Showing posts with label voters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label voters. Show all posts

Monday, November 7, 2016

2016 U.S. Presidential Election Is Being Rigged As Reports Of Mass Voter Fraud Surface In Final Push To Steal The Presidency


 
Hillary Clinton

There are reports of mass voter fraud in America, in support of Hillary Clinton. She is the one with the connects and resources to pull it off. There are 4,000,000 Dead and inactive voters in many U.S. states are on voter rolls ready to vote and voting for Clinton. Dead people can't vote, neither can inactive registrants. 

The FBI needs to void these fraudulent votes by dead people, because it is squarely their fault a brazen criminal, Hillary Clinton, is the Democrat's nominee for president, rather than the man who earned it, Bernie Sanders, who was the far better choice for America. The FBI has sat on and suppressed evidence of a host of crimes by Hillary Clinton, which includes but is not limited to:

Taking massive financial bribes domestically and internationally
Issuing massive bribes
Lying in Congress
Lying under oath
Lying to the FBI
Mishandling classified information
Failing to report a pedophile which allowed innocent minors to be harmed (Anthon Weiner)
Illegal wiretapping in America and the international community
Illegal computer hacking in America and the international community
Illegal phone hacking in America and the international community
Illegally accessing store, protected email data via hacking
Voyeurism
Illegal interception of U.S. mail
Voter fraud
Wire fraud
Bank fraud
Money Laundering
Tax Fraud
Charity Fraud in abusing IRS tax exempt status
Commissioned aggravated stalking via private investigators
Commissioned aggravated harassment via private investigators
Racketeering in violation of RICO statutes
Misusing U.S. taxpayer money (i.e. criminally sending U.S. military to fly recognizance missions and spy over innocent people's properties)
Then there's the infamous Clinton Kill List (here and here)

The woman is an outright criminal. The fraudulent votes in early voting need to be cancelled out and completely voided and the remaining ineligible people quickly removed from voter rolls before November 8, 2016. Voter fraud spits in the face of democracy and is a federal crime.

Weeks ago, President Obama, hypocritically claimed voter fraud can't happen via the election being rigged. However, when Obama was running for president in 2008 he warned the public about voter fraud and rigging elections. He is not an honest person and has criminally blocked criminal investigations into Clinton and others at the Department of Justice (DOJ), which created anger among FBI agents and the American public. It is a crime for a president to interfere at the FBI and DOJ, but reports credibly state Obama has done so in violation of the law.

U.S. presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has repeatedly stated the election is being rigged. He's not lying. The Clinton camp has been rigging the election and once again the federal government needs to cancel out the fraudulent votes. The world is watching and it doesn't look good (read the external articles excerpted below under STORY SOURCE and visit their sites, regarding nationwide incidents of voter fraud and rigging).

Years ago, I wrote a review for a film entitled "Hacking Democracy." It referenced Hillary Clinton and discussed how U.S. elections can be rigged, via dumping paper votes and through computer hacking.  

This election did not go how I wanted it to at all, but one must respect the process. However, it is not right that Hillary CLinton be allowed to steal the election when she is not the people's choice for president. Turn out to her rallies have been low and paltry in comparison to Trump's events. That's a sign he has more Americans backing him for president. It should be the people's choice, not Clinton's via fraud.

STORY SOURCE

As Obama Ridicules Trump Over Voter Fraud, He Warned Of ‘Rigged Elections’ In 2008 [VIDEO]

10:51 AM 10/22/2016 - President Barack Obama said this week “no serious person” would believe the presidential election could be rigged. The President, at a joint press conference with Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, went on to attack GOP nominee Donald Trump by saying, “I’ve never seen in my lifetime or in modern political history any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the election process before votes have even taken place.” In 2008, however, then candidate Obama was singing a very different tune. 

Speaking at a campaign stop at Kent State University in Ohio, Senator Obama said elections in the past had been rigged when he was asked by a supporter, “I would just like to know what you can say to reassure us that this election will not be rigged or stolen?” As the crowd cheered, Obama answered, “Well, I tell you what it helps in Ohio, that we got Democrats in charge of the machines.” The crowd cheered again. 

Democrats, including Secretary of State John Kerry, also believe Republicans “rigged” the 2004 election in Ohio. “But look, I come from Chicago,” Obama continued, “so I want to be honest, it’s not as if it’s just Republicans who have monkeyed around with elections in the past. Sometimes, Democrats have, too.” 

At the 2008 rally, Senator Obama went on to say, “Whenever people are in power, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.” Obama continued, “That’s why we’ve got to have, I believe, a voting rights division in the Justice Department that is nonpartisan, and that is serious about investigating cases of vote fraud. Is serious about making sure that people aren’t being discouraged to vote. That’s why the voting rights legislation that was passed a couple of years ago to help county clerks make sure that the machines were in place that were needed, are important. That’s why we need paper trails on these new electronic machines so that you actually have something that you can hang on to after you’ve punched that letter – make sure it hasn’t been hacked into. Those are all part of the process of making sure that our democracy works for everybody.” 

http://dailycaller.com

Top Indiana election official alleges more voter fraud

11:40 a.m. EDT October 20, 2016 - The exact number of fraud cases hasn’t been disclosed by Indiana Secretary of State Connie Lawson's office, October 2016. Wochit. Another election official says that may be a hasty conclusion.  As Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump repeats his message that the general election process is "rigged," the top election official in the home state of his running mate, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence, said she has found thousands more incidents of what she characterized as potential "voter fraud." 

Republican Secretary of State Connie Lawson said her office has found voter registration forms containing first names and birth dates different from what voters provided. She said she has handed those altered records over to the Indiana State Police for review. However, a leading election official in Hamilton County, also a Republican, said labeling the discrepancies as fraud was a hasty conclusion. County officials report no widespread issues with voter records. 

Lawson's allegations also come just one week after a Tippecanoe County election official acknowledged that the secretary of state's voter data system could be manipulated by those wishing to cause harm. County officials report no widespread issues with voter records. Lawson said the discrepancies were discovered when voters checked online with the Statewide Voter Registration System to see whether they were registered and could not gain access because their names or birth dates had been changed. 

“These records were changed on paper forms, at the BMV and online,” Lawson said in a news release. “At this time, my office is not sure why these records were changed, but we have evaluated the Statewide Voter Registration System and have found no indication it has been compromised,” Lawson said in the statement. "We believe this may be a case of voter fraud." 

Though Lawson said thousands of tampered forms were discovered, neither office spokeswoman Valerie Warycha nor State Police would reveal precisely how many. Warycha said a number of registration forms each election are changed by voters themselves to provide updated information. In addition, government employees make a certain number of data entry errors. But she said the number of changed registrations this year was much higher than in past elections, which led officials to believe fraud was being committed. 

Lawson's office said it and county election offices have been inundated with calls from voters whose information had been changed. However, it would not disclose how many complaints have been received. 

Bangert: An experiment in voter fraud. In Hamilton County, Republican elections administrator Kathy Richardson said she had not received any complaints and said she was miffed how Lawson concluded so quickly that the alleged anomalies might be fraud. "I don't know how you distinguish between people purposely changing their information and those who didn't," Richardson said. "In an election like this, where everyone wants to vote, you are going to get a lot of changes. People change their first names or last names or change their addresses. Especially people who haven't voted in a while." 

Registered voters who want to make changes can walk into their local elections office and ask for a new form to make the changes, Richardson said. They don't have to show any identification but must sign an affidavit that they are truthful. They also can make changes online. But that online voter registration system can be manipulated, as Tippecanoe County Clerk Christa Coffey acknowledged in a column last week by Lafayette Journal & Courier writer Dave Bangert. 

http://www.indystar.com

WATCH: New BOMBSHELL video just released by James O’Keefe on MASS VOTER FRAUD

Oct. 18, 2016 1:53 pm - James O’Keefe is out with this latest bombshell video entitled “Mass Voter Fraud”: In the second video of James O’Keefe’s new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. 

Monday, October 3, 2016

Hacking Fears Increase In The 2016 U.S. Presidential Election


 
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
 
There's something great about a honest, well recorded vote in any world nation. There have been dirty tricks in politics all over the world that left some disenfranchised and that is regrettable. Currently there are hacking fears in America regarding the 2016 Presidential election between Donald Trump (Republican) and Hillary Clinton (Democrat).

Players supporting each of the two major party candidates are planning and plotting to hack the election in favor of the person they want to see  become the new President of the United States. However, hacking is not democratic. Leave the vote alone. Let the people vote and decide who they want for president. When the results are tallied, let it reflect the will of the people as a whole.

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Pennsylvanians In The Steel Industry Are Switching From Voting Democrat To Republican Donald Trump In 2016 Presidential Election (CBS News And MSNBC) (Video)

Since 1992, Pennsylvania has voted Democrat in presidential elections. However, according to CBS News and a separate report by MSNBC, more Pennsylvanians are voting Republican this year in a switch to candidate, Donald Trump. The U.S. economy is in a bad way. National debt has reached a record high under current President Barack Obama, hitting $13 trillion dollars.  


Donald Trump
 
94,000,000 Americans are unemployed and have been removed from employment rolls by the Obama Administration to make the unemployment rate look better, when it is actually quite dire. A recent poll revealed Americans believe Trump would handle the economy better than rival candidate Hillary Clinton (Presidential Poll: Americans Believe Donald Trump Would Handle The Economy Better Than Hillary Clinton). This is correct. Trump would handle the U.S. economy better than Clinton.

 

Hillary Clinton
 
The Judiciary Report is of the belief, neither Clinton or Trump will fix the U.S. economy. Former President George W. Bush and incumbent Barack Obama have done an extensive, extraordinary amount of damage to the U.S. economy. It would take a financial genius to fix the damage that has been done and a person willing to stop the costly wars and government corruption.


CBS News interviews man in steel industry who stated Pennsylvanians are switching to Trump (Republican). The unemployment and poverty rates in the state have become dire and intolerable under President Obama (Democrat)
 
 The 2016 election is a matter of choosing the candidate who will do the least amount of financial damage. As it stands, we know based on her track record Clinton would go into office and be completely corrupt. Trump, the better financial choice, is proven in the business world, but how well he will stand up to the corrupt pressures of special interests and greedy corporate entities who prey on presidents, remains to be seen. He also needs to apologize to Mexicans, Muslims, blacks and the disabled for comments he has made. Trump needs to disown the comments.

STORY SOURCE

Tough times in a Pa. town attract voters to Donald Trump
 
JOHNSTOWN, Pa. -- When CBS News' poll asked voters who would do better on the economy, Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton by 11 points. Last month, they were dead even. Tough times are drawing voters to Trump, as CBS News found out in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. There was a time when the city led the nation in steel production. 

That industry, and its thousands of good paying jobs, have long since left. "This is a small town," said John Silk. "It used to be like a small Pittsburgh. It's just...a hard hit area." Silk is a welder, and his faith in the future has been shaken. He was a lifelong Democrat. But now, he is a Trump supporter. "You can only go forward with him," he said. "I don't think you can go backwards and you sure as heck can't stay the same." 

Silk said he has lost faith in the Democratic Party. "We have way too many regulations," he said. "Donald Trump has talked about undoing them and getting them out of the way and letting our local industry do that they do best and just create jobs." But restoring Johnstown's former glory is a tough order. The average income in the town is less than half the national average. And 34 percent now live in poverty. "Our economy obviously hasn't recovered from the crisis in 2008 so we gotta start worrying about home -- we gotta take care of this place first," Ankney said. Pennsylvania has favored Democrats in every presidential election since 1992. But this year, the ghosts of long-dead industries could have their final revenge. 

http://www.cbsnews.com

RELATED ARTICLES





 




 









Monday, July 25, 2016

Russian Government Hackers Expose Democrats In Email Hack Leaking Items Revealing Election Rigging And Mocking Bernie Sanders Leading To Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's Resignation

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Hit With Class Action Lawsuit For Rigging Primaries


Bernie Sanders (left) and smug, corrupt, election rigging Hillary Clinton (right)
 
Last Year, Florida congresswoman and Democratic National Committee chair, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, attended the Grammys with fellow member of Congress, Sheila Jackson Lee. They were slammed as corrupt for doing so by many on social networking (The Public Slams Democrats In Congress For Attending The Grammy Awards In Twitter Backlash). 

Yesterday, Wasserman-Schultz's corruption came to ahead, when she was forced to tender her resignation, after Russian government hackers exposed her and the Democratic Nation Party, via a hack to their computer systems. 
 
The whistleblower website Wikileaks, released thousands of emails exposing the corruption, lies, deceit and treachery Wasserman-Schultz and others have been disgracefully engaging in, via an unethical conspiracy to sabotage and destroy the campaign of Bernie Sanders, who was Hillary Clinton's top rival for the nomination. Sanders, who was the far better candidate, saw his bid for the presidency subjected to dirty tricks, lies, smear campaigns and voter disenfranchisement by Clinton and company. Emails reveal Sanders was also secretly being mocked for being a "secular Jew." 



Debbie Wasserman Schultz
 
Political party chairs are supposed to be impartial. However, Wasserman-Schultz is so corrupted by the Clintons, who promised her political fame and fortune, she secretly conspired with them to get rid of Sanders in very unethical and unseemly ways. Breitbart stated, "Wasserman-Schultz came under heavy fire after an enormous series of damaging leaks helped to reveal what many in the Democratic base suspected: She had rigged the primary for Hillary Clinton to win."
 
The leaked emails have people on social networking stating Wasserman Schultz helped rigged the primaries to ensure Clinton would win the Democrat's party nomination. It shows complete dishonesty and untrustworthiness. As another consequence of her criminal behavior, Wasserman-Schultz has been slapped with a class action lawsuit for "rigging the primaries."

Hillary Clinton has been running one of the most crooked, corrupt, underhanded political campaigns in U.S. history. Everything about Clinton's campaign is completely rigged. They want the presidency so badly they are willing to lie, cheat, steal and bribe.


Donald Trump slams Wasserman Schultz and Hillary Clinton on Twitter over stealing the primaries and Democrat's nomination for President of the United States
 
Wasserman-Schultz is another person disgraced and ruined over their association with Hillary Clinton's unlawful conduct (for further reference see: James Comey and the Loretta Lynch). Clinton quickly hired Wasserman-Schultz yesterday when the scandal broke and she was forced to step down. Neither Clinton or Wasserman-Schultz are fit to be in politics. They are both corrupt. It's a shame Sanders didn't get the nomination.

For weeks the Judiciary Report stated Clinton was rigging the election (Obama Administration Meddling In Election Trying To Give Hillary Clinton And His Party The Presidency). The disclosure of yesterday's emails proves it. The woman is evil. She's so smug about the corruption that has disgusted the populace. 

Stop smirking on television, you election rigging, hard up, callous, scheming, social climbing battleaxe. Have some shame about what you've done in stealing another person's destiny (Bernie Sanders). It's an evil thing to do to another human being. You're looking like Cruella Deville at podiums with that perma-smirk, clearly pleased with the chronic corruption. And it's ugly...very ugly. It's unattractive and disingenuous. Your role model is clearly Lucifer to stoop to such drastic lows in actively trying to steal an election. Hillary, your horns are showing.

STORY SOURCE

Report: DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz To Resign After Convention
 
24 Jul 2016 - DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz issued a statement Sunday saying she plans to resign after the Democratic National Convention concludes, according to reports. Wasserman-Schultz came under heavy fire after an enormous series of damaging leaks helped to reveal what many in the Democratic base suspected: She had rigged the primary for a Hillary Clinton win.



Debbie Wasserman Schultz Served Class Action Lawsuit for Rigging Primaries

This is the first of many consequences the Democratic Party will face for manipulating millions of voters
 
06/30/16 11:30am - On June 28, the Miami-based law firm Beck & Lee filed a class action lawsuit against the Democratic National Committee and DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz. “There are essentially six legal claims we are asserting in this lawsuit on behalf of the composed class members,” said attorney Jared Beck in a YouTube video announcing the lawsuit. “The first is a claim for fraud—against the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz—based on the revelations from the recent Guccifer 2.0 documents purportedly taken from the DNC’s own computer network.” The Guccifer 2.0 documents include internal memos in which the DNC broke legally binding neutrality agreements in the Democratic primaries by strategizing to make Hillary Clinton the nominee before a single vote was cast. 

The second claim filed is for negligent misrepresentation, a legal theory based on the first claim of fraud. The third claim alleges the DNC and Wasserman Schultz participated in deceptive conduct in claiming the DNC was neutral during the Democratic primaries, when there is overwhelming evidence suggesting favoritism of Clinton from the beginning. The fourth claim of the lawsuit seeks retribution of any monetary donations the DNC to Bernie Sanders‘ campaign. The fifth claim alleges the DNC broke its fiduciary duties during the Democratic primaries to members of the Democratic Party by not holding a fair election process. The sixth claim is for negligence on behalf of the DNC—for not protecting donor information—as hackers broke into the DNC networks, potentially compromising their personal information. 

“This lawsuit is our effort as attorneys to give a voice, in the political system, to all those who have been defrauded by the conduct of the DNC in supporting and promoting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy in violation of its own charter which requires it to be neutral,” added attorney Jeff Beck. The class of representatives in the class action lawsuit is currently in the thousands and continuing to grow, as any donor to Bernie Sanders’ campaign eligible to join. The Beck & Lee Law Firm has set up a Facebook Page with updates on the progress of the lawsuit. 

Hillary Clinton won the Democratic Primaries in large part due to the manufactured public consent within the Democratic Party that she would be the presidential nominee before the primaries even started. Prior to the first state to hold an election in the primaries, over 400 super delegates formally supported Clinton. Clinton’s 2008 Campaign co-chair, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, did everything she could behind closed doors to ensure the 2016 primaries were not democratic, but rather a coronation for Clinton. 

“It is clearly the case that, when given truth serum, Debbie Wasserman Schultz vastly prefers Hillary Clinton to be the nominee—obviously—and to the extent that there are things that can be done institutionally and marginally to facilitate that outcome, they are being done,” said MSNBC host Chris Hayes this past May. 

Such favoritism for Clinton has extended throughout the Democratic Establishment. DNC vice chair Donna Brazile even foreshadowed the rigging in 2013, revealing in an interview with ABC News, “if Hillary Clinton gets in the race, there will be a coronation of her.”

The DNC’s overtly fraudulent conduct and disregard for democracy has incited calls for Wasserman Schultz to resign, but the reforms and consequences for their transgressions don’t start and stop there. Had the DNC not colluded with the Clinton Campaign to shield her from exposure, Clinton’s fate would have likely been similar to that of Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush, who fell from grace in a broad pool after once being presumed to come out on top as the Republican Party’s presidential nominee...

http://observer.com

Bernie Sanders Campaign Chief Says Someone Must Be 'Accountable' for What DNC Emails Show
 
Jul 23, 2016, 4:38 PM ET - Bernie Sanders campaign manager Jeff Weaver said his team was "disappointed" by the emails from the Democratic National Committee leaked through WikiLeaks, which seemed to reveal staff in the party working to support Hillary Clinton. "Someone does have to be held accountable," Weaver said during an interview with ABC News. "We spent 48 hours of public attention worrying about who in the [Donald] Trump campaign was going to be held responsible for the fact that some lines of Mrs. Obama's speech were taken by Mrs. Trump. Someone in the DNC needs to be held at least as accountable as the Trump campaign." 

Weaver said the emails showed misconduct at the highest level of the staff within the party and that he believed there would be more emails leaked, which would "reinforce" that the party had "its fingers on the scale." "Everybody is disappointed that much of what we felt was happening at the DNC was in fact happening, that you had in this case a clear example of the DNC taking sides and looking to place negative information into the political process. 

"We have an electoral process. The DNC, by its charter, is required to be neutral among the candidates. Clearly it was not," Weaver said, responding for the first time to the growing controversy. "We had obviously pointed that out in a number of instances prior to this, and these emails just bear that out." Another member of Sanders' staff, Rania Batrice put it this way: "Everything our fans have been saying -- and they were beaten down for and called conspiracy theorists -- and now it's in black and white."...
 
http://abcnews.go.com

RELATED ARTICLES

FBI Hit With Massive Backlash From Americans Labeling Them 'Corrupt' For 'Rigging' Hillary Clinton Investigation Into Mishandling Classified Information And Not Charging Her For Crimes She Committed

Orlando Gay Club Shooting Terrorist Was On FBI Watch List, Then Removed And Never Added To The No-Fly List With The Agency Refusing To Arrest Him

Members Of Congress Question FBI Director James Comey In Hearing About Hillary Clinton Lying To The Legislature And FBI Under Oath



Presidential Poll: Americans Believe Donald Trump Would Handle The Economy Better Than Hillary Clinton

The Public Slams Democrats In Congress For Attending The Grammy Awards In Twitter Backlash

Donald Trump Receives A Record 13,000,000 Primary Votes Surpassing Hillary Clinton

President Obama Tells Donald Trump 'This Is Not A Reality Show'

Sunday, July 10, 2016

A Record Number Of Republicans Voted In The 2016 Presidential Primaries But There Was A Large Decrease In Democrats At The Polls (Trump vs. Clinton)


 
Donald Trump
 
New voting data reveals the 2016 presidential primaries in America saw a huge turn out for Republican, Donald Trump, who received a record 13,000,000 votes. However, there was a very noticeable 21% decrease in the number of voters on the Democrat side, which barely gave Hillary Clinton the nomination. What will this mean come election day in November.


Hillary Clinton

Initially, Trump had raised a paltry sum for political donations ($1,500,000) and was laughed at by the Clinton camp, as she and husband, former president, Bill Clinton, had solicited and received $48,000,000 from Hollywood and members of the Saudi royal family. However, new numbers indicate Donald Trump and the Republican party raised $53,000,000 last month. To date Trump has raised $55,000,000. Clinton's tally is now $68,500,000.   
 
 
Bill Clinton 
 
I've found it disturbing the financial figures raised in presidential elections in America over the past 16-years. It feels like the presidency is routinely being bought, where it should go to the most qualified person based on merit not money. I am of the belief, there should be financial caps on how much money can be raised for an election.

STORY SOURCE

The Republican Party and Trump raised over $50M last month
 
July 7, 2016 | 12:26am - The Republican Party and Donald Trump ramped up their joint fund-raising last month by hauling in a combined $51 million to support his presidential bid. The real-estate tycoon chipped in $3.8 million to boost the total to $55 million. Trump vowed he would raise more than enough money to defeat Hillary Clinton, noting how he raised less and spent wisely to defeat his primary opponents...Trump and the GOP still trail Clinton and the Democratic National Committee, which raised a combined $68.5 million last month.
STUNNING FINAL ANALYSIS=> GOP Primary Turnout Up 62% This Year – Dem Primary Turnout Down 21% This Year
 
Jul 4th, 2016 10:59 am 252 Comments - This ought to keep Democrats up late at night. Despite the constant negative press by the liberal media, Republicans are coming off a historic primary season. Donald Trump continues to fill stadiums across the country like this capacity crowd in Bangor, Maine last week.
Republican turnout was up 62% this year.
Democratic turnout was down 21% this year.
Despite her tight race with Socialist Bernie Sanders Hillary Clinton received 1,019,237 fewer votes this year than in 2008. 

DEMOCRAT PARTY TURNOUT–

** In 2008 there were 38,111,341 Democrat votes in the primary. In 2016 there were 29,939,251 
votes. A net decrease of 8,172,090 (-21%).

REPUBLICAN PARTY TURNOUT–

** In 2012 there were 19,214,513 Republican votes in the primary. In 2016 there were 31,108,968 votes. A net increase of 11,894,455 (+62%).

Republicans had 1.1 million more primary voters this year than the Democratic party. These are 
stunning numbers!
 
RELATED ARTICLES









Donald Trump Receives A Record 13,000,000 Primary Votes Surpassing Hillary Clinton

Monday, February 9, 2015

The Public Slams Democrats In Congress For Attending The Grammy Awards In Twitter Backlash


Members of Congress, Sheila Jackson Lee (left) and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (right)

Mainstream newspapers are reporting that people on the popular social networking website Twitter, slammed several Democrats in Congress for attending the Grammy Awards this past Sunday. Voters spoke out in anger on Twitter at members of Congress hobnobbing with stars in Hollywood, labeling it distasteful and hypocritical.

Some members of Congress who were in attendance dodged questions from the press on how inappropriate their presence was at the event. The members of Congress who did respond to the press about attending the Grammys and having fallen afoul of voters for doing so, stated they were at the event doing research. However, the public is not buying it.

The fact of the matter is Hollywood is a lawless place, hiring private investigators to wiretap, threaten, assault and rob innocent people. Hollywood also steals copyrighted materials by the truckload, then hypocritically demands the public not pirate the stolen works they have falsely and criminally misrepresented as their own.

Hollywood is demanding more rights for the works they have stolen from others, then bribing judges with corporate stock, cash and favors that lead to money, to get away with it. Yet the actual writers and producers being ripped off by Hollywood and its stars essentially have no rights, despite the fact the Constitution says otherwise.

Hollywood criminally steals copyrights from people in America and around the world, then divides the stolen goods among its companies. Hollywood is behaving as though America is not a democracy and people have no right to own property (copyrights = money). It's hard to take the government presiding over the criminality seriously. I am going to have to agree with Twitter, the whole thing is hypocritical. And the music industry wonders why sales have hit an all time low.

STORY SOURCE

Congresswomen who champion income equality are accused of hypocrisy for attending Grammys with wealthy Hollywood elite

Published: 06:09 EST, 9 February 2015 | Updated: 09:20 EST, 9 February 2015 - They were walking the red carpet with the likes of Beyonce, Jay Z, Rihanna and Kanye West. But congresswomen Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and Sheila Jackson Lee caused more of a storm than the majority of the celebrities with their own attendance at the star-studded bash.

Both Democrats, who are outspoken over wanting to close the wealth gap between rich and poor, sparked calls of 'hypocrisy' from disgruntled voters with their appearance alongside the Holywood elite. Within minutes of being spotted, people took to social media to question why they were there. Facebook group 100 Percent FED Up wrote: 'Inequality queens living it up at the Grammy Awards' sparking angry backlash.

Marcia Quimby Ortner posted: 'Glad this photo is going around FB. So hypocritical.'

When questioned by MailOnline, Wasserman Schultz's press secretary Sean Bartlett said she was at the Grammys attending a political event, adding that her travel was paid for through her campaign. Political event: A spokesman said Debbie Wasserman Schultz (left) was attending the Grammys with Democratic colleagues including Sheila Jackson Lee (right)

'The Congresswoman was at the Grammys attending a political event with some of her Democratic colleagues; she was in LA over the weekend for a series of political and official events,' he said. 'There are a few programs, workshops and informational sessions that Members on both sides of the aisle attend on the sidelines of the Grammys so they can hear directly from the creative community about the changing music industry.

'As you might have seen reported in Politico this weekend, Congress is gearing up to deal with legislation related to copyright issues and my boss has been involved in that issue previously.' Outspoken: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is accused of 'hypocrisy' for attending the star-studded bash while campaigning to address the wealth gap between rich and poor.
 

Out of touch Dems Wasserman Schultz, Jackson Lee hobnob at Grammys: ‘Tax-payer or lobbyist funded trip?’ 

February 9, 2015 - Feckless Democrats in Congress might find something else to do when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu comes to Washington, but they wouldn’t miss hanging with the glitterati at Sunday night’s Grammys. As this Twitter picture shows, two of the House’s nuttier Dems, Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas and Democrat National Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz of South Florida managed to find time to rub elbows with the richer and famous while no doubt promoting their party’s empty “income inequality” message.

While President Obama contented himself with a video message, these champions of the oppressed found time to turn out themselves. Sharp-eyed Twitter users took note — and couldn’t help wondering who was paying for it. The odd part is, neither appears to be having much fun. Jackson Lee might have just heard Beyonce was going to lose “Album of the Year” to white guy Beck. (Wasserman Schultz simply looks stoned.). Others are asking who footed the bill. They’re Democrats. Anybody want to guess?

Friday, December 5, 2014

Public Protests On Behalf Of 90-Year-Old Florida Man Arrested Three Times For Feeding The Homeless


Arnold Abbott

90-year-old chef, World War II veteran and civil rights activist, Arnold Abbott, who has been feeding the homeless for many years, has become the victim of a new ordinance in the South Florida city of Fort Lauderdale, which neighbors Miami. People in Fort Lauderdale are no longer allowed to feed the homeless in public places. It must be done in a building sanctioned by the city.

For many years, Abbott, a Christian, has been feeding the homeless hearty meals he cooks, even ordering them pizza from restaurants. He also runs a culinary school teaching the homeless how to cook and find jobs. Many have spoken up in favor of Albert. Even the police look embarrassed to cite Abbott and two local preachers who are helping his effort. However, police are acting on the orders of local lawmakers. Each citation carries a fine of $500 and up to two months in jail. Abbott successfully fought a similar ban in 1999. Protests have been held in support of Abbott.

If Arnold is jailed on one of these citations, the Judiciary Report will start an online campaign on this site, encouraging the public to vote out every single lawmaker responsible for the ordinance. Each lawmaker responsible for the ordinance will be listed by name on this site in the lead up to the local elections, with the request the public vote for your rival (and if I do the online campaign right, you guys will be homeless and need Arnold's food *tongue in cheek statement*).

In all seriousness, being homeless is a terrible thing for many. Do not penalize the people trying to help the homeless. It's cruel. There are so many problems plaguing society. Picking on and arresting a 90-year-old man, who has been feeding the homeless for decades, is wrong and should not be a priority. That's not what you were elected to do and the people of South Florida and many more all over the country are not with you in targeting him, wasting taxpayer money.

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

14 Million Less People Voted In The 2012 U.S. Election Than The 2008


The First Family

Voter turn out in this year's U.S. Presidential election is significantly down from 2008's numbers by a whopping 14,000,000 people. That's a bad sign. People have become disappointed in and disillusioned with the process and the state of the economy.

   

Mitt Romney

President Obama's reelection is going to result in more financial losses to the country, as his administration continues to spill enormous amounts of much red ink. The nation is buckling under the weight of the debt and loss of prosperity with no viable financial plan in sight to remedy the serious problems. 

STORY SOURCE

Do U.S. Swing States Get Better Treatment From The Government And Political Parties

     

Barack Obama  

Do major swing states in America, who are crucial to gaining maximum electoral votes to win the U.S. Presidency, receive better funding and treatment than other states. It appears so and that's not right. Each state should be treated well and equally. There are too many disparities in how different demographics are treated and the divisiveness and uneven treatment needs to stop, as it doesn't help the country as a whole.

Some view it as free money and applaud it, but don't realize it is not, as it is done on the taxpayer's tab and is running up the deficit, assisting in bankrupting America. Spending needs to be reined in and funds that go go out, need to be done in a even, equitable manner.

Barack Obama Reelected President Of The United States In Tight Presidential Race Against Challenger Mitt Romney


The First Family

Barack Obama was reelected President of the United States, winning the electoral college (303/206) and currently the popular vote by a narrow margin. Votes are still being counted Wednesday morning in certain regions of the country and their status labeled, "Too close to call." The site was awaiting the popular vote count as well, but as the electoral college has been settled the results are finalized.

The day before the election, pollsters predicted the race had become tight towards the end, but many polls favored challenger and businessman Mitt Romney based on surveys, due to the battered economy. The popular vote reveals many changes in voting patterns from the 2008 election, such an erosion in support for the president, after four years of bad economic numbers. 

The election suffered from allegations of fraud coming from both sides of the aisles, but thankfully there were no major acts of violence, which would have been counterproductive and negative. 

As it stands, the Judiciary Report is not of the belief President Obama will be able to repair the severely damaged U.S. economy, in a situation he has made much worse via unchecked spending on the people's tab. Things are dire and what Obama has been doing for the past four years is has not and will not work in the future. It is financially harmful.

RELATED ARTICLE

Sunday, November 4, 2012

President Obama Catching Flak Over Hurricane Sandy Complaints In A Storm That Could Cost Him 300,000 Votes


Barack Obama

Reports today indicate, devastating Hurricane Sandy, which has killed over 106 people in America and 65 in the Caribbean, is reflecting poorly on the Obama Administration, due to news reports showing people in New York and New Jersey suffering with no food, water or electricity in the cold weather. My heart goes out to them, as storms can be very difficult to go through.

Another report revealed, President Obama could lose over 300,000 votes due to Hurricane Sandy in next week's November 6, 2012 presidential election. Today, when asked about the storm and suffering people, Obama turned away and refused to answer any questions.

I would suggest the government engage the military on a greater scale, as they are tough and properly trained, equipped to get into tough areas. Helicopters dropping supplies in hard to reach areas would be another beneficial maneuver. Things cannot remain the way they currently are.

RELATED ARTICLES











Saturday, November 3, 2012

Joe Biden On Obama: 'There's Never Been A Day In The Last Four Years I've Been Proud To Be His Vice President'

Say What!
 
U.S. Vice President Joe Biden needs to clarify statements he made to an audience during a campaign stop this week. Biden stated of President Barack Obama, "There's never been a day in the last four years I've been proud to be his vice president."


Mitt Romney: thanks Joe

Biden is gaffe prone. Therefore, maybe his statements fall under said category. Either way, it could not have come at a worse time, with only 3 days left to go until the presidential election on November 6, 2012, where rival Mitt Romney is leading in most polls. Romney supporters have seized on the gaffe. While Obama supporters are scratching their heads at Biden's statement. 
RELATED ARTICLES











 

Friday, November 2, 2012

The Next Four Years In The White House Will Determine America's Future For Many Years To Come

     
 
Mitt Romney (left) and Barack Obama

The excitement is building for the presidential election in America next Tuesday. President Barack Obama and rival Mitt Romney have resumed campaigning after Hurricane Sandy damaged parts of the East Coast, bringing events to a halt.
 
Polls continue to place Romney in the lead. The ads from both sides of the aisles pull no punches, as both candidates seem to want the win more than any others in recent history. This is likely due to the fact America is at another crossroads, due to the economy. The next four years in the White House will determine the nation's future and role in the world, when so much is changing around the globe.

RELATED ARTICLES











Little Girl Crying Over The Election Says 'I'm Tired Of Bronco Bama And Mitt Romney' (Video)

Oh Snap! This Little Girl Is Not Playing!



A little 4-year-old girl went off and said she is sick of the election and wants it over with. Those weren't her exact words, but you get the point. She started crying and said she is, "Tired of Bronco Bama and Mitt Romney." I'm not gonna lie, I laughed. "Bronco Bama?" Priceless.


In America, especially in the South, black people use the word "Bama" to refer to an unsophisticated man or woman, who is not worldly. It's like calling someone a country bumpkin. That little girl needs to be careful or "Bronco" will have her family audited by the IRS. Just five more days to go...

STORY SOURCE


RELATED ARTICLES