest purveyor of child porn in a deranged, demented initiative from the Federal Bureau of Investigation that victimizes innocent children all over again, via disseminating sick and abusive images Human Rights Activists Slam The FBI After It Is Discovered They Became The World's Top Distributor Of Child Porn.

The next time you stand up in Washington, the United Nations or anywhere else in the world and open your hypocritical mouths to lecture Americans and the world on the merits of a free society and ethics - I want you to remember the extreme lack of freedoms in America, how black people are being horrifically abused and killed by cops and how you are criminally brutalizing immigrants, such as Jamaican Christians and other groups such as Muslims - and shut your hypocritical mouths. You attack innocent people who haven't done a thing to you and do so for the most nefarious, insidious, inexcusable, greedy reasons. You have unequivocally become the most corrupt, destructive, hateful, malicious, mean spirited government in the world. 

RELATED ARTICLES




Friday, October 23, 2015

Jay Z's 'Big Pimpin' Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Dismissed On Corrupt Technicality


Jay-Z

The copyright infringement lawsuit against rapper Jay Z over his foul, explicit song "Big Pimpin" has been thrown out of court by a U.S. federal judge (*feigns surprise*). The lawsuit contends frequently sued copyright infringers, rapper Jay Z and producer Timbaland, used a sample of the preexisting song "Khosara Khosara" without the permission of the copyright holder. The lawsuit was brought by Osama Fahmy, the current owner of the song, written by his uncle, the late Baligh Hamdi.

U.S. federal judge Christina Snyder basically ruled Egyptian law does not apply in America and Jay Z and Timbaland are allowed to steal his music. Technically, the judge is correct in stating Egyptian law does not apply in America. However, the United Nations' Berne Convention does, as America is signatory to it and it covers the breadth of copyright law.

At the end of the day, if the copyright owner does not want you using their work, you have no business doing so. If defeats the purpose of ownership and intellectual property laws that any idiot can steal something and use it against the wishes of the copyright owner. It constitutes fraud, financial fraud, conversion, grand theft larceny and copyright infringement.

If foreign recording artists began stealing Jay Z and Timbalands songs, using them abroad and making money off them while stating American law does not apply in their nations, the two men would be livid (and knowing Jay Z and his legal track record he would willfully commit acts of assault, attempted murder or murder). However, they expect to do this to others and get away with it, as the U.S. federal court system is unequivocally the most corrupt in the world. 99.9% of copyright cases are questionably thrown out by a federal judge before it gets the chance to reach an American jury to decide the merits of the case. That is disgraceful. Hollywood is an industry of thieves. 

RELATED ARTICLES












Tuesday, December 30, 2014

North Korean Government Calls U.S. President Barack Obama A 'Monkey' In Racist Slur After Sony CEOs Slur Him As Well In Computer Hacking Scandal



U.S. President Barack Obama is on the receiving end of racial slurs in North Korea and America, over the Sony hacking scandal that has greatly damaged the struggling company. The problems all emanate from Sony's ill-willed, ill-fated idea to make the corny, cheesy, anti-North Korean movie "The Interview" and unconfirmed retaliatory hacks allegedly from the nation in question.

President Obama, who was slurred by Sony chiefs, Amy Pascal and Scott Rudin regarding his taste in black film in an email exchange ("Would he like to finance some movies. I doubt it. Should I ask him if he liked DJANGO? 12 YEARS. Or the butler. Or think like a man? Ride-along. I bet he likes Kevin Hart."). Obama was also the recipient of a racial slur by the North Korean government, who called him a "monkey." The North Korean government stated, "Obama always goes reckless in words and deeds like a monkey in a tropical forest" In America the term "monkey" is a racial slur regarding black people. These comments from Sony and separately the North Korean government were completely inappropriate.

 
Scott Rudin is racist and rude

The Judiciary Report has to wonder, why President Obama waded into this issue in the first place and further violated domestic and international law, via illegally hacking and cutting off the internet in North Korea. Under United Nations' laws, this was a human rights violation. It was not fitting that a President engage in such illegal activity. President Obama is a lawyer and knows better. He did not follow the rule of law.

Additionally, as head of state, Obama is meant to set a good example, not resort to debased, unlawful hacker tactics, not befitting anyone. Obama is supposed to be engaging in international diplomacy, not inflaming a nation with a nuclear arsenal and dangerous agents, who can inflict harm on innocent Americans, over a worthless movie.


Angelina Jolie and Amy Pascal

In reference to school kids in North Korea, whose lessons were interrupted because Obama had their internet cut off without authority or warning, what lesson does he think that taught them about him? The ways of diplomacy? The ways of due process? The ways of fair play? No, Obama gave them a lesson in dictatorship, which has nothing to do with democracy. To take out the internet for an entire nation, when the United Nations describes internet access for all as a human right, was an abuse of Obama's post as President.

Obama has a highly inappropriate relationship with Sony, whom he gave access to top secret U.S. government files, to make a movie, much to the anger of many lawmakers in the U.S. Congress. Sony also contributes much in the way of financial donations to Obama, which is why they get away with numerous criminal violations of U.S. law, such as insider trading, hacking, phone hacking, wiretapping, bank fraud, criminal copyright infringement, copyright infringement, trademark infringement, patent infringement, racketeering and espionage.

 
James Franco and Seth Rogen star in "The Interview"

Seth Rogen's movies are subpar, unintelligent, inartistic, misogynistic, disgusting, gross out, unoriginal pieces of trash (i.e. "Knocked Up" "The Green Hornet" "This Is The End" and "The 40-Year-Old Virgin"). I have to wonder which person he is having sex with in Hollywood, why his movies keep getting made (rhetorical). Why anyone would greelight a movie by Rogen on such a sensitive subject matter as North Korea is a mystery.

The idiocy that comes with a Rogen film has only added to the offense the movie "The Interview" has caused. It was not quality filmmaking tackling a sensitive subject. It's trash. There are so many stories one could do on North Korea, to highlight the plight of the poor and disadvantaged, yet this is what Sony choose - the murder and assassination of their head of state.

 
President Barack Obama is being hypocritical, considering he had a U.S. filmmaker indicted on trumped up charges, out of revenge for making a film about him

The artistically bereft movie "The Interview" is a about two men, who on the orders of the CIA, murder North Korean head of state, Kim Jong-un. The Judiciary Report espouses the ways of democracy and does not agree with the politics of Kim Jong-un. However, I would never make a movie about killing Kim Jong-un or any other sitting head of state. To make a movie centered on murdering a sitting head of state is highly disrespectful, hateful, malicious and shows a great lack of respect for human life.

"The Interview" is disgraceful and a waste of money. It has endangered Americans in the United States and the world and for a foolish cause. It will not help in matters of international diplomacy, as North Korea is stating they are offended and understandably so. If a movie industry of another nation made a movie about murdering President Obama, people would be very offended and understandably so. Therefore, put yourself in the North Korean people's shoes to understand their reaction. The message Sony sent via "The Interview" is a North Korean life is of no value, which is an ugly message.

 
The Interview

Hollywood needs to act responsibly. The conflict America is facing regarding North Korea is serious and should be a government matter. It's not a laughing matter for a tacky film. It didn't need an offensive, ignorant, degrading movie being made to muddy the waters of diplomacy. It was immature, ill-timed and foolish. There are struggling and starving people in North Korea who need help. Spitting on their head of state via film is not going to open up the country to receive the help it needs. If someone made a movie about murdering you, would you want to engage in diplomatic talks with them.

It reminds me of people who draw a picture of Islamic figure, Mohammed, knowing it will greatly offend and inflame Muslims, leading to violence and even death, as has happened, but do it anyway. Why endanger yourself and people associated with you, trying to prove some point. Just because you can do something doesn't mean you should.

Friday, October 25, 2013

Newspaper Reports The NSA Is Illegally Spying On 35 World Leaders


Barack Obama

This is a follow up to yesterday's article "The NSA Gets President Obama Into International Trouble Over Spying On Other Heads Of State." Initially, it was reported the NSA has been spying on the heads of state of France, Germany and Mexico, respectively.

The Judiciary Report indicated the spying extends much further than the three heads of state, even stating British Prime Minister David Cameron has been a target (they snatch the calls/signal off the satellite). Yesterday's Judiciary Report article also mentioned previous illegal wiretapping by the Obama administration of the Jamaican head of state, which began years ago, as one of my sources informed me in 2010 regarding Former Prime Minister Bruce Golding, "They have him on tape."


U.S. President Barack Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel

Over an hour after yesterday's article was published to the Judiciary Report and to the site's time stamped blog, the Guardian newspaper in London went public with information stating the Obama Administration via the NSA, has been spying on 35 world leaders via illegal wiretapping (among other things).

This scandal has led to world leaders going to the United Nations regarding the illegal spying, seeking to curb the criminal misconduct. The latest claims have come forth from files associated with brave American whistleblower, Edward Snowden, who is currently domiciled in Russia.

STORY SOURCE

NSA monitored calls of 35 world leaders after US official handed over contacts

The Guardian, Thursday 24 October 2013 14.14 EDT - Agency given more than 200 numbers by government official. NSA encourages departments to share their 'Rolodexes.' Surveillance produced 'little intelligence', memo acknowledges.

The NSA memo suggests that such surveillance was not isolated as the agency routinely monitors world leaders. Photograph: Guardian

The National Security Agency monitored the phone conversations of 35 world leaders after being given the numbers by an official in another US government department, according to a classified document provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The confidential memo reveals that the NSA encourages senior officials in its "customer" departments, such the White House, State and the Pentagon, to share their "Rolodexes" so the agency can add the phone numbers of leading foreign politicians to their surveillance systems.

The document notes that one unnamed US official handed over 200 numbers, including those of the 35 world leaders, none of whom is named. These were immediately "tasked" for monitoring by the NSA.

The revelation is set to add to mounting diplomatic tensions between the US and its allies, after the German chancellor Angela Merkel on. Wednesday accused the US of tapping her mobile phone...


Exclusive: Germany, Brazil Turn to U.N. to Restrain American Spies

Thursday, October 24, 2013 - 8:18 PM - Brazil and Germany today joined forces to press for the adoption of a U.N. General Resolution that promotes the right of privacy on the internet, marking the first major international effort to restrain the National Security Agency's intrusions into the online communications of foreigners, according to diplomatic sources familiar with the push.

The effort follows a German claim that the American spy agency may have tapped the private telephone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and dozens of other world leaders. It also comes about one month after Brazilian leader DilmaRousseff denounced NSA espionage against her country as "a breach of international law" in a General Assembly speech and proposed that the U.N. establish legal guidelines to prevent "cyberspace from being used as a weapon of war."

Brazilian and German diplomats met in New York today with a small group of Latin American and European governments to consider a draft resolution that calls for expanding privacy rights contained in the International Covenant Civil and Political Rights to the online world. The draft does not refer to a flurry of American spying revelations that have caused a political uproar around the world, particularly in Brazil and German. But it was clear that the revelation provided the political momentum to trigger today's move to the United Nations. The blowback from the NSA leaks continues to agonize U.S. diplomats and military officials concerned about America's image abroad.

"This is an example of the very worst aspects of the Snowden disclosures," a former defense official with deep experience in NATO, told The Cable, referring to former NSA contractor Edward Snowden. "It will be very difficult for the US to dig out of this, although we will over time. The short term costs in credibility and trust are enormous."...


Report: NSA Spied on 124 Billion Phone Calls in One Month

October 23, 2013 3:10 pm - Tallies of top-secret documents show widespread data collection. The National Security Agency recorded information about more than 124 billion phone calls during a 30-day period earlier this year, including around 3 billion calls from U.S. sources, according to a tally from top-secret documents released by multiple news outlets.

Documents revealing details about the NSA’s Boundless Informant program show that information regarding billions of phone calls and computer communications was collected by the agency from across the world. Boundless Informant "allows users to select a country on a map and view the meta data volume and select details about the collections against that country," according to the Guardian, which first reported on the top secret program earlier this year.

Multiple leaked screenshots of the Boundless Informant program show that information on around 124.8 billion phone calls were collected in just 30-days this year, according to documents released by the Guardian and other news sites. The documents provide a window into the sheer volume of data being collected by the NSA as late as March of this year, according to the Guardian...

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Bradley Manning Sentenced To 35 Years In Prison Over Leak Of Government Files


Bradley Manning (right)

Reuters is reporting U.S. soldier Bradley Manning, has been sentenced to 35-years in prison for leaking documents and videos to the whistle blower website Wikileaks, uncovering criminal conduct by the government. Manning will be eligible for parole in 10-years. The sentence is seen as making an example of the soldier to discourage others from coming forward as whistle blowers with proof of criminal wrongdoing on the part of the government.

Elizabeth Goitein of Liberty and National Security Program stated of the sentencing, "It's more than 17 times the next longest sentence ever served. The Judiciary Report agrees, the sentence is excessive. Manning's actions were not done for profit, but out of concern regarding the government breaking the law. Ironically, he goes to prison, while select members of government who violated the U.S. Code, Constitution and U.N. law, go free. That is not justice. 

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Obama Administration Accused Of ‘Kidnapping’ The President Of Bolivia In Edward Snowden Scandal

An Abuse Of Power By The Administration


Barack Obama

Remember last week when President Obama said he wouldn’t be "scrambling the jets" to get (at) NSA whistle blower Edward Snowden, whom he derisively and dismissively referred to as some "hacker." Well, what he didn’t tell you is he would be scrambling other nations’ jets to get Snowden.

The Obama administration created an embarrassing international incident that is being carried all over the world for brazenly violating U.N. law, as the government summarily ordered allies to divert the plane of Bolivian President, Evo Morales, based on false accusations that Snowden was aboard the plane.


Edward Snowden

This is a follow up to the Judiciary Report article "American NSA Whistleblower Comes Forward From Hong Kong (Photo)" regarding Edward Snowden's NSA leak confirming claims I'd made online for several years about the agency illegally spying on people. Today, the administration dragged France, Italy, Portugal and Austria into the fiasco, only for the latter to search the plane and find no Snowden.

The Bolivian government is rightly accusing Obama of having "kidnapped" their head of state. If that were me I’d have been angrier than a rasta at a pork festival (side bar: rastas hate the pork, don’t even say the word bacon around them LOL).

Just imagine if someone had diverted a plane with Obama on it, falsely stating he was hiding a foreign fugitive on board, as was done regarding Morales. You can’t treat people like that. Obama, "Do unto others as you would have done unto you" because you would be outraged if someone had pulled that stunt on you. You basically crapped on Bolivia’s sovereignty in an unnecessary faux pas. Even if Snowden had been onboard this move would not have been justified.


Evo Morales

This is one of the points the Judiciary Report keeps trying to emphasize regarding one of the most negative traits of the Obama administration. The extreme lengths the administration goes to in bids at getting at people.

Men like Eric Holder (DOJ) and Robert Mueller (FBI) abusing the law to obsessively pursue people, wasting a fortune in tax payer money to settle personal vendettas and against fellow citizens (see: New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims and IRS Says Sorry For Targeting Conservatives As Obama Denies All Knowledge Of Misconduct).
STORY SOURCE

Bolivia angered by search of president's plane, no sign of Snowden

Wed Jul 3, 2013 6:49am EDT - (Reuters) - Bolivia accused Austria of an act of aggression by searching President Evo Morales' plane on Wednesday and blamed Washington for its forced landing in Vienna over suspicions that former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden was on board.

Morales' plane was stranded at Vienna airport for several hours after Portugal and France abruptly canceled air permits for it to fly through their airspace, but eventually resumed its flight home form an energy meeting in Moscow. Austria found no sign of Snowden on board. He is believed to still be in the transit area of a Moscow airport, where he has been trying since June 23 to find a country that will protect him from prosecution in the United States on espionage charges.

The diversion and search of Morales' plane were the latest turns in the 30-year-old Snowden's bid to escape the clutches of the United States since he divulged details of a secret U.S. government surveillance program, Prism. Bolivian Foreign Minister David Choquehuanca blamed the forced stopover in Vienna on "unfounded suspicions that Mr Snowden was on the plane".

"We don't know who invented this lie," Choquehuanca said in La Paz. "We want to express our displeasure because this has put the president's life at risk." Bolivia's ambassador to the United Nations told reporters in Geneva that Austria's decision to search the plane was an act of aggression and a violation of international law...


Act of aggression’: Bolivia to file UN complaint over airspace blockade

Published time: July 03, 2013 09:51 - ‘An act of aggression and violation of international law’ is how Bolivia’s UN envoy described Austria’s decision to search the Bolivian presidential jet for NSA leaker Edward Snowden. The envoy has pledged to make an official complaint to the UN…

Friday, May 3, 2013

Billboard Magazine Outs Singer Beyonce For Repeatedly Stealing Copyrighted Music, Images And Videos


Beyonce stealing from European pop singer Kerli brought on the latest scandal about her unlawful stealing of other artists' protected works

Thieving Sony Music singer, Beyonce, has been slammed and exposed by the music industry's top magazine, Billboard, for stealing other artists copyrighted music, videos and images, in a subtle op-ed piece. Beyonce is known and mocked all over the internet for being a thief, who insists on stealing from others in failed attempts at unlawfully making herself look like an artist who does it all.

Copyright infringement is a crime under U.S. and U.N. laws. Stop for a moment and think about that. When you steal copyrighted works, you are a criminal under domestic and international law (not to mention a fraud and a phony). When you steal someone's copyrights, it is the equivalent of stealing a mansion or luxury car, due to the value of intellectual property.

Shamefully, this happens often in the music industry, especially regarding certain mainstream artists in Hollywood cults such as Kabbalah, who call themselves the Illuminati. Leaked documents have shown, when they see or hear something they like, they simply take it, in criminal violation of the law, as copyright infringement is a federal crime. To applaud Beyonce or any other artist engaging in this felony, is the equivalent of praising a bank robber, burglar or ponzi schemer like Bernard Madoff.


Beyonce's husband Jay-Z has been sued by many people in unrelated cases for theft of copyright, trademark and money 

The FBI, under Robert S. Mueller, has failed in their congressional mandate in this regard, operating under the corrupt premise stars are allowed to break the law, which is disgraceful and an embarrassment. These thefts are damaging America's bottom line, as these stolen copyrights are executed incorrectly and devalued in the process, bringing in lower revenues and tax dollars.

Having been a victim of copyright infringement at Beyonce and Jay-Z's hands (see items listed below), the Judiciary Report has covered Beyonce's many thefts in past articles, which were subsequently read by millions online. A noticeable and significant sales decline began for both aforementioned artists shortly after, as no one in good conscience could support such thievery, dishonesty and fraud.

This week it is Billboard's turn, as the industry's most prominent publication details some of Beyonce's most brazen and disgraceful thefts, completely calling her artistry or lack thereof into question (see article below).

STORY SOURCE

Op-Ed: When Beyonce's Inspiration Turns Into Imitation

May 01, 2013 11:48 AM EDT - They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but what if the person imitating is a polarizing icon that should be doing otherwise -- someone like Beyoncé? On Monday (April 29), pop singer Kerli posted a side-by-side photo on her Facebook page of her and Beyoncé donning the same Amato Haute Couture dress. The photo of Beyoncé comes from the pages of her 2013 "Mrs. Carter Show" tour book.

Except, it's not just the Furne One designed dress -- which also Nicki Minaj wore in her "Va Va Voom" video -- that's similar in the photo. Both singers can be seen painted in white, from head to toe, and stylistically posed as sculptures. No one owns a look, image, dance move (after all, how many artists have pulled out signature Michael Jackson moves?), or in this case, an experimental costume. They're not copyrighted property, but filed as intellectual property.

Any artist, including Beyoncé, can wear whatever another artist wore, but that multiplicity gets suspicious and easily pegged as stealing. And understandably so, when it's not only the look of the artist that is being traced, but his or her entire idea.

Beyoncé first caught flak for working up a dance similar to Josephine's Baker's iconic banana dance in her "Deja Vu" video, then was seen sporting a skirt with dangling bananas when performing the "B'Day" track. But let's be honest: that wasn't that serious, at least not at that point in her 20-year plus career. She later borrowed from Bob Fosse's routine, "Mexican Breakfast," in the video for her girls anthem, "Single Ladies (Put a Ring On It)." There are also references to "Rich Man's Frug" scene (of Bob Fosse's "Sweet Charity") in Bey's "Get Me Bodied" video.

There's a difference between inspiration and imitation. "Countdown" is a good example of Beyoncé doing both in one piece of work. She references Audrey Hepburn's "Funny Face" dancing and both Hepburn and Peggy Moffitt's late 50's/early 60's fashion, then elaborates with color schemes and pairs the choreography perfectly with the pace of the soundscapes. She also samples Boyz II Men's countdown from their song, "Uhh Ahh."

As the video continues, we see Bey' using the same choreography, cinematography and costumes that Belgian choreographer and dancer, Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker, used in "Rosas Danst Rosas." It's one thing to be inspired by someone else's work and revamp with one's personal style, but it's another to duplicate exact movements, which is ultimately violating the artist's intellectual property. Context matters.

Before the debut of "Countdown," Beyonce was criticized for nearly replicating Italian singer Lorella Cuccarini's live performance with her performance of "Run the World (Girls)" at the 2011 Billboard Music Awards. She later stated that she had hired the same choreographers that had worked on Cucarini's performance, but it's still puzzling as to why she didn't work with them to create a groundbreaking concept of her own.

The choreography, seen in the performance and the song's accompanying music video, comes from Mozambigue dance troupe Tofo Tofo. Instead of thanking them for the inspiration after the fact, as she's done with Cuccarini and Keersmaeker, Beyoncé brought them to the U.S. and hired them to dance alongside her in the "Run the World (Girls)" video.

The 2011 song, off her fourth studio album "4" swipes the beat from Major Lazer's 2009 "Pon De Floor." According to Diplo, one half of Major Lazer, the making of "Run the World (Girls)" started out as a "joke" (whatever that means).

Beyoncé's "1 + 1" video features scenes similar to the unfinished French film, "Le'Enfer," while her "Love On Top" video has dancing scenes much the same as those in New Edition's "If It Isn't Love" video...


ADDITIONAL BEYONCE THEFTS AS LISTED BY THE JUDICIARY REPORT: 


Beyonce 2011 (left) and Lorella Cuccarini 2010 (right)

Thieving Sony singer, Beyonce, has been stealing from other artists again, in a nasty habit that has made her the recipient of a number of copyright infringement lawsuits. Her career has solely been based on copyright theft, which is a federal and international crime.


This time Beyonce stole in great detail, the preexisting video performance of European pop artist, Lorella Cuccarini, for her appearance on the Billboard Music Awards show last week. She's being slammed all over the internet for it.


Beyonce performed the infringing song "Run The World Girls" which has flopped on the charts and paired it with a scene by scene rip-off of Cuccarini's performance from last year that was televised in Europe.


Internet users are slamming Beyonce for this unoriginality. This week Beyonce also premiered a new song entitled "1+1" which is already being panned by people online. Ironically, Beyonce's "1+1" is a dead rip off of the 1960's song "Wonderful World" by my dad's favorite singer, Sam Cooke, who he plays often on his radio show. 


Sam Cooke

My dad played "Wonderful World" so many times in the house and car, while I was growing up, when I heard the Beyonce song, I instantly recognized the infringement. A few of the copyright infringing lyrics are:

Sam: but I do know one and one is two
Beyonce: but I know one plus one equals two
Sam: don't know much about algebra
Beyonce: I don't know much about algebra
Sam: don't know much about the French I took
Beyonce: I don't know much about fighting
Sam: what a wonderful world this could be
Beyonce: when the world's at war
  

En Vogue

Beyonce's "1+1" is also a rip off in certain parts, of the 1991 En Vogue hit "Don't Go." It's clear she slapped the two songs together ("Wonderful World" and "Don't Go"). There are melodic infringements and lyrical ones as well:

En Vogue: don't go
Beyonce: don't let me go
En Vogue: let's make sweet love
Beyonce: make love to me
En Vogue: I won't put up any fight
Beyonce: I will fight for you
En Vogue: lay me down
Beyonce: I'm laying right next to you
En Vogue: Our love's been growing freely
Beyonce: our love will heal us all
En Vogue: it's out of my hands
Beyonce: when I ball up my fist
En Vogue: body next to mine
Beyonce: laying next to you


BEYONCE'S OBSESSION WITH RIPPING OFF VANESSA WILLIAMS' MUSIC CAREER:

Vanessa in 1991 Beyonce in 2008

Vanessa Williams took the photo posted above on the left in 1991 for her "Running Back To You" single. In 2008, Beyonce ripped it off. Note the similarities:

1. Vanessa Williams is wearing a black leotard covered by a black jacket. Beyonce is wearing a black leotard.

2. Vanessa Williams is wearing black paten leather ankle high boots and Beyonce is also wearing black paten leather ankle high boots .

3. Vanessa Williams has the front of her hair upswept with blonde highlights at the top while the back is flowing over her shoulders. Beyonce has the front of her hair upswept with blonde highlights at the top while the back is flowing over her shoulders.

4. Another sick note to add, Vanessa Williams has a daughter named Sasha. Beyonce adopted an alter ego named Sasha Fierce (more like Sasha Stupid ripping everybody off).

PREVIOUS PHOTO AND VIDEO THEFTS OF WILLIAMS' WORK BY BEYONCE:
Vanessa Williams 1988: Beyonce 2009:

(Above) same see through jacket, plunging neckline dress, dangling earrings, hair teased upwards and the same pose.

Same blue hued video tint, same hairstyle and highlights, but the part is on a different side and both wearing coats with black:
Vanessa Williams "Darlin I" 1988: Beyonce "Halo" video 2009:
Pictured below, is Vanessa Williams in another scene from the 1988 "Darlin I" video, wearing that same black coat, makeup and hairstyle Beyonce is now wearing 20 years later in the rip off video (photo above right):
 

Vanessa Williams "Just For Tonight" 1991 (left) Beyonce 2008 (right)


Vanessa Williams "Comfort Zone" 1991 (left) Beyonce 2008 (right). Beyonce posing topless with a cross on her arm (bracelet) is sacrilegious and disrespectful to God. 


Vanessa Williams 1988 (left) Beyonce 2008 (right) wearing the same style corset top, tutu, leggings and black boots as Vanessa Williams did in her "Right Stuff" debut video 20 years ago.


Vanessa Williams' "Darlin I" video 1988 (left) and Beyonce's "Get Me Bodied" video 2007 (right). Both scenes contain the singer getting out of the same old style black car with a chauffeur in uniform holding an umbrella for them in the rain, however, Beyonce stole it from the Vanessa Williams music video.

 
George Michael's "Too Funky" music video 1990's (left) Beyonce 2008 (right)
 
OTHER BEYONCE THEFTS:

For details on the thefts listed below see the Judiciary Report article Butt Shaking Beyonce Strikes Again
 
Sued for stealing the song "Survivor"

Sued for stealing the song "Baby Boy"

Sued for stealing the song "Independent Women"

Sued for stealing the song "Kissing You"

Took credit for writing "Crazy In Love" when she didn't

Took credit for writing "Irreplaceable" when she didn't

Sued for not paying Wilhelmina

Sued for not paying Greg Walker/Icon Entertainment

Sued for stealing $32,000,000 from the family of her former dead co-manager who got them their record deal

Will be sued shortly for stealing the songs “Worldwide Woman,” “Amor Gitmo” and “Welcome To Hollywood” and the videos “Beautiful Liar,” “Suga Mama,” “Greenlight,” “Flaws and All” and “Still In Love.”

Monday, October 29, 2012

15-Year-Old Girl Who Killed Herself After Having Sex With Four Football Players On Camera Highlights The Ongoing Problem Of Bullying


Felicia Garcia

Beautiful 15-year-old New Yorker, Felicia Garcia, jumped in front of a train to her death this month, after being bullied on social networking sites, when word got out she had sex with four football players from her high school. Her last tweet on Twitter revealed she as at wits end over the bullying, as she wrote, "I cant, im done, I give up."

The lovely freshman, who was in the foster care system, was like many young girls today, who want to fit in and choose to emulate sexually promiscuous pop culture stars (Rihanna, Kim Kardashian, Paris Hilton, Cassie ect) as a means of achieving that goal, believing it is the way to be liked and accepted. However, it is not. 

Sex is serious, as it forms emotional attachments underage girls are usually not equipped to deal with. As a matter of fact, many grown women have difficulties as well when sexual relationships end badly. It just isn't that simple. Many men have been hurt as well, when someone they love leaves them. Don't let people use and exploit you for sex or money. You deserve better than that. You deserve someone who truly loves you and don't let anyone convince you otherwise.   

In Garcia's case, her problems were compounded when the online bullying began, as classmates allegedly saw a sex tape the football players made of the sexual encounter with the 15-year-old at a party. It is not yet known if the tape was made with or without Garcia's consent (legally, she couldn't consent as a minor anyway) but one thing is certain, she did not want the public viewing it and was humiliated by the unnecessary and uncalled for taunting from classmates. 

 

Felicia Garcia

Under the law, the sex tape is child porn and those responsible for its filming and dissemination should face criminal charges. Not to mention, a person is now dead. As the Judiciary Report has stated repeatedly for years, people should not be able to film or photograph others without their consent, in states of undress or whilst performing sex acts.

It is a blatant human rights violation. Universally, legislation needs to be revised in this regard, providing greater legal penalties for offenders. If a person knew they would have to spend at least 10-years in prison for such an offense, they'd think twice before doing so and disseminating the contents of the illegally made material.

Grown men and underage boys have surreptitiously taken photos and videos of unsuspecting females in states of undress or during sex acts, then released it to the public, in misguided and unkind attempts at asserting their manhood. Real men don't do that. Gentlemen don't do that. 

To women or men contemplating suicide over photos or sex tapes that have been made public without your consent, it is not worth taking your life over. It is not the end of the world. There is still much you can do in life. Fight to overcome this victimization that was not your fault and never give up on yourself.  

RELATED ARTICLES






Thursday, August 16, 2012

Is The FBI Living Up To Its Congressional Mandate In The Area Of Copyrights And Their Enforcement


FBI Director Robert S. Mueller
 
Recently, the FBI put out an item about allowing copyright holders to use the agency's seal and warning about piracy on their products, both digital and physical. I couldn't help but shake my head, as the FBI has wilfully failed to uphold the rights and copyrights of the average American and global citizen that submitted registration fees to the Library of Congress in Washington.  

In many instances, the FBI has helped Hollywood steal copyrights from everyday Americans and foreigners, by deliberately failing to follow their congressional mandate to investigate such matters and in tandem with the Department of Justice, prosecute copyright infringers. It happened in my case and that of "The Matrix" movie (also involving Warner Bros) to name a few of many.

As stated on the site previously, in "The Matrix" case the FBI found evidence the copyright holder's work (Sophia Stewart) that was stolen was present on the set of the movie and used to make the film. But the FBI violated their congressional mandate and did not prosecute.

In my case, I was told by a well connected, unimpeachable international source (who is the source of some of my exclusives, which have been proven true) the FBI found evidence of mass criminal copyright infringement, but FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller, accepted a $1,000,000 bribe from chronic thief Madonna to stonewall the case and not lock her up. Copyright infringement is a federal crime.

I once had a Library of Congress copyright agent named Robert Blankenberg tell me that though I am registering copyrights and have paid thousands for years to do so "Hollywood is free to use your (my) work" without permission or payment. That's the kind of arrogance, criminality and injustice that exists in the system.

Sadly, the average American and global citizen is wasting their hard earned money paying for copyrights, because at the end of the day, the FBI nor the courts will do anything about it when Hollywood inevitably steals copyrighted works. 95% percent of the projects that come out of Hollywood are stolen. The whole thing is a scam.

Furthermore, the United Nations' WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) states a copyright is established FOR FREE the second it is authored. America is signatory to the United Nations' Berne Treaty on copyrights.

However, Congress enacted a law that states you must obtain a copyright for a fee from the Library of Congress, because if your works are infringed, it is the only way you will be allowed to sue in an American court to recover financial damages. But Hollywood has most entertainment law firms and judges that hear such cases on their payroll, so justice shall not be found anyway. Once again, it's a disgraceful scam and it is going to unravel in a mighty scandal shortly.   

RELATED ARTICLES











Wednesday, May 9, 2012

United Nations Says America Should Return Some Stolen Land To The Indians


Congress

The Guardian newspaper has published a piece titled "US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations." It deals with native Indians in America, being robbed of their land and facing terrible "racial discrimination" and financial hardships. According to the report, Congress is ignoring the plight of the native American Indians. 

Contrary to what many think, all native Indian tribes are not swimming in tax free money and living the high life. Many are poor and disenfranchised. As the original Americans, more needs to be done to help them. Their ancestors were robbed of their land and murdered. Restitution needs to be made in some financial form for these injustices.    
STORY SOURCE

US should return stolen land to Indian tribes, says United Nations 

Friday 4 May 2012 23.46 BST - UN's correspondent on indigenous peoples urges government to act to combat 'racial discrimination' felt by Native Americans. A United Nations investigator probing discrimination against Native Americans has called on the US government to return some of the land stolen from Indian tribes as a step toward combatting continuing and systemic racial discrimination.

James Anaya, the UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, said no member of the US Congress would meet him as he investigated the part played by the government in the considerable difficulties faced by Indian tribes.

Anaya said that in nearly two weeks of visiting Indian reservations, indigenous communities in Alaska and Hawaii, and Native Americans now living in cities, he encountered people who suffered a history of dispossession of their lands and resources, the breakdown of their societies and "numerous instances of outright brutality, all grounded on racial discrimination"...