Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label privacy. Show all posts

Friday, March 25, 2016

Jury Awards Hulk Hogan $25 Million More In Damages In Gawker Secret Sex Tape Case As Editor Reveals He Would Publish Child Porn On The Site


Hulk Hogan

Last week a Florida jury awarded wrestler Hulk Hogan $115,000,000 in a leaked sex tape case he filed against the Gawker website. Gawker, owned by Nick Denton, was given a secretly filmed sex tape of Hogan, shot without his permission or that of his sex partner. Gawker lawlessly decided to publish the voyeuristic tape and was hit with a $100,000,000 lawsuit for this misconduct. The jury has now awarded Hogan an additional $25,000,000 in damages. Jurors revealed seeing the tape during trial made up their minds to throw the book at Gawker for this egregious misconduct. 


Heather Clem
 
The jury's verdict in this case and others, such as Erin Andrews v. Marriott Hotels and separately Lastonia Leviston v. 50 Cent, is the American people sending the media and Hollywood a clear message that the public is not agreement with secretly spying on people in their homes, hotels and public toilets - and to make it worse, publishing the contents of the illegal voyeurism. The media and Hollywood are in their own world where anything goes, but the American public and the world as a whole are not in agreement with this perversion that is criminally violating people's rights to privacy.


Gawker owner Nick Denton and his boyfriend/civil partner
 
What's also alarming is Gawker's editor, A.J. Daulerio stating celebrity sex tapes are newsworthy, meaning they should be made public with or without the subject's consent. When asked what would constitute going too far, Daulerio answered, "If they were a child." Hogan's attorney asked "Under what age" to which Daulerio perversely and troubling replied "Four." That means Gawker would publish child porn if the subject is 5-years old and up. These are the kind of perverts Gawker has on staff. Is there any wonder those perverts at Gawker gleefully and illegally published the secretly filmed Hogan sex tape. 


Gawker's A.J. Daulerio
 
The whole thing is sick, stomach turning and deserves to be slapped down in every legal venue possible. Adults and separately children's rights are being violated, by perverts who are deviants and sexual predators desperate and hard up for any form of sexual stimulation they can find. This is not legal porn where of age actors are paid and know they are being filmed. This is secretly watching and filming people in private places, such as their bedrooms, hotel rooms and public toilets and it has to stop. It's disgusting, sick and denotes serious mental problems in people engaging in this criminal behavior. Anyone engaging in such depraved behavior belongs in a mental institution, as they are a danger to the public.

STORY SOURCE
 
Where Gawker editor draws the line: A sex-tape of a 4-year-old
 
March 9, 2016 | 11:29am - Jurors in Hulk Hogan’s sex video trial on Wednesday heard a videotaped deposition of Gawker’s former editor in chief — saying he’d draw the line at posting the sex tape of a celebrity who is under 4 years old. A.J. Daulerio, 41, was sitting ramrod straight in the Florida courtroom during the awkward moment when he was asked on video by Hogan’s lawyer, “Can you imagine a situation where a celebrity sex tape would not be newsworthy?” 

Daulerio answered flatly, “If they were a child.” 

“Under what age?” attorney Charles Harder asked. 

“Four,” he said. 

“No four-year-old sex tapes, OK,” Harder said...  


Hulk Hogan jurors said seeing Gawker sex tape solidified their decision to award wrestler more than $100m including ANOTHER $25m in punitive damages 

Published: 22:40 EST, 21 March 2016 | Updated: 01:09 EST, 22 March 2016 - The jurors in the Hulk Hogan sex tape case against Gawker said seeing the video 'solidified' their decision to hand the wrestler the winning verdict. Salina Stevens, a 35-year-old college-campus safety agent from St. Petersburg, Florida, told reporters once she saw the video she knew Hogan's privacy had been violated. 

'The video was worse than I expected in some ways. 'Not so much the sex part of it but just the conversation. 'I just feel like if he knew that he was being videotaped, he would not have spoke about the things he spoke about,' Salina said. She said the conversation between Hogan and the woman in the video was 'very human' and proved to her the wrestler didn't know he was being recorded. 

'I understand that we have a First Amendment, and I stand behind the First Amendment but I don’t want that to be used improperly. 'I think that it is used improperly way too often, and we also have privacy laws, and I hope those will be taken into more consideration when stories are being ran,’ Salina said. 

Hogan was awarded an additional $25million in punitive damages - three days after the jury ruled in his favor with a $115million judgment. That $25million will be covered by both the site and its owner Nick Denton, who jurors ordered to pay $10million of the punitive damages out of his own pocket. The jury's decision came just hours after Judge Pamela Campbell informed the four women and two men deciding the case that Denton is worth $121million while the site is valued at $83million. 

Judge Campbell also informed the jury that the former editor of the site who posted the video, 41-year-old AJ Daulerio, has no assets and owes $27,000 in student loans. He was hit even harder than Denton by jurors Monday, who ordered him to pay $100,000 of his own money despite being told about his financial status earlier in the day...

Tuesday, December 22, 2015

Republicans Vowing To Repeal All Of President Obama Policies When He Leaves Office (Including ObamaCare)


U.S. President Barack Obama

Republican rivals of Democrat, President Barack Obama, are vowing to repeal all he did while in office, after his term expires. The biggest piece of legislation that was rammed through under the Obama Administration, is ObamaCare, regarding health care for Americans. The Judiciary Report has repeatedly stated in the past that America needs a healthcare program, but ObamaCare is not it.

Things have gotten so bad under ObamaCare doctors' offices are turning patients away after they've shown up for appointments, stating all the voluminous paperwork has not been completed. Hospitals and physical rehabilitation facilities are also denying ObamaCare patients admittance, demanding doctors scrap vital post surgical care, resulting in the deaths of many people due to complications tied to recovering at home without medical supervision.

STORY SOURCE

Cheer Up, Obama’s Legacy Can Be Erased

The White House rammed through an agenda that could be quickly undone by a Republican president

Dec. 20, 2015 4:06 p.m. ET - President Obama seems to aspire to join Franklin Roosevelt and Ronald Reagan as one of the three most transformative presidents of the past hundred years, and by all outward signs he has achieved that goal. But while Roosevelt and Reagan sold their programs to the American people and enacted them with bipartisan support, Mr. Obama jammed his partisan agenda down the public's throat...


RELATED ARTICLES







Tuesday, March 3, 2015

Ebola Nurse Sues Texas Hospital For Negligence And Violating Her Privacy


President Barack Obama and nurse Nina Pham

Texas Health Presbyterian hospital has been sued by nurse, Nina Pham, who contracted the Ebola virus while on the job. Pham has sued her former employer for negligence, in not properly training staff, as well as releasing a video of her in quarantine, without her consent. The video was played all over the world, violating Pham’s privacy and image rights. Pham was also invited to meet President Obama, after her ordeal.

Saturday, March 8, 2014

Select Members Of The Press Want Video Of Justin Bieber’s Penis Released And A Miami Judge Says…

No!


The press took the Miami Police to court demanding the release of full length jail videos of 20-year-old pop superstar Justin Bieber, after he was arrested for DUI, reckless driving and drag racing. Some of the videos in question of the singer’s brief incarceration involve Bieber urinating and in various states of undress. The press stated it is of public importance and they have a right to know. However, the Judiciary Report disagrees and sides with the judge in the case, who refused to permit the full release of all the video footage. 

Bieber, just like anyone else in this world, has what is known as a “right to privacy.” In many situations, the law stipulates a right to privacy is to be expected. Translation, Bieber’s penis is no one’s business but his own. It is voyeuristic to want to see someone in states of undress and or naked without their consent. In closing, leave Bieber’s wee wee alone (LOL)!

Friday, March 7, 2014

The Benefits And Drawbacks Of High Profile Relationships


Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber

Some people love high profile relationships. They are reported on by the press and blogosphere, creating publicity that is sometimes of a good nature. However, some of the publicity that comes with a high profile relationship is negative. The least little problem is blown out of proportion. People make up lies about things that allegedly happened behind closed doors. Then there are the women who decide they want to make trouble and publicly go after the famous male in the couple, in conduct that is disgraceful.

High profile relationships look stressful. I would not want the attention, but sometimes women fall in love with someone who is famous and decide it is worth the risks. As a writer/blogger, I know what can happen when someone decides to write items for site views, omitting the truth. I don’t do that, as I believe in writing the truth, but I’ve seen others flat-out lie for site views.

If I was seen kissing a famous man and asked about it, I would be like, “I was giving him CPR! Mind your business!” (I’m just kidding). Seriously, people should be careful what elements of their lives they make known to the press and on social networking. You may see it as being free and open, but not everyone has good intentions seeing it as a challenge to wreak havoc in your life.

Monday, August 12, 2013

President Obama Talks Transparency But Is He Living Up To His Word


 


Barack Obama

Due to the Edward Snowden leaks regarding the illegal NSA program PRISM, being used by the Obama Administration to spy on innocent people, President Obama is promising transparency in government. 

However, Obama made this same promise in 2009 and as you can see, PRISM went full throttle after that.
I would like to take the President at his word, but sadly I and many others know better and all too well, as we have seen his administration engage in brazen cover-ups of government wrongdoing and criminal activity, from Fast and Furious to Benghazi.

On a personal level, I have witness Obama's DOJ and FBI illegally hide and withhold FOIA documents that to this day the are unlawfully refusing to release in violation of the Freedom of Information Act enacted by Congress.

The Judiciary Report must ask, Congress, what was the sense of enacting the Freedom of Information Act when you have agencies like the FBI arrogantly and disrespectfully spitting on people like me and organizations like the ACLU and EFF, who legally and properly demand documents under the Act, only to be sent pages of redacted information not revealing anything.

Some individuals and organizations are reporting receiving the equivalent of blank pages from the FBI in response to Freedom of Information Act requests. This kind of immature, unprofessional conduct should not come from any entity claiming to be attached to a democratic government. It is disgraceful and a mockery of democracy. At the end of the day, accountability and oversight are supposed to come from Congress on these matters and the legislature is failing in this regard.

In closing, due to the ongoing FOIA misconduct many people like myself and the aforementioned organizations are experiencing, I do not believe the Obama Administration's promises of transparency and you the public should not be taken in by them either, as they do not deserve your trust and will let you down...again.

Monday, July 9, 2012

FBI Being Given New Authority To Spy On You On Social Networking Website


Department of Justice Attorney General, Eric Holder and FBI Director, Robert S. Mueller. The Department of Justice is the parent agency of the FBI. 

The U.S. Congress has given the privacy invading, lawbreaking FBI even more authority, issuing them billions to spy on you on social networking websites such as Twitter and Facebook. It will become a matter of law (the FBI was illegally doing it for quite some time) and as with all tools Congress gives the FBI regarding your privacy, look for it to be severely abused.

There is no such thing as privacy in America anymore, thanks to the FBI and its parent agency, the DOJ. America has officially become a police state, where civil liberties are gone, in a massive power grab that is destroying the people's rights.

Thursday, June 9, 2011

How To Protect Yourself From Being Spied On In Your Home Through Your Webcam Or Mobile Phone

This is a continuation of the article Leading Rental Company Facing Lawsuit For Spying On People In Their Homes Through Their Laptops, which focused on the terrible act of invasion of privacy, targeting people in their very homes. There are videos online, such as the two in this article, that address the problem and give you tips on how to protect yourself and your family.

There are other methods criminals are employing of spying on others, which are more technically advanced and as such, not mentioned in the aforementioned videos. However, said invasive methods would require police intervention to bring it to a halt, against innocent members of the public. But for the most part, the two videos in this article cover most of the ways one can protect one's privacy.

RELATED ARTICLES

Leading Rental Company Facing Lawsuit For Spying On People In Their Homes Through Their Laptops

Truth Comes Out In School Webcam Spying Case

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Monday, July 27, 2009

Celebrity Prescriptions

Michael Jackson

Considering the nature of the often intrusive press and violations of patient confidentiality that have occurred, why is there not a service for celebrities, politicians and other well-known individuals, to discreetly obtain their prescription medication, even by mail.

They should be able to do so anonymously, via a computer system, that generates prescriptions by a customer number instead of by customer name.

Some famous people have social diseases such as Herpes, which they find embarrassing and do not wish to have a local pharmacy staff knowing their business that could end up in the tabloids or on the blogs.

Similarly, some have sad diseases such as cancer or AIDS and want to keep their health battle private.

The computer system could have safeguards to insure the same celebrity does not abuse meds, such as painkillers or any other potent drug, via receiving an excessive amount thereof, well over the recommended dosage.

In the medical field, privacy is paramount, but some unscrupulous individuals toss that out the window for a quick buck.