Showing posts with label Waterloo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Waterloo. Show all posts

Monday, December 7, 2009

Obama Afghanistan Backlash

"Barack Obama orders 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan"

Based on declining poll numbers, public feedback sections and basic chatter on the streets, the American people are not happy with President Barack Obama's decision to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan, to fight a futile war. Obama has pledged that after sending the additional troops, the war will be wrapped up by 2011, one year before the Presidential elections. This is a bad idea and it shall become his Waterloo.

U.S. President Barack Obama

Due to the political, social and military dynamic that exists in the Middle East, the U.S. Army is in for a terrible time with this renewed mission, which should have been ended, not rebooted. Islamic extremists will strengthen their resolve and many lives will be lost as a result, which is horrible. The U.S. and British militaries need to leave the region and deal with terrorism in a productive manner, more conducive to and in accordance with the preservation of human life.

Obama Approval on Afghanistan, at 35%, Trails Other Issues

Decline from 49% in September far exceeds that for other issues and for approval more broadly

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans are far less approving of President Obama's handling of the situation in Afghanistan than they have been in recent months, with 35% currently approving, down from 49% in September and 56% in July.

http://www.gallup.com

Obama Orders 30,000 Troops to Afghanistan; Withdrawal to Begin July 2011

VOA News 01 December 2009 - U.S. President Barack Obama is ordering some 30,000 more American troops to Afghanistan, starting in early 2010.

In his highly anticipated speech on his new war strategy, President Obama said the United States did not "ask for this fight," saying that the war started in response to the al-Qaida terror attacks that killed nearly three-thousand people.

He said the terror group's base of operations was in Afghanistan, and members of the terrorist network were harbored by the Taliban, which he described as a "ruthless, repressive and radical movement." ...

http://www1.voanews.com

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Obama To Send More Troops To Afghanistan - Pt. 2

According to the Wall Street Journal, U.S. President Barack Obama is leaning in the direction of sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan. This decision shall prove a fruitless mistake that follows him for years to come. Too much of a troop build up is detrimental to the nation's financial health and war weary psyche.

U.S. Cool to Surge in Afghanistan's Own Force

NOVEMBER 30, 2009 - White House Leaning Against Call to Double Nation's Police and Army, but Surge of Some 30,000 American Troops Is Likely

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration has soured on a call from its top commander to double the size of the Afghan police and army, reflecting the White House's continued skepticism about the Afghan government even as the U.S. prepares a surge of troops into the country, people familiar with the matter say.

At an address at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point on Tuesday, President Barack Obama is expected to announce that he will send roughly 30,000 American reinforcements to Afghanistan in addition to the 21,000 he deployed early in his administration. The escalation would bring total U.S. forces to some 100,000, the largest American troop deployment to Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion that toppled the Taliban government....

http://online.wsj.com

Saturday, October 10, 2009

40,000 More Troops For Afghanistan

"40,000 Troops to Afghanistan?" - CBS

40,000 more troops have been requested from U.S. President Barack Obama, for combat in Afghanistan. The lowest estimate furnished is 10,000 troops, with the ideal target amount being 40,000.

Afghanistan is going to become Obama's waterloo, if they charge ahead with this plan. The Judiciary Report and many others are not for this course of action.

America's creditors, such as China, are already concerned and questioning the country's debt level. This surge via 40,000 troops is going to create massive expenditures. Not to mention, terrible loss of life.