Crooked Judge Illegally Presided Over And Threw Out Kesha Rape Case Against Dr. Luke Due To Blaring Conflict Of Interest Via Husband Working For Sony Music

Kesha crying in court

Further evidence of criminal corruption in the American justice system has surfaced. The story of Sony Music recording artist, Kesha, who accused her producer, Dr. Luke, of raping her, continues to be discussed online. Kesha recently lost her lawsuit against Sony Music and Dr. Luke, who also has a deal with the company via a subsidiary label. Kesha sought to be released from her Sony Music recording contract due to Dr. Luke's ties to the label. 

The entertainment industry is America is currently being run by a sick cult, who are evil, vile and vindictive. Kesha fears her career and life will suffer at their hands for speaking out about the rape. It is standard practice in Hollywood that people are sexually exploited and passed around. Those who complain and or speak out lose their careers. However, it is rape and sexual assault  (there is also sick pedophilia in the industry as well).

Dr. Luke
 

The judge who presided over the Kesha lawsuit threw out the case, leaving the singer in tears during the court hearing. It turns out the judge, New York Supreme Court Justice, Shirley Kornreich, is now being slammed and disgraced worldwide for hiding the fact her husband works for Sony Music. Under the judicial cannons, Kornreich was supposed to recuse herself from the case, due to the blatant conflict of interest, as her husband, lawyer Ed Kornreich, works for the law firm, Proskauer Rose, who were retained by Sony Music for huge sums of money. 

By law, Kornreich was supposed to step down and the Kesha case would have automatically been assigned to another judge without a conflict of interest in the matter. However, as Sony Music puts bread on her table, to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars via her husband's law firm, Kornreich obstinately remained on the Kesha case and completely corrupted it. Kornreich kept ruling against Kesha until she was able to finally throw the case out. That is disgusting. It takes a evil person to rule against a rape victim. You should be permanently kicked out of the judiciary and put in prison. You're a disgrace to the U.S. court system.

Robert A. Jacobs
 

This is the same thing I warned my readers of regarding the bribery and corruption present in the U.S. justice system. I was in a very similar situation to Kesha, regarding a lawsuit I filed against Madonna years ago in Miami, as she had stolen and criminally spread my PREEXISTING Library of Congress copyrights to Sony Music (same defendant as the Kesha rape case) and Warner Bros, who share the same music publishing lawyer, Robert A. Jacobs, at the law firm Manatt ( www.manatt.com/Robert-A-Jacobs). Madonna criminally obtained a copy of my preexisting, unpublished, Library of Congress registered copyrights via commissioned hacking.

Sony Music bribed the judge, Cecilia Altonaga, with stock in Sony Music they quietly passed to her daughter. After I formally requested Altonaga's recusal from the case, via a court motion I filed, she was forced to admit it in writing regarding the Sony stock given to her daughter, which she had hidden. Judge Altonaga also concealed the fact her husband, George Mencio, works for the law firm Holland and Knight, whom Sony Music retained for a significant amount of money. Altonaga knew she never should have been on the case, but obstinately remained and completely corrupted it, violating my legal rights in a life or death matter.

President Barack Obama and Madonna, who has connections to the mafia
 

Madonna paid people to try to kill me, via attempting to run me over via vehicular assault in Miami. I went public with it via this site and many people read the article. Then, a year later the FBI and DOJ confirmed in the criminal court case of Hillary Clinton and Madonna's private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, that when they can't find any dirt to blackmail a victim into doing what they want such as keeping quite about their crimes, they try to run them over with a vehicle and kill them, then bury them in the desert. 

Hollywood is being run by a depraved, untalented cult with no original ideas. It was and is criminally imperative Madonna, Sony, Warner Bros ect...continue to criminally steal copyrights to illegally make money and saw bribing the judge as a way to continue illegally doing so. When I appealed the case to the Supreme Court, Sony Music and Madonna's co-defendant Warner Bros (the company Madonna works for) passed $700,000 in company stock to Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, resulting in my case being denied. The American Justice system is the most brazen corrupt and disgraceful in the world.  

Shirley Kornreich
 

All my allegations have since proven true. The FBI was able to lock up Hillary Clinton and Madonna's private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, for 15-years, using documents and spoken testimony I gave them regarding his methods and as it relates to his clients (computer hacking, wiretapping, identity theft, racketeering, threats, bullying, intimidation, assault). The Metropolitan Police in London, England were able to make the phone hacking case that I broke first via my sites, using a police complaint I filed about Madonna's business associate, Rupert Murdoch (News Corp/News International). 

That all emanated from the civil case I filed in Miami and went public with that was completely corrupted in the U.S. court system. However, the public was able to see the truth, then the criminal convictions in two countries further proved my claims as well. The Kesha case, as well as my own regarding Sony Music et al, will be included in my documentary "American Justice System Corruption" which will be released December 2016.

Ed Kornreich
 

Congress can continue to sit on its collective butt and let the crazies meddle in the government/court system rigging cases and see if it doesn't create an unprecedented collapse. This disgusting corruption that is going to lead to an unmitigated disaster. You’re going to see a number of Americans forgoing the corrupt court system in favor of private arbitration services. As a result their will be layoffs in the court system. You will see fewer and fewer people petitioning the Supreme Court, rendering it an antiquated model. 

You’re going to see the international community removing American judges/jurists from global forums (there‘s already talk of it in the international community). You’re going to see Sony collapse. You're going to see America experience an unprecedented collapse. And world history will record that Congress fell asleep at the wheel and let it happen. I have a history of being right. I was certainly right about the U.S. economy predicting the 2008 financial crisis first and other problems that arose. The crazies are going to destroy America.

STORY SOURCE

Sleeping with the enemy? Judge who tossed out Kesha's case against Sony married to partner at law firm that REPRESENTS the music company
 

Published: 10:26 EST, 25 August 2016 | Updated: 13:54 EST, 25 August 2016 - The judge who declined to grant Kesha a injunction that would terminate her contract with Sony this past February and two months later dismissed the singer's civil suit against her producer is married to a man who is a partner in the law firm that represents that music company. 

Page Six reports that New York Supreme Court Justice Shirley Kornreich is married to Ed Kornreich, who has been an attorney at the firm Proskauer Rose for over 20 years. Proskauer Rose has represented Sony in a number of high profile cases over the years.  'There seems to be a strong conflict of interest,' said one source inside the music industry. 

What's more, it was also lawyers from Proskauer Rose who represented Kesha herself back in 2011 when she and Dr. Luke were being sued for breach of contract by her former managers. Sony did not respond to a request for comment. The judge who declined to grant Kesha (above in April) an injunction against Sony is married to a partner in a law firm the represents that music company.    

Court documents seen exclusively by Daily Mail Online, filed in October 2014, chronicles a decade of abuse and exploitation so complete that it left Kesha 'broken, damaged and traumatized.' She 'lived in a prison of abuse, suffering a psychological and physical fallout so severe as to be described as 'life-threatening', requiring her to check into rehab. 

She broke down in court after hearing the judge's ruling on Friday before sending out a message to her fans thanking them for the outpouring of support.

It was Justice Kornreich who also dismissed Kesha's civil suit against her producer Dr. Luke (above in 2014) in April after she accused him of sexual assault.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

RELATED ARTICLES

Former Child Star Corey Feldman Says He And Corey Haim Were Sexually Molested And Passed Around By Hollywood Pedophile Ring Beginning At Age 11

Singer Kesha Cries In Court As Judge Refuses To Release Her From Sony Music Contract Tied To The Man She Says Raped Her (Dr. Luke)

'Lord Of The Rings' Star Elijah Wood Speaks Out About Pedophiles Preying On Kids In Hollywood 

 

Music Producer Dr. Luke Denies Claim Sony Set To Drop Him Over Kesha Rape Allegations 

 
Kesha’s Rape Allegations Against Her Producer Rings True For Some

The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right

 

John Roberts

The U.S. Supreme Court has come under fire in a recent expose on the Associated Press and Yahoo News websites. The article states U.S. Supreme Court justices have millions of dollars in stock in American corporations, who are filing civil cases for the Supreme Court to decide. It is a felony for a Supreme Court Justice to rule on cases where they have stock in any of the litigants companies.

The head of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, ruled over a case I filed with the Supreme Court, who has one of the rudest, most ill-mannered, ill-tempered clerks in existence. Roberts ruled in the original Aisha v. Madonna case I had filed in 2005 that reached the Supreme Court in 2008, with them affirming the corrupt lower court's decisions, rendered by bribe taking Florida federal judge, Cecilia Altonaga.

Here's were the corruption is apparent. Chief Justice Roberts should not have ruled in the case. The Associated Press and Yahoo News revealed this week Roberts has $500,000 of stock in Time Warner, who owns Warner Bros, the label and movie company Madonna has worked for since the beginning of her fraudulent career. Time Warner and Warner Bros were also sued in the first Aisha v. Madonna case Roberts unlawfully ruled in. That was illegal.

Roberts and the Supreme Court criminally allowed a corrupt series of legal rulings in Miami, Florida by Cecilia Altonaga and Marcia G. Cooke stand, in what nearly led to my death and that of my mother, when Madonna felt so empowered by the bribery and corruption, she sent a Miami Kabbalah Center lunatic to attack my mom at a Miami Chase Bank location (the staff rushed to her aid when they heard my mom screaming in horror, in what prevented the worst from happening).

In three separate incidents, members of the Kabbalah Center tried to run me over with vehicles, in a criminal tactic later revealed in criminal court by U.S. prosecutors in California as conduct Madonna's now incarcerated private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, often commissioned on behalf of celebrities in Hollywood, paying him to insanely target and harass innocent people.

Altonaga completely corrupted and deliberately destroyed the case with corrupt rulings, knowing she was committing a felony, as Madonna's co-defendants Sony gave her stock in their company (which she was forced to admit in a judicial recusal motion). Sony and Warner Bros share the same copyright lawyer in New York and share in publishing money and credits on various songs. Altonaga's husband was and is a partner in the law firm that represents Sony in many legal matters.

All this meant she should have recused herself, but she stayed on and destroyed the case via corruption. I had to file a motion to recuse Altonaga citing the blatant conflict of interest. That's when she admitted in response to the motion that Sony had slipped her daughter, a minor in her care and household, stock in their company. She refused to acknowledge the fact her husband is their lawyer, which was sitting right on his firm's website and in legal magazines (which is where I found the information). The Supreme Court affirmed the corruption in denying to hear the case, thus criminally aiding Hollywood in stealing billions of dollars in copyrights and abusing an innocent immigrant family they tried to kill. I have since sued Madonna again in 2015, as her criminal conduct has grown exponentially worse, posing a serious danger to our lives.

How are these Supreme Court judges affording millions of dollars worth of stock in these American corporations. They don't make enough money to afford theses stocks. As I have stated before, the U.S. legal and justice system does not work. It is full of corruption and bribery. It is the most corrupt in the world.

STORY SOURCE

Roberts sold more than $250,000 in Microsoft stock

February 4, 2016 4:14 AM - FILE - WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court's recent decision to step into a relatively unimportant case involving Microsoft's Xbox 360 gaming system revealed that Chief Justice John Roberts has sold between $250,000 and $500,000 in Microsoft stock in the past year.

Federal judges violate the law if they take part in a case involving a company they own shares in, although Roberts declined through a court spokeswoman to comment on his situation. His decision, though, raises this question: If the chief justice can unload one of his two largest stock holdings (Time-Warner is the other), why does any justice continue to own individual companies' stock, knowing that doing so sometimes will force him out of a case?

"We're not talking about grandpa's stock in the family business where a justice might have some sentimental reason for holding onto the shares. These are major corporations who regularly come before the court," said Arthur Hellman, who specializes in judicial ethics at the University of Pittsburgh.

Roberts himself backed a change in federal law to make decisions to sell more palatable financially. In 2006, Congress changed the law to prevent judges from getting socked with a big tax hit if they sell a stock to avoid a conflict of interest, then reinvest the money in government securities or certain kinds of mutual funds.

Only three justices — Samuel Alito, Stephen Breyer and Roberts — even own individual stocks. Yet in the past few months, Alito has had to sit out a Supreme Court case and Breyer and Roberts acknowledged they overlooked stock ownership that should have precluded their participation in cases.

Alito's ownership of up to $15,000 worth of shares in Wisconsin-based Johnson Controls Inc. caused him to miss the court's consideration of federal policy on electricity pricing. Johnson Controls owns a subsidiary that was involved in the high-profile energy case. Breyer took part in that case despite his wife's ownership of the very same stock.

The routine check Breyer's office did to avoid conflicts failed to flag the Johnson Controls stock as a problem, Supreme Court clerk Scott Harris said in a letter to the parties after the argument. Breyer's wife, Joanna, quickly sold 750 shares worth about $33,000 after Breyer was alerted to the conflict.

Breyer voted with the majority to uphold the policy that was being challenged by industry groups.
In early October, Roberts took part in the denial of an appeal by Texas Instruments among 20 parties that appealed their share of the costs to clean up a hazardous waste site in Arizona. Roberts owns between $100,001 and $250,000 in Texas Instruments stock, and court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg acknowledged Roberts should not have been involved. Alito sat it out, without explanation.

Fix the Court, a judicial ethics watchdog, first spotted Roberts' Texas Instruments conflict. The chief justice's sale of his Microsoft stock was the largest single stock sale by anyone on the court in at least the 10-plus years he has been there.

In 2014, Alito got rid of shares in five companies worth at least $330,000, and perhaps as much as $900,000. The justices report their financial holdings in ranges, rather than exact values. Alito's investment portfolio has grown in recent years through inheritance and he has sought to reduce some individual stock investments. He still held stock in nearly three dozen companies as of the end of 2014, according to his most recent financial disclosure.

Breyer and Roberts also have reduced some holdings. Breyer's largest single investment, worth from $1 million to $5 million, is his wife's stock in the Pearson media empire that her family started and built.

Roberts holds roughly a dozen individual stocks, the largest of which is $250,000 to $500,000 in Time Warner Inc.

http://news.yahoo.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Madonna, Jay Z, Beyonce, Rihanna, Rita Ora And Jessie J Sued Over Copyright Infringement, Invasion Of Privacy, Commissioned Criminal Harassment And Assault Via The Kabbalah Center

Racist Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia States In Ruling That Blacks Are Slower Than Whites Causing Uproar On Social Networking

Antonin Scalia Slammed By Members Of Congress As A Racist Who Should Be Removed From The Supreme Court

Google Calls Black President Obama's White House 'The Nig*a House' And The Supreme Court 'Dumb F**ks'

Drudge Report Writer Matt Drudge Threatened By Supreme Court Justice Seeking To Shut His Site Down

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Complains About Negative Public Perception Of The Court

 

Donald Trump Slams The Racist Comments Of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Jay Z And Court Judge Slammed In Trademark Infringement Case For Inappropriate Conduct That Has Become Common In Corrupted Hollywood Lawsuits

Jay-Z

Editorial Note: I have sued Jay Z for stealing copyrights, business plans and trade secrets in the Aisha v. Madonna/Kabbalah Center case (click here)

Rapper and business con artist Jay Z is in court for stealing a trademark (again) and is being accused of engaging in improper conduct with the judge, who is openly showing him favoritism in the case. Jay Z, a chronic copyright thief, is in court after being sued by artist, Dwyane Walker, for stealing the logo for his now defunct Roc-A-Fella Records.

Walker's lawyer has accused, Judge Ronald Ellis, who is presiding over the case of showing an open bias towards Jay Z and has refused to recuse himself. Such conduct brings disgrace upon the judiciary, as the public domestically and worldwide will believe the case has been corrupted by Jay Z and the lawyers representing him.

However, it should be noted that judges in the U.S. court system routinely accept bribes from Hollywood and the corporate sector. Case in point, when I first sued Madonna in 2005, after I broke the News Corp phone hacking case via a formal complaint to the Metropolitan Police and gave the FBI evidence and written testimony regarding her wiretapping private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, who was imprisoned by the agency 4-months after, a Brickell Avenue lawyer in Miami with the firm Holland and Knight told me that I was not to be confident that I would win the case, as the law firm Madonna uses has connections with the judge.

He was right. The judge, Cecilia Altonaga, accepted a bribe in the case, via stock from Madonna and her co-defendants. Altonaga was completely vile, arrogant, disrespectful and biased against me in court (all violations of the Judicial Cannons) without any provocation or disrespect from me, as I'd shown her the utmost respect. I'm not a fool, though. I don't want to be in contempt of court. So I let people act out and I simply "smile and nod" as the phrase goes, then I go online and shame them to the world for being corrupt (not to mention my forthcoming movie "Justice And Truth" that none of those featured in the film for corruption will live down).

Altonaga completely corrupted the case, because of the stock that had been discretely gifted to her underage daughter by Madonna and her co-defendants and the fact her husband is a member of a law firm that receives millions in legal fees from Madonna and company. Tellingly, Altonaga corrupted another case recently where Madonna was sued in Miami for copyright theft by a businessman. Altonaga mysteriously threw out the valid case, violating the businessman's rights.

The U.S. Congress and FBI are to blame for the rampant corruption in the court system. The FBI use the federal judges to push through their criminal cases, so they allow them to engage in all sorts of financial fraud, bribe taking and criminal behavior from the bench. Congress also appoints federal judges for life, which is a mistake, as they do whatever illegality from the bench they feel like, knowing it would take big impeachment proceedings to get them fired. Even then, said judges collect a six figure salary for life on the taxpayers' dime.

They are going to destroy America with the corruption that is taking place in the government. America has already lost its prime position in the world due to the financial crisis of 2008 that happened due to the government corruptly allowing the rich to gouge and financially abuse the middle class and the poor.

Worst things are happening in the government now and there are terrible things they are allowing the rich to do in violation of the law and it is going to culminate into a complete and utter disaster for America, leading to the nation's ruination, if the government does not get a hold of itself and stop with the corruption.

STORY SOURCE

Judge accused of 'favoritism' toward Jay Z during a $7 million copyright lawsuit

Jul. 25, 2015, 12:10 AM - NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge on Friday refused to recuse himself from a $7 million copyright lawsuit against Jay Z over his Roc-A-Fella Records logo, after the plaintiff said the judge appeared to be biased toward the rap star and music entrepreneur.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Ronald Ellis in Manhattan said there was no evidence that he showed "deep-seated favoritism or antagonism" in handling the lawsuit by Bronx clothing designer Dwayne Walker, or that his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. In his July 2012 lawsuit Walker claimed that he created artwork in 1995 depicting a vinyl record that became the basis for Jay Z's Roc-A-Fella logo, which includes a superimposed "R." ...

In seeking Ellis' recusal, Walker had accused the judge of issuing inconsistent rulings favoring Jay Z, and basing one order on a private call with defense lawyers. "Walker mischaracterizes both the facts surrounding these decisions and the supporting rationale provided by the court," Ellis wrote...

The case is Walker v Carter et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12-05384.

http://uk.businessinsider.com

Judge Tells FBI To Buzz Off Denying Request To Hack Into Person's Computer And Spy On Them Using Their Webcam

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

A Texas judge told the FBI to kick rocks when the agency requested clearance to hack into the computer of an alleged suspect to copy the person's files and take control of their webcam to watch them in their home. I've been warning you for years in this column the FBI has been watching select people in their homes via audio and visual means and in most cases without justification.

Secretly watching people in their homes is perverted and sick beyond redemption. It is an abomination and the worst, most depraved privacy violation in history. Only extremely sick people do nastiness like that. It is not justified under any circumstances.

The judge in Texas stated, "The FBI provided 'little more than vague assurances' to protect privacy" of the alleged suspect. If the FBI was looking for corrupt judicial rubber-stamping maybe they should have tried one of the Miami judges on their payroll (you know, like Jose E. Martinez, Marcia Cooke or Cecilia Altonaga). However, this was a jurisdictional issue, as their target in this case resides in Texas.

The sad part about it is the FBI has been known to abuse its authority granted by Congress to request court orders to get into the computers of law-abiding journalists and bloggers, who write exposés on the agency and select politicians, revealing they are breaking the law. The FBI labels it a "national security" matter, but it is actually a national cover your butt matter, when they are outed for breaking the law. The FBI has even gone so far to state they, "Might arguably not be required to obtain a warrant to remotely install spyware" on people's computers to watch them in their homes and copy their files.

The FBI has also misused their authority to get into the computers and emails of select financial executives, so certain people in the Federal Bureau of Investigation can make quick money on the stock market. While they do that, terrorists plot attacks against America and are allowed to roam around free in the country (see: Boston Marathon Bombers).

STORY SOURCE

Judge denies FBI request to hijack suspect's PC using spyware

By Joshua Kopstein on April 26, 2013 09:45 am 20Comments - A rare public court opinion ruled the request was too vague, and the privacy risks too great. For a long time, the FBI has been refining its ability to get inside your computer whenever it thinks you might be breaking the law. But this week a Texas judge put his foot down, denying the agency a search and seizure warrant that would have allowed them to break into an unknown suspect’s computer system and secretly install malware that steals data and monitors activities.

It’s a rare but not unprecedented situation that casts law enforcement in a light strikingly similar to the hackers it’s normally hell-bent on pursuing. After deploying the payload, the FBI would be able to record keystrokes, read emails, and even take pictures from an attached webcam for a period of 30 days — the last part being somewhat ironic, considering that the FBI has warned about the possibility of criminals using the same tactic. "FBI provided "little more than vague assurances" to protect privacy"

In the Wall Street Journal, Jennifer Valentino-DeVries reports the "offensive" cybersecurity measures were being requested to pursue a case of fraud and identity theft that seemed to originate from a Texas bank account. The computer, according to the court documents, was targeted because it used an email address similar to the one on the account.

But Federal Magistrate judge Steven Smith said the FBI didn’t give any information on exactly how they’d be deploying the spyware, and provided "little more than vague assurances" that it would be able to minimize the amount of data collected from innocent people in the process. And since the identity of the suspect and the location of the computer are both unknown, there also existed the possibility that the FBI might be hacking an innocent stranger whose computer has already been compromised by the culprit.

Law enforcement's use of such tools is not without precedent. First discovered in 2001, a spyware package called Magic Lantern has been used by the FBI for remote monitoring, reportedly delivered as an email attachment. And in Germany, a flawed piece of spyware engineered by the German government that opened remote backdoor access was famously reverse-engineered and exposed in 2011 by the renowned hacker group Chaos Computer Club...

"FBI emails mention that "one might arguably not be required" to obtain a warrant to remotely install spyware"...

http://www.theverge.com

Why Are Federal Judges Allowed To Throw Out Cases In Acts That Are Being Abused For Profit

        

Mad-onna

The U.S. judicial system has a massive flaw in that judges are autocratically permitted to throw out any case they feel like, without the benefit of a jury of 11 people deciding the merits of the legal action. Judges are also permitted to toss out financial awards granted by juries, which is also questionable. This essentially negates the need for a jury.

Both aforementioned privileges granted to judges has opened the judicial system up to terrible corruption and bribery that takes place on a regular basis. All you have to do is bribe the right judge and you'll get away with murder (in the legal system, but not with God).

Cecilia Altonaga is a corrupt judge

As someone who has seen the U.S. legal system as a victim of crime, who was robbed of a fortune in preexisting copyrights, shortly before breaking the phone hacking scandal, I saw the abuses committed by bribe taking judges firsthand, who had a financial stake in the criminal defendants winning. That's a disgrace.

As mentioned previously, one of the federal judges, Cecilia Altonaga, did not disclose her family's financial stake in the lawbreaking defendants' companies and unprovoked proceeded to call a hearing to verbally abuse and insult me for daring to sue the people putting money on her table. It wasn't the legal system's finest moment and one that will be captured in my forthcoming film "Justice and Truth" which starts shooting this year.

Judge Marcia Cooke (someone so wretched and evil should not share a last name with legend Sam Cooke)

Altonaga's conduct prompted me to file a motion for recusal. She recused herself and admitted some of the conflict of interest in her ruling (but did not acknowledge the full extent of it). However, her friend, Judge Marcia Cook, who also has questionable ties to people involved in the case, summarily threw it out WITHOUT READING IT.

We know this because she had a full caseload, yet threw the case out the same day she received it, according to court sign in sheets. There is no way she could have read the case and gone over the gigabytes of evidence in one work day plus tended to all her other cases.

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

Cooke also vouched for the defendants in her ruling, unethically acting like a personal character witness, stating in writing they would never do such a thing (commissioned phone hacking, wiretapping, copyright infringement and stalking).

However, since the time Altonaga and Cooke violated the judicial cannons in said matter, the phone hacking case I broke first in 2005 via a police complaint to the Metropolitan Polce became an international scandal proving my allegations 100% true and correct.  The phone hacking scandal has confirmed all my allegations about Kabbalah's Rupert Murdoch and Madonna, among others in the sick sect.

    

Madonna's fellow Kabbalah member, Rupert Murdoch and his wife, Wendi Murdoch, are at the center of the phone hacking scandal

The lawsuit that was thrown out it Miami, Florida by Altonaga and Cooke in in December 2005, mirrored my allegations in the Metropolitan Police complaint I filed in October 2005, with the first arrests taking place six months later in 2006. In total, 30 people have been arrested to date in the phone hacking scandal.

In 2011, it was revealed in the phone hacking inquiry and Parliamentary testimony that the same defendants I named in my case, routinely phone hacked, computer hacked, wiretapped, harassed, threatened and stalked people using a team of hackers, private investigators and thugs the PIs employed - just like I alleged in 2005.

Rupert Murdoch's son James Murdoch was disgraced when emails revealed he knew about and approved of the phone hacking transpiring at News Corp

Had the crooked judges in my Miami case bothered to read the actual lawsuit they would have figured that out. But it would not have mattered, as one of the sources responsible for much of my many exclusives revealed to me, the FBI under the Bush Administration had passed Cooke some information to aide Hollywood in criminally stealing my copyrights for undue financial gain.

The FBI had interviewed me twice in November 2005 about the case and promised to issue an investigative report on the phone hacking, computer hacking, wiretapping and harassment, as it is their congressional mandate to do so in such federal mandate, but as stated before, I was told FBI Director Robert S. Mueller took a bribe from the defendants and launched a cover-up to help them criminally steal my intellectual property worth a fortune. There's a nasty side of the government you don't see everyday, but it's the ugly truth.

You know what's even more ironic regarding the case, Marcia Cooke is black and due to her conduct in corruptly dismissing the case without reading it, as I was exposing Madonna's criminal conduct and financial thievery, it ended up facilitating the robbery of the African nation of Malawi by Madonna and her equally sick and greedy Kabbalah cult.

If Cooke had done her job that the taxpayers pay her salary to do, while I was exposing the crimes taking place, Madonna could not have gone on to rob an entire African nation of suffering people, using their poverty stricken plight to raise money she and her cult ultimately stole.

Had there been a judicial decision in writing about Madonna's blatant theft that millions online know about no world government would have allowed her into their office, to use their name to raise funds and handle millions in charity money, which she and Kabbalah went on to steal for their own enrichment.

Had a definitive judicial decision been made against Madonna in the case, where I alleged a pattern of criminal theft of property (copyrights), charity fraud, phone hacking, exploitation and harassment, she would not have been able to set foot in Malawi, ripping them off as she did.
A sell out judge and another on the take, vouched for the criminals in the phone hacking case, ignoring all the evidence presented illustrating crimes being committed. It empowered Madonna and Kabbalah to do even worse, concocting a charity scam, lying to the people of Malawi about building a multi-million dollar school for their nation's poor. They have an established record of robbing and abusing black people.

Madonna and Kabbalah ended up hurting so many Africans, when they bulldozed the homes in their poor village, lying to them about building a large school, then never came back to do so, pocketing $60,000,000 in charity money solicited in their nation's name. The money has been used to fund the lavish lifestyles of Madonna and the Berg family that founded the Kabbalah cult.

Madonna has greatly damaged the government and people of Malawi with her scandalous actions and the sad part is, they are starving and impoverished and really need the assistance. Kids in Malawi are dying from starvation and disease. Adults have it very hard as well, but she has tainted their country's name in a manner that will make it difficult for them to get financial assistance in the future. People will be scared to give.

Since the United Nations cosigned and legitimized Madonna's greedy criminal fraud, allowing her to use their name and premises in New York for charity events, where she and Kabbalah solicited millions from the public in Malawi's name, then disgracefully stole it, they need to do the right thing and give Malawi food, medicine and housing assistance.

But back to the corrupt judges. It is astonishing that two sitting federal judges, both appointed by George W. Bush, perjured themselves in legal rulings and violated the judicial cannons on behalf of high profile criminals. Said criminals, might I add, that did such things as criminally violating the privacy of a deceased teenage girl in the phone hacking scandal, Milly Dowler, who was the victim of a horrible murder. Not to mention, greedy Hollywood stars in the Kabbalah cult ripping off starving Africans, while their children die of starvation and disease.

What does that tell you about the judicial system. It is not about justice. It is about money. The judges vouched for the criminals. Their names are gone. But even the FBI has engaged in corruption as well. When I lawfully tried to obtain the Freedom Of Information Act files on the case, as it pertains to me, which the FBI acknowledged having, but later said they would not release due to the cover up, another corrupt judge, Jose E. Martinez, also a George W. Bush appointee, granted them "sovereign immunity" in breaking the law and threw out the case.

Once again, a criminal pattern of throwing out credible cases to benefit high profile criminals and bribe takers. How do you guys sleep at night after having sold out the judiciary's name in such a horrible fashion and for all to see. The judicial system's name is supposed to be something sacred, yet you lot just signed it away, in ways that cannot be repaired. Millions of people know what you have done (source: website stats). The taxpayers deserve more than this corruption.

None of this paints the profile of an honest or decent judicial/justice system. It has the foul stench of corruption all over it for the whole nation and world to see. Amazingly, these are not sensible, contrite people, sorry for the things they've done. They grow more arrogant with each new act of corruption. They are vindictive and vile people involved in serious crime, so look for them to engage in more corruption - which is going to cause an even bigger scandal that's right around the corner. Some people don't know when to quit and it is going to be their legal downfall.

Sadly, all their corruption delayed my forthcoming patents regarding cancer and AIDS sufferers. I am confident regarding my work, by God's grace. Past science articles on the site have been successful as well. The aforementioned criminals have blood on their hands and those that facilitated it deserve to be impeached.

FBI Sued In Madonna Case

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, the FBI and DOJ, have been sued in the Madonna human rights abuse case, under the Freedom of Information Act and the Civil Rights Act. To read the lawsuit click here.

Be sure to read the parts about her famous producers, friends, associates, staff members and Kabbalah members, contacting and approaching me on her behalf and the part about Kabbalah member Russell Davies' sick misconduct in conjunction with her (press ctrl F and then type in his name Russell Davies). I will post a summary of the lawsuit shortly.

During the George W. Bush administration, I filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the FBI. First they lied in writing and stated there were no files. Then, when I pressed the issue some more with a written "appeal" of their decision, they stated in writing there are files and they are withholding them and I'd have to sue them to get it, so I did today.

The FBI has been withholding thousands of pages in files relating to the case and other items concerning me, in violation of the Freedom of Information Act.

Madonna

When Obama ran for President, he promised "Change" in America. He also promised "transparency" in government, something that was sorely lacking during the Bush years.

Therefore, it is in this vein that I filed the lawsuit. A rough draft of the lawsuit, along with a polite, respectful letter was sent to Obama on July 15. 2009, which the U.S. Postal Service confirms the White House has received.

It was a last resort, as Madonna's conduct is endangering my very life, as the lawsuit details and the FBI's criminal negligence and cover-up thereof, has caused me extensive damage as well. Madonna, through her staff, famous producers, associates and friends, keeps contacting me and harassing me.

Marcia G. Cook (center)

As many of you know, I sued Madonna/Sony in 2005 and the case was corrupted by her. It was thrown out without being read, by Miami Judge and George W. Bush appointee, Marcia G. Cook (the magistrate judge was Stephen Brown).

She is the same judge that violated the Constitution to aid Bush, who for the first time in U.S. history, held a man in prison for years, without charging him for a crime. 400 years of painstaking law was thrown out the window, marking a profound low in the Judiciary's history.

Cook further stated the case, which involved assault and death threats against me was, "Amusing." Yes, really. That's the word she inexcusably used in her ruling, while stating pop stars could not have broken the law. She reminds me of verbally abusive, Judge Kent, who was recently impeached.

She threw it out, clearly without reading it, the same day she received it, according to the court's case transfer sheet. My case was not the only one she had that day, as she had dozens. Therefore, she could not have possibly read the 60 pages of the lawsuit, 200 pages of evidence exhibits and Gigabytes of comparative data illustrating infringements.

In short, she committed fraud. People do not pay their taxes and court filing fees, for their cases not to be read and reviewed correctly. That spits in the taxpayers faces, who pay judges salaries and is a violation of the judicial canons.

She also stated something in her ruling, that was riddled with misspellings and misapplied law, that I was instructed to cut the case down to 50 pages, when I was told to cut it down to "60 pages" by her colleague, who was the judge that had the case first, Cecilia Altonaga.

Cecilia Altonaga

Madonna and her cohorts kept stealing items from my preexisting Copyrighted Catalog and Altonaga ignored the motion for an injunction to bar her from stealing anything else, which I thought was strange.

Then, she and the Defendants called me into court for a hearing in December 2005, where she basically treated me the victim, like a criminal and the lawbreaking Defendants' lawyers, like royalty.

She even sarcastically told me to "Try state court" which is absolutely the wrong venue for a copyright case, as copyrights pertain to federal law and federal court. I've seen other copyright cases dismissed from state court with the court stating it is the wrong venue. I can't imagine as a judge, Altonaga did not know this. I politely requested in a motion that she recuse herself.

She was acting in the Defendants' best financial interest, not in the interest of justice and truth. Turns out, Altonaga's child had been given stock in the Defendants' company (Sony) and her husband works for the law firm, Holland and Knight as a partner and Sony is one of their biggest clients. That's a multi-million dollar account. So they put food on her table and as such, she ruled in their favor.

R. Allen Stanford was arrested a few months ago for running a ponzi scheme

It's this same sort of thing that allowed R. Allen Stanford to win a case in Miami he should not have. It's a shame, as had integrity prevailed in the case years ago, when a man formally sued and accused him in court, of running a ponzi scheme, providing proof thereof, investors in America, Britain and the Caribbean, would have saved billions of their hardearned life savings.

This year it was revealed, the FBI also knew since 1998, what Stanford was doing in running a ponzi scheme, but kept silent, allowing it to continue, instead of arresting him and stopping the financial damages a decade ago, which grew to terrible proportions over the last 10 years.

The case against Stanford was dismissed and the innocent, truth telling Plaintiff, was ordered to pay that crook Stanford $300,000 in court costs and damages. Talk about corrupt. Read about it by clicking here. Stanford's chief financial officer has now pled guilty, disclosing their criminal misconduct.

As stated above, Obama promised "change" and "transparency" in government. So, let's see if things have changed regarding the government, court system and corporate America or if my rights will be corruptly violated again in court.

It will also be a bellwether to you, the business owner and the domestic/global investor, as to the true state of things in the corporate and court sector.

I filed the case in the appropriate jurisdiction, under the appropriate laws, it is formatted according to the rules of federal procedure and I have successful proved access and misconduct that are a proximate cause of the clear cut damages I sustained.

The case has been assigned to judge Jose Martinez. However, the magistrate judge providing oversight, is the same one from the 2005 Madonna case, judge Stephen Brown (18 magistrate judges and I get the same one again). However, once again, I'm going to act in good faith.

I will post all the details of the case as it transpires, every single aspect, on the Judiciary Report and its affiliated sites. I'm also asking you to forward the lawsuit link to as many people as possible, to create awareness about the case.

The more people that know about it, the less inclined those Hollywood Kabbalah loons should be, in continuing to harass and terrorize me.

Florida Corruption Probe

Downtown Miami (photo credit: Marc-Averette)

As noted previously, Florida has a corruption problem. As a victim of crime, I have witnessed a significant amount of corruption, which I have chronicled online.

Then there are the scandalous cases such as R. Allen Stanford and Jack Abramoff, illustrating how far and deep bribery and corruption runs in this state.

Therefore, the following news does not surprise me. The U.S. Justice Department is investigating top Florida officials on corruption charges.

Marcia Cooke (center)

Wouldn't you know it, the crooked judge from the Madonna human rights abuse case, the repugnant Marcia Cooke, who threw out the case, without reading it, which constitutes criminal fraud and an egregious breach of the federal judicial cannons, has recused herself from the case, as she is considered a George W. Bush associate.

The same Bush that believed and practiced the sick foreign policy that criminally pillaging the assets of foreigners would bring prosperity, see war for oil in Iraq, but instead it brought severe financial calamity, permanent loss and destruction, decimating the economy.

Cooke also assisted Bush with destroying 300 years of Constitutional law, during the Jose Padilla case, which states a person cannot be held without being charged, even tossing out what Bush did at trial, in conduct condemned and abhorred all over the world and will never be forgotten. This is your legacy (Google it).

R. Alexander Acosta

Former Miami U.S. attorney, R. Alexander Acosta, who I previously wrote about here, also he quit several days after, also recused himself from the Florida corruption case, due to his ties to George W. Bush.

The aforementioned people, through their thoroughly repugnant conduct, have millions of people in the world, firmly believing, Miami is the most corrupt, violent, abusive, xenophobic city in America.

Feds' corruption probe looks at top Florida officials

July 3, 2009 - The U.S. Justice Department is investigating corruption allegations made by an indicted Fort Lauderdale insurance executive who, in a bid for a favorable plea deal, has named lawyers, lobbyists and fundraisers he claims plotted with him to thwart a state crackdown on him and his industry.

Justice officials have convened a federal grand jury to pursue the claims of former Mutual Benefits Corp. chief Joel Steinger. The wealthy businessman contends that he orchestrated a campaign to stifle a 1999-2000 statewide grand jury probe by attempting to improperly influence public officials, three knowledgeable sources have told The Miami Herald. The Herald has agreed to maintain their confidentiality...

Word of the corruption investigation by Justice has started to ripple through the state Capitol and South Florida, where speculation is rife about who -- if anyone -- might face indictment, who is talking to the feds and how high the investigation could reach...

But legal observers said that Steinger -- who faces up to 20 years in prison on each of 25 counts -- is pursuing a defense strategy like that of one-time Washington super-lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Abramoff was indicted on federal fraud charges stemming from his purchase of Broward-based SunCruz Casinos -- then sought to limit his punishment by cooperating with the Justice Department and naming names in a major Washington corruption probe...

Huck's father, U.S. District Judge Paul Huck, recused himself from the Steinger fraud case after it was assigned to him. Another federal judge, Marcia Cooke, who once worked in the administration of Gov. Jeb Bush, also recused herself from the case. It ended up with Jordan.

Former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, who recently left the post to become the dean of Florida International University's law school, and his successor, Acting U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, also recused themselves from supervising the Steinger fraud case...

http://www.tcpalm.com