Showing posts with label John Roberts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Roberts. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Crooked Judge Illegally Presided Over And Threw Out Kesha Rape Case Against Dr. Luke Due To Blaring Conflict Of Interest Via Husband Working For Sony Music


Kesha crying in court
Further evidence of criminal corruption in the American justice system has surfaced. The story of Sony Music recording artist, Kesha, who accused her producer, Dr. Luke, of raping her, continues to be discussed online. Kesha recently lost her lawsuit against Sony Music and Dr. Luke, who also has a deal with the company via a subsidiary label. Kesha sought to be released from her Sony Music recording contract due to Dr. Luke's ties to the label. 

The entertainment industry is America is currently being run by a sick cult, who are evil, vile and vindictive. Kesha fears her career and life will suffer at their hands for speaking out about the rape. It is standard practice in Hollywood that people are sexually exploited and passed around. Those who complain and or speak out lose their careers. However, it is rape and sexual assault  (there is also sick pedophilia in the industry as well).


Dr. Luke
 
The judge who presided over the Kesha lawsuit threw out the case, leaving the singer in tears during the court hearing. It turns out the judge, New York Supreme Court Justice, Shirley Kornreich, is now being slammed and disgraced worldwide for hiding the fact her husband works for Sony Music. Under the judicial cannons, Kornreich was supposed to recuse herself from the case, due to the blatant conflict of interest, as her husband, lawyer Ed Kornreich, works for the law firm, Proskauer Rose, who were retained by Sony Music for huge sums of money. 

By law, Kornreich was supposed to step down and the Kesha case would have automatically been assigned to another judge without a conflict of interest in the matter. However, as Sony Music puts bread on her table, to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars via her husband's law firm, Kornreich obstinately remained on the Kesha case and completely corrupted it. Kornreich kept ruling against Kesha until she was able to finally throw the case out. That is disgusting. It takes a evil person to rule against a rape victim. You should be permanently kicked out of the judiciary and put in prison. You're a disgrace to the U.S. court system.


Robert A. Jacobs
 
This is the same thing I warned my readers of regarding the bribery and corruption present in the U.S. justice system. I was in a very similar situation to Kesha, regarding a lawsuit I filed against Madonna years ago in Miami, as she had stolen and criminally spread my PREEXISTING Library of Congress copyrights to Sony Music (same defendant as the Kesha rape case) and Warner Bros, who share the same music publishing lawyer, Robert A. Jacobs, at the law firm Manatt ( www.manatt.com/Robert-A-Jacobs). Madonna criminally obtained a copy of my preexisting, unpublished, Library of Congress registered copyrights via commissioned hacking.

Sony Music bribed the judge, Cecilia Altonaga, with stock in Sony Music they quietly passed to her daughter. After I formally requested Altonaga's recusal from the case, via a court motion I filed, she was forced to admit it in writing regarding the Sony stock given to her daughter, which she had hidden. Judge Altonaga also concealed the fact her husband, George Mencio, works for the law firm Holland and Knight, whom Sony Music retained for a significant amount of money. Altonaga knew she never should have been on the case, but obstinately remained and completely corrupted it, violating my legal rights in a life or death matter.


President Barack Obama and Madonna, who has connections to the mafia
 
Madonna paid people to try to kill me, via attempting to run me over via vehicular assault in Miami. I went public with it via this site and many people read the article. Then, a year later the FBI and DOJ confirmed in the criminal court case of Hillary Clinton and Madonna's private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, that when they can't find any dirt to blackmail a victim into doing what they want such as keeping quite about their crimes, they try to run them over with a vehicle and kill them, then bury them in the desert. 

Hollywood is being run by a depraved, untalented cult with no original ideas. It was and is criminally imperative Madonna, Sony, Warner Bros ect...continue to criminally steal copyrights to illegally make money and saw bribing the judge as a way to continue illegally doing so. When I appealed the case to the Supreme Court, Sony Music and Madonna's co-defendant Warner Bros (the company Madonna works for) passed $700,000 in company stock to Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, resulting in my case being denied. The American Justice system is the most brazen corrupt and disgraceful in the world.  


Shirley Kornreich
 
All my allegations have since proven true. The FBI was able to lock up Hillary Clinton and Madonna's private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, for 15-years, using documents and spoken testimony I gave them regarding his methods and as it relates to his clients (computer hacking, wiretapping, identity theft, racketeering, threats, bullying, intimidation, assault). The Metropolitan Police in London, England were able to make the phone hacking case that I broke first via my sites, using a police complaint I filed about Madonna's business associate, Rupert Murdoch (News Corp/News International). 

That all emanated from the civil case I filed in Miami and went public with that was completely corrupted in the U.S. court system. However, the public was able to see the truth, then the criminal convictions in two countries further proved my claims as well. The Kesha case, as well as my own regarding Sony Music et al, will be included in my documentary "American Justice System Corruption" which will be released December 2016.


Ed Kornreich
 
Congress can continue to sit on its collective butt and let the crazies meddle in the government/court system rigging cases and see if it doesn't create an unprecedented collapse. This disgusting corruption that is going to lead to an unmitigated disaster. You’re going to see a number of Americans forgoing the corrupt court system in favor of private arbitration services. As a result their will be layoffs in the court system. You will see fewer and fewer people petitioning the Supreme Court, rendering it an antiquated model. 

You’re going to see the international community removing American judges/jurists from global forums (there‘s already talk of it in the international community). You’re going to see Sony collapse. You're going to see America experience an unprecedented collapse. And world history will record that Congress fell asleep at the wheel and let it happen. I have a history of being right. I was certainly right about the U.S. economy predicting the 2008 financial crisis first and other problems that arose. The crazies are going to destroy America.

STORY SOURCE

Sleeping with the enemy? Judge who tossed out Kesha's case against Sony married to partner at law firm that REPRESENTS the music company
 
Published: 10:26 EST, 25 August 2016 | Updated: 13:54 EST, 25 August 2016 - The judge who declined to grant Kesha a injunction that would terminate her contract with Sony this past February and two months later dismissed the singer's civil suit against her producer is married to a man who is a partner in the law firm that represents that music company. 

Page Six reports that New York Supreme Court Justice Shirley Kornreich is married to Ed Kornreich, who has been an attorney at the firm Proskauer Rose for over 20 years. Proskauer Rose has represented Sony in a number of high profile cases over the years.  'There seems to be a strong conflict of interest,' said one source inside the music industry. 

What's more, it was also lawyers from Proskauer Rose who represented Kesha herself back in 2011 when she and Dr. Luke were being sued for breach of contract by her former managers. Sony did not respond to a request for comment. The judge who declined to grant Kesha (above in April) an injunction against Sony is married to a partner in a law firm the represents that music company.    

Court documents seen exclusively by Daily Mail Online, filed in October 2014, chronicles a decade of abuse and exploitation so complete that it left Kesha 'broken, damaged and traumatized.' She 'lived in a prison of abuse, suffering a psychological and physical fallout so severe as to be described as 'life-threatening', requiring her to check into rehab. 

She broke down in court after hearing the judge's ruling on Friday before sending out a message to her fans thanking them for the outpouring of support.

It was Justice Kornreich who also dismissed Kesha's civil suit against her producer Dr. Luke (above in 2014) in April after she accused him of sexual assault.
 
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

The Associated Press Accuses U.S. Supreme Court Judges Of Taking Stocks As Bribes And They're Right

 
John Roberts

The U.S. Supreme Court has come under fire in a recent expose on the Associated Press and Yahoo News websites. The article states U.S. Supreme Court justices have millions of dollars in stock in American corporations, who are filing civil cases for the Supreme Court to decide. It is a felony for a Supreme Court Justice to rule on cases where they have stock in any of the litigants companies.

The head of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, ruled over a case I filed with the Supreme Court, who has one of the rudest, most ill-mannered, ill-tempered clerks in existence. Roberts ruled in the original Aisha v. Madonna case I had filed in 2005 that reached the Supreme Court in 2008, with them affirming the corrupt lower court's decisions, rendered by bribe taking Florida federal judge, Cecilia Altonaga.

Here's were the corruption is apparent. Chief Justice Roberts should not have ruled in the case. The Associated Press and Yahoo News revealed this week Roberts has $500,000 of stock in Time Warner, who owns Warner Bros, the label and movie company Madonna has worked for since the beginning of her fraudulent career. Time Warner and Warner Bros were also sued in the first Aisha v. Madonna case Roberts unlawfully ruled in. That was illegal.

Roberts and the Supreme Court criminally allowed a corrupt series of legal rulings in Miami, Florida by Cecilia Altonaga and Marcia G. Cooke stand, in what nearly led to my death and that of my mother, when Madonna felt so empowered by the bribery and corruption, she sent a Miami Kabbalah Center lunatic to attack my mom at a Miami Chase Bank location (the staff rushed to her aid when they heard my mom screaming in horror, in what prevented the worst from happening).

In three separate incidents, members of the Kabbalah Center tried to run me over with vehicles, in a criminal tactic later revealed in criminal court by U.S. prosecutors in California as conduct Madonna's now incarcerated private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, often commissioned on behalf of celebrities in Hollywood, paying him to insanely target and harass innocent people.

Altonaga completely corrupted and deliberately destroyed the case with corrupt rulings, knowing she was committing a felony, as Madonna's co-defendants Sony gave her stock in their company (which she was forced to admit in a judicial recusal motion). Sony and Warner Bros share the same copyright lawyer in New York and share in publishing money and credits on various songs. Altonaga's husband was and is a partner in the law firm that represents Sony in many legal matters.

All this meant she should have recused herself, but she stayed on and destroyed the case via corruption. I had to file a motion to recuse Altonaga citing the blatant conflict of interest. That's when she admitted in response to the motion that Sony had slipped her daughter, a minor in her care and household, stock in their company. She refused to acknowledge the fact her husband is their lawyer, which was sitting right on his firm's website and in legal magazines (which is where I found the information). The Supreme Court affirmed the corruption in denying to hear the case, thus criminally aiding Hollywood in stealing billions of dollars in copyrights and abusing an innocent immigrant family they tried to kill. I have since sued Madonna again in 2015, as her criminal conduct has grown exponentially worse, posing a serious danger to our lives.

How are these Supreme Court judges affording millions of dollars worth of stock in these American corporations. They don't make enough money to afford theses stocks. As I have stated before, the U.S. legal and justice system does not work. It is full of corruption and bribery. It is the most corrupt in the world.

STORY SOURCE

Roberts sold more than $250,000 in Microsoft stock

February 4, 2016 4:14 AM - FILE - WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court's recent decision to step into a relatively unimportant case involving Microsoft's Xbox 360 gaming system revealed that Chief Justice John Roberts has sold between $250,000 and $500,000 in Microsoft stock in the past year.

Federal judges violate the law if they take part in a case involving a company they own shares in, although Roberts declined through a court spokeswoman to comment on his situation. His decision, though, raises this question: If the chief justice can unload one of his two largest stock holdings (Time-Warner is the other), why does any justice continue to own individual companies' stock, knowing that doing so sometimes will force him out of a case?

"We're not talking about grandpa's stock in the family business where a justice might have some sentimental reason for holding onto the shares. These are major corporations who regularly come before the court," said Arthur Hellman, who specializes in judicial ethics at the University of Pittsburgh.

Roberts himself backed a change in federal law to make decisions to sell more palatable financially. In 2006, Congress changed the law to prevent judges from getting socked with a big tax hit if they sell a stock to avoid a conflict of interest, then reinvest the money in government securities or certain kinds of mutual funds.

Only three justices — Samuel Alito, Stephen Breyer and Roberts — even own individual stocks. Yet in the past few months, Alito has had to sit out a Supreme Court case and Breyer and Roberts acknowledged they overlooked stock ownership that should have precluded their participation in cases.

Alito's ownership of up to $15,000 worth of shares in Wisconsin-based Johnson Controls Inc. caused him to miss the court's consideration of federal policy on electricity pricing. Johnson Controls owns a subsidiary that was involved in the high-profile energy case. Breyer took part in that case despite his wife's ownership of the very same stock.

The routine check Breyer's office did to avoid conflicts failed to flag the Johnson Controls stock as a problem, Supreme Court clerk Scott Harris said in a letter to the parties after the argument. Breyer's wife, Joanna, quickly sold 750 shares worth about $33,000 after Breyer was alerted to the conflict.

Breyer voted with the majority to uphold the policy that was being challenged by industry groups.
In early October, Roberts took part in the denial of an appeal by Texas Instruments among 20 parties that appealed their share of the costs to clean up a hazardous waste site in Arizona. Roberts owns between $100,001 and $250,000 in Texas Instruments stock, and court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg acknowledged Roberts should not have been involved. Alito sat it out, without explanation.

Fix the Court, a judicial ethics watchdog, first spotted Roberts' Texas Instruments conflict. The chief justice's sale of his Microsoft stock was the largest single stock sale by anyone on the court in at least the 10-plus years he has been there.

In 2014, Alito got rid of shares in five companies worth at least $330,000, and perhaps as much as $900,000. The justices report their financial holdings in ranges, rather than exact values. Alito's investment portfolio has grown in recent years through inheritance and he has sought to reduce some individual stock investments. He still held stock in nearly three dozen companies as of the end of 2014, according to his most recent financial disclosure.

Breyer and Roberts also have reduced some holdings. Breyer's largest single investment, worth from $1 million to $5 million, is his wife's stock in the Pearson media empire that her family started and built.

Roberts holds roughly a dozen individual stocks, the largest of which is $250,000 to $500,000 in Time Warner Inc.


RELATED ARTICLES


 
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, February 6, 2016

Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts Complains About Negative Public Perception Of The Court

 
John Roberts

First racist Supreme Court judge, Antonin Scalia, made bigoted, ignorant remarks about black people (Antonin Scalia Slammed By Members Of Congress As A Racist Who Should Be Removed From The Supreme Court) then tried to invoke the name of God and His role in America, when God in heaven doesn't support the behavior of such a man or his corrupt judicial colleagues who are helping to destroy the United States. Now Chief Justice John Roberts has done an interview complaining about the negative public perception of the court.  

The Washington Post stated, "Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said late Wednesday that partisan extremism is damaging the public’s perception of the role of the Supreme Court." The court has made decisions that cost innocent people their lives. Public perception of the Supreme Court is very negative. The reason the Google Maps debacle happened, where the Supreme Court was labeled "The Dumb F**ks" is because the public labeled them as such and the tech company failed to edit it (Google Calls Black President Obama's White House 'The Nig*a House' And The Supreme Court 'Dumb F**ks'). 

Online searches will also reveal very negative comments from the American and global public about the Supreme Court. The comments indicate the court is hated by many, consistently going against the will of the people to do the bidding of presidents and special interests.

In the not too distant future, due to egregiously corrupt decisions the Supreme Court has already made, the public will petition them far, far less. There will be a massive decline in cases. Then you guys will have time to play Scrabble, watch Wheel of Fortune on TV and a riveting show you guys should be on "American Greed."

STORY SOURCE

The political wars damage public perception of Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts says

February 4 at 9:53 AM - BOSTON — Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said late Wednesday that partisan extremism is damaging the public’s perception of the role of the Supreme Court, recasting the justices as players in the political process rather than its referees. Divisive battles over confirmations and mischaracterization of the merits of the court’s decisions worry him, Roberts told a ballroom crowd of about 1,000 people at a celebration of Law Day for New England Law-Boston.

Criticism of the court “doesn’t bother me at all,” Roberts said, as long as it is not based on a misunderstanding of how the court differs from the political branches. “It’s usually discussed as, ‘Oh, you’re in favor of this or you’re in favor of that,’ ” Roberts said in response to questions from the law school’s dean, John F. O’Brien.

“In fact, our ruling is that whoever does get to decide this or that is allowed to do it, and that it’s not unconstitutional, that it’s consistent with the law,” Roberts said. “But we often have no policy views on the matter at all, and that’s an important distinction.”

The court is under heavy criticism from all sides in the presidential campaigns, with Republican Donald Trump suggesting he would appoint justices who would overturn the court’s 5-to-4 decision saying gay couples have a constitutional right to marry and Democrats Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders making a rejection of the court’s Citizen United campaign finance decision a litmus test for their potential nominees.

And before the justices adjourn in June, the court will decide a host of issues at the heart of the political debate: affirmative action in university admissions, abortion restrictions, the ability of religious objectors to opt out of the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive coverage obligation, and President Obama’s plan to shield millions of illegal immigrants from deportation.

Roberts himself — once touted by Republicans as a prototypical Supreme Court nominee — has become a focus on the right. GOP presidential candidate Ted Cruz, the senator from Texas, said Roberts’s nomination was a mistake, and even former Florida governor Jeb Bush, whose brother chose Roberts as chief justice, has criticized him.

The unhappiness arises basically from two of Roberts’s decisions on the same subject — finding Obama’s health-care act constitutional and then last year saving it from a potentially devastating challenge based on the language of the law...


RELATED ARTICLES
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)