Obama Slammed During Trip To China After Human Rights Lecture And Forced To 'Go Out The A*s' Of Air Force One Without Traditional Red Carpet

No Red Carpet Treatment For Obama

When the Chinese saw Air Force One pulling up on the runway they said roll up the mat! It's a wonder they gave him any stairs.

Once again it continues regarding "How The World Fell Out Of Love With Obama." U.S. President Barack Obama went to China last week for G20 talks and it did not go well. The Guardian newspaper in London is reporting President Obama was not given a red carpet reception in China, while his global counterparts were, such as British PM Theresa May. China, exasperated by Obama's antagonistic behavior regarding trade, the military and the South China Sea, knows his time in office is almost up and are focusing on new world leaders such as May to forge relationship with in the world. China, a nation that has invested over $1 trillion dollars in America, is also paying close attention to the current presidential election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, in reference to future diplomatic talks.

Last week Obama hypocritically lectured the Chinese on human rights (never mind he has wars running in the Middle East, which constitute human rights abuses). Obama took particular issue with what he deems a lack of  free speech in the Chinese press. Obama’s speech was downright hypocritical and comical to journalists and bloggers in America, who are routinely harassed, threatened and hit with unlawful and underhanded financial punishments from the IRS and Google Ads on his orders, for daring to criticize the policies of His Royal Excellency Supreme Overlord Ruler, Barack Obama.

British prime minister Theresa May and chancellor Philip Hammond received the full red carpet welcome in China last week

Obama unlawfully extended his abuses into Britain, engaging the FBI and CIA to illegally terrorize British journalists and their families, for exposing his criminal behavior in the press. Obama then proceeded to threaten the British people about the Brexit vote, which caused the populace to do the exact opposite of what the erstwhile visiting dictator demanded. 

There has never been a U.S. president who so opposed free speech and free press, as Barack Obama. He is a narcissistic megalomaniac who pays more attention to his press clippings than the skyrocketing national deficit. Just ask journalist Sharyl Attkisson. Her story is just the tip of the iceberg on how far Obama is willing to go to destroy the finances and rights of those who peacefully and lawfully criticize his political policies on television, online and in the newspapers. 

STORY SOURCE

Barack Obama 'deliberately snubbed' by Chinese in chaotic arrival at G20
 

Sunday 4 September 2016 03.27 EDT - The US president was denied the usual red carpet welcome and forced to ‘go out of the a*s’ of Air Force One, observers say. Barack Obama forced to exit from ‘a*s’ of Air Force One China’s leaders have been accused of delivering a calculated diplomatic snub to Barack Obama after the US president was not provided with a staircase to leave his plane during his chaotic arrival in Hangzhou before the start of the G20. 

Chinese authorities have rolled out the red carpet for leaders including India’s prime minister, Narendra Modi, the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, the South Korean president, Park Geun-hye, Brazil’s president, Michel Temer, and the British prime minister, Theresa May, who touched down on Sunday morning. But the leader of the world’s largest economy, who is on his final tour of Asia, was forced to disembark from Air Force One through a little-used exit in the plane’s belly after no rolling staircase was provided when he landed in the eastern Chinese city on Saturday afternoon. 

When Obama did find his way on to a red carpet on the tarmac below there were heated altercations between US and Chinese officials, with one Chinese official caught on video shouting: “This is our country! This is our airport!” “The reception that President Obama and his staff got when they arrived here Saturday afternoon was bruising, even by Chinese standards,” the New York Times reported. 

Jorge Guajardo, Mexico’s former ambassador to China, said he was convinced Obama’s treatment was part of a calculated snub. “These things do not happen by mistake. Not with the Chinese,” Guajardo, who hosted presidents Enrique Peña Nieto and Felipe Calderón during his time in Beijing, told the Guardian. 

“I’ve dealt with the Chinese for six years. I’ve done these visits. I took Xi Jinping to Mexico. I received two Mexican presidents in China. I know exactly how these things get worked out. It’s down to the last detail in everything. It’s not a mistake. It’s not.” Guajardo added: “It’s a snub. It’s a way of saying: ‘You know, you’re not that special to us.’ It’s part of the new Chinese arrogance. It’s part of stirring up Chinese nationalism. It’s part of saying: ‘China stands up to the superpower.’ It’s part of saying: ‘And by the way, you’re just someone else to us.’ It works very well with the local audience. 

“Why [did it happen]?” the former diplomat, who was ambassador from 2007 until 2013, added. “I guess it is part of Xi Jinping playing the nationalist card. That’s my guess.” Bill Bishop, a China expert whose Sinocism newsletter tracks the country’s political scene, agreed that Obama’s welcome looked suspiciously like a deliberate slight intended “to make the Americans look diminished and weak”...

 https://www.theguardian.com

RELATED ARTICLES

Why Is The Obama Administration Contacting The Family And Friends Of Journalists And Bloggers Harassing Them On His Behalf Over His Press Clippings

 

New Scandal Erupts Regarding The FBI And Justice Department Monitoring Calls Of AP Reporters Confirming Previous Site Claims

Obama’s War On Journalists Evident In The Case Of CBS News Journalist Sharyl Attkisson Among Others

How The World Fell Out Of Love With Obama

David Cameron Resigns As British Prime Minister, Theresa May Is Appointed The New PM And Boris Johnson Foreign Minister

 
David Cameron and family
 

British Prime Minister, David Cameron, today handed in his resignation. The fallout from the Brexit vote to leave the European Union, which was the opposite of what he campaigned for, resulted in his resignation. Me personally, I would not have resigned. But to each his own. Theresa May, the former Foreign Minister (Home Secretary), is now the Prime Minister of Britain. She is the second female Prime Minister in British history. Two weeks ago, before this rounded out and May was the only one left standing to be the new Prime Minister, I tweeted on Twitter that she reminds me of Margaret Thatcher (see tweet at end of article).

   
Theresa May and husband Philip May
 

May has appointed former London mayor, Boris Johnson, the new Foreign Minister. Whether you agree with May's political views, it is best that political parties in Britain work together for the good of the country.  Cameron's primary mistake was the joint press conference with President Barack Obama, who basically threatened the British public stating do what I say in this vote or I will financially punish Britain by pushing the nation "to the back of the queue" in trade deals. It was an odious comment to make and was ill-received. 

 
David Cameron's tearful daughter
 

People behind the leave campaign in Britain credit Obama with getting the vote through to leave the European Union, which is the exact opposite of what the president demanded the British people do. Obama repeatedly abused the "special relationship" between Britain and America, in conduct other modern American presidents simply did not do. An international visit from Obama has proven political poison to several world heads of state, who ended up leaving shortly after or being voted out. Hence the Politico article "Politico: How The World Fell Out Of Love With Obama."

 
The Camerons leaving 10 Downing Street for the last time
 

I am not of the belief Britain has cause to panic over Brexit. If you needlessly give off fear and panic, people will pick up on that and act accordingly regarding investments and trade. I know London quite well. I also know some of the home counties in England. Britain is a stable, civil place with a lot going for it. There are many financial opportunities available in Britain, which is a large, prosperous nation with a strong economy. London, the nation's centerpiece, is a beautiful, bustling city that is a center of commerce and entertainment for many all over the world. 

 

 
My tweet two weeks ago regarding Theresa May reminding me of Britain's first female prime minister Margaret Thatcher
 

Hold your heads up and be determined in your resolve to succeed and grow as a nation. Stop apologizing for being British in trying to fit in more with Europe. And for the record, there's nothing wrong with European, it is great as well. Each nation should be unreservedly proud of their country. There's nothing wrong with being proud of where you come from. 

RELATED ARTICLES

British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit

President Barack Obama Caught Spying On World Leaders Again

Politico: How The World Fell Out Of Love With Obama

The UK Leaders Debate 2015 And Britain’s Future 

 

World Leaders Blaming Obama For Brexit

 

Britain Expands Business Ties With China 

Donald Trump Using Brexit In Political Campaign To Plead His Case For The U.S. Presidency But It's Not The Same Thing

Donald Trump
 

U.S. presidential candidate, Donald Trump, used the Brexit victory, regarding Britain voting to leave the European Union (EU) as a platform to state he has international political credibility (but within hours proclaimed Brussels a country, when it is a city in Belgium). Trump has been stating he wants something similar for America and has voiced the same online and during political rallies. Trump used the Brexit win to bash U.S. President, Barack Obama and presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, both of whom publicly opposed Britain leaving the European Union, in the lead up to the vote.  

However, it's not the same thing. Brexit is not the same as Trump's political platform of banning Muslims from America and isolating Mexico. Britain has no rule excluding immigrants from any nation and the United Kingdom has more Muslims citizens than America. Brexit was about massive immigration from European Union states and the strain it created on the NHS (Nation Health System), overcrowding in schools, lack of affordable homes in London, as well as billions of pounds being paid out in cash and housing benefits to the influx of people who came to the country without financial support. Britons began struggling to get jobs and housing, then watched as their tax dollars went to people who had just landed in the country from other parts of the EU. 

 

Hillary Clinton

Brexit was about white, black and Arab people complaining about overcrowding and fewer jobs being available due to mass migration from the European Union, which is mostly white people. It wasn't a racial matter. However, Trump's campaign took on a racial tone, as he has insulted minorities - Mexicans, Muslims and blacks. Trump also insulted women with outright sexist statements and mocked the disabled, which is wholly unacceptable. That's a broad cross-section of people Trump has offended.

For the life of me I don't know why Trump chose this path. He could have been elected to office being the rich guy promising to turn around America's fortunes. Racism, sexism and xenophobia should not have been apart of his platform, ruining the prestigious name he once enjoyed, which was synonymous with wealth.  

Barack Obama

Democrats are now worried the success of the Brexit vote will give Trump an edge in the election, as it speaks to America's discontent with the economy. The Democrats' problem is compounded by the fact Clinton has experienced many disasters in the area of foreign policy. Proof of this being Benghazi, spying on the entire United Nations and getting caught while doing so, trying to illegally obtain the medical records of former Argentinean President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner and the illegal private email server scandal she is currently under criminal investigation for at the FBI.

RELATED ARTICLE

Presidential Poll: Americans Believe Donald Trump Would Handle The Economy Better Than Hillary Clinton

World Leaders Blaming Obama For Brexit

Barack Obama
 

World leaders, political pundits and journalists are blaming President Barack Obama for Brexit. In the April 25, 2016 article "British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit" the Judiciary Report warned that Obama flying to Britain and arrogantly threatening journalists and the British public to vote to remain in the European Union (EU) or else he would take negative action against the United Kingdom, was a bad idea. I don’t know what possessed him to do it. 

If a foreign leader flew into Washington and in a televised address began threatening Americans to vote how he says or he will punish the United States, it would go over horribly and rightly so. As a world leader you can’t go into other people’s countries browbeating and bullying them into doing your will. 

Rumors are rife in European political circles that heads of state and party politicians in the EU are squarely blaming Obama’s arrogance during the aforementioned trip to London, England for the British people voting against remaining in the European Union. Obama needs to stop asking others to do things he would not, because in America there is an appropriate rule that immigrants cannot get benefits for 4-years. During Bill Clinton’s time, he also reformed the welfare system regarding Americans and immigrants, in a way that helped to tame the nation’s finances.

A nation’s finances does not work by magic. Impractical and or excessive spending can cause any nation of the world to collapse. When a nation collapses it is not pretty - it leads to widespread poverty, social unrest and increased crime levels. It is a scenario to be avoided through proper financial, legal and social management. 

One of the biggest, richest and most influential nations in the EU, Germany, did not want to lose Britain from the European Union, as both nations have been paying a massive amount of their taxpayers money to help support the collective of nations. With Britain gone from the EU, Germany will have to do significantly more, as they have the most money and manpower. 

Considering Germany has already taken in 1,000,000 non-German speaking migrants who will need food, clothes, shelter and jobs, as well as the nation giving billions to the European Union, I hope their economy and tax coffers can sustain such a massive commitment. Germany is a strong and industrious country, but they are being stretched to the limit as well. German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, publicly stated she is in no rush to usher Britain out of the European Union, referring to the United Kingdom as a partner. Britain and Germany have done great business together. So have Britain and France and Spain, among others. 

British Prime Minister, David Cameron, bent over backwards to accommodate the EU. Britain gave 19 billion pounds per year and allowed millions of immigrants from the European Union into the United Kingdom. However, I do believe he sensed public dissatisfaction in the number of immigrants from the European Union and the issues it created with overcrowding in classrooms, the strain on the NHS and heavy demand on the benefits system. 

Last year I read a report stating Cameron was trying to negotiate a deal with the EU, stipulating immigrants could not apply for financial and housing benefits for four years after coming to Britain (it’s the same rule in America, which is not apart of the EU). The EU (headquartered in Brussels, Belgium) should have approved Cameron’s request if they wanted Britain to remain in the European Union. This was the major sticking point for the British public, Cameron tried to fix it, but the EU did not embrace it. 

British Home Secretary, Theresa May, also tried a last ditch attempt at fixing the issue. Last year May stated on British television that the government would like to implement a rule that stipulates immigrants coming to Britain should have a job lined up and financial means of support. Once again, the EU did not embrace it. 

History has repeatedly shown for centuries that when one is involved in politics, one must listen to and correctly gauge public sentiment. Never ignore public discontent. Look what it turned into for so many world leaders throughout time who refused the will of the people. The European Union lost the British people’s vote for this reason. 

Let’s be reasonable, millions of people from other parts of the European Union were emptying out into Britain, a nation that received an enormous amount of mass immigration. There should have been rules to assure immigration was done in a more controlled manner, to prevent any EU nation from breaking under the strain of immigration. However, the European Union rejected it.

From 2009 the Judiciary Report sensed public discontent in Britain regarding immigrants coming to the UK and immediately getting sizeable financial and housing benefits ( and ). The Judiciary Report made suggestions on how to reform the benefits system as the issue was turning into a powder keg for Britons, who felt they were being taken advantage of by immigrants. 

David Cameron

Once again, it wasn’t a matter of racism or xenophobia, as many of the immigrants from the European Union are white and many Brits have married them, but Britons losing benefits while seeing immigrants living very comfortably and in some cases lavishly off state money, due to the British government wanting to be hospitable in fulfilling their role in the EU and to political refugees seeking asylum, did a significant amount of political damage to the European Union’s cause. 

At the end of the day, some able bodied people would not work realizing they could just leave other parts of the European Union and plead poverty in Britain, then receive sizeable cash and housing benefits. Meanwhile, Brits born and raised in the United Kingdom, who have been working long hours for years, were not eligible for benefits (as in all countries with a benefits system, it is for the needy). Be honest, how would you feel if that happened in your country. 

Not everyone did this, as there are many French, Polish, German and Middle Eastern corner shops, phone stores, computer stores and clothing businesses I have bought goods and services from in Britain, run by hardworking immigrants, who work from sun up to sun down. However, let’s be honest, there are some immigrants that have been taking advantage of the British benefits system and this is what created the discontent among natives. 

To the Brits on the trains who get up early to go to work in business offices, stores, restaurants and on construction sites, among other places, it pained them that they have been working so hard, only to see immigrants claiming poverty getting generous financial and housing benefits (as seen in the newspapers). Some immigrants needed to understand that benefits are supposed to be within reason and for people who are sick, disabled or truly can’t find work, to stop them from becoming destitute and homeless. 

Newspapers such as the Daily Mail and the Mirror among others, began running credible stories showing immigrants who came to Britain and immediately got big benefits to the point they lived in middle class and upper class homes with multiple flat screen televisions, leather furniture, designer clothes and luxury shoes. They took advantage of the system due to their family size. The more family members and children you have in one household, the more benefits you receive and the bigger the property you will be housed in, all underwritten by the taxpayers. 

British homes are very nice and the bigger the house, the more lavish its appointments will be. Local councils had difficulty finding larger homes in more moderately priced areas of London, so big immigrant families ended up housed next to high earning judges and doctors. 

This is why in 2009 the Judiciary Report suggested the government house immigrants in places like the home counties, where there are big homes in nice neighborhoods at lower prices (Britain's Benefits). Surrey, England is nice and affordable. However, some immigrants registered for benefits in London, England, wanting to be in the heart of the fabulous capital and this is where another problem occurred for the government. 

The new rule should be immigrants applying for benefits are automatically housed in the home counties, because large London homes for big families is too expensive for the taxpayers to underwrite in benefits cases. There are many hardworking Britons in the home counties, who live in nice homes and travel to London via train for work or to enjoy the many activities in the capital. It’s workable. At the end of the day, as an immigrant, someone is giving you a chance at a new life. Be understanding, take the opportunity and make the most of it.

HERE ARE A FEW ITEMS FROM SOCIAL NETWORKING REGARDING OBAMA AND BREXIT:

 

STORY SOURCE

 Nigel Farage: Britons voted for Brexit because Obama told them not to
 

June 24, 2016, 12:01 pm - A leading figure in the British push to exit the European Union says President Obama accidentally helped the Brexit cause. Nigel Farage on Friday said Obama's calls for the United Kingdom to stay in the EU caused people to vote to leave. “Threatening people too much insults their intelligence,” the United Kingdom Independence Party head said. 

“A lot of people in Britain said, ‘How dare the American president come here and tell us what to do?’ ” Farage continued on Sirius XM’s “Breitbart News Daily,” citing Obama’s U.K. trip in April. “It backfired. We got an Obama-Brexit bounce, because people do not want foreign leaders telling them how to think and vote.” 

Obama warned Britain against leaving the EU during a visit in April, saying it could hurt potential trade deals with the U.S. “The U.K. is going to be in the back of the queue,” he said during an appearance alongside Cameron. “Not because we don’t have a special relationship but because given the heavy lift of any trade agreement, us having access to a big market with a lot of countries rather than trying to do piecemeal trade agreements is hugely inefficient.” 

Donald Trump on Friday mocked Obama for being on the losing side in the Brexit vote. “The world doesn’t listen to him,” the presumptive GOP presidential nominee said during a press conference in Turnberry, Scotland. Trump said he wholeheartedly backed Britain’s decision to leave the EU and once again forge its own path. “You just have to embrace it,” he said. "It’s the will of the people. What happened should have happened, and they’ll be stronger for it.” 

Farage on Friday said Britain’s exit from the EU could ultimately jeopardize the organization’s existence. “I think we’ve changed not just the future of British history, I’m sure the European Union project itself will come tumbling down. People power can beat the establishment if they try hard enough."...

http://thehill.com

Obama’s credibility takes a beating after Brexit vote

June 24, 2016 | 11:21pm President Obama ate a serving of humble pie Friday after Britain ignored his advice and voted to leave the European Union. “Yesterday’s vote speaks to the ongoing changes and challenges raised by globalization,” Obama said while attending a tech conference in Silicon Valley. 

“The world has shrunk. It is ­interconnected . . . It promises to bring extraordinary benefits, but it also has challenges,” Obama said. One of those challenges is to the president’s credibility, which is taking a beating after he heavily advocated for the Brits to remain in the EU. Conor McCann, a Dublin-based political-affairs analyst, wondered if Obama’s lost Europe. “Obama, with his great status in Europe — if he couldn’t sway it, it’s an indication things have changed,” McCann told Bloomberg News. 

In April, Obama traveled to the UK in part to advocate that it remain in the EU. He even threatened the UK directly, saying it would have to go to the “back of the queue” in trade negotiations with the United States because the EU is so much bigger. On Friday, the president’s language was far more deferential. “Based on our conversation, I’m confident that the UK is committed to an orderly transition out of the EU,” he said...

Presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump rubbed salt in the wound on his trip to Scotland. “A lot of people don’t like him,” Trump said of Obama. Trump, who backed the “Leave” campaign, added, “I was actually very surprised that President Obama would’ve come over here and he would’ve been so bold as to tell the people over here what to do.” 

http://nypost.com

German chancellor Angela Merkel is in no hurry to see Britain go Reuters

Jun. 25, 2016, 6:52 PM - Germany (Reuters) - German Chancellor Angela Merkel called on Saturday for clear-headed negotiations with "close partner" Britain over its departure from the European Union. Foreign ministers of the EU's six founding members had earlier said Britain should leave the bloc as soon as possible after Britons voted on Thursday to quit the 28-member bloc. However, Merkel struck a more conciliatory tone. 

"The negotiations must take place in a businesslike, good climate," Merkel said after a meeting of her conservative party in Hermannswerder, outside Potsdam, to the west of Berlin. "Britain will remain a close partner, with which we are linked economically," she said, adding that there was no hurry for Britain to invoke Article 50 of the EU treaty - the first step it must take to set in motion the exit process. 

"It should not take ages, that is true, but I would not fight now for a short time frame," Merkel said, in contrast with the more urgent call by the foreign ministers of Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg, who were meeting to the north of the German capital... 

https://www.yahoo.com

RELATED ARTICLES

British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit

British Government Addressing Affordable Housing Requests In London

Britain's Benefits Part 2

Britain's Benefits

British Government Employees Need To Quickly Move Forward After Brexit

David Cameron

To reassure Britons and consumers worldwide, the British government needs to move forward quickly after the historic Brexit vote last week, regarding leaving the European Union. Though British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has resigned stating he will leave in October 2016, he is still Britain’s leader until a suitable replacement is appointed. Therefore, Britain is not and has not been without a Prime Minister during this transition period. Britain is not without governance. 

There have been other resignations in the respective Conservative and Labour parties (mainly the latter). Those positions need to be quickly filled, to get back to the business of serving the British people. The government needs to eschew public discord and remember, “Keep calm and carry on.” 

No one in government unhappy with Brexit or anyone else outside of Britain, should act vindictively (*looks at mean spirited, threat issuing Barack "push you to the back of the trade queue" Obama, whom world leaders are blaming for Brexit*), because at the end of the day, the United Kingdom has a large, influential economy and there is money to be made in the country. Britain is still a good place to do business, as the British people are great consumers. Foreign businesses with stores/locations in Britain, such as Nandos, Pret-a-Manger, Nero and Costa (immigrant owned),  among others, are companies making big money in the United Kingdom. 

For others listening to the fear mongering, it would be unwise to pull out of Britain, one of the richest nations in the world, with a population of 60,000,000, all potential consumers for your businesses. Britain has the 5th largest economy in the world. To discount Britain would be an unwise business decision, as there are enormous sums of money that can be made in the United Kingdom. 

In the area of finance, many businesses require financing and would pay interest on loans. Parents need loans for children to go to university. Britons by food, clothes, cars and household goods. It is a very viable, big market. The sports industry is also worth a fortune in Britain.

RELATED ARTICLES

 

British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit

 

British Government Addressing Affordable Housing Requests In London

 

Britain's Benefits Part 2

 

Britain's Benefits

Britain Votes To Leave The EU

David Cameron

 

Britain has voted to leave the EU. The British people have spoken. The will of the people must be honored. Britain belongs to the British people and they get to decide what they do with it (much like in any other sovereign nation). British Prime Minister, David Cameron, has resigned after backing the failed move to remain in the EU. Cameron stated a new Prime Minister will be selected in October 2016. People online have commented that U.S. President Barack Obama’s trip to Britain a few months ago regarding remaining in the EU, did the movement more harm than good. Britons do not want to be told what to do by Obama or any other leader they did not elect.

Cameron has done good things for Britain, via austerity and proper tax collection, which helped to guide the nation out of the 2008 financial crisis that emanated from Wall Street. Financial cuts were needed and it helped to increase Britain’s fortunes. The pound has lost some of its value due to the vote to leave prevailing, but is still holding. Markets all over the world have lost some of their value as well, in what is a correction to reflect the current vote.

There is no need to panic. Britain will be just fine. The Chinese yuan is relatively low and China is still a prosperous, industrious, wealthy nation. The key to flourishing in the world is producing goods and services people want and need. Britain has many great products and services people want and need. Britain has innovative companies in the area of finances, automotive, food and clothing, among others. The Premier League is also the biggest tourist attraction in Britain bringing in 5 billion pounds annually from visitors.

Britain is one of the oldest countries in the world. It is a very nice place to live. It is peaceful and civil. It is a great country that has survived a lot throughout history. Brexit is just a hiccup. That’s not to insult the EU, as there are many great countries in it as well. I love and admire nations such as France and Spain, among others.

Some believe Britain’s vote to leave the EU was based on discontent regarding immigration levels, which have dramatically surged. With the freedom to move among the EU nations, many Britons complained that the “traffic is moving in one direction” into Britain, creating new costs the British taxpayers had to underwrite. Many members of the British public feared the country would not be able to handle the added long-term financial costs.

Britain has free healthcare via the NHS and cash benefits to those who need it. People were moving into Britain from other parts of the EU and getting free healthcare, financial benefits and council housing. No nation in the EU can afford to indefinitely accommodate the level of traffic Britain received, plus pay 12 billion pounds per year into the Union as well. One nation could not sustain that indefinitely.

No country is perfect. However, I will state this, I know Britain well and I have not found it to be a racist or xenophobic country. There are many interracial marriages in Britain. There are also many marriages in Britain among local Britons and foreigners. On the whole, Brits are very open minded people. They do try to fight racism and xenophobia within the scope of the law, using legislation and court imposed penalties. Therefore, the vote was about a financial concern of many in Britain. Based on comments I have read in the lead up to the vote, I think the biggest gripe of the British people is the sum of money the country has been paying to the EU.

At the end of the day, the British people have the right to determine the future they want for their nation. That’s how democracy works. It is nice to see that though many in the British government wanted to remain in the EU, the vote wasn’t rigged.

The British people need to work together for a great future for Britain. Even if the vote did not go how you wanted it to, you still have a great country worth treasuring and preserving. Therefore, stand together and make things work. Invest in your country and the nation’s future.

RELATED ARTICLES

British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit

British Government Addressing Affordable Housing Requests In London

Britain's Benefits Part 2

Britain's Benefits

British And American Journalists Call President Obama A ‘Hypocrite’ For Meddling In Brexit

U.S. President Barack Obama

Journalists in Britain and America are slamming U.S. President, Barack Obama, labeling him a hypocrite, for going to London, England and interfering in Brexit. Britain is contemplating leaving the European Union (EU), a move endorsed by the mayor of London, Boris Johnson, but opposed by the prime minister, David Cameron. This potential departure is known as Brexit. 

Obama imperialistically began meddling in the issue, prompting over two dozen British lawmakers in Parliament to sign a petition demanding he stay out of it. The British public has not taken kindly to Obama’s meddling either, as a host of comments reflecting their displeasure at him wading into the issue and telling people what to do, has been posted on numerous websites’ feedback sections. 

Obama then flew to London last week and publicly claimed it is up to the British voters to make the decision on whether to stay in the European Unopm. Then, for over 25-minutes rambled on during a press conference as to why Britain must not leave the European Union. Obama also issued threats against Britain regarding delaying a trade deal 10-years if they leave the European Union. Reporters who were present immediately chastised Obama for meddling in Brexit once again. 

U.S. President Barack Obama and U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron

Last week Boris Johnson accused Obama of being anti-British, as he is half Kenyan and has been raised by his father, the late Barack Obama Sr., to resent the nation due to the days of colonialism. Some gasped at the suggestion by Johnson, but it’s not exactly a secret. I wrote about it a month ago as well. Some accused Johnson of “dog whistle racism” but I am black and stated the same thing a month ago, as Obama has engaged in actions that are not in the best interests of the British people.

There are books and articles that discuss Obama’s disdain for Britain due to the hatred his anti-colonialism, Kenyan father engrained in him. Obama’s grandfather had been arrested and tortured under British rule in Kenya, for engaging in actions against the ruling government and due to that Obama was trained to hate Britain. 

As mentioned previously on the site, in what was taken from mainstream press reports, when Obama took office in 2009, he was barely able to contain his contempt for Britain, rudely removing the Churchill bust from the White House’s oval office and according to well publicized reports, sending it back, though it was a gift to America from the British people. 

Obama has been trying to make Britain pay for what happened to his grandfather, which is irrational. Modern Britons have nothing to do with it. To want innocent people punished for the sins of one’s ancestors is wrong. 

STORY SOURCE

Obama shamelessly wades into Brexit row and uses WORLD WAR TWO to say UK should STAY in EU

PUBLISHED: 03:00, Fri, Apr 22, 2016 | UPDATED: 17:52, Fri, Apr 22, 2016 - BRAZEN Barack Obama has controversially used the sacrifice of the Allies soldiers during the Second World War as a “breathtaking” tool to argue to remain in the European Union (EU). The US President waded into the heated EU referendum debate on his arrival in Britain last night for a brief visit including talks with David Cameron and a lunch with the Queen. 

The pro-EU supporter faced a stiff backlash from Brexit campaigners who told him to "butt out" of the debate he is quickly making “deeply anti-democratic”. Mr Obama highlighted the special relationship between his country and the UK "forged as we spilled blood together on the battlefield". Barack Obama said the sacrifice of his country’s soldiers during the Second World War meant America has a stake in the referendum debate. 

The emotional appeal invoked the spectre of the battlefield and described how the EU was formed from "the ashes of war to sustain a prosperous peace". Boris Johnson slammed the comments by the US president. He said the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans in the battles to liberate Europe against Nazi Germany showed the strength of the ties between the transatlantic continents. 

Writing in the Telegraph he said: "I will say, with the candour of a friend, that the outcome of your decision is a matter of deep interest to the United States. "The tens of thousands of Americans who rest in Europe's cemeteries are a silent testament to just how intertwined our prosperity and security truly are. And the path you choose now will echo in the prospects of today's generation of Americans as well."

http://www.express.co.uk

Brexit hypocrite: Remember when Obama accused Netanyahu of meddling in America’s affairs?

Posted at 9:33 am on April 23, 2016 - As President Obama stirs controversy across the Atlantic by threatening Great Britain if the British people vote to divorce themselves from the European Union, it’s instructive to look back at the president’s reaction when a foreign leader came here to America to voice his concerns over one of his policies. Last night the president warned that the UK would be left “at the back of the queue” on trade deals if they went forward with the Brexit initiative slated for a June 23rd referendum. 

The rather undiplomatic threat was met with derision by those in Britian supporting the exit plan: Justice Minister Dominic Raab led an angry backlash against Mr Obama as the Leave campaign tried to shift the emphasis to immigration. He said: “This is really about a lame duck US president about to move off the stage doing an old British friend a favour. I have got no doubt that future US trade negotiators are going to look to other opportunities – I think the British will be first in the queue, not at the back of the queue.”

http://hotair.com

Hypocrite Obama needs to mind his own business

PUBLISHED: 00:01, Mon, Apr 18, 2016 - Yesterday Chris Grayling hit out at Barack Obama’s support for Britain’s EU membership saying that the US president “doesn’t understand” the nature of our relationship with Brussels. What is certain is that America would never accept the strictures currently placed upon Britain as a condition of our membership. America is a country that jealously guards its own sovereignty. 

Indeed, presidents have in the past refused to sign a number of international treaties because of a real or perceived threat to their nation’s right to govern itself. The idea that Mr Obama would put up with an arrangement that enforced open borders with Mexico, gave a court in Canada jurisdiction over the US and allowed foreign bureaucrats to override American laws is absurd. 

http://www.express.co.uk

RELATED ARTICLE

Barack Obama Curses And Slams British Prime Minister David Cameron As 'Distracted' But He Is The Biggest Distraction Of All