Showing posts with label Madoff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Madoff. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Madonna's Underage Son Has Been Drinking And Doing Drugs With Homeless People


Madonna posted a video for the mannequin challenge looking like a deranged lunatic. Her son slammed the crazy looking video on Instagram stating, "I'm glad I don't live there anymore."

As a result of Madonna’s terrible parenting, her 16-year-old son Rocco Ritchie, has spent the past year doing drugs and drinking with homeless people and drug dealers. The negative effects of living with a deranged, evil, abusive mother, has resulted in drug addiction and alcoholism to numb the pain.

Madonna's son has learning disabilities, as does his dad, Guy Ritchie. Madonna's son has repeatedly been frustrated by her cruel and evil behavior via acts such as publicly shaming him on social networking in stating he has no penis, mocking his learning disabilities, as well as repeatedly belittling his dad whom she calls "retar*ed" and "stupid" and "motherf**ker." 


Madonna's son slams her on Instagram after she posts crazy video that is her insane take on the mannequin challenge

It doesn’t help that based on blog reports and items on social networking, Madonna insanely did drugs with her children and drank alcohol with them as well, encouraging this destructive behavior. Most people’s children love them. However, with Madonna it is clear her children despise and hate her. Madonna’s children behave as though they've been held hostage by a madwoman and had to flee the insane asylum that is her home. 

After his drug arrest in London last week, Madonna’s son took to social networking and stated of an item his insidious mother posted on Instagram, “So glad I don’t live there anymore.” The comment has since been deleted, as some of crazy Madonna’s crazy fans began harassing him on Instagram, prompting him to block them. Why is it some people online take it upon themselves to disgracefully search out and harass people’s family members on social networking. What kind of crazy behavior is that. 


Madonna's underage son doing drugs and drinking alcohol under a bridge in London with homeless people in April 2015 at age 15

As the phrase goes, "You reap what you sow." It is quite ironic how lecherous Madonna sought out, hounded, harassed and corrupted the minds and lives of then young, up and coming stars, such as Britney Spears, Lindsay Lohan, Amanda Bynes and Chris Brown, for her Kabbalah cult, extracting money from them for the sect (that misused it) and leeching off their newly found popularity, hoping to inject life into her faded, dying career.
 
Said young stars became violent, agitated, clinically depressed and mentally ill from the sect's abusive behavior and brainwashing, to the point they became drug addicts and alcoholics roaming the streets in a despondent, troubled manner (said stars have all been ruled mentally ill by the courts, via psychologists' mental evaluations and subsequent reports). Now the same has befallen Madonna's children Rocco in London and daughter Lourdes in New York, who are now addicts as well, who repeatedly roam the streets looking troubled, despondent and high. The same thing has befallen Madonna's children, just like all the young lives she ruined with her madness in that cult.

 
A photo of police arresting Madonna's son for drug possession

It also reminds me of Bernard Madoff (and as many of my longtime readers know, I have referred to Madonna as the music industry's Madoff, as she's stolen everything she has in her possession). Madoff callously and gleefully stole billions of dollars from innocent people and squandered the money on luxury living. When the truth came out that he was running a ponzi scheme, two investors committed suicide.

Madoff expressed no remorse over their deaths or any of the thefts, bragging and smirking that his victims deserved to be robbed. Madoff was prosecuted and sentenced to life in prison. Madoff's son, so humiliated and despondent by the public shame and hatred his father had brought on them by stealing, committed suicide and in the presence of his small son. Just as Madoff had driven two investigators to suicide via his actions, the same thing befell his son. 
 
STORY SOURCE

Madonna's son Rocco takes a swipe at his mum's mannequin challenge as he states he's 'glad he doesn't live with her' amid his drugs scandal 

Published: 07:44 EST, 27 November 2016 | Updated: 08:23 EST, 28 November 2016 - Rocco Ritchie has publicly announced how happy he is that he no longer lives with his mother, Madonna. In an Instagram post which has since been deleted, the 16-year-old made a comment about Madonna's recent video completing the mannequin challenge around a dinner table with friends. 

'So glad I don't live there anymore,' came Rocco's cutting remark. Rocco doesn't live here anymore! Madonna's son takes a pop at his mother's mannequin challenge announcing he's 'glad he doesn't live with her' amid drugs scandal. Cutting: Rocco Ritchie has publicly announced how happy he is that he no longer lives with his mother, Madonna.

This sparked a series of Madonna's fans to contact him via the social networking site, in an attempt to reach out to the troubled teen. When the fans asked why he was making unkind remarks, saying to him that the dinner 'looked like a lot of fun', he replied with laughing emojis. He then proceeded to block said fans, after which he removed his comment; the original video has also since been removed.

Tough time: Rocco, 16, whose mother is Madonna, was arrested after neighbours reportedly saw him 'smoking or doing drugs' and called the police. The bitter remark comes amid Rocco's arrest on suspicion of cannabis possession last week. Although the mother and son relationship has been fraught of late, with Rocco claiming he would rather live with film director father Guy Ritchie in London, the pair had seemingly reconnected. This social media exchange suggests the contrary, however... 


RELATED ARTICLES
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, January 30, 2016

Jay Z Lies In New York Post Article About Samsung Paying Rihanna And Roc Nation $25,000,000 For Tour

 

Rihanna

An article recently appeared in the New York Post claiming electronics company Samsung is on the verge of agreeing to pay singer Rihanna $25,000,000 for her upcoming tour sponsorship. The story was placed by Rihanna's management and new record label Roc Nation. However, the truth of the matter is Samsung didn't even pay half that figure. Samsung agreed to buy 1,000,000 copies of Rihanna's flopped "Anti" album for $1 a piece, which Billboard is refusing to count for chart inclusion, as the copies were not sold.

Samsung agreed to $5,000,000 in tour sponsorship and some of the costs are recoupable against ticket sales. If the tour bombs, as past tours have done, leaving Rihanna in the red (at one point Rihanna only had $20,000 in her bank account) Samsung will see no return on their investment, which will anger shareholders.

Considering Samsung hit a sales decline in the past two years, as reported in various stock market news outlets, they do not have $25,000,000 to throw around. The shareholders would be livid. Previously, Samsung agreed to buy 1,000,000 copies of Jay Z's flopped "Holy Grail" album that contained many copyright infringing songs. Jay Z's Samsung deal was worth approximately $2,500,000, but had deductions and failed to give Samsung an earnings boost. After taxes and associated fees, the deal did not create much revenue for Jay Z and did nothing for Samsung.


Jay Z

Rihanna is going on tour this summer because she needs the money. She has lost endorsements from Cover Girl and Nivea over her foul image. Rihanna and Jay Z need to be careful about releasing false figures, as others will expect the same money from Samsung in sponsorship deals and cancel when they do not get it. They are doing Samsung no favors with this madness in trying to appear like they are making a fortune.

Not to mention, Samsung also has to answer to shareholders, who will be none too pleased. Rihanna and Jay Z also need to be careful regarding fake figures, as financial records are often subpoenaed in copyright infringement lawsuits and the truth will come out in that manner. 

Jay Z and Rihanna, who are in the so-called Hollywood "Illuminati" (Kabbalah) are mimicking the crazy conduct of the head of the cult, Madonna. She repeatedly leaked false endorsement figures to inflate her image and net worth. For example, Madonna publicly bragged in articles and press releases that Microsoft paid her "$10,000,000" for a sponsorship deal, which prompted the company to come forward and say not even close and they paid her nowhere near that figure.


Jay Z and Rihanna

Greatly exaggerating figures is also a method employed by Def Jam's Russell Simmons, who Jay Z publicly claimed encouraged him to do the same. Jay Z lied that his former company, Rocafella, built on drug money from dealing crack cocaine to adults and children on the East Coast of America, was worth $125,000,000. However, an audit and company evaluation commissioned by a prospective buyer revealed it was barely worth $25,000,000.

It is a federal crime in America to falsify the worth of companies and financial endeavors, as it deceives and defrauds existing shareholders and will do the same regarding members of the public, who seek to potentially invest their money. Real business people do not conduct their financial dealings in such a disgraceful manner. Only con artists, ponzi schemers and scammers do such things.

Side Bar: another item of note is due to Rihanna's foul behavior, she could find herself in the same situation cyclist Lance Armstrong did, where sponsor, the U.S. Postal Service, sued via the U.S. Justice Department, to recover sponsorship money they gave him, when the truth came out about his illegal, cheating conduct (steroids). Rihanna, Jay Z and Madonna are the music industry's equivalent of Lance Armstrong (or the financial equivalent of  Bernard Madoff) due to mass criminal copyright infringement and other commissioned crimes they have been committing sure to taint any brand they are associated with. Any company that inks a deal with the aforementioned criminal entertainers would do well to beware, as there will be far reaching, long lasting financial and social consequences for it. 

STORY SOURCE

Rihanna inks $25M sponsorship deal with Samsung

October 29, 2015 | 11:24am - South Korean electronics giant Samsung has reached an unprecedented $25 million deal to sponsor Rihanna’s upcoming album and tour, The Post has learned. Rihanna, known for hit songs such as “Umbrella” and “Rude Boy,” is signed to Roc Nation, run by rap mogul Jay Z, who has had a long and profitable relationship with Samsung.

The Rihanna deal follows seven months of talks and is the biggest music-marketing tie-up in recent memory. Hammering out the details took longer than expected in part because Rihanna made some last-minute tweaks to the album, sources said. Samsung couldn’t immediately be reached for comment, while Roc Nation declined to comment...

The company also cut a $5 million marketing deal with Jay Z’s Roc Nation in 2013, surrounding the release of the hip-hop star’s Magna Carta Holy Grail album, according to reports. In exchange for a $5 million check, Jay Z provided Samsung 1 million copies of the album to be downloaded on the company’s new Galaxy SIII and other devices...

The deal is bad news for marketers, said one source, noting that few have pockets deep enough to afford such multi-million dollar global tie-ups. “No-one wants to have $25 million deals in the market place,” said a source. But event sponsorship is a huge growth area. IEG notes that spending in the space will rise 5 percent in 2015 to $1.4 billion.


RELATED ARTICLES
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 7, 2016

Madonna Steals More Copyrights Ripping Off The Works Of Artist Danny Quirk For Her Flopped 'Rebel Heart' CD



Mad-onna

 Nasty, evil, abusive Madonna, the biggest fraud in entertainment history is at it again, stealing copyrights from everyone for her fake career built on lies, deceit and theft. Not only has Madonna stolen preexisting copyrighted songs from my Library of Congress registered catalogue of works, she stole Charlotte Church's album cover from the multi-platinum hit album "Tissues And Issues" and has illegally taken the works of artist, Danny Quirk (see examples below).

Madonna likes to claim she is the queen of reinvention and everything she releases contains new, fresh items she has come up with, which is a complete and utter lie. The songs Madonna stole from me for 2015's "Rebel Heart" CD have been registered with the Library of Congress for approximately 10-years and the CD cover she ripped off from Charlotte Church is from 2005. There's nothing new or inventive about Madonna. From the very first song she releases, it has all been other people's preexisting copyrighted works she stole. Madonna is the entertainment industry's Madoff.

Charlotte Church 2005:


Madonna 2015:
Madonna is being slammed all over the internet for stealing preexisting photos from artist Danny Quirk for 2015's "Rebel Heart." When I did a search of my Twitter username online, listings for the Danny Quirk infringement also came up, so I decided to check it out. Quirk complained to her publicist Liz Rosenberg, who has a penchant for telling outright lies on her behalf, but nothing was done about it. Madonna continues to engage in copyright infringement. Some have brought up the "Fair Use" doctrine of the Copyright Act but are misapplying it in a severe manner.

"Fair Use" is the for purpose of teachers, schools, journalists, bloggers and the general public to "discuss" and critique items deemed "current events" without fear of Copyright Infringement. You cannot hack people's computers, copy the data and then use it, as that constitutes criminal copyright infringement, theft of trade secrets, Computer Abuse, Fraud, Conversion, Racketeering and money laundering, all very serious felonies,, both domestically and internationally.

You cannot steal someone's album cover or art work, already in the public domain (or unreleased) and use it for your own publicity photos and or album pictures, as that constitutes copyright infringement, via the illegal commercial use of other people's property. Madonna, the labels she has recorded for and their respective lawyers all know this, but Madonna is a crazy, greedy Kleptomaniac with no respect of regard for other people's rights and property.

Quirk's lawyer claims, clearly in what came from Madonna's corrupt, bribe issuing lawyer, that his work is "transformative" so they are allowed to steal it, which is a load of crap. Copyright Law and the Berne Convention make no provisions for the illegal COMMERCIAL usage of another person's works. Madonna has been illegally using Quirk's photos for her album and on tour, which clearly falls under COMMERCIAL USE. She is criminally making money from Quirk's work and collecting credit for the stolen items as well, which is foul, pathetic and vile.

 

On the right are pictures of Danny Quirk's PREEXISTING artwork. In the left are pictures of Madonna's subsequent illegal rip off of his works, forbidden under domestic and international Copyright Law and the Berne Convention. Photos have been redacted by the Judiciary Report for nudity.

All lazy, thieving, degenerate Madonna is doing is laying around on her leathery backside and stealing items from the internet, iTunes and Library of Congress for illegal use, without the knowledge or consent of the copyright owners. Radar Online already exposed the fact a leaked memo by Madonna's Kabbalah Center revealed they informed all the cult's members to steal any and all copyrights they can and repurpose the stolen materials for illegal use to make money. The New York Post also revealed Madonna's Kabbalah Center teaches members of the cult to rip off anyone they can, including the government, via financial scams, for undue enrichment.

Madonna, the Kabbalah Center and its members (both famous and non-famous) insanely seem to think pretending they do not know the original source of the stolen copyrights is a legal or ethical excuse or defense. At the end of the day, you have no business using or putting your name on something you did not author, citing "Fair Use" where it does not apply. You are a foul, disgraceful, disgusting bunch of criminals with no morals or decency, behaving like you were raised in barns and caves by animals and savages. End of story.


Mad-onna

As stated previously in the column, a songwriter who is mixed up in Kabbalah, who I will name at a later date, threw it in my face that Madonna has connections at the Library Of Congress's Copyright Office in Washington, whom she bribes for illegally made copies of the unreleased, unpublished works that have been registered by others, then she criminally uses them without permission. Madonna's Kabbalah Center hackers have also been hacking the Copyright Office.

Said songwriter in Kabbalah also threw it in my face that Madonna bribes someone at the Copyright Office to backdate her infringing rip offs of stolen copyrighted works, which all constitute a series of terrible financial crimes that are felonies (not to mention, backdating is easily unraveled in court due to a number of chronological and digital factors that cannot be changed, thus exposing the fraud).

It's disgusting that Madonna has corrupted and disgraced an entity, the Copyright Office, connected to the U.S. Congress and bearing its name. World history will not record it well. All you writers submitting works to the Copyright Office, beware. Madonna will steal your copyrights. It's disgraceful that Madonna has criminally stolen her way into history. However, it is all going to fall apart with an astonishing series of revocations and a reversal of fortune (for further reference see: Madoff).

STORY SOURCE

Did Madonna Really Steal Artwork For Her ‘Rebel Heart’ Tour?

10/05/2015 - It isn’t the first time that Madonna has been accused of stealing ideas…“Are you here to take risks?” Madonna posed this question to a packed crowd at her concert Saturday Night (October 3) in Atlanta. Apparently, she’s always up for some risk taking. On Sunday (October 4), a visual artist known as Danny Quirk Artwork posted an entry on Tumblr accusing Madonna of stealing his artwork.”

He begins, “Back in January, it came to my attention that Madonna’s social media team had been using a series of 3 images in a campaign on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram with her head superimposed on my paintings to promote her new album, “Rebel Heart”. Tsk, tsk! Meanwhile, the 18-year-old daughter of the ‘Rebel Heart’ hit-maker was in the front row at mommy’s concert with a group of her friends when she was snapped opening a chilled can of beer and chugging it. Quite the risk taker indeed.



Hypocrites: Taylor Swift and Madonna Are Shamelessly Stealing Artwork of Unknown Artists

12/21/2015 - The music world has been buzzing with plagiarism stories these days, as two of the biggest pop stars, Madonna and Taylor Swift, have been accused of ripping off several artists. Both singers have taken the work of unknown artists without permission or without giving any credit whatsoever. So, Taylor first: she stole a piece by New Orleans artist Ally Burguieres and used it to promote her latest album "1989," which sold 8.6 million copies worldwide.

You can check out Ally's open letter to Taylor at the bottom of the article. Now, Madonna: She ripped off an artist called Danny Quirk by apparently using MS Paint to paste her face on one of his pieces, and did a similar thing to Jonas Jödicke, except that face-pasting was done with a tad more taste. 

Last year, when someone stole her stuff, Madonna said that music piracy and stealing art is "artistic rape" and "a form of terrorism." Taylor on the other hand, was very vocal about how artists need to be paid and recognized. She penned an open letter to Apple Music about the whole matter, and pulled her catalog from Spotify.

And while it's obvious that there's a very strong chance that neither Madonna nor Taylor personally stole the stuff, and that it was their employees who fucked up, the whole thing makes the two ladies look quite hypocritical.



Artist Annoyed At Madonna Using His Work With No Credit Under ‘Fair Use’ 

December 19, 2015 - As artists, we find the ‘Fair Use’ doctrine to sometimes be beneficial, but sometimes to be extremely disturbing. I guess illustrator Danny Quirk subscribes to the latter according to a post he made concerning Madonna using his work on her shows under that doctrine. Danny has a series of illustrations called Dissections which shows medical sketches (the kind you find in old medical books), combined with living humans. This was his senior project for Pratt institute.

Danny claims that an artist called BessNYC4 [NSFW] pasted a photo of Maddona’s face on his drawing and that they were used in her social media. Any many young artists, Danny was first very happy for the fact that his art was so widely exposed. But then he realized that he was not getting any credit for his illustrations. Danny claims that he tried contacting Maddona’s agent and got no response.

Danny got even angrier when he discovered that those illustrations were also used in Madonna’s shows. Being annoyed he posted about it until his lawyer told him to take the post down as BessNYC4’s work was protected under the Fair Use doctrine for being transformative enough. Danny got annoyed enough that he shared his frustration on his page which got thousands of likes, shares and comments. I am attaching his letter after the jump.

First and foremost … I just want to deliver an open, and honest “F**K YOU” to the “Fair Use Act”, and an ACTUAL “what the F*K!?!?” to those it protects. Almost a year ago to date (Jan 2015) I awoke to a barrage of texts stating my work was popping up on Madonna’s FB, IG, and Twitter, with tens of thousands of likes, shares, comments, etc. ! ! At first, I thought … “WHOAH! / COOL!“ but shortly there after, it sunk in. I contacted her agent, and received absolutely no response. In the meantime, I found out digital collage artist BessNYC4 was the one who ‘made’ the work, sending it to her, merging MY ART with her head, and reaping all the benefits.. Things petered out, and I more or less forgot about it; u n t i l … early Oct 2015. I found out (for all intents and purposes) my art was used in her concerts, despite my attempts at getting proper credit acknowledgment, etc. I made a post to build momentum / got a lawyer, and was hoping for justice. My lawyer said “PULL THE POST!” and it was determined the work was ‘transformative’ under the “Fair Use Act”, which protected them / her and the coinciding articles (which came from momentum of the post covering the ordeal) made ME out to be the bad guy. WHY? Anyone with eyes can see… anyhow, this is a rant how WE ARTISTS are taken advantage of, and how laws protect everyone except for who they should, as you can see in THREE of my pieces … anyhow, I’m not thrilled. Pass along if y’all agree (maybe we can build momentum?)

Thanks,

Danny #

Not being a copyright lawyer myself, I have no idea if the work is transformative or not, Danny posted some sample and you can take a look yourself. This is one of Maddona’s instagram posts:
 

Why is it OK for celebrities to use other people’s art for commercial purposes without permission?

September 30, 2015 - Time and time again we hear about singers and other types of celebrities getting sued over their use of other people’s art without permission or credit, and in many cases those pieces are used for commercial purposes. The latest allegation comes from artist Danny Quirk, whose art was taken without permission by none other than Madonna.

Back in January, it came to my attention that Madonna’s social media team had been using a series of 3 of images in a campaign on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram with her head superimposed on my paintings to promote her new album “Rebel Heart”. I didn’t want to make a big stink about things just because it was a high profile name, but despite my messages / emails to Liz Rosenburg (her agent) commenting on the said social media posts, and the MANY posts of people defending the work / calling her out on it, the messages were overlooked and ignored, and the work was never credited.

Doing the math, off of Instagram, the images got a collected 145,000 + likes, on Facebook, some 77,000+ likes, and Twitter, about 1,000+reposts. That’s some serious exposure that was leeched from me and my art, and used to promote her agenda.

Since the Rebel Heart tour kicked off, I found out the art is being used on her tour from a friend who recognized the work during the show. I’ve seen at least 4 YouTube videos that show it, as it’s part of a loop played during her song “Rebel Heart”. Granted it’s a SMALL part of the show, but I was never A.) asked, and B.) COMPLETELY ignored when I called her staff / team out on improper use of my creative property.

That’s awful coming from an artist worth like $800 million. The photoshop job is also awful, but let’s not get sidetracked here. Considering that singers know what is like to have their work used without permission, one would think they would relate and not pull this kind of antics, but it’s easy for them to claim the things they “borrow” as public domain.

The worst part is that many relatively unknown artists don’t fight back because they don’t have the means to hire a lawyer, and because many times the “your art is not copyrighted, so it’s public domain” phrase comes up into the conversation, making the original artists have doubts about their chances of winning a case against people or companies using and even selling their art.

To make matters worse, this is something that happens quite a often. After a quick Google search I came up with the following results:

Back in 2013 Lil’ Kim took a photograph of a makeup artist in zombie makeup (it was a photograph of the actual artist), slapped her logo on it, used it for her social media accounts, and even used the picture as album art. All of that without giving credit to the makeup artist.

In 2014 visual artist Maya Hayuk (left) sued Sara Bareilles and her record company for the use of her mural “Chem Trails NYC” as a backdrop for numerous promotional pictures and videos of the pop star without Hayuk’s knowledge or permission. They were used to promote Bareilles’ music and concert tour.

Also last year, the rapper known as Mase was sued for using a photograph from model Stephanie Delgado’s Instagram as artwork without her permission to promote his single, “Why Can’t We.” 

Joseph Tierney, a street artist who goes by the name Rime, sued Italian fashion firm Moschino and designer Jeremy Scott for copyright infringement and misappropriation after they allegedly used his graffiti art on their expensive outfits, one of which was worn by singer Katy Perry at a high-profile event in New York City. Katy Perry was apparently paid to wear said dress.

Freelance photographer Giordano Cipriani filed the lawsuit against Kendrick Lamar for the use of his photo of a mother breastfeeding two children, which he shot in 2011 on a trip to Africa. Lamar used it as the artwork for his single, “The Blacker the Berry.”

Fine art photographer Laura Ferreira from Trinidad and Tobago found out that one of her photos of a woman in a carnival costume was being used by rapper T.I. to promote a big party that he was throwing. When he was called out on it he threw a tantrum, insulted the photographer, and still used giant-size versions of the artwork on the walls on his party.

Rapper “The Game” is being sued by rapper and designer Ariza Obey over the artwork for “Ryda,” his single with Dej Loaf. The Game allegedly took this photograph and repurposed the artwork in a brown tone.

And as a change of pace, the time the so called “artist” known as Richard Prince used other people’s Instagram photo posts in an exhibition without their permission, and then sold the prints for $90,000 a piece.

I never understood why Instagram let him off without a fight, but I guess it comes down to a phrase I read some time ago; “If you aren’t paying for service you’re not the customer, you’re the product.”

In general it would be nice and wise if celebrities and companies stopped stealing artwork for commercial uses. I’m almost certain that it’s pretty infuriating to the original artists to have their pieces get so much recognition under other people’s name and without a single mention, so at least ask beforehand.

Stop stealing other people’s work and passing it as your own.

 

RELATED ARTICLES

 
 


 

 


 

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, October 23, 2015

FBI Director Mum On Hillary Clinton Criminal Investigation As The Agency Sits On Evidence That She Committed Serious Crimes (Video)



FBI Director James Comey in Congress

FBI Director James Comey made an appearance in Congress yesterday, where under oath, he declined to provide any details on the criminal investigation of former U.S. Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, regarding emailgate. Based on the sparse evidence released by the FBI thus far, Clinton willfully violated U.S. government rules and procedures as Secretary of State, in sending emails via a private, unencrypted server. This made U.S. national secrets vulnerable to hacking. As a result, U.S. national secrets were accessed by the communist block. A hacker branding himself a variant of Lucifer (yes, as in Satan) has also offered Clinton's hacked emails for $500,000 on the black market. Clinton broke the law in this misconduct and in carelessly doing so, unintentionally damaged America.  

As the 2016 presidential election is underway regarding each political party's nomination process, the FBI should make their full report public regarding Clinton's behavior in this scandal. The American people have a right to know what has transpired and all the evidence, to aid in choosing the next President of the United States. Clinton is not a good choice, due to her unlawful conduct. The FBI is also sitting on evidence that Clinton has willfully engaged in illegal, commissioned wiretapping, phone hacking and computer/email hacking, prior to, during and after her time as Secretary of State. Clinton is a criminal. Her hands are dirty. There exists clear cut, compelling evidence/proof of her using illegally obtained surveillance items in criminal violation of U.S. law. Someone with such gross lack of character and a flagrant unwillingness to obey the law, should not be running for president.
 

FBI Director James Comey

In far too many FBI cases, reports and evidence are suppressed by the agency under the guise of the file in question being an ongoing investigation. As a result many innocent people who are victims of crime are endangered, further abused and damaged, while brazen, dangerous criminals skate roaming around the public, as nothing is released revealing their crimes.

 For example, the FBI and SEC knew of Bernard Madoff and Robert Sanford's financial crimes well before they were arrested. However, the FBI allowed these brazen ponzi scheming fraudsters to remain free and they did an extraordinary amount of damage during that time, when they could have been behind bars, which would have mitigated much of the damage.


Hillary Clinton

During that time, more innocent Americans and international citizens invested billions of dollars with their companies, not knowing it was an outright fraud/ponzi scheme being run by the men (in separate cases) and they would certainly lose their money. It was the SEC and FBI's duty to inform the public from the time they knew of the fraud, as it would have saved the unsuspecting public billions of dollars in investor money that no government agency was able to recoup, due to the fact Madoff and Sanford wasted large sums on high living. In the end it created a greater mess for government agency's to clean up and greatly tarnished America's name in the business world and international law enforcement circles. 

I am of the belief that Congress will enact legislation in reference to how the FBI handles cases and the dissemination of information in the agency's possession. As it stands, the FBI has active, unrelated cases containing compelling evidence they are hiding and sitting on regarding dangerous pedophiles, murderers, serial killers, kidnappers, ponzi schemers, drug dealers and thieves engaging in criminal copyright infringement and hate crimes endangering innocent lives. Due to corruption in the form of bribery and an unwillingness to arrest and prosecute the rich and or famous, dangerous criminals are roaming among the innocent public, doing an extraordinary amount of permanent damage America will not recover from. This is wholly wrong and unethical.

RELATED ARTICLES
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, November 21, 2014

Why Do Rihanna Fans Call Chris Brown's Girlfriend Karrueche Tran Broke When She Has More Money Than They Do

 
Karrueche Tran

A group of fans of singer Rihanna, who is the on and off again girlfriend of singer, Chris Brown, have escalated their online bullying and attacks on his girlfriend, Karrueche Tran. They continue to call the model broke and basic, among other things. Not only are they insulting her online in unprovoked written attacks on social networking, they are sending these cruel statements to her pages on Twitter and Instagram.

What's ironic is Tran has made more money than the average Rihanna fan calling her "broke." Tran has made a number of paid appearances, done modeling assignments and been compensated for a role in a film. Tran has made roughly $200,000 for the aforementioned work, which exceeds the average household income in America.

Greedy Rihanna

Anyone who criticizes Rihanna's debauched and unethical behavior is attacked online by a select group of her fans insanely known as the "Rihanna navy." If Mother Teresa were still alive and offered constructive criticism regarding Rihanna's destructive behavior, such as her illegal drug use, alcoholism, nude pics, softcore porn music videos and chronic copyright theft, the "Rihanna navy" would have slammed Mother Teresa calling her a "broke bi*ch" who is "basic" and "she's just mad she can't twerk like Rihanna" and is "jealous Rihanna can have Chris Brown and he won't give her none."

Ironically, Rihanna's money, which her "Rihanna navy" fans tout, comes from criminal copyright infringement, which is a federal and international crime. To tout a thief stealing the property of others for undue financial enrichment, you may as well praise Madoff for stealing from many people including charities or Hitler for stealing the property and money of Holocaust victims. To steal the property of others is not an accomplishment, but a criminal disgrace.

 
Chris Brown

At the end of the day, there's nothing wrong with being rich or poor, but there is something wrong with insulting and bullying people for not having material things and big bank accounts. If money is earned honestly, it is a blessing. If it is stolen, becomes the opposite to the thief. You reap what you sow.
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, September 26, 2014

Beyonce And Jay Z's HBO Concert Special 'On The Run' Bombs As One Of The Lowest Rated Specials In The Network's History

Beyonce And Jay Z's 'On The Run' One Of The Lowest Rated Programs In HBO's History


Jay Z to Beyonce: man, nobody watched it!
 
The fall out from the Jay Z and Solange elevator fight continues. Rapper Jay Z and his wife Beyonce embarked on a tour titled "On The Run." Many of the tour stops suffered from poor ticket sales, which led to higher ticket prices in VIP and special seating to compensate for the losses. 


The couple turned their "On The Run" tour into a special for HBO and in bombed in the ratings department. It turns out the public is "On The Run" from Jay Z and Beyonce, as only 800,000 people viewed the special on HBO, indicating the couple's popularity is seriously declining. Despite this fact, Beyonce and Jay Z announced plans for a joint album, to be released to a public that is suffering from fatigue where this overexposed couple is concerned.


Beyonce and Jay Z are constantly in court facing a number of trademark and copyright theft lawsuits, as well as cases for financial fraud. People should endeavor to do business in a lawful, honest and ethical manner. It may seem like one is getting ahead at first via dishonest financial transactions and theft, but history has a way of correcting itself at a moment's notice. Just ask Bernard Madoff, who lost it all overnight.
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, March 24, 2014

Jealous Jay-Z Disses Drake


Jay-Z is like the movie character Nino Brown in "New Jack City" - brags about the drug trade rather than denouncing it, has a penchant for stabbing people (Lance Riviera) and hates on good looking men, jealous over their looks (stabbed Christopher Williams' character for being handsome)

Kabbalah member Jay-Z released a new song with rapper Jay Electronica in which he disses fellow rapper, Drake. Jealous Jay-Z is angry that pretty boy Drake embarked on a high profile relationship with singer Rihanna this month, whom he'd quietly dated on and off prior to their dates this month. Rihanna is also Jay-Z's mistress and has been since he signed her to Def Jam.

Jay-Z is known in industry circles for targeting the men dating or pursuing his sex partners or women he is trying to have sex with. Jay-Z has lied to and threatened men over several women, before and during his marriage to Beyonce. He's done this regarding situations he shouldn't have even been in.

Jay-Z is jealous of good looking male entertainers and athletes. Jay-Z is known in the industry for hating on them and feeding them lies about women he is interested in sexing, while trying to get their suitors out of the way. What kind of married man goes around calling, emailing, texting, DMing and confronting other men over the women they are with or are pursuing (keep it up, the full truth is going to come out about that one day). Jay-Z gossips more than a housewife (and people in the industry are talking about him for it).


Rihanna and Drake

Drake stated in a Rolling Stone interview, "It's like Hov can't drop bars these days without at least four art references . . . I think the whole Rap/art world thing is getting kind of corny." That's because Jay-Z has been targeting him over Rihanna, much like he did to R&B singer Chris Brown, the man she actually loves. He's done the same to other men, regarding several other women.

This week Jay-Z dissed Drake via the weak lyrics, "Sorry Mrs. Drizzy for so much art talk. Silly me, rappin' 'bout **** that I really bought. While these rappers rap about guns that they ain't shot. And a bunch of other silly **** that they ain't got." No one believes Jay-Z is some art buff. He's a pretender. It reminds me of that joke by Jackie Mason, where he stated a show off he knows, who doesn't know art, bought a Picasso, but doesn't realize he hung the painting upside down on his wall.

Considering Jay-Z is also a man who started a music production company using crack cocaine money while still bragging about the drug trade to this day rather than denouncing it, using payola to bribe disc jockeys to play his music, running record sales scams to inflate his numbers, stealing hundreds of copyrights and trademarks belonging to various other people and ripping off his employees, cheating them out of their wages, he has nothing to brag about. Jay-Z's about as accomplished and talented as Bernard Madoff.
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Rihanna Booed Again By Her Fans This Time In Paris (Video)


Rihanna's Diamonds tour continues to be plagued with problems. Several tour stops were canceled due to alleged illness, but coincidentally reports surfaced that tickets were selling poorly, therefore said dates would have cost her money.

Rihanna was booed in Boston and received a cold reception in New York. Now it is being reported she was loudly booed in Paris, France as she went to a Chanel fashion show. Chanel, the same brand who denounced her trying to claim she is their new model/spokeswoman, running to Vogue to distance their fashion house from her. Rihanna also showed up 2-hours late for her show in Cologne, Germany, angering her fans who were left waiting, as she had gone out drinking and smoking weed. How unprofessional.


Rihanna

Rihanna is very pretentious with an inflated opinion of herself. She became famous from getting a record deal in exchange for sleeping with Jay-Z as a minor, stole copyrighted music, videos and images from several copyright holders, some of whom have sued. She illegally became rich of copyright infringement, a crime forbidden by domestic and international law. What a fraud. Another music industry Madoff.
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, June 4, 2012

Bill Clinton Warns Obama Off Bashing Mitt Romney For Being A Successful Businessman


Barack Obama

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton has warned fellow Democrat, President Barack Obama, it is not a good idea bashing election rival, Mitt Romney, for being a successful businessman, as it sends the wrong message to the public, especially aspiring entrepreneurs.


Mitt Romney

This is the same message the Judiciary Report has published for the past month as well, stating President Obama should not slam Romney for legitimately succeeding in the business world. He is not Bernard Madoff or R. Allen Sanford. Government should not punish success, as there is nothing wrong with doing well. Greed and thievery are wrong, but not good old fashioned hard work that leads to prosperity.


Bill Clinton

At a time when the U.S. economy is seriously struggling, President Obama and all in his administration should want as many successful businesspeople as possible, willing to work, create jobs and honestly earn a living. Free enterprise within the scope of the law is a good thing. Not something to be bashed and criticized.

STORY SOURCE

Bill Clinton: Mitt Romney's business record 'sterling'

5/31/12 10:50 PM EDT - President Bill Clinton veered sharply off message Thursday, telling CNN that Mitt Romney's business record at Bain Capital was "sterling." "I don't think that we ought to get into the position where we say 'This is bad work. This is good work,'" Clinton said. "The man who has been governor and had a sterling business career crosses the qualification threshold." Clinton also went on to say that Romney's time at Bain Capital represented a "good business career."


RELATED ARTICLES
Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Movie Review: Across the Line: The Exodus of Charlie Wright

Title: Across the Line: The Exodus of Charlie Wright

Year Of Release: 2010

Review Date: October 31, 2011

Rating: R

Running time: 110 minutes

Box Office Gross: $227,817, 248

Site Rating: 3 out of 10 stars

Family Warning: contains violence and bad language

A ponzi schemer named Charlie Wright flees to Mexico (why didn't Madoff think of that) with billions of dollars in clients' money (Madoff didn't think of that either) to hide from the law in America, regarding his dirty financial dealings. He goes on a wild goose chase in Tijuana along the way, with the authorities following him seeking to make an arrest.

Wright is an obsessive man, who looks like an alcoholic (hey, who better to manage your money than a drunk, after all, what could go wrong). While the cast of this film was strong, this movie was too dark and sad to be enjoyable, with a resolution that doesn't exactly scream justice. I am not a fan of such films.

http://www.celluloidfilmreview.com

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Florida Courts Have Gone Bankrupt Requiring An Emergency $46,000,000 Bailout Loan From Governor Rick Scott


Miami, Florida federal courthouse is a den of corruption

The Florida court system went bankrupt this month, requiring Governor Rick Scott to issue an emergency $46,000,000 loan to keep the courts open. A few years ago, I warned this would happen if the corruption in the court system continued, which I witnessed and wrote about online firsthand, regarding the Madonna and FBI cases in Florida.

I did state if the public lost faith in the integrity of the judicial system, revenues would go down, as people would stop wasting their money filing cases, choosing other non-court services to resolve disputes, due to the corrupt decisions they saw emanate from certain judges.

Revenues did go down and all they court were relying on to stay afloat is foreclosure filings by banks, which is corrupt, as some of it is due to illegal robo-signings. But when foreclosure filings began slowing down over the past several months, court revenues took a second hit it could not sustain. What a way to make money - putting people out of their homes they worked hard for over the course of many years.

Regarding the Madonna (2005) and FBI (2009) cases (Aisha v. FBI), nobody wants to see that corrupt mess coming from the courts. Have you any idea of how repugnant you look to the nation and the watching world as judges when you engage in corruption. People aren't stupid. People all over the world know what you've done. No one is impressed by that insidiousness. Do you really think people respect you for that garbage.

Rick Scott: you better pay me that money back!

Congress did not give you the authority to criminally strip people of their property and assets, to benefit stocks and other incentives you criminally accepted from defendants breaking the law, who stole from hardworking people. All of you that have done this are a disgrace. You deserved to be named and shamed.

Once again, you won the battle, but lost the war. You can't fight the internet (because now millions know and have shunned you). It will get you every time. If the courts would act with integrity, giving everyone a fair shake in accordance with the law, with certain judges refraining from taking bribes from the corporate sector, the U.S. financial crisis of 2008 would not have taken root as it did and revenues would be healthy all around.

The courts, particularly the federal section, shot down key lawsuits warning and complaining of grand scale theft and fraud from certain corporate entities, which allowed the criminal conduct to continue unimpeded, destroying the economy. Key lawsuits, in unrelated legal actions, by different people, were filed against lawbreaking banks, financial institutions, thieving entertainment companies and ponzi schemers like Bernie Madoff and R. Allen Standford (over a decade before they were arrested) for defrauding, robbing and gouging the public, but corrupt judges dismissed the cases, allowing said lawbreakers to go on and wreak worse havoc in America, costing the nation trillions of dollars.

At the end of the day, you have to accept the fact, thieves and frauds do not create and contribute to society, they only take from and destroy it. These judges and the FBI/DOJ were the nation's first line of defense against this criminality and they failed spectacularly.

RELATED ARTICLES

Rupert Murdoch Is Being Investigated By The Government For Using 'Mafia Tactics' On Rivals

Rupert Murdoch Is Being Investigated By The Government For Using 'Mafia Tactics' On Rivals

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp Is Under Investigation For Computer Hacking And Corporate Theft

Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp Spying On People With Drones

UK Police Widen Rupert Murdoch News Corp Criminal Probe To Include Computer Hacking

Senator Demands FBI Investigate Rupert Murdoch For Hacking Rival & Stealing Their Copyrights

Rupert Murdoch Executive Admitted To Bribing The Metropolitan Police (Video)

Madonna Fraudulent Charity For Africa Squanders Millions On Big Salaries & Luxury Items For Greedy Kabbalah Members

After Robbing And Exploiting Blacks In The US And Africa Why Is Madonna Headlining The Super Bowl Half Time Show In The Predominately Black NFL

Confirmed: Kabbalah Is Under Criminal Investigation

Report: Kabbalah Cult Under Grand Jury Investigation

Rupert Murdoch Is Being Investigated By The Government For Using 'Mafia Tactics' On Rivals

Madonna Booed In London At The Premiere Of Her Copyright Infringing Film “We”

The FBI Corruptly Granted "Sovereign Immunity" In The Aisha v. FBI Case

Rupert Murdoch Finally Admits His Company's Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Crimes

Madonna's Connection To Phone Hacking And Wiretapping Scandal

Newsweek Outs Madonna As The Criminal Behind Kabbalah

Wall Street Protestors March Outside The Home Of Greedy CEOs Such As News Corp's Rupert Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch Defames Australia’s Prime Minister Then Retracts It After Legal Threat

Rupert Murdoch Uses Slur In Reference To Black People

STORY SOURCE

Scott grants Florida court system $45.6 million loan

Posted by at
Labels: , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)