Showing posts with label likeness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label likeness. Show all posts

Friday, November 9, 2012

Just Bieber Blow Up Sex Doll Has Sold Out


Justin Bieber blow up sex doll

A report this week indicates the blow up sex doll, pardon the pun, baring the likeness of teen pop star Justin Bieber, has sold out (you know Kim Kardashian, Perez Hilton and Harvey Levin from TMZ bought one). Ok, who exactly is buying this doll. Could it be his fanbase. Did you guys take your parents credit cards to purchase this doll. 


Justin Bieber (right, just in case you were wondering)

As stated a week ago, the doll needs to be pulled. However, there could be another reason it is said to be sold out. Some are speculating the makers of the doll stopped producing them as Bieber's lawyers came after them. No official word yet on what transpired.

STORY SOURCE

Justin Bieber lookalike sex doll in demand and out of stock 

November 8, 2012 - Bad news for all those out there that want one of those new Justin Bieber lookalike blow-up sex dolls but haven't had the chance to order one. It appears that the cleverly named "Just-In Beaver" doll is currently out of stock. Although t is uncertain when the item might again be in stock, there might be a couple reasons for there being none available.

Pipedream Products, the manufacturer of the anatomically correct inflatable (to accommodate both males and females), could be sold out due to intense demand. Of course, it very well might be out of stock due to the litigation being threatened by Bieber. Either way, it is currently unavailable for purchase.

The just-turned 18-year-old singer is reportedly incensed at the idea that someone might profit from the sex doll that is being packaged with a Bieber lookalike on the box cover. Insinuating blurbs -- like "I'm not gay! (ok maybe just a lil')," "Beaver Fever," and "I wanna be your boy toy!" -- appear in various places around the lookalike...     


RELATED ARTICLE


Saturday, September 11, 2010

Lady Gaga Exposed As A Fraud

The mother of late indie singer, Lina Morgana, has released a very telling video to YouTube, comparing photographs of her late daughter, with rip-offs her old friend, Lady GaGa went on to release. The video shows Lady GaGa and her producer, Rob Fusari, who was Morgana's writing partner, to be complete frauds.

As written on the site previously, Morgana killed herself a few years ago, by jumping off the roof of a New York hotel, which is regrettable as suicide is not the answer. A year later, Lady GaGa, released her debut and ripped-off the deceased singer's image and persona. Time will tell if she stole music Morgana had written as well.

It's very sad and pathetic, what some do to be famous. As much as crazy Madonna would like to take credit for Lady Gaga and every other female singer in the world, when she can't even sing, the newcomer's debut is nothing like her.

The Judiciary Report can see how Lady GaGa ripped off Morgana and there are visible traces of David Bowie and Grace Jones in her debut as well. But the thing is, Jones and Bowie are famous and living. Morgana never got her chance at stardom and it was patently wrong, creepy and morbid, for Lady GaGa to assume a dead woman's life, exploiting it for fame and fortune. She has serious mental problems to have done such a thing. You are a fraud.

Friday, March 19, 2010

Lady Gaga Steals From Another Indie Artist

Top to bottom: Maluca, Lady Gaga

Left to right: Lady Gaga, Shania Twain (Courtesy of ONTD)

Lady Gaga burst onto the music scene with a style reminiscent of Grace Jones and David Bowie. Her music started off on a fairly new course, representing something somewhat new and different, but of late, she has been pilfering items from other singers and it is hurting her name online, as audiences are pointing out the rip-offs.

Kerli (left) and Lady GaGa (right)

The most recent is indie singer, Maluca, who slammed Lady Gaga for stealing her trademark "soda can rollers" look, for her latest video "Telephone" featuring fellow bisexual Beyonce.

RELATED ARTICLE