Professor Admits Climate Change Fraud

Professor Phil Jones

Professor Phil Jones, of the University of East Anglia, has admitted Climate Change is a fraud. His email account and those of his colleagues, were hacked and disclosed to the public a few months ago, revealing doctored scientific data on global warming, " Jones said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming."

Jones has refused to turn over research documents in response to a formal Freedom of Information Act request in Britain. In the Judiciary Report's experience, when people refuse to comply with the Freedom of Information Act, it is usually because they are guilty and don't want the evidence to come out. The cat's already out the bag, so you may as well just rip the band aid off and get it over with.

Side Bar: do you know how many people wanted a BMW or Mercedes, but didn't buy one, because they were told it is bad for the environment, so instead, they drove cars the size of matches boxes.

Climategate Fraud Admitted

Written by David Arnett, Publisher Monday, 15 February 2010 10:34

The United Kingdom’s Daily Mail is reported Sunday that the scientist at the center of the controversy over fraudulent scientific assertions which serve as the basis for United Nation reports and the Obama Administration’s economy killing energy program has admitted that he has trouble “keeping track” of information and that his record keeping is “not as good as it should be.”

Professor Phil Jones, whose data is crucial to the theory of climate change, is refusing Freedom of Information requests to produce the data. Colleagues say the reason is that the Professor may have actually lost the relevant papers.

Sunday on the BBC Jones said there was truth to the observations of colleagues that he lacked organizational skills. He conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now and suggested global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon. Jones said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming...

The Obama Administration and Congressional Democrats continue to fight for an energy policy they call “Cap and Trade” (or Restrict and Tax by critics) which would cost anyone who owns a light switch or rents one in America. At a time of increasing concern over national financial stability, critics believe such a program would have devastatingly harmful effects both directly and in secondary costs to American consumers...

http://www.tulsatoday.com

Global Warming Email Scandal

University of East Anglia in England

The current global warming scandal, regarding hackers breaking into the computers at a British research facility in the University of East Anglia and releasing emails, revealing scientists colluding to manipulate and suppress data, that is contrary to their point of view, is being met with calls for government probes.

Abusing the earth is not a good idea, but some really took global warming to the limits, costing many a great deal of money, inconvenience and guilt.

The revelation of a concerted effort among select, global scientists to silence critics, who have been debunking aspects of the global warming paradigm, violates many international treaties on free speech and free press, not to mention human rights charters, expressly forbidding depriving people of employment and a good name.

Climategate: how the MSM reported the greatest scandal in modern science

November 21st, 2009 - ...E-mails allegedly written by some of the world’s leading climate scientists have been stolen by hackers and published on websites run by climate change sceptics.

The sceptics claim that the e-mails are evidence that scientists manipulated data in order to strengthen their argument that human activities were causing global warming...

But what it does demonstrate is the growing level of public scepticism towards Al Gore’s Anthropogenic Global Warming theory. That’s why, for example, this story is the single most read item on today’s Telegraph website.

What it also demonstrates – as my dear chum Dan Hannan so frequently and rightly argues – is the growing power of the Blogosphere and the decreasing relevance of the Mainstream Media (MSM).

This is not altogether the MSM’s fault. Partly it is just the way of things that more and more readers prefer their news and opinion served up in snappier, less reverent, more digestible and instant for.

But in the case of “Climate Change”, the MSM has been caught with its trousers down. The reason it has been so ill-equipped to report on this scandal is because almost all of its Environmental Correspondents and Environmental Editors are parti pris members of the Climate-Fear Promotion lobby. Most of their contacts (and information sources) work for biased lobby groups like Greenpeace and the WWF, or conspicuously pro-AGW government departments and Quangos such as the Carbon Trust. ...

As Upton Sinclair once said: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.”...

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk