Boycott Madonna's 'Rebel Heart' CD And Songs Such As 'Living For Love' Which Are Stolen Constituting Criminal Copyright Infringement

 

Madonna

Chronic copyright thief Madonna, who has stolen from many singers, songwriters, producers, directors and photographers, for every single album she has ever released, has stolen from my preexisting copyrights again. This time the thefts are for her forthcoming "Rebel Heart" CD.

Pre-release and leaked items reveal Madonna has been stealing from my preexisting copyrights again, via select items, such as the lead single "Living For Love" that was registered with the Library of Congress in my name over 7-years ago. Other tracks on the leaked CD "Rebel Heart" reveal even more infringements from my preexisting copyrights.

The items were criminally obtained through illegal, unauthorized computer access, via hacking my computers, in criminal acts paid for by Madonna and carried out by the staff of Madonna.com. Some of the staff of Madonna.com are hackers from Madonna's insidious cult the Kabbalah Center (whose so-called rabbi, Yehuda Berg, has been sued for drugging, sexually assaulting and trying to rape a female student and threatening to beat and kill her for sexually rejecting him Madonna’s Rabbi Yehuda Berg Sued For Sexual Assault And Threatening To Beat And Kill Student At The Kabbalah Center For Not Having Sex With Him).

Madonna also continues to criminally pass around items from my preexisting Library of Congress registered copyrighted catalog to members of the Kabbalah cult such as Rihanna, Beyonce, Jay Z and Katy Perry, among others. The aforementioned artists also have a very questionable history of copyright infringement, having been sued by many people in America and the international community for stealing.

All these artists do is steal and you need to stop supporting them. Some of the proceeds from my copyrights were meant to support and produce my forthcoming pharmaceutical drug patents to help terminally ill people live longer. Proceeds from my illegally liquidated copyrights were not meant to be used for thieving, disgraceful stars to live the high life. That's blood money.

Years ago when I was interviewed by the FBI and gave them documents and information regarding phone hacking, illegal wiretapping and computer hacking being done by Madonna and the Kabbalah Center's private investigator, Anthony Pellicano, the charging indictment of him revealed he had four hackers on staff at his Hollywood office, hacking into the computers of innocent people celebrities paid him $100,000 to target. Now that Pellicano is in prison, Madonna and the Kabbalah Center have their own hackers on staff continuing the criminal hacking.

Madonna is a complete loser with no work ethic or decency. Everything she has released, from her first CD to the present, contains preexisting copyrighted materials she stole from many artists, songwriters and producers. She is a complete and utter fraud with absolutely no talent.

A new lawsuit will be filed against her and the Kabbalah Center, among others, in the next few weeks. It will be included in my forthcoming film Justice And Truth, regarding the News Corp phone hacking scandal, which I broke first (Madonna is a business associate of News Corp's Murdoch family and illegally passed some of my preexisting Library of Congress copyrighted items to them).

 

RELATED ARTICLES

 

Madonna's Pedophilic Kabbalah Center (Google Case)

 

Google Releases Information In Madonna/Kabbalah Center Death Threat Case

 

Madonna’s Rabbi Yehuda Berg Sued For Sexual Assault And Threatening To Beat And Kill Student At The Kabbalah Center For Not Having Sex With Him

 

Serial Copyright Thieves Beyonce And Jay Z Sued For Stealing 'Drunk In Love' And Even Including A Clip Of The Original Artist's Voice On The Track

 

Sam Smith Settles With Tom Petty Over Stealing His Song For 'Stay With Me'

 

Katy Perry Slammed For Being A Devil Worshipper

 

Rihanna Rips Off Jewelry Company

Copyright Office Corrupted By Madonna And The Kabbalah Center Issuing Bribes To Employees To Backdate Registration Dates And Access Private Copyrights

Madonna

As the Judiciary Report has illustrated in past articles, exclusives that later proved 100%, singer, Madonna, has a long, disgraceful, detailed history of copyright theft click here. She's been sued so many times by Americans and international citizens for stealing preexisting copyrighted work, then fraudulently trying to pass it off as her own. She's also been criminally stealing copyrights from me and repeatedly harasses me, though I don't want anything to do with her, in what has become a sick obsession on her part click here. 

A Kabbalah Center member issued threats to me, from her, stating Madonna and other members of the Kabbalah Center, which a number of experts have labeled a sick cult, have been issuing bribes at the Copyright Office/Library Of Congress in Washington, DC, to illegally access preexisting, private, unpublished copyrighted works, apart of various writers, producers, authors and directors' forthcoming projects, enabling her to receive unauthorized copies of the contents. 

Then as apart of the bribe, receive a backdated registration date, making it appear Madonna and the Kabbalah Center registered the works first when she did not. The scam on Madonna's end becomes apparent when copyright registrants with preexisting "Poor Man's Copyrights" and other time stamped methods of establishing the date of authorship, still trump the fake registration dates she illegally bought and paid for through bribery at the Copyright Office/Library Of Congress.

The Copyright Office/Library Of Congress is connected to the U.S. Congress, the center of lawmaking in America. Yet this is going on there. To think a lazy, untalented, trashy pop star has criminally corrupted the Copyright Office/Library Of Congress is terrible and disgraceful. 

American and international citizens from all over the world, in the tens of thousands, some whom are struggling artists who can barely afford to pay their bills, scrape together money to pay the Copyright Office/Library Of Congress fees of $75 per registration, only for a greedy, shiftless, vile pop star, Madonna and her equally insane cult, the Kabbalah Center, to be issuing bribes to gain undue access and copy private, unreleased works, trying to get an illegal jump on the true authors of the works. That is sick and despicable. 

This kind of corruption should not be occurring in an entity connected to a house of legislature (Congress).

I was once told by a Copyright Office/Library Of Congress employee, Robert Blankenberg that "Madonna is free to use any of your copyrights" without permission, whilst trying to talk me out of suing her, abusing his authority. He so twisted copyright law in his repugnant, corrupt explanation of how copyrights work, in order to justify what U.S. Federal law describes as criminal copyright infringement, racketeering (RICO), conversion, grand theft larceny, invasion of privacy, fraud and money laundering, it was astonishing. 

My advice to copyright holders and those seeking to copyright items, be careful, as the Copyright Office/Library Of Congress is corrupted. Your copyrights are not safe. Ironically, the United Nations, via the WIPO, states that a copyright is supposed to be FREE to the owner/author and is automatically established when one creates a work. 

However, Congress created the Copyright Act years ago, in violation of United Nations' law, forcing all American and International citizens to pay a fee to copyright works in Washington, DC or you cannot sue in America if the works are stolen. This is not helped by the fact that 99.9% of copyright cases in America are thrown out by federal judges, who refuse to let the cases go to trial. Federal judges might I add, it has been discovered have serious financial ties to Hollywood in a number of ways (stocks, revenue connections and advisory posts).

I recently sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the Copyright Office as apart of my forthcoming film "Justice And Truth." I sent it registered mail. Therefore I have confirmation. The Copyright Office has defied federal law as enacted by Congress and refused to answer the FOIA request sent to them 3-months ago, which is illegal on their end.

I'm sending a copy of everything to the FBI, so it will be on record that I filed this complaint regarding Madonna and the Kabbalah Center criminally corrupted the Copyright Office, Library of Congress. It will also be featured in my forthcoming film "Justice And Truth."

"Salt" Acting Salty

Please boycott the film "Salt"

Several months ago, on December 11, 2009, I slammed another instance of copyright infringement by Sony, regarding the Angelina Jolie film "Salt" which was illegally stolen from my Copyrighted Catalog of music and literary works.

Sony, invited me to their offices in 2004, but I did not go, has consistently stolen very valuable preexisting, unpublished and published copyrights I authored over the course of 25 years and registered with the Library of Congress in Washington, DC, in acts that constitute criminal copyright infringement, in violation of the Copyright Act, Digital Millennium Act and Berne Convention.

Then, last week, the official, verified Twitter page for the aforementioned infringing "Salt" movie, joined my Twitter page. Of all the millions of pages on Twitter they could have joined, how did "Salt" know about and why did it join mine.

They've only joined a small number of Twitter pages, in comparison to what others have done, yet mysteriously found mine, sifting through the TENS OF MILLIONS OF USERS ON TWITTER. It supports my allegations regarding them and the duplications of my preexisting copyright they stole. "Salt" illegally came from my copyrights, whose official registrations, predates their rip off by years.

Sony's CEO, Howard Stringer, one of the most cruel and unconscionable in history, was paid $8 million in salary, essentially for failure, while the company hemorrhages billions. This month, Stinger was criticized in many papers and on websites, for his large salary in the face of said blatant failures. He is a lazy, shiftless loser that believes in stealing other people's intellectual property, rather than earning an honest living, as hundreds of lawsuits attest.

Google Loses Copyright Case In Paris

Google HQ

Search giant Google has lost a landmark copyright case in Paris, France, regarding its digital library of books that saw the company scan millions of literary works, without permission from copyright holding authors.

Internationally, one does not need to file a copyright to protect one's works, as in America with the Library of Congress (The Copyright Office). The world works under the premise that the Berne Convention applies to all and a free copyright is established the second one puts pen to paper or fingers to keyboard. One only needs to verify the date of authorship in the event a legal dispute arises.

However, the U.S. Courts requires one to register copyrights at a not-so-cheap-fee, because in the event your work is stolen and due to the treachery and greed of Hollywood, it probably will be, it is the only way you can attempt to recover damages in the American legal system.

Google needs to work out a proper compensation package to the authors whose books were scanned without permission. Then, seek full clearance before continuing with this practice.

RELATED ARTICLES

World Governments Accuse Google Of Copyright Infringement

Paris Court Convicts Google in Copyright Case

PARIS—A French court found Google Inc. guilty of copyright infringement for scanning books and publishing extracts online without a French publisher's consent, a ruling that could hinder the U.S search company's ongoing drive to create a giant global online library.

In a Friday ruling that Google said it would appeal, the court ordered the U.S. company to pay €300,000 ($501,000) to French publisher La Martinière and to remove online extracts of the publisher's books.

The ruling, which is the first of its kind in France and applies only to this country, could set a legal precedent for any future copyright infringement cases by French publishers, said Valerie Barthez, head of the legal department at the French publishers' association Société des Gens de Lettres de France, which was one of the plaintiffs in the case...

Earlier this week French President Nicolas Sarkozy said France would spend €2 billion to digitalize books and other cultural publications itself. "We can't let this heritage go astray," Mr. Sarkozy told reporters. "It's a question of national identity." ...

http://online.wsj.com

World Governments Accuse Google Of Copyright Infringement

Google HQ

The Chinese, German and French governments have correctly accused Google of copyright infringement, in scanning 10,000,000 books, by authors all over the world, without permission.

Google's book scanning endeavor, has prompted legal action in numerous world courts, as they did not obtain the consent of copyright holders before embarking on this endeavor.

The U.S. Government, by way of the Copyright Office/Library Of Congress, has also denounced Google's book scanning project, stating it took away the rights of copyright holders.

The Judiciary Report agrees that the corporate behemoth, Google, should have obtained the permission of copyright holders, before undertaking this massive project. It unintentionally sent the signal that copyright infringement is okay, when it is not.

Many books now appear on the internet for free and pop up in regular searches on numerous topics and celebrities, eliminating the need to purchase the actual book.

This hurts writers all over the globe, who are not being compensated for their copyrighted works. The proposed Google settlement is too small and accurate records of how many times each scanned book was viewed should be provided to gauge the full extent of the financial damage.

The Judiciary Report is all for progress and technological advancement, believing scanning is a great step forward, but within the scope of the law. Obtain permission first.

Side Bar: Speaking of Google News. Someone removed the Judiciary Report from Google News weeks ago, after it had been accepted in the program with a few news articles from the site beginning to appear in search results in Google News.

Apparently, a certain crazy pop tart, Madonna, was angry the site received additional coverage and in her usual misconduct, violated the Civil Rights Act once again, in having it removed from Google News. Madonna's staff at Digilink pulled a similar stunt with the site's WordPress blog, which was later reinstated - a site Madonna's hackers at Digilink have been tampering with, to obscure the page's text.

China authors say Google violated copyrights

Thu Oct 22, 2009 6:06pm EDT, Saturday, 10 Oct 2009 11:09am EDT - SHANGHAI (Reuters) - A group representing authors in China has accused Google of violating copyrights with its digital library, a claim that Google denies by saying the service complies with international law.

Many major publishers and authors have taken up lawsuits against Google for its digitization of their works, accusing Google of copyright infringement. Google has already digitized 10 million books.

The China Written Works Copyright Society (CWWCS) believes Google scanned thousands of books, by over 500 Chinese authors, into its digital library without their permission or compensation, said spokesman Chen Qirong.

"Whether you are a small company or big company you still need to respect the copyright of the authors," Chen said...

http://www.reuters.com

Google, French publishers face off in court

Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:59pm EDT - PARIS (Reuters) - Major publishers accused Google Thursday of "brutally" exploiting France's literary heritage as they launched a court challenge to the Internet giant's drive to scan digital copies of books and put extracts online.

Publishing house La Martiniere, the French Publishers' Association and authors' group SGDL asked a Paris court to fine Google 15 million euros ($22.09 million) and 100,000 euros for each day it continues to violate copyright by digitizing their books.

The trial caps a three-year challenge to what publishers say is the web giant's 2005 plan to create a massive online library without prior approval.

"It's an anarchic way of brutally stockpiling French heritage," Yann Colin, the publishers' lawyer, told the court.

"Digitizing is reproduction," he added. "Once it is digitized, you can't undo it."...

http://www.reuters.com

Germany criticizes Google for copyright infringement

Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:20am EDT - BERLIN (Reuters) - German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Saturday criticized the efforts of Google Inc to build a massive digital library, saying the Internet should not be exempt from copyright laws.

In her weekly video podcast, before Tuesday's opening of the Frankfurt Book Fair, Merkel appealed for more international cooperation on copyright protection and said her government opposed Google's drive to scan libraries full of books.

"The German government has a clear position: copyrights have to be protected in the Internet," Merkel said, adding there are "considerable dangers" for copyright protection in the Internet.

"That's why we reject the scanning in of books without any copyright protection -- like Google is doing. The government places a lot of weight on this position on copyrights to protect writers in Germany."

Google has already digitized 10 million books.

Merkel, who will open the world's largest book fair in Germany's financial capital, said there was a need to discuss the issue in greater detail in international institutions...

http://www.reuters.com

Top US copyright cop opposes Google book deal

SAN FRANCISCO — The nation's top copyright official has joined the mounting opposition to a class-action settlement that would give Google Inc. the digital rights to millions of out-of-print books.

Her objections cast further doubt on whether the agreement will be allowed by a federal court, even as Google offered a concession Thursday aimed at smoothing the way for approval.

Parts of the settlement are "fundamentally at odds with the law," Marybeth Peters, head of the U.S. Copyright Office, testified in a House Judiciary Committee hearing Thursday that was webcast. She also expressed concerns that the settlement would undermine Congress' ability to govern copyrights and could have "serious international implications" for books published outside the United States...

"The so-called settlement would create mechanisms by which Google could continue to scan with impunity, well into the future, and to our great surprise, create yet additional commercial products without the prior consent of rights holders," Peters wrote in a more comprehensive written statement submitted to the Judiciary Committee...

The open-ended nature of the settlement is "tantamount to creating a private compulsory license," Peters wrote, something she believes could circumvent the authority of Congress.

http://www.google.com