Donald Trump Denies He Was Inciting Violence With Second Amendment Comment About Hillary Clinton And The Secret Service Did Not Visit Him

 

Donald Trump: I wish someone would just pop a cap in her butt!

 

U.S. Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, caused a firestorm of controversy this week after he made comments about political rival, Hillary Clinton, being taken care of by "the Second  Amendment people." The Second Amendment is the right to bear arms (guns) in America ("the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed). Some interpreted Trump's statements to mean that Americans would kill Clinton if she chose Supreme Court judges they did not like, in the event she is elected President of the United States. 

 

Trump stated," Hillary wants to abolish, essentially abolish the Second Amendment. By the way, if she gets to pick, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know." Trump later stated his comments were to motivate gun owners to vote against Clinton, not shoot her.

 

   
Hillary Clinton: Yea, keep playing with me Donald and you and your combover are gonna end up on the Clinton kill list (and boy does it have a lot of names). Bernie just got off the list last month (LOL).
 

 CNN reported the Secret Service formally interviewed Trump about his statements. The Trump campaign stated CNN lied. The Secret Service backs up their statement in also denying CNN's claims. Trump slammed CNN for the story stating, "No such meeting or conversation ever happened. A made up story by low ratings CNN." 

 

I can see how some could interpret Trump's statements as dangerous. It sounded like he was joking and hoping regarding gun owners lighting up Hillary like a Christmas tree. There are always fanatics who are unbalanced and will hear or read items and act upon it in an illegal manner. Trump needs to be careful of what he says, because if someone pops a cap in Hillary's butt, some will blame him.

 

   
Bernie Sanders (left) sweating bullets, pardon the pun and Hillary Clinton (right)

 

Side Bar: Two months ago, a Democrat writer indirectly called for Donald Trump's assassination and the mainstream press said nothing (weeks after, someone did actually try to kill Trump). This week Trump makes a statement that is interpreted by some as violent and it lands on all the mainstream outlets. That's quite uneven. Both stories should receive the same amount of attention. 

RELATED ARTICLES

Questions Mount About Hillary Clinton's Health And Whether She Is Mentally And Physically Fit To Be President

More Questions Arise About Hillary Clinton’s Health Due To New Information And Photos

New Reports Indicate Hillary Clinton Is Too Physically Sick To Be President (Videos)

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg Under Fire For Comments Apologizes To Donald Trump

Ruth Ginsburg: what did I do?
 

Supreme Court Justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, put her foot in it criticizing presidential candidate, Donald Trump last week. I do not agree with comments Trump has made about Mexicans, Muslims, blacks and the disabled and expressed my personal view on this site that he needs to apologize. However, Ginsburg unwisely made comments about Trump in a public interview.

Ginsburg labeled Trump “a faker” and further stated, “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego…How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that.” 

I have no words for this meme (LOL)
 

Trump became incensed and stated Ginsburg needs to resign. Trump stated, “Justice Ginsburg of the U.S. Supreme Court has embarrassed all by making very dumb political statements about me. Her mind is shot - resign!” Ginsburg ironically suffers from something Trump does as well - speaks before thinking (while Trump’s rival Hillary Clinton is too busy deleting emails to speak). Ginsburg is on the Supreme Court. 

In slamming Trump, this means she will have to recuse herself from everything concerning him in the future, as she exposed an obvious bias and outright contempt. Trump is a businessman with significant assets and with that type of portfolio comes lawsuits to protect one‘s property.

Ginsburg sleeping on the job during an Obama speech, which is understandable
 

I’m all for free speech but what Ginsburg did is self-defeating. Any Trump lawsuit that reaches the Supreme Court would automatically call for a Ginsburg recusal. If Trump becomes president, Ginsburg has major problems, as she will have disqualified herself from everything he would send to the Supreme Court. Items liberals want approved by the Supreme Court, would be hampered with one less judge in the vote.

Realizing what she has done, Ginsburg has apologized. However, the problem she created for herself and her political party, the Democrats, in slamming Trump in the manner she did, still remain and will repeatedly be cause for a recusal under certain circumstances. Furthermore, voters don't form their opinions on who to vote for at the polls based on the words of judges trying to swing the election. 

Donald Trump: I will pop a cap in your butt...
 

One would think judges would realize, it may feel good indulging in inappropriate speech against someone you think you are in a position to put in their place, but when the soundbites or press quotes come back to haunt you, it could cost you your career and name. Furthermore, calling Trump a “faker” is grounds for a defamation lawsuit. You may and others may think he is fake, but can you prove it. 

Trump: talk to the hair, Ruth
 

The Supreme Court wants the public to have confidence in them, yet it has been revealed they take massive stock bribes, engage in racist speech as seen with Justice Antonin Scalia who kept insulting black, calling us “slower” than white people and now open bias as seen with Ginsburg. None of this inspires confidence. Is there any wonder the American public is actively calling the government “corrupt” and “rigged” on social networking sites.

STORY SOURCE

Ginsburg Apologizes For 'Ill-Advised' Trump Comments
 

July 14, 201610:44 AM ET - Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg says she regrets calling Donald Trump a "faker" and making other disparaging remarks about the candidate. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has apologized for what she called "ill-advised" comments she made earlier this week criticizing presumptive Republican presidential nominee. 

"On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them," Ginsburg said in a statement Thursday morning. "Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future I will be more circumspect." In an interview with the New York Times over the weekend, Ginsburg didn't hide her contempt for Trump, saying, "I can't imagine what the country would be — with Donald Trump as our president" and that her late husband would have said it was "time for us to move to New Zealand." 

She doubled down on those statements Monday to CNN, calling Trump a "faker." "He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego...How has he gotten away with not turning over his tax returns? The press seems to be very gentle with him on that," Ginsburg continued.

http://www.npr.org

RELATED ARTICLES

The Obama Administration Is Interfering In Civil And Criminal Court Cases In Violation Of The Law Corruptly Ordering Judges How To Rule And Bugging Trees And Rocks At Courthouses

Attorney General Loretta Lynch Dodged 74 Questions In Congress About The Corruption That Led To Hillary Clinton Not Being Criminally Charged For Mishandling Classified Information

FBI Hit With Massive Backlash From Americans Labeling Them 'Corrupt' For 'Rigging' Hillary Clinton Investigation Into Mishandling Classified Information And Not Charging Her For Crimes She Committed

Members Of Congress Question FBI Director James Comey In Hearing About Hillary Clinton Lying To The Legislature And FBI Under Oath

The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right

British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit

Politico: How The World Fell Out Of Love With Obama

World Leaders Blaming Obama For Brexit

Obama Has Brought Permanent Disgrace On Jurists Like Loretta Lynch And James Comey (Among Others)

Barack Obama
 

In his immense zeal to get his own way at all cost, President Obama has issued directives that amount to egregious acts of corruption, via commanding people in the government's employ, to fall in line with illegal behavior. In doing so, Obama has brought lasting, permanent disgrace upon jurists such as FBI Director and lawyer, James Comey as well as Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, among others. In reading the many overwhelmingly negative comments on social networking regarding James Comey and Loretta Lynch, who were also humiliated in Congress, one has no choice but to come to the conclusion they are ruined. Their names are gone.  

Comey and Lynch are two public figures who are now actively being branded "corrupt" bribe takers by countless Americans and international citizens, who are slamming them online over "rigging" the system in not charging presidential candidate Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information. Obama, who is Comey and Lynch's boss, wants Clinton in office based on what she could do for him and their party if she became president.

Clinton and her husband, former U.S. President, Bill Clinton, offered Lynch inducements, such as retaining her as Attorney General, as exposed the U.S. Congress this week, if she dropped the case against "Crooked Hillary" as she is now known in the public domain due to a number of political scandals. 

   
Loretta Lynch was excoriated in Congress this week
 

Comey was flat out forced by Obama to look the other way and recommend charges not be filed against Clinton. Comey still had the option of saying no, but he's not very brave and Obama has enough on him to ruin him. Obama is a vindictive, mean spirited person, who likes to bully others and throw around threats (for further reference see his Brexit speech in London, England this past April that completely backfired, after he arrogantly threatened an entire nation of Britons). Is there any wonder this happened: Politico: How The World Fell Out Of Love With Obama.

As stated on the site recently, a mainstream newspaper report revealed the Obama Administration, via the FBI, has been secretly planting surveillance items at courthouses, in violation of the law, which is also violating "attorney client privilege" each time a lawyer and his or her client holds a conversation they wrongly assume to be private (The Obama Administration Is Interfering In Civil And Criminal Court Cases In Violation Of The Law Corruptly Ordering Judges How To Rule And Bugging Trees And Rocks At Courthouses).

Obama also has FBI and CIA agents going to select court houses in America in cases he is meddling in for nefarious reasons and ordering judges how to rule, which is a violation of the "Separation of Powers" and his oath of office as President of the United States. My question is, once the jurists involved in this misconduct on the orders of the Obama Administration are publicly unmasked, how will they get their names back (I will be including said judges by name in my forthcoming documentary "American Justice System Corruption" as well as including the Hillary Clinton FBI/DOJ scandal that was debated in the U.S. Congress this week). Said judges will be in the same sinking boat as Comey and Lynch, publicly disgraced and humiliated to the nation and the world for corruption, but it is richly deserved, especially when the public finds out what they've been doing (and it's very bad).

James Comey was excoriated in Congress last week
 

Will Obama give the corrupted judges in question the standard, crappy "thank you for your service speech" as their names are publicly ruined, their family members want to change their last names and the public slams them online and votes them out of office for being corrupt. I think that's one of the worst things about the president's behavior. He doesn't give a damn who is disgraced with their personal and professional lives ruined by shameful scandals - as long as he gets his way, that's all that matters.

Judges, lawyers and other government workers need to learn from Comey and Lynch's dramatic downfall and public disgrace. Assurances from Obama telling you that you will be alright if you engage in unsavory behavior on his behalf and that of his cronies means nothing. That's an assurance no president can give, especially in modern times where technology makes it easy to reach the masses in seconds. 

Obama can't turn public opinion in your favor, as his name is not what it once was in America or the world. A president can't protect you from public disgrace and your family becoming utterly ashamed of you and disappointed by your unlawful, corrupt behavior. Obama can't buy your name and reputation back. Only you can preserve your name and shield yourself and your family from utter disgrace and public disfavor by doing the right thing.

 
RELATED ARTICLES

The Obama Administration Is Interfering In Civil And Criminal Court Cases In Violation Of The Law Corruptly Ordering Judges How To Rule And Bugging Trees And Rocks At Courthouses

Attorney General Loretta Lynch Dodged 74 Questions In Congress About The Corruption That Led To Hillary Clinton Not Being Criminally Charged For Mishandling Classified Information

FBI Hit With Massive Backlash From Americans Labeling Them 'Corrupt' For 'Rigging' Hillary Clinton Investigation Into Mishandling Classified Information And Not Charging Her For Crimes She Committed

Members Of Congress Question FBI Director James Comey In Hearing About Hillary Clinton Lying To The Legislature And FBI Under Oath

British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit

Politico: How The World Fell Out Of Love With Obama

World Leaders Blaming Obama For Brexit

The Obama Administration Is Interfering In Civil And Criminal Court Cases In Violation Of The Law Corruptly Ordering Judges How To Rule And Bugging Trees And Rocks At Courthouses

And To Think Obama Is A Lawyer! Go Figure! #Crooked

Barack Obama

The Obama Administration, on President Barack Obama's orders, has been criminally interfering in civil and criminal court cases, in a brazen violation of the "Separation of Powers" also known as Checks and Balances, under the United States Constitution. America's "Separation of Powers" broke the U.S. government up into three branches: the Executive (President, Vice President), the Judicial (court system) and the legislative (Congress). However, President Obama is autocratically and criminally functioning as all three and very poorly might I add. 

However, Obama's FBI and CIA have been criminally meddling in civil cases, as well as criminal cases, illegally telling judges how to rule in violation of the law and citizens rights, clerks to engage in abusive behavior and file tampering, which all constitutes completely corrupt and illegal conduct worthy of imprisonment. It's bad enough Obama has corrupted Congress and to the point they rammed through ObamaCare, the president's dodgy health plan that has led to patient deaths via doctors and hospitals cutting corners, without even reading its 10,000 pages of legislative national financial disaster and debt. 

Obama has been criminally meddling in the court system, in some cases having the White House personally calling judges to order them to rule in the manner Emperor Obama states, which is illegal. Why are FBI and CIA agents skulking around select U.S. courthouses and having private conversations with judges. It has a horrible look of impropriety (much like Bill Clinton meeting with Loretta Lynch). It is all disgustingly corrupt. 

There were report in the news recently about the FBI skulking around courthouses and other public places in America and installing hidden listening devices on trees and under rocks, among other locations, hiding the surveillance items to secretly spy on innocent people. This is a criminal violation of "Attorney Client Privilege" as some of the cases being heard in said courts involve President Obama, his policies, his cronies and campaign donors, as well as the FBI and CIA. The Obama Administration is insane and paranoid to be doing this. 

RELATED READING

Hidden Microphones Exposed As Part of Government Surveillance Program In The Bay Area
 

May 13, 2016 6:24 PM - OAKLAND (CBS SF) — Hidden microphones that are part of a clandestine government surveillance program that has been operating around the Bay Area has been exposed. Imagine standing at a bus stop, talking to your friend and having your conversation recorded without you knowing. It happens all the time, and the FBI doesn’t even need a warrant to do it. 

Federal agents are planting microphones to secretly record conversations. Jeff Harp, a KPIX 5 security analyst and former FBI special agent said, “They put microphones under rocks, they put microphones in trees, they plant microphones in equipment. I mean, there’s microphones that are planted in places that people don’t think about, because that’s the intent!” 

FBI agents hid microphones inside light fixtures and at a bus stop outside the Oakland Courthouse without a warrant to record conversations, between March 2010 and January 2011. Federal authorities are trying to prove real estate investors in San Mateo and Alameda counties are guilty of bid rigging and fraud and used these recordings as evidence. Harp said, “An agent can’t just go out and grab a recording device and plant it somewhere without authorization from a supervisor or special agent in charge.” 

The lawyer for one of the accused real estate investors who will ask the judge to throw out the recordings, told KPIX 5 News that, “Speaking in a public place does not mean that the individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy…private communication in a public place qualifies as a protected ‘oral communication’… and therefore may not be intercepted without judicial authorization.” 

Harp says that if you’re going to conduct criminal activity, do it in the privacy of your own home. He says that was the original intention of the Fourth Amendment, but it’s up to the judge to interpret it.

http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com

RELATED ARTICLES

New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims

FBI Agent Arrested For Accepting A $200,000 Bribe To Derail A Criminal Case The FBI Was Supposed To Be Investigating

Human Rights Activists Slam The FBI After It Is Discovered They Became The World's Top Distributor Of Child Porn

NSA Admits Employees Illegally Spied On Love Interests And Significant Others Confirming Site’s Previous Claims

NSA Workers Admit To Reading The Emails And Listening To The Calls Of Americans In Violation Of The Law

The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right

Judge Rules The NSA Illegally Spied On Americans Confirming The Site's Previous Claims (Video)

IRS Says Sorry For Targeting Conservatives As Obama Denies All Knowledge Of Misconduct

Another FBI Agent Caught Taking Bribes To Derail Serious Cases (Video)

News Report: The IRS Targeted Christians

Miami Voted 'The Worst Place To Live'

Miami
 

The Washington Times posted a report which stated Miami has been voted "the worst place to live." The article stated of the study, "No city in the United States is worse to live in than Miami." It's a terrible and dubious distinction, given to Miami due to the sheer levels of corruption in the city, among other things. Thanks to this corruption, which only begets crime, Miami is not considered a model city, which is indicated by the Washington Times article. 

Considering the harrowing nightmare my family and I faced in Miami for years, thanks to a sick, bribe issuing Hollywood cult and the corruption of the FBI, in tandem with local government and the court system, roped into helping them do the unthinkable, I'm not surprised Miami has been voted "the worst place to live." 

Innocent people have been brutalized and killed in Miami in deeds the federal and local government knew about and could have prevented, but due to bribery chose to look the other way and unconscionably let it happen. Yet, it's amazing how after the FBI disgraced Miami to America and on the world stage with millions have read about the corruption and taking a dim view of it, the FBI left Miami, relocating to another city in Florida, ensconced in Broward County. 

The FBI could have picked anywhere to relocate the FBI's Miami office within the city limits. However, the FBI chose a city outside of Miami, well outside the Miami city limits, to put the new Miami FBI office. Let that sink in, the Miami FBI office IS NOT EVEN IN MIAMI. It's one of the dumbest things I've ever seen. But the FBI knows why it hightailed it out of Miami...

Another thing the government needs to let sink in regarding their corruption that has greatly damaged Miami's name in the aforementioned study, even with poison water in Flint, Michigan - 49 people being unjustly killed in an Orlando, Florida night club shooting, a singer fatally gunned down in an Orlando, Florida theatre and a beautiful child being killed by an alligator at Disney in Orlando, Florida...Miami still beat those cities as "the worst place to live."

At the end of the day, it is the government's fault Miami has been given such a dubious distinction. The government are supposed to be the gatekeepers who maintain law and order, evenly distributing justice. The government are the gatekeepers, who are supposed to make sure people aren't being ripped off, homes stolen, working for low wages at arduous jobs and subjected to human rights abuses. What has negatively transpired in Miami is what the government has corruptly allowed. 

STORY SOURCE

Not so sunny: Miami tops list of the 50 ‘worst cities to live in’: report

Tuesday, June 28, 2016 - It is a city said to be glamorous, historic, scenic, vibrant and charming. Nonetheless, Miami has been named the absolute “worst city to live in,” according to a meticulous new analysis of demographics and other data. Researchers from 24/7 Wall Street, a consumer and financial advisory site, based their conclusions on U.S. Census Bureau statistics from 550 American cities with populations over 65,000. They collected numbers on categories such as crime, economy, education, environment, health, housing, infrastructure, and leisure to make their judgments. 

“While people love and hate cities for any number of reasons, there are some objective measures by which all cities can be compared,” wrote Thomas Frolich and Samuel Stebbins, who led the research. “Based on a range of variables, including crime rates, employment growth, access to restaurants and attractions, educational attainment, and housing affordability, 24/7 Wall Street identified America’s 50 worst cities to live.” The Florida showplace landed at the top of the roster. 

“No city in the United States is worse to live in than Miami. The city’s median home value of $245,000 is well above the national median of $181,200. However, with a median household income of only $31,917 a year, well below the national median of $53,657, most of these homes are either out of reach or a financial burden on most Miami residents,” the authors noted in their rationale. “Like most of the worst cities to live in, more than one in every four people in Miami live in poverty.” 

The Florida showplace landed at the top of the roster. They also cited “citywide violence” along with rates of incarceration, unstable employment, lower cognitive functioning among children, and “anxiety.”...

http://www.washingtontimes.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Madonna, Jay Z, Beyonce, Rihanna, Rita Ora And Jessie J Sued Over Copyright Infringement, Invasion Of Privacy, Commissioned Criminal Harassment And Assault Via The Kabbalah Center

Obama's FBI Is Engaging In A Vicious Criminal Pattern Of Abuse And Brutalization Against Innocent Jamaicans - Part 2 (MURDER)

Obama's FBI Is Engaging In A Vicious Criminal Pattern Of Abuse And Brutalization Against Innocent Jamaicans

Corruption And Loopholes In The American Justice System Empowering Criminals To Further Victimize Victims (Brock Turner)

Criminals Arrogantly Fighting Victims In Court

There Is A Serious Problem With The U.S. Justice System When The Government Starts Treating Victims Like Criminals And Criminals Like Victims 

Brock Turner

 

The justice system is supposed to be fair and equitable. However, the Brock Turner rape case has revealed it is anything but that, confirming what the Judiciary Report has been stating for years about the U.S. justice system. Judge Aaron Persky, an alumni of Stanford University, gave one of its current students, Brock Turner, 6-months in jail, as opposed to the required 6-years in prison for a vicious 3-count rape that left a victim with terrible emotional, mental and physical damage. 

The case has sparked outrage in America, as millions of citizens demand Persky be removed. Persky is the most hated judge in America and considering all the corruption currently in the justice system, that is no small feat. The case needs to be revisited/reopened, as in cases where it is discovered a judge, prosecutor, FBI or police acted illegally or improperly against a party in the case. 

A segment of the victim's statement on the Turner rape, once again unmasks the corruption in the justice system and how criminals are using loopholes and other disgraceful tactics to get out of the consequences of their crimes. The victim stated, "I thought there’s no way this is going to trial; there were witnesses, there was dirt in my body, he ran but was caught. He’s going to settle, formally apologize, and we will both move on. Instead, I was told he hired a powerful attorney, expert witnesses, private investigators who were going to try and find details about my personal life to use against me, find loopholes in my story to invalidate me and my sister, in order to show that this sexual assault was in fact a misunderstanding."

Lawyers are engaging in criminal behavior with judges in a number of cases, such as issuing cash or stock bribes to derail cases on behalf of their lawbreaking clients. Where cases appear open and shut, due to the seriousness of the crimes and evidence present, they are not airtight in the current corrupt atmosphere in the U.S. justice system. Even the Supreme Court is taking bribes "The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right." It's not a good look. The America and world are watching the corruption in the U.S. justice system with contempt and disgust. 

Even websites like TMZ brag about celebrities and the rich questionably squirming out of the consequences of criminal behavior and corruptly getting valid cases against them tossed. It's not something to brag about. It is disgraceful what they are doing, as it is painting a terrible picture in the eyes of the nation and the world of how corrupt and buyable the U.S. justice system has become. It's a black eye.

The U.S. justice system needs to be cleaned up lest it takes the whole country down over the misconduct of rich criminals, who aren't even 2% of the population and could not survive without the rest of America. After all, without the middle class and lower income people, who would work for and buy the products of America's wealthiest 2 percent. 

The wealthiest 2 percent ripping off, defrauding and abusing the middle class and the poor in America is not in the nation's best interest, as it is morally wrong, cruel and destroying the backbone of the country. America never used to be like this. However, over the past 15-years, as the phrase goes, "The inmates have been running the asylum." Highly questionably people have been installed in the government and justice system to America's detriment. It used to be the cream rises to the top. However, with all the corruption, bribery and nepotism, the crap has risen to the top and no society in world history has sustained itself under those conditions and did not catastrophically fall (for further reference, see the fall of Rome).

I read world news articles, medical and science journals and legal documents 6-days a week. I can state without fear of contradiction, the U.S. justice system has become the most corrupt in the world. The stories of corruption coming out of justice system and government in America are the most severe and astonishing in the world. It's gone too far.

The government needs to clean up the corruption. You are destroying America. There's a crude reference online that the wealthy in America engaging in egregious abuses against the middle class and the poor need to think about as they recklessly destroy the nation's future, "Don't s**t where you eat."

STORY SOURCE

Here Is The Powerful Letter The Stanford Victim Read Aloud To Her Attacker 

Jun. 3, 2016, at 4:17 p.m. - A former Stanford swimmer who sexually assaulted an unconscious woman was sentenced to six months in jail because a longer sentence would have “a severe impact on him,” according to a judge. At his sentencing Thursday, his victim read him a letter describing the “severe impact” the assault had on her.

I thought there’s no way this is going to trial; there were witnesses, there was dirt in my body, he ran but was caught. He’s going to settle, formally apologize, and we will both move on. Instead, I was told he hired a powerful attorney, expert witnesses, private investigators who were going to try and find details about my personal life to use against me, find loopholes in my story to invalidate me and my sister, in order to show that this sexual assault was in fact a misunderstanding. That he was going to go to any length to convince the world he had simply been confused.

I was not only told that I was assaulted, I was told that because I couldn’t remember, I technically could not prove it was unwanted. And that distorted me, damaged me, almost broke me. It is the saddest type of confusion to be told I was assaulted and nearly raped, blatantly out in the open, but we don’t know if it counts as assault yet. I had to fight for an entire year to make it clear that there was something wrong with this situation.

https://www.buzzfeed.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Public Demands U.S. Judge On Stanford Rape Case Be Removed From Office For Giving Rapist Lenient 6-Months In Jail
 
Blame The Victim?

Select Mortgage Companies In America Such As First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation Are Asking Consumers Their Race In Loan Applications Then Using It To Discriminate In Denying Loans

The LinkedIn profile of First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation CEO, Andrew Peters. First Guaranty Mortgage is owned by Kenneth E. Clark.
 

First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation, a company based in Virginia, is engaging in discriminatory and financially abusive acts against minorities, the disabled and people living in America of foreign origin, who try to obtain a mortgage with their company to buy a home. It is an ongoing, illegal practice damaging innocent people. Companies that behave in this manner should be put out of business. 

Recently, the city of Miami sued Wells Fargo bank for discriminating against minorities and people living in America of foreign extraction, who tried to apply for home loans. A suspect Miami judge threw out the City Of Miami's valid case. However, a three judge appeals court in Washington, D.C. reinstated the case. You know judicial corruption has gotten terrible in America when a judge can corruptly throw out a case brought by the government.

In the appeals case City Of Miami vs. Wells Fargo & Co., (No. 14-14544 and D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cv-24508-WPD) the City of Miami prevailed as a panel of three district judges in Washington affirmed their complaint and remanded it back to the district court via a ruling that stated:

"The City’s charges were further amplified by the statements of several confidential witnesses who claimed that the Bank deliberately targeted black and Latino borrowers for predatory loans. For example, one former loan officer attested that Wells Fargo management steered low- and middle-income borrowers away from less expensive Community Reinvestment Act loans and toward more expensive Fair Housing Act and Freddie Mac loans. Id. at 36. Another claimed that the Bank targeted minority churches and their congregations for subprime loans. Id. at 37. A third claimed that Hispanic borrowers’ applications for refinancing were disproportionately denied: ‘a Rodriguez in the last name was treated differently than a Smith,’ he stated."

Let that sink in. There are mortgage companies in America, such as First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation and banks like Wells Fargo, who are discriminating against consumers in America based on them having ethnic sounding names such as "Rodriguez" or "Latisha" or "Mohammed" (black, Hispanic, Arab), hitting them with bigger loan fees and bad financial instruments, in bids at financially exploiting and abusing minorities and immigrants. That's terrible.

You know, the last lending institution who was caught doing that, Washington Mutual, is no more. The Judiciary Report ran a series of articles on Washington Mutual's criminal practices against minorities and within a couple years the company spectacularly collapsed, the remains bought for pennies on the dollar by Chase Bank (Washington Mutual Collapses Seized By Government and Washington Mutual Is No More). First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation needs to heed the warning, as that is what they are firmly headed for regarding their unlawful behavior. Said discriminatory, financially abusive practices costing minorities and immigrants money, homes and loans needs to stop.

There will be more on First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation in an upcoming Judiciary Report exposé.

 

RELATED ARTICLE
 
Boycott First Guaranty Mortgage Corporation And Coester VMS Who Are Scammers And Con Artists Engaging In Discrimination While Ripping Off People Seeking Mortgages

Madonna Crazily Tries To Have Guy Ritchie Arrested For Child Kidnapping Because Her Son Ran Away And Doesn't Want To Live With Her

Son To Stay In London

Guy Ritchie, his wife Jacqui Ritchie and his son whose mother is Madonna, Rocco Ritchie

This past December, deranged pop singer, Madonna, began using her 15-year-old son, Rocco Ritchie, for publicity, in airing the details of what was a private custody battle. The details should not have been made public, as it is a private family matter. However, washed up Madonna cannot bear the fact her music sales are destroyed due to boycotts for stealing copyrights, resulting in her not having a hit in 15-years. Therefore, she did the unthinkable and used the custody case for publicly. Most celebrities can handle the transition out of the limelight, but Madonna cannot deal with it.  

The crazy, attention seeking pop star expected public sympathy to go in her favor regarding her custody battle with ex-husband, Guy Ritchie, but it failed. Ritchie and Madonna have joint custody of the child, who is well within his right to stay with his dad. Madonna corrupted the court case and mysteriously got New York Supreme Court Justice, Deborah Kaplan, to issue overbearing and unconstitutional instructions that the mentally deranged singer's underage son must spend Christmas with his mother, whom he can't stand and ran away from to live with his dad in London, England. 

People all over the world began asking online and offline, how a judge can force a child to spend Christmas with someone he dislikes. It gave the public a certain impre$$ion that brought the court into disrepute. The 15-year-old boy defied the judge's instructions and did not board the plane from London to New York, refusing to spend Christmas with his violent, abusive mother, who had repeatedly degraded and humiliated him on Instagram and Twitter via inappropriate videos and nasty comments that cause him acute public embarrassment.

Ritchie filed paperwork in a London court, refuting Madonna's crazy claims and demands. The British Court sided with their 15-year-old son and Ritchie, stating the boy will not be forced to board a plane for New York to spend time with his mother. The holidays are a time people prefer to spend with the ones they love. As it stands, Rocco Ritchie prefers his stepmom, Jacqui Ritchie, to his real mother.

A reliable source responsible for some of my site exclusives informed me regarding Madonna and Rocco Ritchie, "Her son hates her." Word in the industry is Madonna's unstable lifestyle, embarrassing publicity stunts, unflattering "mutton trying to pass for lamb" raunchy stage shows and videos, chasing after males and females in their teens and twenties for sexual relationships, coupled with her abusiveness, made the boy flee. It is also being stated Madonna's terrible and embarrassing public conduct has made her son the subject of ridicule and bullying by his peers.

After sharp public criticism against previous judicial instructions, Judge Deborah Kaplan, made a u-turn and scolded Madonna in court this week. Judge Kaplan informed Madonna that her public custody battle is upsetting her son, who wants the matter resolved between both parents. The 15-year-old boy's layer stated the case is "stressful and upsetting" for him and he wants it to end. The British judge had previously issued similar comments. Rocco Ritchie's lawyer made it clear to the court he does not want to live with his mother and would prefer to stay with his dad in London.

Madonna's lawyer Ellen Alter ironically stated, "He thought it was better for Rocco to live with him. He may be right, I don't know. But the proper procedure was to come back to New York and ask for a change in circumstances. He used self-help. He taught his son that obeying court orders was not important and I think that's one of the most serious things that's happened in this case that's detrimental to Rocco." 

Firstly, Madonna's own lawyer stating, "he (Guy Ritchie) thought it was better for Rocco to live with him. He may be right, I don't know" reveals doubt regarding her client's parenting skills (or lack their of). Secondly, Madonna is psychotic, violent and abusive person, who is deeply into the occult and in sick, lawbreaking ways. The boy ran away for a reason. In essence, the court is being asked to force a child to go back to his insane, abusive mother he ran away from to stay with his father and step-mom in an environment better than the one he was in.

Thirdly, Madonna asking the New York court to arrest, Ritchie, a British citizen they have no jurisdiction over, for contempt of court, due to the fact she was so abusive with her son he ran away to live with his dad in another country, is hypocritical. To accuse Ritchie of "kidnapping" and wanting him prosecuted as such, is crazy, as he has joint custody and Madonna has been abusive to the boy. She is the one who should be in prison in the custody case.

Madonna (yuck)

Madonna has irrationally accused Ritchie of turning their son against her. However, any sane person can see she turned her son against her via terrible parenting. Madonna repeatedly made nasty comments about him online, degrading the size of his penis (saying he doesn't have one "no sausage"), calling him the n-word slur for attention in what turned into a nasty scandal that led to blacks and whites slamming her for using the word, coupled with other behind the scenes abusiveness.

Madonna's adopted African son and daughter, also want to live with Ritchie. Madonna is holding them hostage in exchange for Rocco back. Madonna had her lawyer file manipulative court papers to that effect, stating Ritchie is not allowed to have visits with her adopted children if she doesn't get her biological son back, who by all counts, does not want to live with her. Rocco Ritchie has been enrolled in school in London, prompting Judge Kaplan in New York to accept the boy's decision, stating she is pleased he is in school. Ritchie attorney also alluded to the fact he could include damning documents in the case, but does not want to distress his son. Ritchie has a lot of dirt on his ex-wife, enough to put her in prison for life. 

As the scripture states, "You reap what you sow." It's ironic that Madonna has lost her son these past months, as she stole someone else's child. Madonna was slammed a decade ago over an illegal adoption, where she insanely and illegally ripped a little African boy away from his devastated, crying family in Malawi (they did interviews protesting the adoption). The world began booing and slamming Madonna as a "baby snatcher" and "baby thief." It brought the weathered pop tart to tears on "The Oprah Winfrey Show." Her plan to leech off the massive worldwide publicity and applause Angelina Jolie received for privately adopting an African child had backfired on Madonna, provoking public hatred against the faux singer.

Reports online indicated Madonna bribed a judge and government official in Malawi, demanding she wanted to adopt the boy, whose family did not want to give him up. Madonna also lied and told the boy's village she would build them new homes. Instead the satanic Hollywood star bulldozed an entire village for their land and did not build the poor and destitute villagers new homes. Then, it was revealed Madonna solicited over $40,000,000 in charity donations for Malawi, but did not give them money. Madonna and the cult she runs, the Kabbalah Center, also illegally claimed the land in Malawi after the demolition job. The nasty pop star was even seen grinning her dentures at the cameras as she left Malawi, while waving around a bottle of hand sanitizer, scorning the poor Africans as unclean.

As stated in the column previously, Madonna should not have custody over any child, as the New York Post reported she was sued a decade ago for beating up, choking and slamming against a brick wall, an 11-year-old boy, Keith Sorrentino, who "pestered her for an autograph on her day off." Madonna settled the case for $600,000. Ironically, I received an email from someone stating they are Keith Sorrentino.

RELATED ARTICLES

Madonna, Jay Z, Beyonce, Rihanna, Rita Ora And Jessie J Sued Over Copyright Infringement, Invasion Of Privacy, Commissioned Criminal Harassment And Assault Via The Kabbalah Center

Jay Z And Madonna's Floundering Tidal Sued For $5,000,000 Over Copyright Infringement In Not Paying Artists While Inflating Their Own Sales To Go Number One On Billboard

Newspaper Reports Madonna Has Hired Private Investigator To Stalk Guy Ritchie, His New Wife And The Couple’s Children Confirming Previous Site Claims

Racist Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia Dead

Antonin Scalia

Over the past 3-months, the Judiciary Report, has written a series of articles about racist Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia (Racist Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia States In Ruling That Blacks Are Slower Than Whites Causing Uproar On Social Networking and Antonin Scalia Slammed By Members Of Congress As A Racist Who Should Be Removed From The Supreme Court and Donald Trump Slams The Racist Comments Of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and this week on February 6, 2016 Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Complains About Negative Public Perception Of The Court).

It is being reported this evening that Scalia has died on a Marfa, Texas ranch. Reports reveal he was not feeling well yesterday and did not come down for breakfast this morning. He was subsequently found dead. He was 79-years-old. Scalia will be remembered as the racist who stated blacks are slower than whites and should not be admitted to elite universities. He will also be remembered as the Supreme Court judge who robbed politician Al Gore of his destiny in corruptly awarding George W. Bush the 2000 U.S. Presidential election, which set in motion a deceitful war that left over 1,000,000 people dead and darn near bankrupted America. Scalia was unrepentantly and unapologetic racist, corrupt and defiant to the end. Scalia has a lot to answer for when he meets God, the true Judge of us all that made us all equal.  

Social networking is not mourning Scalia. Thousands of comments have been posted slamming him, Clarence Thomas and the Supreme Court as a whole. Americans are fed up with the decisions pouring out of the Supreme Court, as they are not instep with the will of the people. It also doesn't help that Supreme Court judges are corruptly sitting on many millions of dollars in stock in major U.S. corporations that are petitioning the court, when said justices can't afford said stocks on their salaries (The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right). It doesn't look good.

RELATED ARTICLES

Madonna, Jay Z, Beyonce, Rihanna, Rita Ora And Jessie J Sued Over Copyright Infringement, Invasion Of Privacy, Commissioned Criminal Harassment And Assault Via The Kabbalah Center

Racist Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia States In Ruling That Blacks Are Slower Than Whites Causing Uproar On Social Networking

Antonin Scalia Slammed By Members Of Congress As A Racist Who Should Be Removed From The Supreme Court

Google Calls Black President Obama's White House 'The Nig*a House' And The Supreme Court 'Dumb F**ks'

Drudge Report Writer Matt Drudge Threatened By Supreme Court Justice Seeking To Shut His Site Down

The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Complains About Negative Public Perception Of The Court

 

Donald Trump Slams The Racist Comments Of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Madonna's Kabbalah Center Spying On, Threatening And Blackmailing Famous Athletes, Entertainers And Judges

Madonna

Madonna and her equally deranged cult  the Kabbalah Center, have been engaging in terrible conduct, such as threatening and blackmailing famous athletes, entertainers and judges. I received an item from someone with information and photos, accusing Madonna and the Kabbalah Center of having select U.S. federal judges under illegal surveillance and stating they are using the contents to get the judges to rule in their favor. This is highly illegal.

I also received word from one of my very credible sources, responsible for some of my site exclusives that later proved 100% true and correct that Madonna has been threatening and blackmailing certain celebrities into publicly doing and saying what she wants. I know who the athletes and singers are, but I am withholding their names at this time. One athlete was even issued a death threat by them if he did not post what they wanted him to on social networking, which is foul. However, it is Madonna and the Kabbalah Center's way to threaten people who don't want anything to do with them.

I also have it on good authority Madonna has been issuing nasty, vicious threats about Drake in the entertainment industry, after he accidentally embarrassed her when she kissed him on stage without permission, triggering his involuntary gag reflex (Madonna Mocked On Social Networking For French Kissing Drake Causing Him To Gag And Wipe His Mouth In Disgust). Drake needs to watch his back. Madonna is an evil, violent psychopath, who is so vile she even choked a child and likes to pay people to harm others, like a disgusting coward and loser.

RELATED ARTICLES

Madonna, Jay Z, Beyonce, Rihanna, Rita Ora And Jessie J Sued Over Copyright Infringement, Invasion Of Privacy, Commissioned Criminal Harassment And Assault Via The Kabbalah Center

Pharrell Williams Is A Chronic Copyright Thief But Is Protesting $7,300,000 ‘Blurred Lines’ Verdict Obtained By Marvin Gaye Estate

Congress Reintroduces Songwriters Equity Act Legislation But Will It Stem The Wave Of Copyright Infringement In Hollywood

Madonna's Rabbi At The Kabbalah Center Threatened To Beat And Kill A Student He Drugged And Tried To Rape

One Of Madonna's Kabbalah Center Hackers Revealed Via Court Subpoena (Photo And Name)

Madonna's Many Acts Of Copyright Infringement

Madonna's Pedophilic Kabbalah Center

Serial Copyright Thieves Beyonce And Jay Z Sued For Stealing 'Drunk In Love' And Even Including A Clip Of The Original Artist's Voice On The Track

  

 

Jay Z and Beyonce

Chronic copyright infringers, Beyonce and Jay Z, have been sued by a Hungarian singer named Monika Miczura for stealing her preexisting, traditional Roma folk song "Bajba Bajba Pelem" for illegal use on their 2013 song "Drunk In Love." The theft of copyright is so brazen, the mentally deficient couple, Jay Z and Beyonce, even clumsily included a small clip of Miczura's actual singing voice on "Drunk In Love" while trying to plagiarize elements of her preexisting tune.

As many of you know, Jay Z and Beyonce, have been repeatedly sued for copyright infringement and financial fraud in stealing people's copyrights, money and or goods. Many people have dragged them into court over stealing preexisting copyrights. Previously, in a similar case, Jay Z was sued for using singer Demme Ulloa's vocals on his track "H To The Izzo" and never paying her. Jay Z was also sued for stealing Egyptian vocalist Abdel Halim Hafez's song "Khosara Khosara" for use on his profane song "Big Pimpin'."

 

Jay Z and Beyonce

Recently, Beyonce was hit with credible claims she stole the "7/11" music video from the preexisting video of indie artist, OG Maco titled "You Guessed It." Upon viewing both videos, the theft is blatantly apparent. Beyonce also stole the music video for "Countdown" from Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker's "Rosas Danst Rosas. "Single Ladies" was stolen from Bob Fosse's "Mexican Breakfast." "Get Me Bodied" is stolen from Bob Fosse's "Sweet Charity." "Love On Top" is a brazen theft of New Edition's hit video "If It Isn't Love."

There are many more copyright infringement claims against the disgraceful couple. Everything they do is stolen. They've made millions from criminal copyright infringement in acts that make a mockery of the law and decency. Is there any wonder some people on the internet constantly mock Beyonce and Jay Z as "swagger jackers" (see: thieves).

 

A still from Og Maco's video (left) and Beyonce's subsequent theft (right). Other scenes from OG Maco's videos were stolen as well for the infringing Beyonce clip "7/11."

 

A tweet on Twitter from OG Maco indicating Beyonce and her family knew about his work...before Beyonce criminally stole it.

However, thanks to thieves like Jay Z, Beyonce, Madonna, Rihanna, Katy Perry, Coldplay and Simon Cowell, the federal court system is so utterly and thoroughly corrupt, copyright infringement cases never make it to trial due to bribery (stocks, assets, cash and or checks issued in the judges' names or that of their family members or business associates). I have checked many credible copyright cases filed in the federal court system, where the copying/infringements are absolutely blaring and not a single one made it to trial. A small percentage of them were settled, but 90% of the cases were all dismissed by corrupt federal judges based on opinion and not the law.

It's not like state court, where unethical judges can be voted out for corruption, simply by notifying the public of their bad behavior. Federal judges are appointed and well paid for life on the taxpayers' dime and a number of said jurists behave very badly as a result. There are federal judges illegally playing character witnesses for thieving stars in glowing dismissal rulings, via conduct that is an absolute disgrace to the legal system. It is an alarming trend that has led American and international litigants to forgo suing in America, in favor of courts in Britain and Europe. However, Hollywood has no shame or they would comprehend the disgrace and what it means to actually bring an entire court system into domestic and international disrepute. If Congress does not act on this matter, the federal court system's name will never recover.

RELATED ARTICLES

Copyright Office Corrupted By Madonna And The Kabbalah Center Issuing Bribes To Employees To Backdate Registration Dates And Access Private Copyrights

Beyonce Steals Again But This Time From Sam Cooke, En Vogue And A European Artist

Beyonce Steals "Countdown" Music Video From European Artist's Work

Beyonce Knowles Settles Copyright Infringement Case

Producer: Beyonce Stole Credit For Bootylicious

Beyonce Keeps Stealing From The Braxton Family

Beyonce Sued For Racketeering

Jay-Z And Mary J. Blige Sued For Stealing Song

Jay-Z and Beyonce Steal Restaurant

Butt Shaking Beyonce Strikes Again

Jay-Z Robbing People Again