Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label immigration. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Angela Merkel Political Party CDU Loses State Election In Germany Due To Open Door Policy Regarding Influx Of Syrian Migrants


Angela Merkel
 

The Judiciary Report’s political sensibilities have proven correct again. CDU, the political party of German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, have been defeated in a state election. The defeat occurred in Merkel’s home state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. The issue that caused the CDU’s defeat is Merkel allowing over 1,000,000 migrants into Germany in less than a year, under an open door immigration policy.

Merkel meant well, but the social and physical logistics of such a maneuver, as well as the financial price tag, proved her party’s undoing in the state election, where they placed third. The newly created far right Alternative for Germany (afD) political party defeated Merkel’s CDU, placing second. The Social Democratic Party placed first. A report released today indicates Merkel has now changed her focus to the deportation of immigrants who have been denied asylum. Merkel stated in Parliament, “The most important thing in the coming months is repatriation, repatriation and once more, repatriation.”

Once again, the Judiciary Report is not anti-immigration. However, immigration has to be done in a controlled, orderly fashion to prevent financial and economic damage to the host nation. Immigrants must also assimilate for immigration to properly work. Issues have arisen in Germany, such as some migrants not wanting to work. Some have also been engaging in crime such as theft, assault and murder. The high profile murder of a pregnant German woman walking on the street, who was killed by a migrant has not helped matters. Other issues have surfaced, such as child brides, which is forbidden by law in the West. Once again, immigrants must assimilate and adhere to the laws of their new nation.

Side Bar: Once again, a committee is needed regarding the immigration issue in Germany. To have over 1,000,000 new people in one's nation and not truly knowing who many of them are is a national security risk. The German government needs to formulate a plan to obtain the identities of the migrants.

STORY SOURCE

'I'm very unhappy' Angela Merkel admits open-door policy DID cause defeat by far-right

PUBLISHED: 13:53, Mon, Sep 5, 2016 | UPDATED: 16:56, Mon, Sep 5, 2016 - ANGELA Merkel has admitted her hated open door policy on migrants led to her party’s crushing defeat in this weekend’s elections. But she basically went on to insist the German people did not know what was good for them and she just had to be more persuasive.

Mrs Merkel’s CDU party was beaten into third place by the right wing Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party in her home state of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. CDU could muster only a pitiful 19.2 per cent of the vote compared to the victorious AfD's 21 per cent, leading to growing scepticism about Merkel's ability to cling onto power in Germany after her party also lost three elections to the AfD in March…

Today at the G20 Summit in Hangzhou, China, Mrs Merkel conceded the open door policy to migrants had swayed the election but added that she considered the "fundamental decisions" of the refugee policy were correct…

Monday, August 22, 2016

Some Syrian Migrants Refusing To Work In Germany Posing A Problem For The State Regarding Supporting The Refugees


Angel Merkel
 
This is a follow up to the Judiciary Report article "The European Union Must Address Immigration Imbalances Threatening Select Member Nations Economic Future And Stability." A new report in the British newspaper the Express revealed, "German asylum seekers refuse to work insisting 'We are Merkel's GUESTS.'" 

This poses a problem for Germany, as some Syrian migrants were allowed in, while others stormed the borders, with estimates revealing 750,000 have poured into their borders. While I’m certainly not xenophobic, having been an immigrant (from Jamaica) and I do sympathize with the migrants, in the aforementioned article months ago, I posed the practical, reasonable question, as a head of state and government, how do you reasonably care for an influx of 750,000 plus people, find them work (though they do not speak the language), food, shelter and clothing, without it completely walloping and overwhelming your system. It was and is mind-boggling. 

Now the problem has arisen regarding some migrants not wanting to work, referring to themselves as "Merkel's guests" and seeking to get benefits instead (and this was bound to happen, as able bodied immigrants from a number of nations went to Britain - who recently voted to leave the EU - and opted to go on benefits rather than working in the United Kingdom). 

   
Berlin, Germany
 
What that means is they expect the state to provide for them. That could financially destroy Germany. It could legitimately cause Germany to financially collapse. Migrants are also turning to crime in Germany, with a number of high profile crimes, from theft to murder, being written about in European newspapers.

The Germans are brilliant and very industrious, but as the site expressed months ago, they are going to have their work cut out for them regarding the massive immigrant influx under what are an unusual set of challenging circumstances. This would pose a massive challenge for any world nation.

I like Merkel. She’s a strong woman, who has accomplished a lot in office. She’s done positive things for Germany. However, this matter with the migrants is a serious issue that could overwhelm her government. A government committee/think tank/regulatory group dedicated to addressing the migrant issue needs to be formed for the sake of Germany and the migrants. I also encourage the Syrian migrants to learn German and cooperate with the government in finding work. Learn to assimilate and make an opportunity at a new life work.

STORY SOURCE

German asylum seekers refuse to work insisting 'We are Merkel's GUESTS'

ASYLUM seekers in Germany are refusing to undertake work to counteract boredom - using Chancellor Angela Merkel’s generous hospitality as an excuse.
 

PUBLISHED: 09:06, Thu, Aug 18, 2016 | UPDATED: 21:09, Thu, Aug 18, 2016 According to mayor Bernd Pohlers of the eastern town of Saxony Waldenburg, the asylum seekers refused to accept the work that was offered to them after they arrived in the country. The local council spent £600 arranging for the men to have uniforms but were stunned when they were told they would not complete it because they were "guests of Angela Merkel". 

While asylum seekers are not allowed to work under immigration rules within the EU, they are allowed to do voluntary work. However officials in the district of Zwickau came up with a plan to help encourage those without employment to get back to work and to help them become more accepted within the local community. In order to do this they created voluntary jobs which included a nominal payment of £18 for 20 hours work.  

But all of the male residents of the local refugee accommodation who initially agreed to get involved in the charitable activities quit after discovering there was a minimum wage £7.30 (€8.50) in Germany. The men had been picked up and offered transportation from their paid-for housing where they are also given food and then dropped home. 

Mayor Pohlers said: "It was subsequently argued by these people that they are guests of Mrs. Merkel and guests do not have to work. "Furthermore, they were of the opinion that there is a minimum wage (€8.50) in Germany, and that this had to be paid by the City Waldenburg." Despite attempts at mediation the asylum seekers refused to return to work. Mayor Pohlers added: "In a specially convened meeting with an interpreter the authorities explained the rules again. "Unfortunately, no agreement could be reached on the continuation of the measure."

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

The European Union Must Address Immigration Imbalances Threatening Select Member Nations Economic Future And Stability

 
European Parliament in Brussels, Belgium
 
The European Union is going through a transition period, as Britain recently voted to leave the EU. Without Britain's vast contribution of 350 million British pounds per month (19 billion British pounds per year) and other benefits, which could go in the next two years if the British government completes the process, the European Union will be working with significantly less money and resources. Hence the immense anger last week from select politicians in the European Union. However, it is better to be civil, as the British people have spoken and this is their democratic vote. Britain has been a great partner in the European Union and trade can continue that is beneficial to both parties.

The European Union must not be inflexible, which is what drove millions of British voters away. Concerns were not be heard regarding massive migration from other parts of the European Union and the strain and constraints it has placed on Britain. The United Kingdom’s massive population boom courtesy of immigration overwhelmed the system. Uneven levels of immigration became a massive problem, which sparked the success of the leave vote. As a recommendation to avoid any nation in the European Union buckling or outright collapsing due to this issue, the freedom of movement law needs to be revisited and revised.

The majority of the European Union traffic poured into Britain, namely London, England and overwhelmed their systems. Transportation, schools, hospitals and benefits offices became overwhelmed by the influx of millions of new permanent residents, many of whom are now receiving generous financial benefits and housing, as they came to Britain below the poverty line. Sensing the problem that was brewing, in 2009 the Judiciary Report published the article "Britain's Benefits" and a follow up entitled "Britain's Benefits Part 2" to recommend the benefits system be revised.  

 
London, England (UK)
 
In America immigrants must wait for years before obtaining benefits and still have to meet certain stringent criteria (one must be sick or disabled). Food stamps and modest cash assistance is only granted to healthy people who are well below the poverty line and with children. The majority of these changes were implemented under former U.S. President, Bill Clinton, to ensure people coming to America seek to work, not indefinitely live on benefits.

Last year, the British government attempted to negotiate a rule that would require immigrants live in Britain for 4-years before receiving benefits. This would ensure those coming to Britain intend to work and pay their way, rather than take financial and housing benefits from the state indefinitely. However, negotiations on the matter fell through.


If Britain proceeds with invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty to depart the European Union, a process that will take an estimated 2-years, Britain is going to get another massive influx as a last ditch attempt to enter the country from the EU. Then, upon Britain's completion of the process of leaving the European Union, immigration traffic will largely switch to Germany and France, two other sizeable economies in the EU. Germany and France are wealthy nations. Immigrants tend to migrate to nations that are the most economically prosperous and popular.



Paris, France 
 
To further illustrate the fact the Judiciary Report was correct in its aforementioned 2009 articles on benefits, in April of 2016, the German government began proposing and pushing for new rules regarding limiting immigrants access to receiving benefits upon landing in their nation (see external article excerpt below under STORY SOURCE for further information). It is not that one is being xenophobic. It's simple mathematics. The average nation cannot afford to give millions of immigrants financial and housing benefits indefinitely (many can't give said financial assistance on a short term basis either). It could bankrupt any country.

To compound issues for Germany, it is estimated they took in nearly 1,000,000 migrants last year from places like Syria. No disrespect to Syria, but once again, how will Germany pay for housing, feeding and clothing a record number of migrants and find said non-German speaking masses steady employment (it is easier to find employment in a nation if you speak the national language).
Which brings me back to my point, the immigration levels in the European Union are untenable. It needs to be evenly distributed among the 28 member nations, meaning each country has a quota of how many immigrants it will take per year. One or two nations can't take the bulk of the traffic. That's lopsided and the proverbial boat that is the EU will sink.



Berlin, Germany

For years millions in Europe poured out into Britain, namely London, England, a glamorous and wealth westernized city (and who can blame them, it's a great place to live). However, the European Union must be practical. No nation in this world can reasonably take that type of influx, year after year, many of whom are people who required financial and housing benefits, without damaging their economic structure. France and Germany are now in for the same influx Britain sustained from the EU and it is going to wreak economic havoc on them.

I love and respect France and Germany and don't want them to buckle under the financial pressure. I don't want the EU to collapse at all, but it is in a financially precarious place. Spain, a beautiful country, is having problems with a massive number of foreclosures, creating economic difficulties and stagnation. Greece, another beautiful country, is experiencing significant financial trouble and is seeking billions of dollars in bailout money.


The European Union must reform. Some of the rules need to change to strengthen the entire EU. You can't have key players in the European Union taking a financial walloping, as they are the back bone of the enterprise. If the key pillars crumble, the entire financial structure of the European Union will give way and collapse. Immigration must be handled in a more orderly fashion with even distribution. Proper budgetary constraints must be placed on nations in danger of collapsing, also accompanied by a regular assessment plan issued and implemented on how to get them out of said financial hole.

 
STORY SOURCE 
 
EU migration to Germany 'hits record high'
 
July 2, 2016 - Germany has proposed new legislation to limit EU migrants' access to welfare payments. Immigration to Germany from other European Union countries hit a new record of over 685,000 people last year, led by Romanians, Poles and Bulgarians, Die Welt daily said Saturday, citing official figures.

A total of 685,485 EU citizens arrived in Germany in 2015 while 303,036 left for a net increase of 382,449, the paper reported, saying it had access to data from the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF). Germany's economic success and relatively low unemployment has drawn people from the EU's poorer members in search of work and better lives.


Romanians topped the list of new arrivals in Germany last year with nearly 175,000, followed by Poles with almost 150,000 and Bulgarians with just over 70,000, Die Welt said.


Promises to limit immigration from other EU states played a key role in the campaign for Britain's membership referendum, which delivered a shock victory last week for the "leave" camp. In April, Germany tabled a proposed law to drastically limit EU migrants' access to welfare payments. Die Welt said a total of 4.1 million EU citizens currently live in Germany.

 
Berlin, Germany 
 
 
RELATED ARTICLES 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Donald Trump Using Brexit In Political Campaign To Plead His Case For The U.S. Presidency But It's Not The Same Thing


Donald Trump
 
U.S. presidential candidate, Donald Trump, used the Brexit victory, regarding Britain voting to leave the European Union (EU) as a platform to state he has international political credibility (but within hours proclaimed Brussels a country, when it is a city in Belgium). Trump has been stating he wants something similar for America and has voiced the same online and during political rallies. Trump used the Brexit win to bash U.S. President, Barack Obama and presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, both of whom publicly opposed Britain leaving the European Union, in the lead up to the vote.  

However, it's not the same thing. Brexit is not the same as Trump's political platform of banning Muslims from America and isolating Mexico. Britain has no rule excluding immigrants from any nation and the United Kingdom has more Muslims citizens than America. Brexit was about massive immigration from European Union states and the strain it created on the NHS (Nation Health System), overcrowding in schools, lack of affordable homes in London, as well as billions of pounds being paid out in cash and housing benefits to the influx of people who came to the country without financial support. Britons began struggling to get jobs and housing, then watched as their tax dollars went to people who had just landed in the country from other parts of the EU. 

 
Hillary Clinton

Brexit was about white, black and Arab people complaining about overcrowding and fewer jobs being available due to mass migration from the European Union, which is mostly white people. It wasn't a racial matter. However, Trump's campaign took on a racial tone, as he has insulted minorities - Mexicans, Muslims and blacks. Trump also insulted women with outright sexist statements and mocked the disabled, which is wholly unacceptable. That's a broad cross-section of people Trump has offended.

For the life of me I don't know why Trump chose this path. He could have been elected to office being the rich guy promising to turn around America's fortunes. Racism, sexism and xenophobia should not have been apart of his platform, ruining the prestigious name he once enjoyed, which was synonymous with wealth.  


Barack Obama

Democrats are now worried the success of the Brexit vote will give Trump an edge in the election, as it speaks to America's discontent with the economy. The Democrats' problem is compounded by the fact Clinton has experienced many disasters in the area of foreign policy. Proof of this being Benghazi, spying on the entire United Nations and getting caught while doing so, trying to illegally obtain the medical records of former Argentinean President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and the illegal private email server scandal she is currently under criminal investigation for at the FBI.

Sunday, June 12, 2016

200,000 New Homes Being Built In London In Response To Population Boom Needs To Go To Britons Who Really Need It


London
 
Last year, the local government in London, England announced 200,000 new homes will be built, in an effort to ease the massive requests for housing in the city of 10,000,000 people. It's not that London does not have homes, as there are millions of well built properties in the city. However, due to mass immigration over the past several years from the Middle East, Africa and Britain joining the EU (huge influx from Europe) there simply aren't enough homes in London. There's nothing wrong with immigration, as long as it is accompanied by assimilation. 

Many need to realize that everyone can't afford London, as real estate prices have soared over the past decade due to the sizeable increase in immigration and should move to the lovely home counties in England, which is not far from the capital. I've been to Hertfordshire, Buckinghamshire, Surrey and Oxfordshire, which all look great. 

The government's new pledge to build 200,000 new homes, a promise that is already underway, needs to have sale guidelines. Many foreign investors have been buying up homes in London, England, due to their value. However, locals who have lived in London, England for many years, are citizens who are not rich, should get first option on buying the affordable new homes. 

If the houses end up being bought up by big investors, often in cash sales, they will be flipped for big prices, in events that will not remedy the housing shortage. The homes and any government subsidies granted towards purchase, should be income restricted to ensure hardworking Britons, who aren't wealthy local or foreign investors, get the properties. It would be beneficial to Britons if the affordable housing initiative helps the working class become homeowners, which is a great thing. 

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Luis Suarez Nearly Misses Airplane After Leaving Passport At Home En Route To London For Arsenal v Barcelona Champions League Match

Luis Suarez

Arsenal F.C. squares off today against Barcelona F.C. in London, England. Reports indicate Barcelona footballer Luis Suarez, forgot his passport at home and nearly missed his flight to London today. However, an overly efficient Barcelona staffer rushed to Suarez's house and quickly brought the passport to the airport, getting him on the plane on time, in defiance of my malevolent benevolent prayer days prior on Twitter that they be banned from Britain (you know God was in heaven like "No she didn't just ask Me to do that" LOL).

Alexis Sanchez is a former Barcelona player, who now plays for Arsenal. He could give Arsenal insight to Barcelona's methods and things of that nature.

You have to admit it though, Suarez leaving his passport at home is ironic and humorous, in light of what I have jokingly been tweeting on Twitter, asking God to ban him from Britain (where London is located) and his fellow top scorers Neymar and Lionel Messi. I've also jokingly been communicating my willingness to bribe someone in British immigration with a meal at Nandos in exchange for banning them (yet British immigration amazingly managed to let the entire Barcelona squad through the airport and probably wished them a great trip too LOL).



My tweets on my Twitter page on the match
 
Seriously, this has the potential to be one of the biggest matches of the year. These types of matches are good for football. It draws considerable public interest to the top sport in the world. Arsenal are considered the underdogs, as Messi. Neymar and Suarez are widely considered the top attacking trio in the world. However, Arsenal, who also has quality talent, is presented with the opportunity to rise to the challenge and give Barcelona a tough match (don't be intimidated by their stature, as they are mortals too). Hope it all goes well and everyone has a great time on both sides playing, "The Beautiful Game." 
 
STORY SOURCE

Suarez forgets his passport ahead of Barcelona's Champions League clash with Arsenal

22 Feb 2016 20:09:00 - A club official from Barca was forced to race back to the Uruguayan's home but the striker was able to make Monday's flight without delay. It’s the nightmare everyone potentially faces at an airport but for Luis Suarez, forgetting your passport is not the end of the world. The Spanish champions made their way to Barcelona airport on Monday morning ahead of Tuesday’s Champions League clash with Arsenal at the Emirates Stadium on Tuesday evening.

But instead of leaving Suarez to browse the duty-free bargains, Barcelona sent a club official racing back to the Uruguayan’s home to fetch his passport. Unfortunately for Arsenal, Suarez, who has already scored 41 goals in 37 games this season, was able to make the flight with his team-mates and took part in training on Monday night.

http://www.goal.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Rita Ora Sues To Leave Roc Nation After Lawsuit Exposes And Humiliates Her As A Thief And Fraud

 
Jay Z and Rita Ora

Fake artist Rita Ora, has filed a lawsuit against Roc Nation, demanding to be released from her recording and management contract with the company, owned by violent rapper, Jay Z. Ora got a music deal through Jay Z after repeatedly having sex with the unfaithful, now married rapper.
Jay Z has been pimping Ora out to music industry and movie executives, in exchange for songs, movie roles, marketing opportunities and publicity. Jay Z has also been pimping Ora out to professional athletes in America and Britain, as an inducement to sign with his floundering Roc Nation sports company, when he doesn't know anything about sports management and is currently messing up careers as a result.

Ora and her Roc Nation label mate Rihanna are two prostitutes Jay Z has been pimping out all over the industry like whores, in trying to make money for him at Roc Nation, in conduct that is criminal (prostitution is a crime). Every minute Ora or Rihanna are pictured going into a hotel with some famous man or industry executive. Two whores!

I sued Ora, Jay Z and others who are apart of the Hollywood cult Kabbalah, led by crazy pop singer, Madonna. The lawsuit is for copyright infringement, hacking, invasion of privacy and harassment. Ora is embarrassed that her name is attached to the lawsuit and is suing Jay Z as a means of distancing herself from it. However, the deceitful little witch knew exactly what was going on and knowingly and willingly participated in the financial crimes.

Ora and Rihanna also did sick thing to provoke me behind the scenes. Those two whores have been willfully stealing copyrights that took me over 25-years to author and register with the Library of Congress and criminally getting rich off the illegal proceeds of the thefts. Then they started engaging in mean spirited, nasty acts in attempts at spitting in my face. I've already asked the public to boycott Rihanna and her album "Anti" flopped. I am going to do the same regarding Ora next.


Jay Z and Rihanna

Ora would also do well to remember, she is not British. Ora is from Kosovo. As she is living in Britain and committing serious financial and social crimes, she needs to remember, the British government (as well as the U.S. government) has implemented a law of deporting foreign born citizens, who engage in egregious financial and or social crimes.

For example, 35-year-old stock market trader, Kweku Adoboli, engaged in financial crimes that caused USB to lose $2.3 billions dollars, has been issued deportation orders, to send him back to his native Ghana. Adoboli has been in Britain since he was 12, which means he has been in London for 23-years of his life. However, due to the massive financial crime he has committed, he is now eligible for deportation.

Another example, 18-year-old Junior Bayode, who is serving 11-years in a British prison for the stabbing death of another teen, has been handed deportation orders. Bayode was born in Germany to Nigerian parents, who immigrated to London, England when he was an infant. However, he and a group of boys gang stalked and killed another teen, 15-year-old, Sofyen Belamouadden, robbing the poor boy of his life in a painful manner.

Ora and Rihanna are the absolute worst type of immigrant (I am an immigrant as well, but I believe in decency and hard work). They go to other countries to live and rather than follow the law, they criminally steal and engage in social crimes, because they are too lazy to get real jobs and want illegal shortcuts to success at other people's expense. There is no excuse for your behavior. None! It is disgusting.

STORY SOURCE

Jay Z's Company Sues Rita Ora We Didn't Screw You You Screwed Us

2/1/2016 10:55 AM PST - Roc Nation, the music label run by Jay Z, is now suing Rita Ora. The label claims it signed Rita in 2008 when she was unknown and invested millions in her career. In return she had to deliver 5 albums, but the label says it only got one.

As we previously reported ... Rita filed a lawsuit back in December claiming she had a bunch of new music for her second album but the label hadn't released it, instead focusing on repping pro athletes.

But according to Roc Nation's lawsuit, the label has already spent more than $2.3 million marketing her second LP and the point of the lawsuit is to get the money back. There's another twist ... Ora's attorney, Howard King, claims Jay Z's already promised to release Rita from her contract ... so the lawsuit will probably just go away.


Rita Ora, Pointing in Lawsuit to Roc Nation's New Interests, Demands Freedom

December 17, 2015 8:48am PT - The singer and actress is suing Jay-Z's company over a violation of California's "seven-year rule." Rita Ora, British chart-topping songstress and coach on The Voice UK, has filed a lawsuit that addresses the current state of Roc Nation and tests California's famous "seven-year rule" on personal service contracts.

In a complaint filed on Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, she's seeking a declaratory judgment that the recording agreement she signed in 2008 at the age of 18 with Roc Nation violates California law and is unenforceable. Ora is taking such action after presenting herself as "orphaned" from Roc Nation in light of the Jay-Z company's developing interest in sports management and other endeavors.

"When Rita signed, Roc Nation and its senior executives were very involved with her as an artist," states the complaint. "As Roc Nation's interests diversified, there were fewer resources available and the company suffered a revolving door of executives. Rita's remaining supporters at the label left or moved on to other activities, to the point where she no longer had a relationship with anyone at the company."

With unmistakable references to Jay-Z's new pursuits (the streaming service Tidal is mentioned), the lawsuit paints Roc Nation as a "diminished" record label with "only a handful of admittedly worthy heritage superstar artists." Ora (now living in California) says she's on her own, "self-funding her promotional television appearances, recording costs and video projects," but she has a problem. In 2013, Roc Nation switched its distribution partner from Sony to Universal, but according to the lawsuit, she's been left behind at Sony, which she paints as "hamstrung" by Roc Nation's alleged inattention...


RELATED ARTICLES



Tuesday, December 8, 2015

Donald Trump Demands America's Borders Be Closed To All Muslims

Trump Demands A “Total And Complete Shutdown” Of America's Borders To Muslims
 

Donald Trump has come under fire tonight from a few fellow politicians for his statements on Muslims

America is a nation of 322,000,000 people. America has 7,000,000 Muslims. U.S. Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, the current frontrunner in election polls, issued a statement today demanding America's borders be closed to all Muslims. Trump stated, "Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in jihad and have no sense of reason or respect for human life."

Trump further stated, "Shariah authorizes such atrocities as murder against non-believers who won't convert, beheadings and more unthinkable acts that pose great harm to Americans, especially women. Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine."

Trump confirmed he would ban all Muslims from America, including immigrants, those seeking visas for educational purposes and tourists. The Guardian newspaper also revealed Trump wants a database containing the names of all Muslims currently in America.

STORY SOURCE

Donald Trump calls to ban all Muslims from entering US

Monday 7 December 2015 23.22 GMT - Donald Trump, the leading contender to become the Republican party’s nominee for US presidential candidate, has called for a “total and complete shutdown” of the country’s borders to Muslims in the wake of the San Bernardino terrorist attack. Trump made his most extreme pledge yet – in a race in which he has consistently pushed the boat out on issues of race and immigration – in a statement released to the media through his presidential campaign team.

He said there was such hatred among Muslims around the world towards Americans that it was necessary to rebuff them en masse, until the problem was better understood. “Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life,” the billionaire real estate developer said.

Trump put out his incendiary proposal just hours before he was scheduled to appear at a rally on board the USS Yorktown, a second world war aircraft carrier that is berthed near Charleston, South Carolina. The military location was carefully chosen for an address that falls on the 74th anniversary of the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor that brought America into the war.

To justify his extreme call for a total rejection of all Muslims seeking to enter the US, Trump turned to what he claimed to be polling data that underlined what he said was the violent hatred of followers of the faith toward Americans. However, the statement cites the Center for Security Policy, an organisation branded extremist by anti-race-hatred campaigners at the Southern Poverty Law Center.

“Shariah authorizes such atrocities as murder against non-believers who won’t convert, beheadings and more unthinkable acts that pose great harm to Americans, especially women,” Trump’s “policy statement” said. The former reality TV star added: “Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension. Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine.”
Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said Trump’s proposed ban would apply to “everybody”, including Muslims seeking immigration visas as well as tourists seeking to enter the country. Another Trump staffer confirmed that the ban would also apply to American Muslims who were currently overseas - presumably including members of the military and diplomatic service...

Friday, April 24, 2015

Floyd Mayweather Denied Visa To Australia Due To Criminal Domestic Violence Jail Record


Floyd Mayweather is scheduled to fight Manny Pacquiao on May 2, 2015 in America

Champion boxer, Floyd Mayweather, has been denied entry into Australia, due to his criminal record in the Josie Harris domestic violence case, where he was sent to jail for beating the mother of his children in the presence of their kids. Mayweather was scheduled to make two appearances in Australia concerning business ventures and attend a charity event to raise money. However, the Australian Immigration Department refused to grant Mayweather a visa.

Immigration Minister, Peter Dutton stated, "A visa has not been granted in this case. The government takes very seriously its role in protecting the Australian community from the risk of harm by non-citizens who engage in criminal conduct and or conduct that is of serious concern. Visa applicants must demonstrate they are of good character, as required under the character test in the Migration Act 1958, before they are granted a visa. I am aware of Mr. Mayweather’s background - both in terms of his professional success as well as his criminal history - as has been extensively reported in the United States and Australian media. In making character decisions, a range of factors are taken into account. This can include consideration of both a person’s criminal history as well as their general conduct over a continuum of time, to reach an assessment as to whether they are of good character.”

Recently, singer Chris Brown was denied entry into Canada twice, due to his criminal record in relation to the Rihanna domestic violence case. Rapper Snoop Dogg was denied entry into Britain due to his arrest record for murder (acquitted) as well as drug possession. Many countries of the world, including the United States, have stringent rules regarding visa applicants and the requirement they not be felons or convicted of violent or drug related crimes, even if the drug crimes are misdemeanors, as opposed to the more serious felonies.

RELATED ARTICLES





Saturday, August 31, 2013

Christians Constitute Largest Immigrant Group In America


Congress

According to a recent Pew report, the majority of U.S. immigrants are Christians and the number of Christians has risen over the past twenty years. Currently, Congress is mulling over an immigration bill that will hugely impact the lives of immigrants in the nation. Some in Congress oppose amnesty, while others seek to lay out a path to citizenship.

STORY SOURCE

Polling and Analysis - Religious Affiliation of U.S. Immigrants: Majority Christian, Rising Share of Other Faiths

...While Christians continue to make up a majority of legal immigrants to the U.S., the estimated share of new legal permanent residents who are Christian declined from 68% in 1992 to 61% in 2012... unauthorized immigrants, by contrast, come primarily from Latin America and the Caribbean, and the overwhelming majority of them – an estimated 83% – are Christian. That share is slightly higher than the percentage of Christians in the U.S. population as a whole (estimated at just under 80% of U.S. residents of all ages, as of 2010). These are among the key findings of a new study by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life examining recent trends in the geographic origins and religious affiliation of immigrants to the United States.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

A Look At The FBI's Terrorist Watch List As The Boston Police Blame Them For Not Sharing Russian Tip About Boston Bomber Which Could Have Prevented The Terrorist Attack

 
Boston Marathon bombers Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev  

Last week, the Boston Police appeared before the U.S. Congress and blamed the FBI for not sharing information with them regarding tips they received two years ago from the Russian government, on one of the Boston Marathon bombers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev. 4 people died in the terrorist attack, including an 8-year-old boy and over 270 were injured. The Judiciary Report is of the belief, had Tsarnaev been detained 2-years ago when the credible tip came in from the Russian government, the attack could have been prevented.

Currently, the FBI and its sister agency, Homeland Security, maintain a list of terrorist suspects. Many of said terrorists are of foreign origin, living in America and under current laws, eligible for deportation. I state this as an immigrant - any foreigner living in America threatening over the phone, online or in person, to wage jihad is not a model citizen. These are not Mexican, Caribbean or European immigrants coming to America in seeking a better life and increased wages, adding to the workforce. These are violent, destructive individuals hell-bent on deadly jihad against society's most vulnerable people.

It stands to reason, threatening the life of the President of the United States, is a serious crime carrying substantial prison time - therefore, threatening jihad against scores of innocent people, should carry the same weight in court. It is a crime, but one the FBI has been negligent in pursuing, using wiretap, email and other audio evidence they have in their possession, regarding a number of jihadist in America.

The FBI is being very unwise with its list. You have to be proactive regarding the list, not reactive when something terrible happens. Learn to nip things in the bud before it becomes a terrible problem. Either you build a sufficient Supermax styled facility to house terrorists or start deporting people with said leanings (however, the latter is risky, as history has shown, they will directly link up with terrorist groups abroad). Deportation is the quick, safe solution, but it is better to detain them while one can.

You can't have it both ways and expect everything to be alright, in maintaining a terrorist list and doing nothing about the individuals on it, running up taxpayer bills in simply watching them. Either you lock them up or send them home, but you can't leave jihadists roaming around among innocent people in society. Go over the list and do something about it.

Monday, June 18, 2012

Obama Proposes New Immigration Rules That Leave Some Skeptical


Barack Obama

President Barack Obama has adopted convenient new immigration rules that will greatly benefit mostly Hispanic students in America, who are illegal immigrants, eligible for deportation. While I am glad for the illegal immigrants this new move will help, I am very skeptical of President Obama's motives. Obama's challenger in this year's presidential election, Mitt Romney, has made inroads in the Hispanic community. 

This has been greatly aided by Hispanic senator, Marco Rubio, campaigning for Romney. Polls have reflected the increase in support for Romney in the Hispanic community. He is using it in an attempt at getting back into office, where he would go right back to setting a record number of deportations again.

Obama's new immigration announcement was a politically motivated, empty gesture, during an election year seeking to capture the Hispanic vote. However, President Obama deported a RECORD NUMBER of illegal immigrants in 2011, breaking up many innocent families that sought a better life.

The Obama Administration also snatched 5,000 children born in America belonging to illegal immigrants, while deporting their parents and placing the kids in foster care. For a man that loves to invoke his kids' names every chance he gets, he certainly doesn't care about other people's children to do such a thing. He wouldn't want anyone breaking up his family, but has no qualms about doing so to others (and the Obama administration has broken up many families).

This leads me to believe Obama is not who he says he is and is just pretending for the cameras. Obama does not care about immigrants, legal or illegal. Take it from a legal immigrant that knows firsthand. The Obama Administration, particularly the FBI and DOJ, view immigrants as slave labor, who can be harassed for political gain. The people of America deserve better than to be represented by such a questionable administration.   

RELATED ARTICLES


















Monday, April 30, 2012

A Record Number Of Mexicans Have Left America


This Is Not Good For The Economy


Barack Obama

Articles were published last week in the mainstream press that states a record number of Mexicans have left America during Barack Obama's presidency. This news is regrettable, as Mexicans have contributed so much to the United States with their culture and labor. This development is not good for the economy.

Last year, the Judiciary Report published an article about American farm owners lamenting the number of Mexicans that have been summarily rounded up and deported to Mexico. Farm owners stated Mexicans were great workers, who are well-conditioned and hard working. U.S. farmers have publicly complained they are losing a fortune, due to said deportations and now sadly voluntary departures from America.

STORY SOURCE

For first time since Depression, more Mexicans leave U.S. than enter

A four-decade tidal wave of Mexican immigration to the United States has receded, causing a historic shift in migration patterns as more Mexicans appear to be leaving the United States for Mexico than the other way around, according to a report from the Pew Hispanic Center. 

“I think the massive boom in Mexican immigration is over and I don’t think it will ever return to the numbers we saw in the 1990s and 2000s,” said Douglas Massey, a professor of sociology and public affairs at Princeton University and co-director of the Mexican Migration Project, which has been gathering data on the subject for 30 years...

The trend could have major political consequences, underscoring the delicate dance by the Republican and Democratic parties as they struggle with immigration policies and court the increasingly important Latino vote...


Historic wave of Mexican immigration at a standstill, report says

April 23, 2012 | 4:39 pm  - The number of Mexican migrants to the United States dropped significantly while the number of those returning home increased, bringing net migration from Mexico to a statistical standstill, according to a report published Monday.

The shift over the last several years marks a significant change after four decades of historic immigration from Mexico, according to the report by the Pew Hispanic Center.

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Eric Holder Is Going To End Up Costing President Obama A Second Term In Office

First Lady Michelle Obama and President Barack Obama

A number of news sites are finally stating what the Judiciary Report has for the past two years, Attorney General, Eric Holder, is going to cost President Obama a second term in office, with his appalling conduct. President Obama has made a very poor choice in continuing to back the disgraced Holder, who 120 members of Congress want gone from the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Attorney General Eric Holder and President Barack Obama

Holder's conduct has been reckless and selfish. He knows he is damaging the president and Democrat party, but continues to cause controversy with catastrophic and illegal decisions that turned into full blown scandals. He is continually unprepared and untruthful in Congress, which is reflecting very poorly on Obama and his administration. It's crazy that an Attorney General can have more scandals than the actual president.

RELATED ARTICLE

120 Congresspeople Call For The Resignation Of Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder

President Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder Connected To Banks Responsible For The Mortgage Crisis

Eric Holder A Massive Liability To Obama In The 2012 Election

Obama Being Accused Of Using Attorney General Eric Holder To Rig The 2012 Presidential Election

91 Members Of Congress Demand The Resignation Of Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder

73 Members Of Congress Sign A Vote Of No Confidence Against Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder Due To 'Fast And Furious' Deaths

Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder In More Trouble As It Is Revealed He Put Cash In The Hands Of The Drug Cartels In Mexico

Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder Retracts Denials He Made And Sent To Congress And Launches Another Cover Up Of The ‘Fast And Furious’ Deaths

President Obama Criticized For His "Complete Confidence" In Scandal Plagued Attorney General Eric Holder

Obama's FBI And DOJ Used Taxpayer Money To Arm Mexican Drug Cartels

STORY SOURCE

Will Eric Holder Cost Obama a Second Term?

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

President Obama Needs To Revise His Immigration Policies As Innocent Americans And Foreigners Are Suffering

Barack Obama

Recently, I read the story of high school valedictorian, Daniela Pelaez, who is being deported from America, the nation she came to from Colombia at age four. She has lived in America since she was a little girl and has excelled in her studies, so much so, she plans to become a doctor. Yet, here we have it, an immigration judge has issued a deportation order for the bright young student, which will uproot her from the life she has known for the past 14-years.

How is this humane. Why is a judge punishing someone that came to this country as a small child. Really, is a four year old a criminal. Is anyone a hardened criminal for seeking what they deem a better life in a new nation. No.

ABC News recently covered a story regarding parents being deported to their native foreign nations and their kids that were born in America placed in foster care in the United States. These families have been broken up in a sad manner, with the government refusing to return the children to their parents who have been deported abroad. There are over 5,000 such cases and counting.

Daniela Pelaez

As covered previously on the Judiciary Report, according to published reports, the Obama Administration has deported a record number of people (The Obama Administration Has Deported A Record Number Of Immigrants In 2011). So much so, tens of thousands of American born citizens were mixed up in the shuffle, rounded up, arrested and carted off to nations they had never been to before, while telling anyone who will listen that the government has made a mistake.

Teens, adults and even the mentally disabled who were unable to speak up for themselves were wrongly deported, though they are American born citizens. I'm not trying to hurt anyone's feelings by writing about this subject, but people's lives are being uprooted and destroyed in a trend that must stop.

We saw this negligence in the case of 13-year-old Jakadrien Turner (who is now 15-years of age). It was covered on sister site Sonustar News: 13-Year-Old Black American Girl Mistakenly Deported To Colombia For Two Years And Is Now Pregnant (Video) and 15-Year-Old African American Girl Mistakenly Deported To Colombia Back On U.S. Shores (Video).

First Lady Michelle Obama, Malia Obama, President Barack Obama and Sasha Obama

President Obama, what if you had not become head of state and someone who was not doing their job properly, without your knowledge, arrested, detained, then negligently deported your underage, American born daughter Malia, to a country she did not speak the language and she fell pregnant at age 15, as in the case of Jakadrien Turner. You would be devastated. But that's the reality the Turner family has faced. Your immigration policies need to change, as Americans and foreigners are being hurt by it.

STORY SOURCE

North Miami students protest valedictorian’s order to leave country

Thursday, 03.01.12 - Daniela Pelaez, who came to the United State at age 4, was denied permanent residency on Monday and a judge issued an order for her to depart the country. Now 18, she is slated to be the valedictorian of her school.

http://www.miamiherald.com

STORY SOURCE 2

Are accidental deportations common? Deported Dallas teen sheds light on faults

Jan 07, 2012 - Whether 15-year-old Dallas teen Jakadrien Turner sought deportation or got caught up in a fast-moving US immigration bureaucracy remains in question as the girl returned to the United States late Friday after an eight-month banishment to Colombia...

But the known facts of her case, namely that an American kid who didn't speak Spanish ended up on a plane to Colombia within six weeks of being arrested in Houston for shoplifting, are reviving questions about the frequency of mistaken or accidental deportations of US citizens. Some suggest that mistakes are on the uptick as US authorities have notched record deportation levels in recent years...

One study published last year looking at cases in which deported Americans have later been able to prove they're US citizens contends that about 1 percent of those detained and deported in any given year are, in fact, Americans. That's about 20,000 people since 2003, it concludes.

http://www.zoopla.co.uk

STORY SOURCE 3

Immigration: Another U.S. citizen deported

January 5, 2012 | 1:25 pm - Here we go again: A U.S.-born citizen deported from her own country. This time the case involves a 15-year-old girl who was sent packing from Houston to Colombia, according to published reports.

Clearly, U.S.-born citizens can't be detained by immigration officials, much less deported by the Department of Homeland Security. But it seems to be happening with greater frequency. Last month, The Times reported that at least four U.S. citizens were detained in Los Angeles County over the last two months.

And in 2007, Pedro Guzman, a mentally disabled man who is illiterate, was deported from Los Angeles to Tijuana even though he was born in this country. Guzman spent months in Mexico sleeping on the streets. Other cases have also popped up in recent years, and a study by a UC Berkeley think tank suggests the number is much higher.

http://opinion.latimes.com