Showing posts with label national security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label national security. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Obama Slammed For Ordering The FBI And DOJ Not To Indict Hillary Clinton For Breaking The Law In Email Scandal

Tweet on Twitter.com by documentary filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza, regarding Obama corruptly meddling in the FBI/DOJ criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton with the intent of corruptly destroying it.

Many experts have revealed their view the FBI is too corrupt to indict Hillary Clinton. Mainstream global and U.S. newspapers have published their view Clinton has broken the law but is, "Too big to jail." The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Justice (DOJ) tend to not arrest well known people, which is why many Hollywood celebrities behave so terribly, harming members of the public. It's absolutely corrupt.


Tweets on Twitter.com by documentary filmmaker Dinesh D'Souza

As it stands, Clinton willfully violated government rules in keeping a private email server and had it maintained with such poor security, she clearly believed she is "too big to" hack. However, that's exactly what happened. American national secrets were hacked by the communist block and passed around among them.
 

Hillary Clinton tweet on Twitter.com has been thoroughly mocked by the public and the press, as hypocritical in light of her unlawful behavior, condemned by the State Department's Inspector General
 

Public feedback calling Clinton a hypocrite
 
Clinton was really reckless to think the communist block wouldn't hack her computers. After all, she has ordered the computers and telephones of domestic and foreign officials be hacked on a regular basis. She has repeatedly received illegal surveillance data, from the time she hired crooked, now incarcerated private investigator, Anthony Pellicano to unlawfully spy on people in sick ways, to her time at the State Department when she arrogantly spied on the United Nations (in what became a global scandal) and members of Congress.

STORY SOURCE

Could Hillary Clinton really be indicted over her emails?

Friday 10 June 2016 06.00 EDT - Did Hillary Clinton do the wrong thing when she used a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013? Yes. She herself has admitted that it was a mistake. A recent report by the state department inspector general found that she broke multiple rules despite repeated warnings to use official communications methods that would ensure her emails were stored and kept safe from hackers. 

Did she break the law? As an FBI investigation continues, expert opinion is divided. Some offer a view reminiscent of Bill Clinton’s famous remark that he experimented with marijuana but “didn’t inhale”. “I believe Clinton did break the law but at the same time I don’t think there’s evidence she committed a crime,” says Douglas Cox, associate professor at City University of New York School of Law.

It is a violation of federal records law to remove or destroy material, Cox notes, although Clinton “in part” fixed this by returning thousands of emails. More important in assessing whether a crime was committed is the question of intent, Cox says. “While there were warnings and memos that she should have been aware of, from a prosecution side they would need to prove her knowledge and intent and have evidence of that to bring before a jury.”... 

 
State Department Inspector General Slams Hillary Clinton For Violating Government Rules In Email Hacking Scandal And Covering Up Hacks








Thursday, May 26, 2016

State Department Inspector General Slams Hillary Clinton For Violating Government Rules In Email Hacking Scandal And Covering Up Hacks (Video)

 
The U.S. State Department's inspector general published a scathing report slamming presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, as having violated government rules in maintaining and unsafe, private email server that was the subject of hacks. Clinton's conduct compromise U.S. national security. Clinton's staff discovered her private email server, which at one point had no anti-virus or anti-spyware software protection, was the subject of hacking. Their solution was a nonsensical one, in turning the computer server off for a few minutes. This constituted extremely poor computer security.


Huma Abedin and Hillary Clinton stonewalled criminal investigation

Clinton and her staff stonewalled the inspector general's investigation, which is being noted in the press. It was discovered Clinton ordered her staff not to speak about the matter, which is also under criminal investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Some have stated, though there appears to be criminal wrongdoing, Clinton is simply" too big to fail" which is corrupt and a poor reflection on the justice system. 

 

Hillary Clinton

The U.S. government has extradited hacker, Guccifer, from Romania, who stated he hacked Clinton's email server. This confirms the Judiciary Report's claim that Clinton's email server was hacked (The Communist Block Accessed Hillary Clinton's Unencrypted Emails). Guccifer has cut a deal with the U.S. government in the case. Clinton's rival, republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has slammed her as "crooked" regarding the latest revelations contained in the inspector general's report. The press is collectively stating Clinton's conduct in the email scandal illustrates she has very poor judgment and is unfit to be President of the United States.

RELATED ARTICLES


Both Hillary Clinton And Her Aide Huma Abedin Illegally Used Private Email Box To Send Classified Government Documents







The Communist Block Accessed Hillary Clinton's Unencrypted Emails

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

Computer Hacks Targeting The U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper Reveals The Need For New Internet Protocols

 
James Clapper
 
Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, is the subject of a computer hack conducted by a teenage hacker targeting U.S. government official. Months prior, teenage hackers targeted the email account of CIA Director, John Brennan and disclosed its contents to the public via the whistleblower website WikiLeaks.

 
CIA Director John Brennan
 
These incidents reveals the fact U.S. national security in the area of computing and the internet is in dire need of upgrading. Two of America's top government officials being the subjects of successful computer hacks means it was an entry way to illegally obtaining top secret information of a higher security classification. Hackers are known for selling information. Many national secrets are ending up in the hands of people in the international community. Washington does not want said people and governments to be in possession of top secret files, but it is happening.

STORY SOURCE
 
US official: Clapper's online personal accounts hacked
 
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Just months after reports that someone was hacking CIA Director John Brennan's personal email, a U.S. intelligence official is confirming that online personal accounts linked to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper also have been hacked. DNI spokesman Brian Hale said Tuesday that Clapper's office is aware of the hacking and has reported the incident to appropriate authorities. He declined to provide other details.

An individual not authorized to discuss details who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence was aware of the hacking incident before it was first reported Tuesday by Motherboard, an online magazine and video channel on science and technology. Motherboard reported that the same teen-age hacker who broke into Brennan's account also targeted Clapper...

 
RELATED ARTICLE
 

Friday, October 30, 2015

Inspector General Slams Obama And The CIA For Allowing Hollywood Access To National Secrets Jeopardizing National Security


Barack Obama

U.S. President Barack Obama and his CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) has been slammed in a report by the Office of the Inspector General, for giving Hollywood inappropriate access to nation secrets, while making the Osama Bin Laden film "Zero Dark Thirty." A FOIA request uncovered the fact the Inspector General excoriated Obama's CIA over this misconduct that the FBI has declined to investigate nor has the DOJ agreed to prosecute on President Obama's corrupt orders.

The Inspector General's report revealed, "We found that the records maintained by the OPA [Office of Public Affairs] are not sufficient to document that entertainment industry requests to CIA for briefings, interviews, visits, and other support are handled in a consistent and fair manner and that engagement with the entertainment industry is effective in furthering CIA’s goal for engagement...OPA and other CIA employees have not always complied with Agency regulations intended to prevent the release of classified information during their interactions with entertainment industry representatives...There was an instance in which CIA allowed an entertainment industry representative to attend a CIA event in which information classified at the SECRET level was discussed."

Obama is always allowing Hollywood to break the law and as stated in the column previously, it is going to destroy America under the madness, corruption and criminality that is transpiring behind closed doors.

STORY SOURCE

Judicial Watch Obtains Previously Classified CIA Inspector General Report Strongly Condemning Agency Handling of Briefings and Interviews with the Entertainment Industry

October 28, 2015 - Report specifically criticizes CIA’s briefings ‘in which foreign nationals may have participated’ specifically criticizes CIA interface with ‘Zero Dark Thirty’ filmmakers

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it has received a previously classified December 2012 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) report from the Office of Inspector General (OIG) strongly condemning the agency’s handling of “briefings, interviews, visits, and other support” given to the entertainment industry. The report specifically criticizes the CIA’s granting of “Secret level” access to the makers of the movie Zero Dark Thirty. The OIG report was declassified in response to a Judicial Watch request for a Mandatory Declassification review.

The OIG “Report of Audit – CIA Processes for Engaging With the Entertainment Industry” is critical of both the agency’s procedures and its record-keeping:

We found that the records maintained by the OPA [Office of Public Affairs] are not sufficient to document that entertainment industry requests to CIA for briefings, interviews, visits, and other support are handled in a consistent and fair manner and that engagement with the entertainment industry is effective in furthering CIA’s goal for engagement … OPA and other CIA employees have not always complied with Agency regulations intended to prevent the release of classified information during their interactions with entertainment industry representatives.

While the heavily redacted document carefully avoids the disclosure of the eight projects it reviewed dating back to January 6, 2006, it specifically cites problems involving CIA interactions with the Zero Dark Thirty filmmakers. According to the OIG report, “There was an instance in which CIA allowed an entertainment industry representative to attend a CIA event in which information classified at the SECRET level was discussed.” The report then adds in a footnote:

CIA officials told us that the filmmaker involved with Zero Dark Thirty was invited to the event so that he could absorb the emotion of the event and that he was told he could not use anything he heard at the event for his project. During our audit fieldwork, the then Director, CIA called for an internal examination of the decision to allow the entertainment industry representative to attend the event.

The CIA Inspector General cites one project in particular that was given “significantly more support” than any of the others reviewed. Though the project is not identified, it is an apparent reference to Zero Dark Thirty:

[W]e noted that the CIA provided significantly more support to one of the eight entertainment industry projects that we reviewed: [REDACTED]. Entertainment industry representatives for this project met with [REDACTED] CIA officers (the majority of whom were under cover) … on multiple occasions, including meeting with one officer 12 times.

The newly-released OIG report also questioned the CIA’s granting of access to foreign nationals who may not have received proper screening before their briefings, warning of possible “negative consequences for the CIA:

We also noted three entertainment projects [REDACTED] in which foreign nationals may have participated in briefings, interviews, and visits provided by the CIA. However, because of the lack of adequate records, we were unable to determine the extent of CIA’s support to the eight projects, the extent to which foreign nationals participated in CIA-sponsored activities, and whether the Director, OPA approved of the activities and participation of foreign nationals.

Failure on the part of CIA officers to adhere to regulatory requirements could result in unauthorized disclosures, inappropriate actions and negative consequences for CIA. [Emphasis added]
The CIA IG also concluded that taxpayers were not compensated for the assistance CIA provided to Hollywood film projects:

CIA Has Not Been Reimbursed for Costs Incurred in Supporting Entertainment Industry Projects...
“The Obama administration put Hollywood before national security in order to help Barack Obama win reelection,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Has anyone been held accountable for these illegal leaks? The Obama administration put the heroes who killed Osama bin Laden at risk in order to help make this film.”...
 

RELATED ARTICLES
 
 
 
 
 

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Secret Service Shifts Almost Double The Hours Of A Standard Work Day Leading To Fatigue And Increasing Assassination Risk For President Obama


Barack Obama

This is a continuation of yesterday's article "Secret Service Lapses Putting President Obama At Risk Of Assassination" where a report issued by the Homeland Security Inspector General proved the Judiciary Report's previous claims correct regarding Secret Service agents shifts being too long (it was revealed this month agents are falling asleep on the job).

The average American work day is 8-hours. The average America work week is 5 days. Secret Service agents have been working 12-hours per day. After 8-hours of work, most people are understandably knackered. After all, we are human. To have Secret Service agents doing almost double those hours per work day, on a dangerous, risky job that requires one to be on high alert, is simply too much to ask. You are asking men and women to hold their concentration at a high level for 12-hours per day. That is mentally taxing and draining. It must be effecting their heart, creating anxiety issues, mental fatigue and problems with their nerves.

A study needs to be done on the mental and physical impact long shifts have on agents, who are charged with protecting heads of state and their families. I am certain agents' health is being negatively effected and that can't be good for national security. Shorter shifts, a one hour break per work day, at least one day off per week and an appropriate amount of vacation time each year, would be beneficial.   

Side Bar: Heads of state need fresh, well rested and alert people for those types of jobs or, to put it in street terms, that's how you get shot. 

RELATED ARTICLES


Wednesday, September 30, 2015

FBI Investigation Unearths Hillary Clinton's Deleted Emails And Reveals Staffer Shared Classified Information On Her Behalf

 

Hillary Clinton

The FBI’s investigation into presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has unearthed her deleted emails from her time as U.S. Secretary of State. Clinton's tech specialists assured her the emails had been permanently deleted and even used the term "wiped." However, as stated in the column weeks before the FBI retrieved the emails, it is possible to recover deleted data from hard drives (Hillary Clinton Under Investigation By The FBI As Her Deleted Emails Are Being Retrieved From Her Personal Server). 

The only thing  you can do to truly delete data is destroy the drive (and in a manner that it can't be pieced back together with fragments of data recovered). Some "thermonuke" drives which is dangerous, as it involves placing the drive in a corrosive chemical solution that could become unstable and incendiary. However, Clinton would have been in trouble if she had destroyed the server. Another less drastic method that sometimes works is to overwrite the data you wish to delete. However, with an email, that's a little tricky. 


Baby to Hillary Clinton: put me down, I'm not voting for you!
 
A member of Clinton's staff shared classified information via email with the Clinton Foundation. Clinton aide Cheryl Mills sent classified data on behalf of Hillary to the Clinton Foundation. Clinton's emails were going back and forth through cyberspace unencrypted, putting national secrets at risk. As stated in the column previously, a hacker is offering a large number of Clinton's emails from her time as Secretary of State, for $500,000. The communist block has also accessed Clinton's emails.

Some online continue to paint Clinton as having committed treason. Once again, as much as I am not a fan of Clinton, due to her involvement with now incarcerated private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, there is no evidence she or her husband betrayed America by selling national secrets to the country's enemies, as some are trying to imply. Don't accuse someone of treason who did not actually commit that crime. It is a very serious allegation to make and in this case against a couple who has done a lot for America.

RELATED ARTICLES





Tuesday, September 22, 2015

The State Department Disagrees With Hillary Clinton's Denials About Her Unencrypted Emails That Were Breached



Hillary Clinton

Former U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, continues to insist she is the one who was acting in the spirit of transparency, in having the State Department go over her emails. However, the State Department disagrees with her assessment. Clinton stated, "When we were asked to help the State Department make sure they had everything from other secretaries of state, not just me, I’m the one who said, ‘Okay, great, I will go through them again,’...“And we provided all of them."

Then the State Department threw her under the proverbial bus, "'In the process of responding to congressional document requests pertaining to Benghazi, State Department officials recognized that it had access to relatively few email records from former Secretary Clinton,' State Department spokesman John Kirby said in a statement e-mailed to The Washington Post. 'State Department officials contacted her representatives during the summer of 2014 to learn more about her email use and the status of emails in that account.'" So basically, Hillary is still up a creek without a paddle. No Air Force One for you.

STORY SOURCE

State Department’s account of e-mail request differs from Clinton’s
September 22 at 5:12 PM Throughout the controversy over her use of a private e-mail system while she was secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton has described her decision last year to turn over thousands of work-related e-mails as a response to a routine-sounding records request...
 

RELATED ARTICLES
 
 
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Government Investigators Raise The Tally Of Unprotected Hillary Clinton Classified Emails From 2 To 150

Hillary Clinton's Major Misstep


Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clinton's legal and presidential campaign problems have worsened. It is forbidden under U.S. law for employees to email classified documents from private accounts. It must be done through secure, government encrypted email channels, to protect national secrets and security. Clinton, the former U.S. Secretary of State, was familiar with the law, but violated it anyway in her role, because she simply couldn't be bothered to follow the proper security protocols.

This misconduct opened U.S. national secrets to hackers, as Clinton sent sensitive information back and forth from her private email account, which lacked proper security. Federal investigators and the State Department have now changed the security status on some of Clinton's emails before releasing them, from unclassified to classified, indicating the serious nature of what the previously unprotected items contained.

Many are questioning Clinton's candidacy as a result of the scandal, because a president must adhere to greater security scandals when handling national secrets via the protection and proper dissemination of classified documents to authorized parties. Government officials and political pundits have labeled Clinton's conduct careless.

STORY SOURCE

State marks 150 more of Clinton's emails as classified

Updated 08/31/15, 05:34 PM EDT - The State Department has deemed roughly 150 more of Hillary Clinton's email messages to be classified, a move certain to fuel the roiling controversy over her use of a private email server instead of an official government account when she served as secretary of state.

The new classifications will more than triple the previous total of 63 classified messages on Clinton's account, but State Department spokesman Mark Toner stressed that the information was not marked classified at the time it was sent several years ago. He also said the decisions to classify the information did not represent a determination that it should have been marked or handled that way back then.


RELATED ARTICLES


Friday, August 28, 2015

Hillary Clinton Admits She Lied About Emails In FBI Investigation As Agents Find Examples Of Her Breaking The Law


Joe Biden to Hillary Clinton: boy are you in trouble!

FBI investigators working for the Department of Justice have found instances of U.S. presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, breaking the law in the email scandal that has enveloped her candidacy. Clinton, in her former post as U.S. Secretary of State, knew she was not permitted to send government emails containing classified information from her private email address/server, as it compromises national security, making state secrets vulnerable to hackers. However, she did exactly that.

This criminal misconduct violated federal law and exhibited poor judgment on Clinton's part. Clinton also destroyed the evidence, or so she thought, ordering the emails be deleted, in conduct that constitutes a felony. However, the FBI was able to retrieve the evidence. As stated in the column previously, computer experts are able to run hard drives backward and retrieve deleted data (Hillary Clinton Under Investigation By The FBI As Her Deleted Emails Are Being Retrieved From Her Personal Server). It requires many hours to do so, but it can be done.   

The ongoing criminal investigation into Clinton has so far unearthed two examples of the presidential hopeful violating said government policy that is federal law, in deeds that compromised national security. Clinton has since admitted she did indeed violate this government policy, when previously she publicly lied stating she never sent classified emails from her private email account/server.

Country Music Legend Charlie Daniels Rips The U.S. Congress A New One Labeling Them Cowards


Charlie Daniels

Country music legend Charlie Daniels took to his Facebook page and ripped the U.S. Congress a new one. Daniels sounded off on Congress, basically labeling them cowards for making the wrong decisions that were not in the best interest of America, but their political coffers. Daniels accuses Congress of selling out the American people, a view many clearly agree with, as the legislature's approval ratings stands at a record low of 9 percent. You can read Daniels' entire message below:

CHARLIE DANIELS PENS OPEN LETTER TO ‘SOLD-OUT, JADED, BURNED-OUT POLITICAL HACKS’ IN CONGRESS

26 Aug 2015 - Charlie Daniels, of Charlie Daniels Band fame, penned an open letter to Congress on Monday blasting the “sold-out, jaded, burned-out political hacks” for what he called their lack of courage:
I am a proud American who believes that America has held – and still holds – a very sensitive and special place in the affairs of mankind on Planet Earth. I believe that America has been divinely blessed and protected in our two centuries plus of existence.

I believe that America has been a counter balance that has cancelled out a lot of tyranny, evil and conquest and, admittedly, we have made a lot of mistakes, but on balance we have exerted a certain Pax Americana in the international affairs of mankind.

It took a lot of old fashioned guts for the Continental Congress to stand up to the world’s mightiest military and tell them that we demanded our independence, even at the peril of going up against a far superior force on land and sea with a ragtag army of untrained citizens, many who had to supply their own firearms.

It took courage above and beyond for Abraham Lincoln to push the country into a Civil War that he knew beyond a shadow of a doubt would divide this nation for decades.

It took guts to give the order for American troops to storm the beaches of Normandy on D-Day, straight into the face of artillery and machine gunfire, wave after wave being cut to ribbons by German shore emplacements.

The history of this nation is written in the blood and courage of men who stood in the face of overwhelming odds, politicians, soldiers, statesmen and ordinary citizens who sought to do the right thing regardless of the cost or the consequences.

Well, ladies and gentlemen of the United States Congress, it seems that that particular pen has run out of ink. The courageous politicians that once championed this nation have been replaced, for the most part, by a breed of milksop, politically correct, scared of their own shadow, pushover, pathetic excuses for public servants who are supposed to be representing a constituency of citizens who have to live with the circumstances of their timid folly.

You don’t even have the courage to face down an out of control president, even when he makes a deal with the devil. Don’t you bunch of timid capons even care what kind of world you’re leaving to your children and grandchildren, not to even mention the rest of us? Are you really party partisans before you’re parents and grandparents or even human beings?

Be honest with yourselves a minute, go into the bathroom and look in the mirror and ask the person you see this question.

“Do I really believe that Iran will not use the money we’re releasing to them to finance terrorists to kill Americans, and, when, not if, but when, the Iranians develop their nuclear device, will they really use it against America and Israel?”

You can’t hide from the truthful answer to that question forever, an answer will be required of you one day.
You have allowed Obama to tilt the Supreme Court so far to the left that they’re little more than a shameful extension of the Executive Branch.

You have talked for decades about the porous southern border but have done absolutely nothing about it.
You have allowed cities in this nation to declare themselves sanctuary cities where they protect the worst of the worst criminal aliens, American citizens paying an awful price for your silence.

You watch an impossible National Debt balloon completely out of control knowing full well that a day of reckoning is coming that will seriously curtail the quality of life for coming generations.

You allow corrupt government agencies like the IRS to run over the very people you are sworn to protect 
and allow the entitlement society to expand exponentially while you actually entertain the idea of raising taxes on those who still work and shoulder the burden.

You compose a third of the constitutionally mandated ruling system and you shirk your duty and allow this nation to move a little closer to the edge every day.

I wish you bunch of sold-out, jaded, burned-out hacks would just go home and let some people who still have some vision and whose consciences haven’t been seared past the point of reminding them when they’re wrong take over and start to claw this nation back on to the path of sanity,

Your ratings are in the single digits, your morals are in the gutter, your minds are on self-preservation and somewhere along the way you traded your honor for political expediency.

You’ve violated your oaths, you’ve betrayed your country you’ve feathered your nests and you’ve sat on your hands while an imperial president has rubbed your noses in the dirt time after time.

You’re no longer men, you’re puppets, you’re caricatures, jokes, a gaggle of fading prostitutes for sale to anybody who can do you a political favor.

“For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?”

What do you think?

Pray for our troops and the peace of Jerusalem.

God Bless America

Charlie Daniels


Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Protecting Landmarks From Terrorism


Beautiful "Big Ben" in London

The terrorist mindset sees the destruction of landmarks as an achievement. They see it as symbols of nations. While this behavior is unquestionably wrong and sometimes creates loss of life, law enforcement must be vigilant in protecting landmarks. Terrorism makes no sense to the average person. Nonetheless, it has become a reality in our world and one that must be tackled head on and defeated wherever it exists. Landmarks such as Big Ben and the Eiffel Tower, among others, must be protected due to their beauty and historical significance.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

After David Patraeus Panty Raid FBI Does Raid Of House Belonging To One Of His Mistresses


Paula Broadwell (back left), stares longingly at David Patraeus (front right) as he walks with his wife Holly Patraeus (front left). I know when his wife found out about his affairs, he probably thought he'd be safer on the battlefield with bombs going off.

Biographer Paula Broadwell was subjected to a surprise search of her home by the U.S. FBI, in conjunction with the David Patraeus scandal. It wasn't a full scale raid, but when the FBI searches your home, it may as well be. The investigation is in regards to Broadwell's adulterous affair with the general and threats she made by email against his other mistress, Jill Kelley. Patraeus abruptly resigned from the CIA as news of this scandal was about to break, leading many to believe there is more to this story than meets the eye.


David Patraeus and Paula Broadwell

Kelley contacted the FBI over the anonymous threats, only to supposedly discover Patraeus' affairs with the two women. It is being stated Patraeus told Broadwell to back off Kelley. It is thought Broadwell wanted access to classified materials, but as of the time of this writing, no documentation has been released to that effect. The FBI really aren't one to talk about compromising national security, female spies and litigants have bedded FBI agents and gotten favors out of them in the process, including protected information. 

RELATED ARTICLE

Monday, July 16, 2012

Police Officer Assigned To First Lady Michelle Obama Who Threatened To Kill Her Is Another In A Long Line Of Security Breaches

The Obamas Are Not Safe


First Lady Michelle Obama and President Barack Obama

Last week, a police officer assigned to protect First Lady Michelle Obama, via accompanying her motorcade by bike, was reassigned from his post, after issuing threats regarding how he would kill her and which gun he would use to carry out the assassination. It just goes to show, you never know who's who. A motorcade has proven dangerous in the past. Look at what happened to former President John Kennedy on the street.


First Lady Michelle Obama, President Barack Obama and their daughters Malia Obama (left) and Sasha Obama (right)

The Judiciary Report has maintained for quite sometime that it is not a good idea that President Obama is so wide open when making public appearances. It gives the impression he is not being properly protected. Apparently, neither is his family. This latest incident is just one in a long line of security breaches involving the Obamas.


President Obama and Secret Service agents

From the Secret Service scandal, where prostitutes had access to the president's security information to the Salahis and others getting too close to the First Family in the White House without security clearance or a pass, it says something is wrong. 


Barack Obama to Michelle Obama: you were scared, weren't you
Michelle Obama: No I wasn't. I'm strapped too...
 
Some think it is good the Obamas are so open when out in public, but when it comes to security for heads of state, the Judiciary Report is of the belief, "It is better to be a live chicken than a dead duck." People could talk smack but my response would be "But I'm alive though (*smirks and holds up peace sign*)..."   

RELATED ARTICLES