Chris Brown
The public is confused regarding the chain of
command in the Chris Brown probation violation case, stemming from
the 2009 Rihanna domestic violence incident. Brown’s probation was
violated a few weeks ago, over an alleged assault in Washington,
regarding an incident that is completely questionable.
Brown voluntarily admitted himself into rehab for
anger management in Los Angeles, where he resides, with Judge James
Brandlin’s approval. Brown completed 95-days in rehab. The judge was
impressed and extended it by 60 additional days, which would keep
Brown in treatment until the next hearing in his Washington case.
However, three issues that were not of an illegal nature occurred,
resulting in his arrest at the facility. Brown currently sits in
jail, after being remanded into custody for a month until the next
hearing in his Washington case.
As the Judiciary Report was the first to state,
Brown’s lawyer should settle the fraudulent Washington case, even
though the victim stated the singer never hit him. Something strange
is going on which could lead Brown spending up to 4-years in jail.
The next day TMZ wrote Brown’s lawyer is looking into settling the
case.
If the Washington case is handled via settlement, it
should by default dispose of the Los Angeles violations as well, as
his probation was violated over what transpired in D.C. If the basis
for the violation is removed from the equation, how can the rehab
incident reasonably remain. Brown was not accused of breaking the
law in rehab. Once again, Brown was accused of violating house
rules, in conduct that was not criminal.
