Movie Distorts History And Has An Excessive And
Embarrassing Amount Of References To The Kardashian Family
That Is Out Of Place
People vs. OJ Simpson
Yesterday, police reported that a former
officer came forward claiming he found the knife used in 1994 to
kill waiter Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown-Simpson, the ex-wife of athlete O.J.
Simpson. The knife was
reportedly found at the demolition site of Simpson's former
Brentwood, California estate that was purchased and knocked down to
build a new house. This sounds like a ratings ploy.
This development is highly suspect, as after
years of contamination who knows what is on the knife via
DNA or if it had anything to do with the vicious double
murders at all. It should be noted, over the years several
people have come forward claiming they have found the knife
used in the murders. They can't all be right and thus far,
none of them have been found to be telling the truth.
Kris Jenner (previously Kris Kardashian)
The movie is garbage. It is full of lies and
inconsistencies. You cannot rewrite history while making a
historical film. Revisionists are mentally unsound to do
such a thing. For example, the filmmakers questionably wrote
in a dramatic scene of prosecutor, Bill Hodgman, collapsing
in court from a heart attack, due to Simpson's lawyer
Shapiro not disclosing the full list of witnesses. This
never happened. A few names had been left of the witness
list by Shapiro's office, but Bill Hodgman developed chest
pains and was hospitalized during a meeting on the case.
Doctors at the hospital later discovered it was stress
induced chest pains and not a heart attack.
The film also contains a ridiculous amount
of references to the reality TV family, the Kardashians, who
were friends with the Simpson. Robert Kardashian Sr., also
represented Simpson at trial. It took away from the film's
credibility to feature the entire Kardashian family so much
in the move. It looked weird, attention seeking and vapid.
People vs. O.J. Simpson movie still of prosecutor Bill Hodgman having a heart attack in court during the trial, which never happened in real life
Other inconsistencies include their
portrayal of Simpson's famed attorney, Johnnie Cochran. I
met Johnnie Cochran in Atlanta, Georgia years ago while on
vacation with my family and friends (years after the Simpson
criminal trial). We were having lunch at Diddy's "Justins"
restaurant in Buckhead, which is a central suburb of
Atlanta. Cochran walked in and though we didn't know him and
he didn't have to, he came by our table and spoke to us and
asked how we were doing. Cochran was there to shoot a
commercial in one of the private dining areas of the
restaurant. He was a very nice, polite, humble man. He was
down to earth, pleasant and walked with a pep in his step.
This arrogant, haughty, cocky, sinister,
uppity portrayal of him in the "People vs. OJ Simpson" TV
movie is grossly inaccurate garbage. They got Cochran and
his mannerisms all wrong. Furthermore, the producers of the
film have no idea what Simpson stated behind closed doors to
his wife, children, colleagues at his office or O.J.
Simpson, as those were private conversations. To make up the
worst possible lines you as a screenwriter could think of to
malign a man for doing his job as an attorney, in defending
someone, who under the law, had a right to legal
representation, is unethical.
Johnnie Cochran
I will state this though, O.J. Simpson
should have been locked up years prior to Brown-Simpson and
Goldman's deaths, for domestic violence. There is proof he
repeatedly beat his wife in horrible ways. Regarding the
murder trial, due to police tampering, the evidence in the
Simpson case was doctored and as such rendered discredited.
We know this because there was lab crime scene chemical
preservatives (anti-coagulant) on items later found in
properties, presented as evidence with blood on it.
That means the blood the forensic scientist
drew from Simpson for comparison after the murders, which
needed preservatives to keep its structural integrity to
some degree, was planted after the fact at his home and
other locations involving the crime. Blood splatter at a
crime scene will not have forensic lab preservatives on it.
It is believe racist police officer, Mark Furman, planted
blood on items in a bid to make sure Simpson would be
convicted, but it ended up doing the exact opposite, freeing
Simpson due to tainted evidence (a tape was discovered of
Furman using the n-word 41 times). Some cops need to learn
to leave the evidence alone. A good lawyer will find the
truth in the unvarnished evidence. When you corrupt the
evidence in trying to win a case, another good lawyer will
discover that as well and destroy your case.
Racist police officer Mark Furhman planted evidence in the O.J. Simpson case and plead the Fifth (Amendment) when asked if he had done so, denying to answer the question to prevent self-incrimination. Furhman later pled guilty to perjury in the O.J. Simpson case after giving false testimony that ruined the case.
My personal opinion on the murders is this,
Simpson is a violent man. So is his son from a previous
marriage, who was on antipsychotic medications and
questioned by police for drawing a knife on a girlfriend and
threatening her (prior to the Brown-Simpson and Goldman
murders). Simpson had a history of flying into rages and
beating Brown-Simpson. Simpson also had a history of
jealousy regarding her (which is hypocritical, as he was
cheating on her all the time).
No one deserves to be brutally murdered,
especially in the heinous manner Brown-Simpson and Goldman
were killed. Brown-Simpson was stabbed in the head and her
throat was slit so deeply, she was nearly decapitated.
Goldman was stabbed in the head, face, torso and thighs,
even after he was already dead and stopped fighting for his
life. Whoever did this deserves life in prison.
O.J. Simpson and ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson
I am of the belief O.J. Simpson did this or
knows who committed the murders. It also doesn't look good
that rather than face the legal charges, he fled in a
Bronco. An innocent man would not do that, opting to clear
their name. There is also a significant amount of evidence
against Simpson that indicates he killed Brown-Simpson and
Goldman.
I do not agree with the fact Simpson was
acquitted of murder, yet a civil case awarded the families
of Brown-Simpson and Goldman $33,500,000 in damages. The
legal precedent is not a good one. However, believing O.J.
Simpson either killed Brown-Simpson and Goldman or knows who
did it, I'm NOT sorry for him being hit with massive damages
in the civil case. They lost their family members and
Simpson has a terrible history of abuse regarding his
ex-wife.
Faye Resnick
Faye Resnick, Brown-Simpson's so-called
friend, was squarely out of line writing a salacious tell
all book about the decedent. What kind of friend blabs all
your secrets in a book. Resnick made Brown-Simpson look bad.
Resnick told the whole world Brown-Simpson was a cocaine
addict, they had a lesbian sexual encounter, Brown-Simpson
slept with one of Simpson's best friends (AC Cowlings),
Simpson made Brown-Simpson get breast implants,
Brown-Simpson performed oral sex on men while they slept,
Simpson stretched out his ex-wife's vagina to the point she
only slept with men his size or bigger, giving way to all
sorts of racial innuendo and exploitative, offensive
Mandingo claims about black men in the book, rendering them
to mere sex objects.
Resnick betrayed the trust of many in her
circle to write the tell all book, to feed her cocaine habit
and lavish lifestyle. Resnick further exploited
Brown-Simpson's death to disgraceful degrees, to promote
herself on television and in side projects to make more
money. It was very selfish and treacherous. She sold out her
friend for fame and money, tarnishing her memory.
Nicole Brown Simpson and O.J. Simpson
In closing, Nicole Brown-Simpson's life
became a sad tale of breaking up a man's marriage and then
inadvertently ending up with a raging abuser. Nicole began
having sex with married 27-year-old Simpson when she was 17
and working for minimum wage at a night club in 1977. Many
jurors in the 1995 murder trial characterized Nicole as "a
gold digger" as at age 17, due to regularly having sex with
Simpson, he got her an apartment and bought her a Porsche. A
woman should not accept such gifts from a married man. Then,
she successfully broke up his marriage/family of a wife and
three kids.
Nicole was determined to get Simpson and
began doing her best to break up his marriage of 10-years to
Marguerite Simpson (nee Whitley). Nicole would repeatedly
drive by his home in the Porsche O.J. bought her to get his
wife's attention. Nicole sent his wife a pair of her
underwear in the mail. Nicole pushed and pushed until she
succeeded in breaking up his marriage in 1979, resulting in
his divorce. Nicole then married Simpson in 1985 after years
of insisting he leave his wife and marry her. Nicole
succeeded in becoming O.J.'s wife and moving into a mansion
with him, living the high life.
Police photos of Nicole Brown-Simpson after she was beaten up by O.J. Simpson on different occasions. One incident resulted in his arrest, where he pled guilty in lieu of a jail sentence
Simpson then turned into a monster on her.
Simpson repeatedly beat Nicole in vicious ways (he did not
beat his former wife). Unprovoked, O.J. would beat Nicole,
throw her in the closet, then an hour later, go back to the
closet and beat her more. He would beat her up at hotels and
throw her out into the hall way. He also picked her up and
threw her against walls in the presence of others, such as
her sister and Resnick. He was very verbally abusive calling
her fat, worthless and stating she has no skills, while
ordering her to get out of his house. He also kept cheating
on her with famous and non-famous women. If she dared ask
him about it, he would badly beat her. It was a nightmare of
a marriage. No one deserves to be treated that way. At the
end of the day, O.J. was not the one for Nicole (and vice
versa) and pursuing him led to her tragic demise at age 35
(not because it was an interracial couple, as there's
nothing wrong with that).
I see it all the time in the entertainment
industry. Women of all races hungry for money and attention
feverishly pursuing rich and famous men, even ones who are
married to other women. They go to great lengths pushing
other women out of the way who are girlfriends, fiancées and
even wives. Then when they get the famous man they
aggressively pushed people out of the way to land, they find
out it is not all it's cracked up to be when these men
become bitter and blame them for their problems. Some end up
viciously abused like Nicole. Others end up used for sex
like a concubine and dumped when the famous man moves on to
the next one. There are women in the industry right now
fighting tooth and nail to push other women out of the way,
trying to land famous men in relationships that will turn
cruel on them. As the phrase goes, "Be careful what you wish
for." Some famous men are decent people, but some are not,
living debauched lives the average man does not, while
hiding behind a fake persona contrived for fans, television,
the internet and paid product endorsements.
Side Bar: In the
Aisha v. Madonna
lawsuit, among the items contained in my copyrights that
were infringed, are outlines to make biopics. Among them are
items to make movies about Aaliyah, TLC, Whitney Houston and
Bobby Brown, O.J. Simpson, Idi Amin and Martin Luther King,
among others. Then all of a sudden, people affiliated with
Madonna's Kabbalah Center cult set off in a mad rush to make
the aforementioned biopics and very poorly and filled with
lies and sensationalism, might I add. They could have made
the biopics long ago, especially right after many of
subjects thereof passed away, which is the standard, yet
waited many years to do so AFTER I included items about
making said biopics in my copyrights that are registered
with the Library of Congress, then were repeatedly
hacked by hackers hired by
Madonna and infringed. Pathetic!
