Showing posts with label Billboard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Billboard. Show all posts

Friday, May 27, 2016

Prince's Ex-Girlfriend States He And Madonna Were Not Friends Despite What She Tries To Claim Now

 

Prince: no they don't have Madonna on stage singing my song off key, voice cracking like her face
 
Anna Fantastic, the British ex-girlfriend of the late singer, Prince, unmasked Madonna's opportunistic Billboard Music Awards tribute to the star that was roundly slammed all over the internet as abysmal and terrible. Madonna has been trying to give the impression she and Prince were great friends, when industry insiders know better.


Prince: at least they had Stevie there!

Fantastic stated, "You know I was there when they recorded their duet together, Love Song and she really wanted to do a music video and he refused. I think he liked the song, but didn't want to do a video. I even said, 'I think you and Madonna in a video could be really cool,' and he said, 'Me and Madonna in a video? No thanks.' 'She (Madonna) also said, 'I'm going through a lot right now with my divorce with Sean.' And he said, 'What has your divorce with Sean got to do with me or this song? I'm not doing a video with you.' They didn't seem like really good friends.' Last year she wanted to do a tour with him and he said something like, 'it's too much, the world can't handle this' or, 'it's too much for the world to handle right now', but he had a great sense of humour."


Madonna
 
With all the friends he has in the music industry who care about him, she was one of the last people that should have been on stage doing a self-centered, attention seeking tribute. Using a visually impaired man, Stevie Wonder, for public sympathy, in the wake of all the terrible press she has been receiving, was low and pathetic. Some people will do anything for attention and publicity, including exploit the dead.

STORY SOURCE

Prince 'refused to film video to his '80s duet with Madonna', according to his ex-girlfriend Anna Fantastic

Published: 03:58 EST, 25 May 2016 | Updated: 10:05 EST, 25 May 2016 - Madonna's musical tribute to her late friend Prince at Sunday's Billboard Music Awards was savaged on social media. And according to the pop star's ex-girlfriend Anna Fantastic, he may not have been too impressed if he would have seen it. English singer and model Anna dated and lived with Prince in the late '80s when he recorded a duet with Madonna for the latter's album Like A Prayer... 
 

RELATED ARTICLES
 
 
 

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Prince's Ex-Girlfriend Confirms Madonna Had Feud With The Deceased Star Confirming Previous Site Claims


Madonna
 

Yesterday, the Judiciary Report contended hypocritical Madonna did things to Prince while he was alive that is mean spirited, leading to arguments between the two. Today, the TMZ website did an interview with Anna Fantastic, who is an ex-girlfriend of the late singer Prince that confirmed, "Madonna and Prince had a heated feud." 

Anna Fantastic revealed a tidbit regarding a song Prince had produced for manipulative Madonna stating, "Madonna tried to play the sympathy card by telling Prince she was in the middle of divorcing Sean Penn...and the song meant a lot to her. Prince's reply, according to Anna? ' What does your divorce have to do with me or this song?'"


Prince
 
Mainstream outlets reveal Madonna tried to pull the race card on social networking in response to the terrible public backlash regarding her performing the Prince tribute at the Billboard Music Awards this past Sunday. However, Madonna being white is not why people objected to her doing the Prince tribute. After all, Prince granted white Irish recording artist Sinead O'Connor permission to remake "Nothing Compares 2 U" and she sang the song perfectly. Reports reveal Madonna sang "Nothing Compares 2 U" at the Billboard Awards last week and botched it badly, sounding awful. So awful that even BET network trolled her on social networking.

For someone who did mean things to forgiving Prince in life and simply cannot sing, it was highly inappropriate for Madonna to do the tribute. "Nothing Compares 2 U" requires someone who can sing, not a pop pretender. My mother stated Meghan Trainor would have been a good choice and she is right. Sheila E could have done the tribute as well, having worked with and been engaged to Prince. Singers such as Miguel, Maxwell, Bruno Mars and D' Angelo could have done the tribute as well with Stevie Wonder.

Madonna didn't give a darn about Prince. She just wanted to see her plastic surgery butchered mug on TV. She is an attention seeker unable to cope with the fact the public has moved on from her...like Prince and so many men have done.

STORY SOURCE

Prince Crushed Madonna's Music Vid Dreams ... According to His Ex-GF

5/24/2016 9:39 AM PDT - THEY DIDN'T SEE EYE TO EYE. Madonna and Prince had a heated feud over the one song they ever recorded together, and the showdown involved one of Madonna's divorces ... according to Prince's ex-gf Anna Fantastic. Anna dropped this bombshell about Prince and the Madge's "Love Song" ... which they recorded in the late '80s. Anna says she was there when Madonna propositioned him to shoot a music video for the track. 

She claims Madonna tried to play the sympathy card by telling Prince she was in the middle of divorcing Sean Penn ... and the song meant a lot to her. Prince's reply, according to Anna? "What does your divorce have to do with me or this song?" Check out the rest of Anna's take. Maybe Madonna's tribute was just payback -- but if nothing else, we got the song out of 'em. 

http://www.tmz.com

RELATED ARTICLES





Untalented Madonna's Jealousy Of Talented Entertainers Such As Prince, Michael Jackson, Whitney Houston, Mariah Carey And Celine Dion

Madonna's Billboard Awards Tribute To Prince Slammed As Terrible As She Tries To Leech Off Public Sympathy In The Wake Of His Death


Madonna's Billboard Awards Tribute To Prince Slammed As Terrible As She Tries To Leech Off Public Sympathy In The Wake Of His Death


Madonna
 
Greedy, crazy, attention seeking pop singer, Madonna, did a tribute to the late singer, Prince, at yesterday's Billboard Music Awards that is being widely panned by critics and social networking as "pitchy" and "terrible" and "karaoke." Madonna can't sing. Therefore, attempting to sing a somewhat vocally challenging song like "Nothing Compares 2 U" was foolish and embarrassing. 


BET slamming Madonna's poor Prince tribute is the talk of social networking with people laughing at her (LOL)
 
The whole thing is ironic, as the music industry knows Prince did not like Madonna, due to her nasty conduct towards him at different times in his life. However, selfishly attempting to tap into public sympathy in the wake of his death, Madonna contacted Billboard and demanded to do the tribute, when Sinead O'Connor (among others) was a better choice.


A tweet on Twitter.com remarking on Madonna's terrible Prince tribute
 
Immediately a petition was launched online that has 10,000 signatures, demanding Madonna not be allowed to do the tribute. However, Billboard went ahead with it anyway and "is paying the piper" as Madonna's pathetic vocals are being slammed all over the internet. Madonna is not a singer, as she can't sing. She is a pop star (who is washed up as well). What made them think tone deaf, non-singing Madonna could sing "Nothing Compares 2 U" with all its vocal changes. Madonna barely has one octave.


A tweet on Twitter.com remarking on Madonna's terrible Prince tribute
 
 Piers Morgan had the most scathing comments regarding Madonna's poor performance, "I do think a tribute to Prince, a poor karaoke version of Sinead O'Connor was inappropriate." People on Twitter remarked that Madonna ruined the Prince tribute with her terrible vocals and should not have been chosen to do the tribute. Delusional Madonna slammed people for disliking her performance branding them haters, but she is a fool. It means the public does not want to see her. She missed the point altogether. The public is telling her to go away.

Here is a selection of social networking comments complied by the Daily Mail:






















STORY SOURCE

'It was karaoke' Piers Morgan joins the protest against Madonna's panned Prince tribute
 
PUBLISHED: 08:13, Mon, May 23, 2016 | UPDATED: 08:45, Mon, May 23, 2016 - The Queen of Pop closed last night's ceremony, dressed in a glimmering purple suit, by belting out the late musician's Nothing Compares 2 U, which was famously covered by Sinead back in 1990. Madonna, 57, came under fire from many on social media, including Piers who unleashed another tirade against the mother-of-four on Good Morning Britain. 

When one viewer noted that Piers, 50, would slam Madge's performance regardless, the former Britain's Got Talent replied: "I do think a tribute to Prince, a poor karaoke version of Sinead O'Connor was inappropriate." But he wasn't the only one left unimpressed by last night's spectacle. Several viewers venting their views on Twitter agreed with the presenter, with one posting: "Madonna performing a Prince tribute is offensive on so many levels."  

I do think a tribute to Prince, a poor karaoke version of Sinead O'Connor was inappropriate - Piers Morgan. Another fumed: "Let me be the first to say… she sounds awful. #Madonna #BillboardMusicAwards." This particularly disgruntled audience member barked: "Dearly Beloved, we are gathered here today to see a horrific flat version of my music @Madonna #BBMAs #PrinceTributeGoneWrong," before another followed: "Madonna is really ruining everything for me."
Organisers of the ceremony defended Madonna's tribute after an online petition called for more musicians to be included. The protest, which was signed by more than 8,000 people on Change.org, claimed Prince was "more than worthy of a better choice as a main performer". 

However, Piers had nicer things to say about Stevie Wonder, who joined Madonna for a duet of Purple Rain, and Celine Dion, whose performance he hailed as "incredibly moving" following the death of her husband and brother in the space of a few days earlier this year. This isn't the first time Piers has made a sworn enemy out of Madonna. He recently called the popstar "an old fraud" and previously warned Kylie Minogue not to go near her with a "barge pole". Good Morning Britain airs weekdays at 6am on ITV1.

http://www.express.co.uk

Madonna's tribute to Prince on Billboard Awards: U got the look, not the voice
 
 May 23, 2016 — 12:39am - Madonna LET.US.DOWN.AGAIN...asking Madonna to sing a ballad only shows that she doesn’t have the vocal chops to pull off a highly emotional tune that demands considerable range. Furthermore, watching Madonna slowly descend a staircase with the aid of a cane wasn’t in the best taste. It summoned images of Prince, wracked by pain that we’ve learned about since his death on April 21, hobbling with a cane... 



Madonna joined by Stevie Wonder as she pays tribute to Prince at the 2016 Billboard Awards
 
23 May 2016 • 6:55am - Prince died on April 21 at age 57. Even though the icons collaborated on Love Song in 1989, and even briefly dated, Madonna was met with criticism online when Billboard announced she would be the one to pay homage to The Purple One. Some felt she should not do the tribute alone, and others said a black artist should be involved and 8,000 people signed a petition calling for more musicians to be included and claiming that Prince was "more than worthy of a better choice as a main performer." 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk

'This is exactly why Doves cry!' Madonna is savaged on social media for her Prince tribute at Billboard Music Awards with Stevie Wonder
 
Published: 22:35 EST, 22 May 2016 | Updated: 11:30 EST, 23 May 2016 - Madonna divided critics and the internet alike for her tribute to the late, great Prince during the Billboard Music Awards in Las Vegas on Sunday. The 57-year-old Material Girl, who collaborated with the Purple One and allegedly had a brief relationship with him, paid homage by donning a Gucci lavender brocade and paisley suit and ruffled blouse while carrying a cane, and belting Nothing Compares 2 U onstage at the T-Mobile Arena. She was then joined by another living icon - Stevie Wonder - for an organ-heavy rendition of Purple Rain. Yet despite her personal and professional connection with the rocker, who tragically died last month aged 57, social media was quick to round on Madonna... 

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Samsung Seeks To Buy Sinking Tidal As Two More Executives Depart From The Struggling Company In The Face Of Mounting Lawsuits


Tidal's Madonna, DeadAmu5, Kanye West, Jay Z and J Cole

As Jay Z and Madonna's Tidal music streaming service falls, skidding towards bankruptcy, electronics giant Samsung, is reportedly interested in buying in the failed business. The Swedish company Aspiro was purchased and renamed Tidal. The price tag was $55,000,000, underwritten via loans and personal funds by recording artists Jay Z, Madonna, Rihanna, Kanye West, Micki Minaj, J. Cole and DeadAmu5, among others. It was launched as an equity business run by the aforementioned entertainers, but adopted the music streaming model pioneered by rival Spotify. 

Spotify is worth an estimated $3 billion and has 30 million subscribers (Apple, who is new to music streaming has 11,000,000 subscribers and Tidal has now has 1,000,000 but Tidal's users are mostly free accounts that are trial memberships). Tidal's owners immediately thought they would become billionaires. However, that's not how things worked out. Approximately 25 people fled Tidal, as the new owners have been engaging in criminal activity, such as falsifying sales, keeping two sets of accounting books, withholding royalty statements from recording artists who signed up the service in acts that constitute breach of contract, financial fraud, conversion and racketeering. 

This week it was announced, Tidal has been sued for doing the very thing the company said a year ago it wouldn't do - not pay artists. The band, The American Dollar, sued Tidal for $5 million American dollars. Oh, but it gets worse. Coincidentally (not really) yesterday Jay Z and company claimed it has fired Tidal's CFO Chris Haart and COO Nils Juell (trying to shift the blame to the two executives for Jay Z and Madonna's unlawful conduct - after blaming Harry Fox and prior to that, Universal, for all their self-induced problems). However, other reports indicate both men left Tidal, adding to the grand total of 25 people that already fled the lawbreaking company. Weeks prior Tidal's Senior Vice President, Zena Burns and Chief Information Officer, Vania Schlogel left.

Jay Z and company are seeking to offload Tidal. It is hemorrhaging millions of dollars and being slapped with lawsuits, wracking up massive legal fees. Despite these facts, Jay Z and his fellow Tidal owners want $100,000,000 for a company they bought for $55,000,000 a year ago and have run into the ground, while incurring serious additional debts. Tidal is also running a criminal credit card scam to boost revenues (Tidal Ripped Off Consumers Fraudulently Charging The Credit Cards Of Former Customers Who Closed Their Music Streaming Accounts).

Any entity that purchases Tidal is going to be faced with serious liabilities on a failed business. Tidal doesn't even have the rights to much of the music they are illegally streaming. Major labels also hate Tidal for botching their releases (and they seek to botch more releases to get them as Tidal exclusives). Vanity Fair magazine wrote, "On top of everything else, music industry executives aren't confident about Tidal, either. In a Billboard survey, 71 percent say they think Tidal will die out within a year. A more optimistic 17 percent gave Tidal one to two years before it folds." In short, they want Tidal gone.

In response to an item Jay Z and Madonna floated to the New York Post about Tidal and a potential sale, Samsung stated to the newspaper, "It is our policy to not comment on rumors or speculation."

RELATED ARTICLES

  Rapper TI Signs With Jay Z And Madonna's Floundering Tidal As IRS Moves In To Seize His Assets Over $6,200,000 In Unpaid Taxes








Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Jay Z And Madonna's Floundering Tidal Sued For $5,000,000 Over Copyright Infringement In Not Paying Artists While Inflating Their Own Sales To Go Number One On Billboard


Madonna (also known as Gollum), DeadMau5, Kanye West and Jay Z at Tidal's ill-fated launch
 
A year ago, greedy entertainers Jay Z and Madonna, among others, bought the Aspiro music streaming company for $55,000,000 and tried to rip off Spotify's business model and software. They promised to pay recording artists more money than every other music streaming service if they signed up with the company. However, they lied. The company immediately began to struggle and was dead on arrival. A few months after Tidal's abysmal launch, Apple's long awaited music service debuted and finished off Tidal. 

A year later, mainstream publications, as well as popular blogs, have branded Tidal a massive failure. Tidal is being financed via loan and personal funds to the tune of $55,000,000 which is a heavy debt load (in addition to operating costs). Tidal is not making anywhere near enough money to sustain itself or cover costs, hence their desperation manifesting via deliberate leaks, botching the releases of major record labels, to place said titles on their failing music streaming service. They are operating under the proviso that once an album is leaked, the record company will be forced to try to recoup costs via streaming on Tidal.


Jay-Z

This week, news broke that Tidal has been sued for copyright infringement regarding not paying artists. Yesh Music LLC artists, the American Dollar, sued Tidal for streaming 116 of its songs, reportedly 13,000 times and not paying them the proper royalties they are owed under standard industry agreements, which constitutes copyright infringement (The Judiciary Report did warn Tidal would rip artists off). 

As usual, rather than own up to their illegal conduct, crazy liars Jay Z and Madonna are shifting all blame to someone else. The dumb duo are blaming the historic Harry Fox Agency in Hollywood for the gross underpayment (However, the band stated Tidal refused to pay them for many months, then lied about their numbers). Much like Tidal shifted all blame for the botched release of Rihana's "Anti" album, forcing record label Universal to brand them "incompetent" and further state, "This whole thing is absurd, we would have taken responsibility if it were our error." Jay Z and Madonna are too old to be this juvenile. It is a sign of mental problems.

Tidal Under-Reporting Record Sales Of Non-Owners To Shortchange Artists 

Madonna the Gremlin

Lawyers for the band, the American Dollar, are stating Tidal is reporting fake numbers to them, in a scam that results in artists being paid less money. I can confirm Tidal is doing this, via keeping two sets of numbers/accounting records, regarding how many times each song is streamed on their service. 

For instance, if Tidal streams an artist's song 500,000 times, the accounting/royalty statement to the artist will state they streamed it 50,000 times, allowing the greedy company to skim profits off the top. They play the song a maximum amount of times and due to fraudulent reporting, only pay a fraction of what is owed to the artist, because they are lying about how many times they actually streamed each tune. It is enabling Tidal to pay less money to the artists, via misrepresenting the number of streams.


Rihanna  

This constitutes several federal crimes. Tidal would have to be audited by a computer specialist and accountant to gain the true figures. Only Tidal's owners have access to the real numbers for their own music and that of the artists who have signed up with the service. Everyone else is being lied to by the company, except its entertainer owners such as Rihanna, among others, whose streams are being grossly inflated to illegally place higher on the Billboard charts. 

This has resulted in Rihanna deceitfully equaling Michael Jackson's record for the most number one singles in music history and it is criminally being done through fraud, robbing the late music legend of a musical honor that he legitimately earned. It's is disgusting and disgraceful. She can't even sing or dance properly for that matter. 

Jay Z Previously Busted And Slammed For Sales Fraud 

  
Jay Z and former Tidal CEO Peter Tonstad

This is not the first time Jay Z has been busted engaging in a sales scam. Years ago, the Billboard chart company, caught Jay Z red-handed bribing retailers to run the same copy of his CDs through the register multiple times to enable him to debut at the top of the charts. For example, when a customer bought one copy of a Jay Z CD, retailers were being paid to run the same copy through the register 3-7 times, which ridiculously inflated his sales. Billboard slammed him for it, as it corrupted chart results, giving him number ones he did not earn, while depriving other artists of their rightful place in music history.

I know the history of the music industry very well and what truly goes on. There were times in music history (up until Soundscan) where music retailers would phone in how many records, CDs and CD singles they sold. The numbers they reported would be completely inaccurate and inflated due to bribery, where some artists are concerned, to help them secure undeserved number ones on the music charts (see: Madonna).

Other scams include manipulating RIAA sales. Some people get excited when they hear their favorite artist's album has gone platinum. However, some record executive, such as Tommy Mottola, formerly of Sony, a man with ties to the Genovese mafia, routinely inflated sales of artists such as Mariah Carey, whom he later married after an adulterous affair for career promotion by the fame hungry star. 

During the 1990s, you could go in any record store in America and find an excessive amount of unsold Mariah Carey CDs on the shelves, more than any other artist. That's because all the RIAA required for a gold (500,000 copies) or platinum (1,000,000 copies) certification is that the label ship the corresponding amount to retailers. You don't actually have to sell that amount to get the certification.

While Mariah Carey was a very gifted vocalist (her voice is very damaged now) Mottola's scam resulted in her having greater sales than Whitney Houston, Barbara Streisand and Patti Page, when she did not sell more albums or singles than the latter. She sold more than Madonna, but not Houston, Streisand or Page. Then, Mottola ripped off Carey, pocketing huge amounts of her actual sales and related products. Mottola, who was in his 40s, saw in an 18-year-old Carey, a great voice, a desperation for fame and a sucker he could exploit (but then she embarrassed him to the world).
  
Madonna, Jay Z And Rihanna Using Tidal To Inflate Their Own Sales 

Jay Z and wife Beyonce

Jay Z, Madonna and Rihanna are using the computer staff at Tidal to inflate record sales. It is apart of the reason some of the original staff fled (Tidal Loses Three More Executives). The first notable incident occurred via Rihanna's "Anti" album, where Jay Z lied stating the album had been streamed 400,000 times on Tidal, the same night Samsung bought and gave away 1,000,000 copies of the flopped album for free to her fans. Those numbers don't add up nor did Nielsen or Billboard corroborate or authenticate said fake numbers from Tidal. 

A new controversy has erupted, as Tidal has falsely claimed Kanye West's album entitled "The Life Of Pablo" which they botched the release of, has been streamed 100,000,000 times in two weeks, which is an outright lie (it's not even West's most talked about or popular album). Adele and Justin Bieber weren't even streamed that much in two weeks and they are currently the top music sellers of 2015 and 2016 (so far). 


Kanye West

Someone then pointed out to Tidal that Drake's album "If You're Reading This It's Too Late" which had way more buzz than Kanye's release, was streamed 17,000,000 times in two weeks on Spotify. Therefore, how did "The Life Of Pablo" which has no real buzz, stream 100,000,000 times in two weeks. They falsified the sales. When called out on the maneuver they were shoveling, trying to inflate sales as usual, Tidal backpedaled and stated "The Life Of Pablo" was streamed "millions of times" not "100,000,000 times."  

To make matters worse, Tidal did not report the streams to Billboard, as it is on the low end of the spectrum. This means for the first time in his 13-year rapping career, West has an album that did not chart on Billboard, which is a very negative development for a major label artist. "The Life Of Pablo" is classified as a flop. Tidal are a bunch of unprofessional, crazy jokers who aren't real business people. They are messing up artists careers. Billboard stated, "In respect to TIDAL and Kanye, for whatever reason they're not reporting that title [The Life of Pablo] to us...I don't know the reason behind it, I just know that they're not" - Silvio Pietroluongo, Billboard VP, Charts & Data Development.

Jay Z and Beyonce

"The Life Of Pablo" was deliberately leaked, so as to make it easier to be placed on Tidal, without the record company becoming enraged, believing it an actual leak. However, Def Jam has lost over $20,000,000 due to Jay Z's poor business acumen and dirty tricks in trying to keep a dead website alive (Tidal) via another leaked release ("The Life Of Pablo"). 

The irony for West is it took him 3-years to record the album, which is a significant period of time for making a studio recording. West also spent a significant sum of money to make the album, at many studios, using a number of guest stars. This all came from record company funds he has to recoup before he sees any money in profit. And as the album is being streamed on Tidal and at poor royalty rates, West will not recoup the costs of making the indulgent "The Life Of Pablo." His next album will have to sell double the usual amount to get him out of the red at the record label, whom he now owes a small fortune.

Con Artists And Thieves


Usher, Rihanna, Nicki Minaj, Madonna, Deadmau5, Kanye West, Jay Z and J Cole (also known as Hollywood's self-professed "Illuminati")

Jay Z and Madonna, among others at Tidal, are terrible con artists and thieves. They have nothing legitimate to contribute to the marketplace, always looking to get an illegal payday off someone else's hard work. They are always looking for someone to rob and rip off. There is something wrong in their brains. The mechanism that regulates people's conscience, sense of decency and ability to accept their fair share, not seeking to take everyone else's, is woefully absent in them. It is a mental defect found in psychopaths and greedy criminals with compulsions regarding money. 

Jay Z and Madonna have been repeatedly sued for years by many people for ripping off, robbing and shortchanging others. They are never satisfied and have absolutely no conscience or decency. If they were given 99 percent of the money in the world, they would still be furiously and feverishly searching the other 1 percent's pockets for money to take. They are not business people. They are criminals running scams and perpetrating acts of criminal fraud that is actively defrauding others.

STORY SOURCE

Jay Z and Tidal Are Reportedly Facing a Lawsuit Over Failing To Pay Artist Royalties (UPDATE)

8 hours ago - UPDATE: Tidal just issued a statement to Complex about the lawsuit and said that they are up to date on all royalties owed to Yesh Music, LLC. TIDAL is up to date on all royalties for the rights to the music stated in Yesh Music, LLC and John Emanuele’s claim and they are misinformed as to who, if anyone, owes royalty payments to them. As Yesh Music, LLC admits in their claim, TIDAL has the rights to the Master Recordings through its distributor Tunecore and have paid Tunecore in full for such exploitations. Their dispute appears to be over the mechanical licenses, which we are also up to date on payments via Harry Fox Agency our administrator of mechanical royalties. 

The entire catalogue in question streamed fewer than 13,000 times on TIDAL and its predecessor over the past year. We have now removed all music associated with Yesh Music, LLC and John Emanuele from the service. This is the first we have heard of this dispute and Yesh Music, LLC should be engaging Harry Fox Agency if they believe they are owed the royalties claimed. They especially should not be naming S Carter Enterprises, LLC, which has nothing to do with Tidal. This claim serves as nothing other than a perfect example of why America needs Tort reform. 

When Jay Z launched Tidal last year, he did so on the idea that the streaming service would be the first of its kind to take care of artists with higher royalty payouts. After the official launch event, Jay even tweeted that Tidal was going to pay every artist, writer, and producer featured on the service a 75 percent royalty rate, which was higher than any other streaming service in the industry, at least according to Hov. Now, it appears that Hov and Tidal are in some serious hot water over their royalty system, as they're reportedly facing a $5 million class-action lawsuit from Yesh Music, LLC and John Emanuele​ from the band, the American Dollar. 

The lawsuit, which was uploaded online to the site Scribd here, claims that Tidal streamed 116 of the band's copyrighted songs without paying back any royalty payments in the process. The firm Garbarini Fitzgerald P.C. reportedly filed the lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of New York over the weekend, according to the uploaded documents. As of now, neither Jay, Tidal, or Tidal's parent company, Aspiro, which is also named in the suit, have responded to the case. 

We spoke with the lawyer in the case, Richard Garbarini, on the phone, and he confirmed that the suit was filed over the weekend. Over the phone, Garbarini said that the band received no royalties for their work until this past Nov., and that the group asked months ago to have their music removed from Tidal. As of today, the band's music is currently still available to stream on Tidal. "I find it fairly amazing an organization that claims it was going to pay the artists, systematically does not pay the artists," Garbarini said. 

Tidal reportedly used faulty numbers to make payments to artists and may have undercut the money they owed to artists by as much as 35 percent, according to the filed documents. The band claims that they were expecting monthly reports on royalty payments and usage of every song on the service, but nothing was ever sent, according to the lawsuit...

http://www.complex.com

TIDAL Refuses to Reveal Stats for Kanye’s “The Life Of Pablo,” 100 Million Streams Likely Wrong

Posted 5 days ago - 2016-02-23 - Minutes ago I clicked on a story from Pigeons and Planes reporting that anonymous sources within TIDAL have revealed that Kanye's new album, The Life Of Pablo, has so far been streamed 100 million times exclusively on TIDAL in the two weeks since its (quasi)release; we can assume that means at least 50 million times in its first week. 100 million? 100 MILLI?!?!?!?...

For comparison, Drake's IYRTITL album held a previous streaming record by racking up approximately 17 million streams of If You're Reading This It's Too Late in its first week, and those official numbers came via Spotify, a service with approximately 25 million paid subscribers and an additional 40 million free users for 65 million total users. So that would mean that Kanye accumulated roughtly three times more streams than Drake in his first week on a streaming service 1/26th the size of Spotify. (TIDAL is currently reporting 2.5 million subscribers, about one million of those new subscribers driven there by Kanye's album.) If those kind of stats seem too good to be true, it's because they likely aren't true. 

Unfortunately, Pigeons & Planes seems to have simply made a mistake in their reporting. According to the original TMZ story they cited, the TIDAL source told TMZ that the album has been streamed "millions" of times, not "100 million times." "Millions" could indeed mean 100 million, or it could mean two million, which would be a mere 98 million off. 

"Sources connected to Tidal tell TMZ ... "The Life of Pablo" and its debut at MSG has already been streamed millions of times in less than two weeks, which is a record for the service." - TMZ
Regardless of who reported what number from where, the confusion around TLOP gets at a deeper story. As fate would have it, I didn't see P&P's story when it first went up because at the time I was on the phone with Billboard's VP of Charts & Data Development, Silvio Pietroluongo. Among the many topics we discussed (full interview coming later), Pietroluongo confirmed that while TIDAL has shared streaming and sales numbers for other artists and releases, they've so far refused to divulge any stats around The Life Of Pablo. 

"In respect to TIDAL and Kanye, for whatever reason they're not reporting that title [The Life of Pablo] to us...I don't know the reason behind it, I just know that they're not." - Silvio Pietroluongo, Billboard VP, Charts & Data Development...


Tidal nears one year of mediocrity and failure

In Music by Joel Freimark / February 25, 2016 - Just under a year ago, Tidal hosted one of the more awkward launch events ever known to man, as a handful of multi-millionaire musicians stood uncomfortably and lost on stage — all seeming to hope one another knew what was going on. In many ways, the event can be seen as the ideal precursor to the brilliant “how do I walk on stage” performance from presidential candidate Ben Carson just a few weeks ago, and the Tidal launch told us all we needed to know about the company. As they approach their first anniversary, things have only gotten worse, and someone should have the decency to put the clueless, unimaginative company out of its misery...

Then, of course, there was Tidal’s promise that they’d be using the platform to help unknown artists achieve stardom. Used by pretty much every music-related startup, this line is as old as “these photos are just so I can show big time producers what you look like,” and as of yet, not a single artist has been vaulted to any real status by the platform. This in itself isn’t entirely Tidal’s fault, as you need a large, active listener-base to achieve this, and they have neither.

Oh wait, that Kanye guy got a TON of hype when Tidal completely botched his album release — and nobody knew about him or Rihanna before they joined Tidal, right? The only thing Tidal achieved with their arrogant, unprofessional style of “exclusive” releases was incurring a massive amount of hate from the very people they’re trying to convince to pay them every month for a service that is done better elsewhere. 

But arrogance runs deep in the lifeblood of Tidal. Even before their launch event, they attempted to garner sympathy and subscribers in an absurd manner. Their pre-launch video was nothing short of unintentional comedic genius and led to countless, well deserved parodies. In short, Tidal was attempting to put forth the concept that they were “the little guy.”

Note to Jay Z, Madonna, Jack White, Kanye West and the long list of multi-platinum millionaires in the video: You can’t make people feel bad for NOT giving you $10 a month when you yourselves haven’t had to consider the value of $10 a month in well over 10 years...










Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Rihanna's Tour In Support Of 'Anti' Album Flopping With Poor Sales Prompting Free Ticket Giveway


Photo caption courtesy of Oh No You Didn't website

Reports indicate tickets sales for Rihanna's upcoming tour in support of her flopped, heavily slammed album "Anti" are flopping as well. The album "Anti" is currently mired in controversy over electronics company Samsung buying 1,000,000 copies for a dollar each and the RIAA certifying the album platinum, which the public is calling fake and cheating.


Billboard slammed Rihanna's Samsung stunt and refused to count the copies towards album sales

Now comes word that Rihanna's planned tour that Samsung paid to have booked in arenas around the world, underwriting the costs in anticipation of good publicity and getting their investment back, is flopping in a big way, prompting Jay Z's Roc Nation to give away free tickets. Samsung is already angry over the negative publicity they are getting on social networking for buying 1,000,000 copies of "Anti." With tour ticket sales in the toilet, they are not going to see return on their investment and are already saddled with bad publicity.


Many people on social networking are mocking Rihanna and Samsung over the sales stunt

Major label artists with Rihanna's type ego, do not like performing to half empty arenas. They are very proud and can't handle it. This is what Rihanna is facing. To save face, Jay Z's company will be giving away loads of tickets in online contests and to radio stations to fill the empty seats.

STORY SOURCE
 
Rihanna giving away free tickets for her low-selling ANTi Tour

February 2nd, 2016, 01:33 am - Rihanna and TIDAL are staging a giveaway for her ANTi World Tour. In an effort to make people stream the album and inflate ANTI's chart positions, the giveaway requires absolutely no purchase. Fans are encouraged to stream the album to increase their chances at winning...the ANTi tour hasn't been selling either and most of the dates have thousands of tickets still available...


RELATED ARTICLES














Rihanna's New Album 'Anti' Officially Flops Selling Only 460 Copies


Rihanna

Lewd singer, Rihanna, is being heavily ridiculed online as news was released revealing her new, frequently delayed album "Anti" is only being credited with selling a paltry 460 copies (and that is in streams, which means people only listened to it and did not buy it) while the rest, 1,000,000 were given away for free. Rihanna cut a deal with Samsung who bought 1,000,000 copies of the album "Anti" for $1 each and gave them away to the public for free. 

Embarrassed by the bad publicity and claims her music career is dead and over, Jay Z and Rihanna lied stating "Anti" had sold 400,000 overnight. However, Forbes magazine rubbished the claims as highly unlikely, branding it a lie. The truth came out today that "Anti" is only credited with selling 460 that weren't actually even bought by the public either, as they represent streams on Tidal. This confirms what the Judiciary Report and others have repeatedly stated about Jay Z and company, regarding their unlawful habit of lying about financial figures to fake the look of success.

Billboard and Soundscan are rejecting the 1,000,000 copies it as a dishonest scam that violates the rules. However, the RIAA has certified "Anti" platinum, but are being mercilessly mocked on social networking for doing so, with audiences labeling it cheating. As discussed in the column years ago, Jay Z was caught red-handed running a Soundscan scam, via paying retailers to run each copies sold of his CDs through the register 3-5 times, which greatly inflated his sales.


Jay Z and Rihanna

My sources informed me that Samsung is furious at the bad publicity and plans to slash the tour money even more than what was negotiated, which is nowhere near the $25,000,000 Jay Z and Rihanna floated to the New York Post. They were not promised even half that figure and the money is to book arenas and pay other costs associated with her upcoming tour slated for this summer.

The tour is already in trouble, as she has no new hits to sell it. Rihanna's last four singles have flopped ("Four Five Seconds" "Bit*h Betta Have My Money" "American Oxygen" and "Work"). Ironically, "Four Five Seconds" "Bit*h Betta Have My Money" and "American Oxygen" were originally apart of "Anti" but were dropped as they had flopped. Rihanna's new single "Work" featuring Drake is flopping as well.

The reviews by mainstream outlets are brutal, but deserved. Rihanna stole and slapped together other people's preexisting copyrighted works, such as Just Brittany's song and separately some of my preexisting copyrights. The rip offs by Rihanna sound tragic and dull, as she has deteriorated and devalued the original works. People work hard to put their music together and not for lazy, money grubbing thieves to steal it.


STORY SOURCE

Rihanna’s ‘ANTI’ Only Sold 460 Copies (Yes, You Read That Right)

February 1, 2016 - 4:41 pm - Some crazy things happen when you give your album away for free. As we reported last week, Rihanna’s long-awaited ANTI, which finally dropped (to polarizing reception) last Wednesday (Jan. 27, 2016), has already been certified platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). Unfortunately for Rihanna, her achievement is somewhat undermined by the fact that Samsung, a sponsor of her upcoming world tour, purchased those copies — all one million of them — and gave them away for free. Do you know who doesn’t count albums given away for free by phone companies? Literally everyone except for the RIAA, including Billboard.

Billboard reports that ANTI debuts at No. 27 on their Album 200 chart, due in large part to streams of “Work,” the album’s first single, and other album tracks made available on TIDAL between Wednesday and Friday. (It also apparently counts only 460 copies of the album sold before the Friday cut-off. If you need a quick math refresher: No. 27 is pretty far away from No. 1, and 460 copies is far, far from platinum.

Meanwhile, the album’s lead single, “Work” (Feat. Drake), debuts at No. 9 on the Billboard Hot 100. Does Bad Gal have another No. 1 on her hands? I suppose we’ll see! Of course, we’re having a bit of fun with the fact that ANTI debuted on an a day that was not a Friday and that it wasn’t available to purchase for more than a day after it was released. Things will look much better for Rihanna next week: with a full week of actual sales (and nearly a full week of being perched atop the iTunes Albums Chart), she is likely to score her second No. 1 album after all. Still. 460 copies. Damn.
 
 
Tidal Claims That Rihanna's Album Has Already Sold 400,000 Copies 
 
an 29, 2016 @ 12:27 PM 9,224 views -  Rihanna’s eighth full length album might only be just over a day old, but according to at least one source, ANTI is selling incredibly well.

Tidal, the streaming service that exclusively has the record available for download for its first week, claims that the album has already shifted over 1.4 million copies. The company confirms that one million of those were paid for and given away to fans by Samsung, so that leaves 400,000 copies that have been sold to expectant fans.

But, is that really true? That 400,000 figure should be taken with a grain of salt. If the numbers are correct, it means that ANTI is already the biggest success of the singer’s storied career, and that’s a bit tough to believe.

To put that 400,000 figure into perspective, it’s worth noting that Rihanna’s largest debut sales week to date was with her last album, Unapologetic. That record became her first to start at number one (and her only number one yet), and it sold just under 250,000 copies in its first week. That campaign was going strong at the time of the album’s release thanks to the massively-popular lead single “Diamonds”, which was another number one hit for her.

So, without a single (lead cut “Work” was released less than a day before the album appeared online) and little to no warning, is it really possible that the record is approaching half a million in sales in just two days? If so, that puts ANTI on track to have a massive first week, dwarfed only in recent memory by Adele or Taylor Swift.

Interestingly, while the RIAA does count those one million copies as sales, neither Billboard nor Nielsen (which provides Billboard with data every week) will recognize them. After Lady Gaga shifted more than one million copies of her second full length record Born This Way thanks to Amazon offering it for just 99 cents a few years back, the rules have changed as to what counts and what doesn’t count when it comes to charting. A full length needs to be sold for at least a certain price ($3.49) within the first month it comes out in order to be included in the weekly ranking. The price that Samsung paid for those one million albums that it gave away can’t be deciphered, so they won’t be included in her official first week tally.

Both Tidal and Rihanna would benefit from these huge numbers—numbers that are only expected to grow. The rollout of ANTI didn’t go as planned for the streaming service, so it could use some good press. The story is so great it’s almost unbelievable…and that’s the problem. This isn’t to say that the figures are incorrect, but do keep in mind where they are coming from. 

RELATED ARTICLES