Showing posts with label Russell Davies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Russell Davies. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Another Pedophile At The BBC Arrested Admits Sex Crimes Against Children


BBC presenter Stuart Hall has admitted to molesting underage girls 
 
[Article background: this is another in the series of phone hacking articles the Judiciary Report has published, regarding a scandal I broke first in October 2005, via a police complaint I filed with the Metropolitan Police in London, England. 90 people have been arrested by the Metropolitan Police since the time I filed the complaint. However, the Murdochs and other key conspirators remain free and the FBI has not arrested anyone, though the crimes began and continue in News Corp's New York headquarters]  
 
This is a follow up to the article May 2. 2013 Judiciary Report Article "Pedophilia At The BBC Comes To Light Just As The Site Predicted With Arrests In Jimmy Savile Scandal" regarding Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris and Max Clifford.

BBC television show host Stuart Hall was also arrested and charged with sex crimes against kids, regarding sexually molesting 20 underage girls as young as 9-years of age. Initially, Hall denied the allegations, claiming innocent and outrage, but shortly after admitted he did indeed commit serious sex crimes against children.

In the course of going over the phone hacking case, which I broke first online, thanks to Madonna’s highly questionable behavior, I discovered there are a few pedophiles ensconced at the BBC (Britain), Warner Bros (the BBC's partner and the label and film studio Madonna is affiliated with), Disney and Sony (Hollywood).

On May 5. 2013, the head of the BBC acknowledged the burden and legal liability the case has created on the British taxpayers, due to the criminal misconduct of the pedophiles in the case and select staff who covered up their crimes (see article excerpt below). In the May 2. 2013 Judiciary Report Article "Pedophilia At The BBC Comes To Light Just As The Site Predicted With Arrests In Jimmy Savile Scandal" the site discussed how unfair their conduct is to the British taxpayers.

BBC Execs Controlling The Lives Of Stars And Other Employees

An external news article entitled "Review prompted by Savile scandal reveals 'strong undercurrent of fear' at BBC" has confirmed what I have witnessed firsthand regarding a few select employees of the BBC, who are utilizing Hollywood type tactics in threatening people into silence.

A few, not all, executives at the BBC are controlling the lives of stars and office employees of the network. This is unethical, as the network is a public trust funded by the British taxpayers. The British government has graciously and generously given the BBC enormous sums of money and not for a few executives at the network to do this. Said executives attempt to regulate what said stars do, say and write on social networking, also where they go and with whom.

It is a human rights violation, particularly regarding free speech and working in an environment free of fear, harassment and retaliation. When you start bullying folks, demanding they not speak to or communicate with certain people in any fashion or lose their jobs, you’ve broken the law.

To have a policy of, if you talk to or consort with so-and-so including the police you will be fired, is crossing the line. Once again, the BBC belongs to the taxpayers; it’s not your privately held network. Stop acting like it is. You didn’t put a dime into creating it, nor have you pumped billions of dollars into its upkeep over the years. The British taxpayers did. What’s equally astonishing is a handful of people are tarnishing a storied network’s legacy. It really is not fair, as the BBC has done some great work that is now being overshadowed by scandal.

Two employees in particular at the BBC are promoting an air of fear, hostility and harassment. They should think twice about their conduct, as not only is it unethical, it is without justification or legal basis. Furthermore, have you no thought for the employees of the BBC, stars included, whom you affect with your bullying, as it is producing undesirable side effects in their lives such as depression, distress and stress.

What does that have to do with entertainment? What if your bullying and interference in the lives of BBC employees leads to someone at the network committing suicide, breaking under the distress and peer pressure. Then what (by the way, please, no one do that, as suicide is not the answer to your problems and depression).

To the two aforementioned employees: keep it up and your names may end up in the public domain in a very unflattering light. And no, no one at the network snitched to me, regarding what you’ve been doing. You’ve sufficiently managed to bully them into silence. I found out through credible outside sources.

So, the next time you consent to opening your mouth to bully someone at the network or mention my name to anyone at the BBC or in the industry with any bull attached to it, I want you to remember the scandals I’ve broken on the internet and how I will have absolutely no hesitation in breaking your corrupt secrets online for millions of people to read (and it will never come off the internet).

Let me hear back from someone again that you have repeated the aforementioned misconduct and I will not even blink in giving you the Rupert Murdoch treatment that has caused him a world of legal problems, embarrassment and disgrace. The fact of the matter is I meant no one any harm at the BBC, being a fan of the network, but you've greatly offended me regarding your conduct with Madonna (Aisha v. FBI [Freedon Of Information Act case]) and her Kabbalah cohorts at the BBC, Russell Davies (another sick perv who has behaved inappropriately towards minors) and Steven Moffat, engaging in criminal copyright infringement, among other things.

If I were you (BBC) I'd back away from her, because an official is quietly looking into her unlawful conduct that she has roped you into and there exists a clear digital paper trail incriminating you and others, due to her arrogance and overconfidence regarding corruption.

 
STORY SOURCE

Veteran BBC football commentator Stuart Hall has admitted indecently assaulting 13 girls, the youngest aged nine.

PUBLISHED: 04:55 EST, 2 May 2013 | UPDATED: 06:35 EST, 2 May 2013 - Hall, 83, entered the guilty pleas last month at Preston Crown Court but they can only be revealed today after reporting restrictions were lifted. The sex offences took place between 1967 and 1986.

On BBC 5 Live he was a regular football commentator and summariser and provided colourful analysis of matches, often including literary references and allusions. Guilty: Stuart Hall arrives at Preston Crown Court today, with solicitor Maurice Watkins, where he has admitted historic sex allegations.

Despite previous vociferous public denials of any wrongdoing, Hall calmly and repeatedly answered 'guilty' when the charges were put to him at the hearing on April 16. Sat in front of the dock with his legal representatives, he confirmed his full name of James Stuart Hall to the clerk in the plea hearing. He then stood up as he uttered the single damning word which has now ruined his reputation.

The Recorder of Preston, Judge Anthony Russell QC, told him he would be required to sign the Sex Offenders Register. He was told a notice which he needed to fill in would be sent to his home in Cheshire within days. An additional charge of rape and three more of indecent assault will lie on file after prosecutors decided not to pursue them following the other guilty pleas. Nazir Afzal, chief crown prosecutor for the North West, described the broadcaster as an 'opportunistic predator'.

A brief outline of the abuse suffered by three of his victims, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was outlined at an earlier hearing at Preston Magistrates' Court. In the 1980s Hall molested a nine-year-old girl by putting his hand up her clothing. He also kissed a 13-year-old girl on the lips after he said to her: 'People need to show thanks in other ways.' On another occasion in the 1970s he fondled the breast of a girl aged 16 or 17...


Review prompted by Savile scandal reveals 'strong undercurrent of fear' at BBC

02 May 2013 - The BBC is to review its bullying and harassment policy and remove gagging clauses from future BBC contracts and compromise agreements. The news comes after an in-depth Respect at Work, commissioned in the wake of the Jimmy Savile sex abuse scandal, found "a strong undercurrent of fear" at the corporation.

Current BBC contracts can include "derogatory statement restrictions". New BBC director general Tony Hall, for instance, is barred from making "any derogatory or unfavourable public remark or statement" about the BBC during his time in office or within two years of his departure. BBC trust chairman Chris Patten revealed last week that this clause would be removed from Hall's contract. The review was prepared with the help of Dinah Rose QC and Change Associates.

Hall said: "Parts of this report do however make uncomfortable reading. We need to be honest about our shortcomings and single minded in addressing them. I want zero tolerance of bullying and a culture where people feel able to raise concerns and have the confidence that they will be dealt with appropriately.

"I also want people to be able to speak freely about their experiences of working at the BBC so that we can learn from them. The measures we are taking today, including the removal of so called ‘gagging clauses’, show our commitment to change. This agenda will be a priority for the senior management team going forward."...


BBC bosses 'knew all about Stuart Hall': Abuser 'had special room set aside to entertain lady friends at studios' as Corporation comes under pressure to hold second inquiry

PUBLISHED: 13:09 EST, 2 May 2013 | UPDATED: 08:23 EST, 3 May 2013 - BBC managers turned a blind eye to Stuart Hall’s regular practice of luring young girls into his dressing room, it was claimed last night. In an echo of the Jimmy Savile sex scandal, a former studio worker claimed Hall took a ‘string of girls’ into BBC Manchester, sometimes describing them as his ‘nieces’.

Gerry Clarke said: ‘Of course they [BBC managers] were aware of what was going on ... Stuart could do what Stuart could do.’ A former producer said Hall frequently took over a medical room at the BBC studios to entertain ‘lady friends’.

‘Stuart Hall pushed me up against a wall and tried to force himself on me': It's A Knockout cheerleader recounts horrific moment BBC veteran sexually assaulted her. One of the presenter’s victims, 16 at the time, revealed how she had been lured into his clutches after he invited her to BBC Manchester.

It also emerged yesterday that at least one of his offences had taken place on a day when he was filming It’s A Knockout for the BBC. Former colleague Linda McDougall said Hall had a reputation as a 'ladies man.' The similarities to the Savile scandal, where the Jim’ll Fix It presenter used his position at the corporation to groom and then abuse youngsters, are striking...


Today it's a TV host. Rock stars with 14-year-old groupies may be next. What we need to stop vile abusers like Hall is a hotline for whistleblowers, says Esther Rantzen

PUBLISHED: 19:45 EST, 4 May 2013 | UPDATED: 19:45 EST, 4 May 2013 - I am as sick of this as you are. Sick, revolted and angry. Once again the familiar grinning mask of a buffoon has been stripped away, to reveal the leering face of a monster.

Stuart Hall, of all people. Hall, aged 83, honoured (as Jimmy Savile was) for services to broadcasting and charity. Hall, who owed his career (as Savile did) to the BBC. And Hall, who used his fame (as Savile did) to get closer to the children he preyed upon.

I never knew Stuart Hall. The only moment in recent years I had even thought about him was when I heard that he had been arrested, and that he had roundly proclaimed his innocence, that the charges against him were ‘pernicious, callous, cruel and, above all spurious’ and that, as a result of them, he had suffered ‘a living nightmare’.

And when, in spite of all that righteous indignation, this week he pleaded guilty to a string of sexual attacks on children, I could hardly bring myself to read the details. So much of my life as President of ChildLine and as a Trustee of the NSPCC entails working with abused children and their families, trying to find better ways to protect them.

The thought that once again we had failed was infinitely depressing. But when I read the heart-breaking letter from one of his victims that prompted the police investigation, even I was profoundly shocked. She wrote that when she was a young teenager Hall had been invited by her school to present their prizes. That he had asked to meet her afterwards, and invited her to the television studios. Then having impressed her, fed her champagne, he had sex with her. The letter ends: ‘It disgusts me that he has the OBE, and that his friend gave him a place to hide, a platform for aggrandisement. It disgusts me to see him on television, to hear him on the radio...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Stuart Hall's teen victims demand BBC probe into 'Savile-style' abuse 

PUBLISHED: 16:03 EST, 3 May 2013 | UPDATED: 19:58 EST, 3 May 2013 - Victims of Stuart Hall last night led calls for an urgent inquiry into how he was able to abuse girls on BBC premises. The demand came after one of the disgraced presenter’s teenage victims gave a graphic account of how he plied her with champagne then had sex with her in his dressing room at BBC studios in Manchester. The woman told how Hall, now 83, invited her to the BBC after meeting her at a school prize giving ceremony in the 1970s...


Knockout for licence payers: Chairman admits taxpayers face bill for Stuart Hall crimes at BBC

5 May 2013 20:52 - But Lord Patten insisted the BBC will not open a new inquiry to run alongside its Jimmy Savile investigation. Compensation claims: Stuart Hall Compensation claims: Stuart Hall. BBC Trust Chairman Chris Patten has admitted licence payers face a compensation bill after Stuart Hall’s admission of paedophilia. The former It’s A Knockout and BBC Radio 5 Live presenter, 83, confessed to abusing children as young as nine.

He now faces civil damages claims from his victims, many of whom are also planning to sue the corporation for failing to stop abuse on its premises. But Lord Patten insisted the BBC will not open a new inquiry to run alongside its Jimmy Savile investigation. Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show yesterday, he said: "I think to set up a new inquiry, when there is already one which is extremely well-resourced operating, would probably delay arriving at the truth." Asked by guest presenter Jeremy Vine if the BBC would be liable for compensation, Lord Patten added: "I imagine so, but that will be a matter for the lawyers and conceivably the courts." But he refused to estimate the cost to the taxpayer...


BBC manager accused of procuring girls for Stuart Hall

Published: 17:24 May 5, 2013 - Victims were allegedly lured to studios and filmed having sex with former TV presenter. London: A BBC manager nicknamed ‘The Pimp’ helped to procure women for Stuart Hall and filmed the TV star having sex with them in his dressing room, it was claimed last night.

A former studio worker has told ‘The Mail on Sunday’ that floor manager Peter Barlow had them brought to the BBC’s Manchester studios for fake auditions. The source claims that the women were lured to a room where Barlow filmed them having sex with the ‘It’s A Knockout’ host.

The new accusations increase pressure for an inquiry, similar to the Jimmy Savile investigation, into how bosses turned a blind eye while Hall molested girls at BBC studios. The latest incidents were said to have happened in Hall’s dressing room, next to the office of news editor Tom German and regional manager Ray Colley.


Stuart Hall's younger brother was cleared of indecently assaulting 13-year-old girl

PUBLISHED: 18:39 EST, 4 May 2013 - Stuart Hall’s younger brother was cleared of indecently assaulting a 13-year-old girl after a three-day trial in 1991. Within minutes of the verdict, Keith Hall quit his job as deputy director of Essex Social Services, which he had held for 12 years.

It was alleged during the trial that Mr Hall, then 56, fondled the girl in his office in Chelmsford and on another occasion while her mother, with whom he was having an affair, sat unaware in the same car. The girl alleged that Hall tried to kiss her up to 20 times between July 1989 and February 1990...

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

BBC's "Doctor Who" Admits Using People's Names, Image And Likeness In Scripts

Russell Davies

In an item mentioned in the August 2009 lawsuit Aisha v. FBI, regarding the BBC program "Doctor Who" using people's real names, images and likeness to base characters on, in violation of the law (Right To Publicity) the people behind the program admitted yesterday that they have done such things.

The writers of the show arrogantly proclaimed yesterday that they took the image and likeness of politicians and others, used it for the show, but added defamatory and unflattering items to it. Yesterday they admitted, they took Margaret Thatcher's name and made her into a very unflattering character named Rehctaht, which is her name spelled backwards.

Such conduct is plain lazy, uncreative, haughty, cowardly and nasty. However, what's your excuse when you criminally misappropriate the names, images and likeness of minors for your programming, which you did to two of my younger relatives, in being nasty to me in unprovoked conduct commissioned by Madonna (see: Madonna Violates The Privacy Of Minors), as mentioned in the aforementioned lawsuit. How do you justify doing such a thing to kids.

I wasn't kidding when I said I am going to sue you and write about you and I promise you, it will be emotionally painful, humiliating and spark changes to the law, when I get finished with you. Imagine that, using the Queen's airwaves to terrorize people.

RELATED ARTICLE

Madonna Violates The Privacy Of Minors

Top BBC Executive Charged As Pedophile

BBC scriptwriters tried to use Doctor Who to bring down Margaret Thatcher

Last updated at 8:55 AM on 15th February 2010

She battled the Argentine army abroad and the unions at home. But Margaret Thatcher never knew she was also under attack from outer space.

Left-wing scriptwriters hired by the BBC during the 1980s tried to inspire a 'Tardis revolution' by using Doctor Who as propaganda to undermine the Tory prime minister.

In one serial they caricatured her as a vicious and egotistical alien ruler who banned outward displays of unhappiness among her downtrodden people and used a secret police to oppress dissidents.

Former actors and writers on the show admitted yesterday that there was also thinly veiled support for the miners' strike and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament...

'The idea of bringing politics into Doctor Who was deliberate. We were a group of politically motivated people and it seemed the right thing to do.' ...

'I was very angry about the social injustice in Britain under Thatcher and I'm delighted that came into the show.'

But he added: 'Critics, media pundits and politicians didn't pick up on what we were doing. Nobody really noticed or cared.'

The ratings plunged to 3million and the series was taken off air, reappearing for a one-off episode in 1996 before the hit 2005 revival.

A BBC spokesman said: 'We're baffled by these claims. The BBC's impartiality rules applied just as strongly then as they do now.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Saturday, October 10, 2009

Did They Learn Nothing From Heath Ledger

Mitch Hewer

Handsome, heterosexual movie star, Heath Ledger, was chosen by gay Hollywood, to play a homosexual predator in the gay film "Brokeback Mountain."

He faced a worldwide backlash, which included public pressure, protests, death threats, hate mail and emails. It began the downward emotional spiral that drove him to illegal prescription medication abuse, which ultimately claimed his life to an overdose.

Yesterday, the Judiciary Report covered the BBC/E4 teen program "Skins" in the article "Madonna Violates The Privacy Of Minors."

A homosexual character on "Skins" was called Maxie and the role was played by heterosexual actor, Mitch Hewer.

Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain, the gay creators and writers of the show, who worked for, then with, sicko writer/producer, Russell Davies, chose Hewer for his good looks. Davies, a camp homosexual, publicly thanked him for including the gay character in the show.

At the time he was chosen to play Maxie, Mitch was barely 17-years-old and required to perform gay kissing and fondling scenes on camera. That's called exploitation of a minor.

Hewer later stated in an interview that people (men) always come up to him expecting him to be gay like the character Maxie, but he is not. His facial expressions and words during the interview betrayed the fact he was not happy regarding these developments.

He has also been typecast as gay, as the work is not flowing in as it should be, for an actor that was on national television, starring on a program that was shown in many countries.

To take a heterosexual male, especially one that is a minor, promise him fame and fortune, but tell him, in order to live his dreams as an actor, he as an underage youth, would have to do gay kissing and fondling scenes with other boys on camera, was reprehensible.

What about Hewer's emotional well being. Did the gay factions of the entertainment world learn nothing from the death of Heath Ledger. They took a straight actor, cast him in a high profile gay role and it resulted in an avalanche of letters, comments and criticism that played a factor in his early demise.

His mind was so distressed and restless that he overmedicated himself. It is a terrible burden they place on straight actors, casting them in gay roles.

Too often, gay executives in show business, want good looking, charming young men to compromise who they are, in order to set up some ideal of what is gay, in a bid at shoving homosexuality down the throats of audiences.

I find the show "Skins" very disturbing. It sets a horrible example for teens, much like the 20th Century Fox film "Jennifer's Body" and certain other programming in that genre. It's not right to foist that on people's impressionable children.

Skins

Jamie Brittain, who nicknamed himself "Devil" on Twitter, bragged recently that "Skins" does show debauchery among teens, but refuses to show the consequences of such misconduct. This dude is crazy. You're not even dealing with adults, but children and this is the terrible mindset you are operating under, in exposing millions of people's kids to vile conduct, guaranteed to mess up their lives in some manner or other, if they try it.

That's called being reckless. You have a pedophilic show full of 16 and 17-year-olds, glamorizing simulating sex on camera, binge drinking (getting very drunk, very often), abusing prescription meds in large doses, taking illegal drugs such as Ecstasy, marijuana and magic mushrooms, violently attacking each other requiring hospitalization for head and body injuries, engaging in property theft and destruction, underage youths having sex with teachers, teenage abortion and racial slurs - yet you are showing off, with your pseudo-intellectual thinking, that this is somehow acceptable behavior. You really are a "Devil."

But what about the consequences?

You seemed to have unrealistically exempted yourself from all consequences in life, such as criminally spying on underage youth and foolishly believing their sibling won't come after you in every court of law, both civil and criminal, until you are incarcerated, destitute and without any form of a name. You are to the BBC and E4, what they call in the insurance and legal industries, a massive liability.

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Madonna Violates The Privacy Of Minors

Russell Davies

As stated in the August 31, 2009 lawsuit, Aisha v. The FBI, Madonna and members of her depraved, disgraceful Kabbalah cult, such as television writer/producer, Russell Davies (Hollywood's "Queer as Folk" and the BBC's "Doctor Who" and "Torchwood") not only infringed my PREEXISTING copyrights, but violated my privacy as well and that of my family and friends, using it as the basis for select episodes of the BBC programs "Torchwood" and "Doctor Who."

For more on that, here is an excerpt from the August 31, 2009 lawsuit, Aisha v. The FBI et al, relevant to this article:

24. Madonna then spread her invasive madness to her label affiliate BBC in London where she lived (BBC’s DVDs are distributed by Madonna’s Warner Bros). The BBC is familiar with Aisha’s family, having worked with her dad and aunt. Previously, in 2004, the BBC called Aisha’s dad, renowned musicologist and disc jockey, Vaughn “Bunny” Goodison, in Jamaica over the telephone, for an interview on the passing of his esteemed, lifelong friend and music legend, 72-year-old, Clement Dodd. On another occasion, the BBC telephoned Aisha’s dad for comment on the passing of famous charity worker, 87-year-old, Sister Mary Ignatius Davies, who was also a good friend of the family. These interviews were carried on BBC radio and on their websites. Aisha’s aunt, Jamaica’s award winning, highly rated, poet laureate, Lorna Goodison, had also done pleasant radio and print interviews with the BBC. Therefore, the family had maintained a good relationship with the BBC, but Madonna, driven by ill-will and hatred, resenting the famous arts family, due to Aisha’s very valuable, groundbreaking Copyrighted Catalog she covets and Aisha’s refusal to respond to her correspondences, viciously sponsored a Kabbalah styled case of gross invasion of privacy and copyright infringement, through BBC employees and Kabbalah members, Russell Davies and Billie Piper (Madonna’s protégé), aimed at vindictively targeting and maligning the award winning family. The family at no time did anything to Madonna, Davies or Piper, not knowing any of them, yet acting in concert with Madonna, they began to place items from Aisha’s preexisting Copyrighted Catalog and astonishingly her personal life as well, in his BBC scripts.

25. Davies infringed Aisha’s copyrights for select episodes of the BBC shows “Doctor Who” and “Torchwood” and additionally, included Aisha’s personal, identifying information unique to her, in his scripts. These items were obtained through hacking by the staff of Madonna.com. Davies, who has visited Aisha’s official websites, before and after the misconduct transpired, as attested by Traffic Facts site statistics software, has followed Madonna’s lead and taken broadcasting to an unprecedented low in Britain for the “Children of Earth” five part series on the “Torchwood” program he writes for. The “Children of Earth” broadcast not only includes items from preexisting, protected items from Aisha’s computers, using it for the main storyline of the 5 part miniseries, it also includes Aisha’s mother’s name “MILLIE” as a character, a variation of AISHA’s name in the script as a character named “MISHA”, a look-alike character that is the spitting image of Aisha’s sister, casting the character as a girl who is maliciously exploited and thrown in prison, the name CLEMENT mcDOnalD, a variation of the name CLEMENT DODD, appears in the script as an elderly character (CLEMENT DODD is Aisha’s aforementioned godmother’s husband, who invented reggae music and signed Bob Marley to his first record deal). There is also a character named MR. DEKKER, which is the real name of one of CLEMENT DODD’s legendary, award winning, international reggae recording colleagues and Aisha’s dad’s late friend, MR. DESMOND DEKKER. The CLEMENT and DEKKER names were cast as psychotic, despised, crazy characters running from aliens, which is disrespectful to the memory of the two, real, beloved, legendary Jamaican national heroes in the music field, which the names were distastefully taken from, in a racist manner by Russell Davies and Madonna’s Kabbalah. Other invasive items that infringe Aisha’s preexisting copyrights were included in select episodes of Russell Davies’ show “Doctor Who.” ...

27. Other members of Madonna’s Kabbalah such as Sacha Baron Cohen, have been outed using real people for characters in TV shows and movies, such as “Ali G” being based on BBC radio disc jockey Tim Westwood and 2009’s Austrian character “Bruno” being illegally based on Austrian TV personality Alfons Haider. In 2009, Madonna’s partner and Kabbalah member, Jerry Bruckheimer was also sued for perversely basing a defamatory episode of “CSI” on a real live couple that owns a Los Angeles real estate firm, Scott and Melinda Tamkin, with the show using their real names and lives for the broadcast without permission, but defaming them as reckless people participating in sexual bondage, pornography, drunkenness and murder, in similar conduct to what Aisha had formally accused Bruckheimer of in her 2005 lawsuit against Madonna.

Since the filing of the lawsuit several weeks ago, I have discovered my teenage godbrother's privacy and that of his mother, who live in South Florida in America, were violated during the case, as he, his mother and I, exchange emails very often and speak on the phone regularly, which was illegally wiretapped Anthony Pellicano style (Madonna's private investigator, whom I gave the FBI detailed information about in 2005 and he was later arrested and convicted on wiretapping charges - See page of lawsuit).

During one of the many hacks into my computer, which were traced back to Digilink, who is the web hosting company for Madonna's official website Madonna.com, not only was my very valuable preexisting Copyrighted Catalog copied and then infringed by Madonna and her cohorts in Hollywood, my emails, both business and personal, were illegally copied, as mentioned in the lawsuit.

As stated in the lawsuit and mentioned above in the excerpt, Madonna's Kabbalah member, homosexual Russell Davies (and his "Doctor Who" actress, Madonna protégé and Kabbalah cult member, Billie Piper) infringed preexisting copyrights belonging to me, for select episodes of "Torchwood" and "Doctor Who" and additionally included items in the script, such as the names of my family members and friends in the "Children Of Earth" 5-part miniseries on "Torchwood."

Skins

Recently, I saw a bio page for the BBC/E4 program "Skins." The homosexual father and son team of Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain, who are the writers and creators of the extremely dysfunctional and distasteful teen show "Skins" was mentioned in conjunction with Madonna's Kabbalah member Russell Davies. The article stated Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain used to work for Russell Davies. They are also Davies' BBC co-workers.

Now, imagine my horror and repulsion, when I scrolled down the character list for the show "Skins" and see my godbrother's name "JJ Jones" listed as a character (his first name is John, but his family and friends call him "JJ").

Imagine my horror again, when I read about the character and realize said character not only has my godbrother's name, mimicking the sick conduct Madonna/Davies did to my family, but also infringes his image and likeness as well. This infringing character was created when my godbrother was 17-years-old. He is now19.

Things the character on skins has in common with my godbrother "JJ Jones":

1. The name "JJ Jones"
2. 17-years of age
3. Wears braces
4. Grew his hair out a bit (his mom kept commenting on it, as she wanted him to cut it)
5. Lives with his mom a single parent
6. A very smart student
7. Hangs out often with his two best friends
8. Has a penchant for drinking Tropicana (an American, Florida brand of fruit juice that amazingly appears in a British show)

How does the BBC explain, how people connected to Madonna via Kabbalah, not only wound up in criminal possession of an illegally made copy of my Copyrighted Catalog, infringing items from it via using them without permission, but said characters in the infringing programs, now mysteriously have my mother's name MILLIE, a variation of my name AISHA ("MISHA"), a look alike character that looks a great deal like my sister, the name my of my godmother's husband who invented reggae music CLEMENT DODD (turned into the variant name "CLEMENT mcDOnalD") and his colleague, the late reggae legend, DESMOND DEKKER's name used as "MR. DEKKER" in the programming (Note: My dad interviewed Desmond Dekker's family on his radio show, listened to by millions around the world, shortly before Madonna/Russell Davies did this invasive madness) and now my godbrother's name, image and likeness, appears along with the other infringements, as characters penned by these same writers, Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain.

Let's not forget, prior to this, the BBC called my dad, a renowned musicologist, twice in Jamaica for interviews on famous musicians that are friends of the family. I kept wondering how they got his number. They also interviewed my aunt, an award winning author, Lorna Goodison, prior to all this as well.

Therefore, the BBC does know my family. Not to mention, the BBC has come up in my website stats numerous times, before and after these incidents regarding Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain transpired.

It's bad enough for Madonna and co. to violate my privacy, but while their invasiveness was going on, she and her comrades at the BBC, invaded the privacy of my sister and godbrother, who were minors at the time this unlawful activity began. That is absolutely criminal.

I am also of the belief, they found out what my sister looks like and based the aforementioned "Torchwood" character on her ("Lois" from Torchwood's "Children of Earth), via photos I had taken of her at the airport, that I emailed to her in Jamaica, after I extracted them from the card of my digital camera.

"Lois" from Torchwood's "Children of Earth" looks like my sister. I asked my mom and another relative to look at the picture and tell me what they think and they said she does look like her (except, my sister usually has her hair straight - however, in the photos that I took of her at the airport and emailed to her, she had the front of her hair braided):

Violating the privacy of minors is a very serious crime. Turning two minors, that are private citizens, into characters on TV, at the request of a sick, devilish pop star, Madonna, invading innocent people's privacy and harassing others, as she is psychopathic and obsessed out of her non-singing mind, is disgusting and nasty.

Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain, have also added other very defamatory and sick items to the characters lives, based on my sister and godbrother, that are more than enough grounds for criminal charges and a lawsuit.

Once again, Madonna and co. have gone too far. The worst part in all this is, we are innocent people that have nothing to do with Madonna or her lunatic Kabbalah cult members like Davies.

And I promise you, all that are involved in committing this foul, nasty misconduct on those shows, that criminally invaded the privacy of minors, will see the inside of a prison cell before this is all over. You have my word on it.

Do, pray tell, what did my young sister and godbrother do to you? They are two good, decent, hardworking kids that make great grades in school and are trying to live their lives.

How did they deserve for a group of vile, despicable, perverted lunatics to invade their privacy and beam their lives, image, likeness and in my godbrother's case, his actual name, around the world (his mom's distinct last name that is different from his, was also used for a Russell Davies' TV character on "Torchwood").

Do stand up like men, albeit cowardly homosexual men, obsessed with underage boys and girls - and tell the world what my young sister and godbrother, who do not even know you at all, nor do I, did to you that they deserve this criminal nastiness and invasiveness you've done in conjunction with your fellow Kabbalah cult member Madonna. You must be so proud of yourselves spying on and picking on underage youths, you perverts.

Really, what if I took the low road, as Madonna has done once again and cast a character in one of my scripts with her daughter's name, writing that the 12-year-old girl is to be dressed like an underage prostitute, trying to be sexy for the camera. Oh wait, Madonna has done that to her daughter already for her latest video, trying to shock people for attention.

Madonna

Regarding, Russell Davies, Bryan Elsley and Jamie Brittain, what if I pen a script, casting your respective parents' names, image and likeness, as characters that molest kids and pee on them in the woods, as Elton John was accused of doing by the Sun Newspaper UK. How would you feel about that. I can get their names off Wikipedia if you'd like (and knowing Wikipedia, there is a 99% probability the names would be wrong, anyway).

But I wouldn't do something like that. Because at the end of the day, one has to ask one's self, what kind of sick people do things like that, you know, as you have done to my innocent family and I, who've done you no harm.

Once again, if the shiftless, useless, corrupt FBI had done their jobs from 2005, when they first received the case, those depraved animals could not have taken things to such sick levels, causing irreparable damage to innocent people, including minors, as mentioned above.

And the FBI wonders why I have nothing positive to write about them. Take a good look at that mess, as two young people have now been harmed, because you corruptly decided to let a foul, vile, dirty old pop star that audiences don't even care about anymore, run loose with this madness, committing crime after crime, against innocent people, so she and Hollywood could criminally rip me off, as my Copyrighted Catalog is very valuable.

Then again, I shouldn't be surprised that the FBI doesn't care about kids, as it was widely reported, the FBI told the parents of missing children to buzz off.

You call that law enforcement. You are such unmitigated failures at what you do. Hands down, the worst law enforcement agency ever.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

FBI Sued In Madonna Case

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller

FBI Director Robert S. Mueller, the FBI and DOJ, have been sued in the Madonna human rights abuse case, under the Freedom of Information Act and the Civil Rights Act. To read the lawsuit click here.

Be sure to read the parts about her famous producers, friends, associates, staff members and Kabbalah members, contacting and approaching me on her behalf and the part about Kabbalah member Russell Davies' sick misconduct in conjunction with her (press ctrl F and then type in his name Russell Davies). I will post a summary of the lawsuit shortly.

During the George W. Bush administration, I filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the FBI. First they lied in writing and stated there were no files. Then, when I pressed the issue some more with a written "appeal" of their decision, they stated in writing there are files and they are withholding them and I'd have to sue them to get it, so I did today.

The FBI has been withholding thousands of pages in files relating to the case and other items concerning me, in violation of the Freedom of Information Act.

Madonna

When Obama ran for President, he promised "Change" in America. He also promised "transparency" in government, something that was sorely lacking during the Bush years.

Therefore, it is in this vein that I filed the lawsuit. A rough draft of the lawsuit, along with a polite, respectful letter was sent to Obama on July 15. 2009, which the U.S. Postal Service confirms the White House has received.

It was a last resort, as Madonna's conduct is endangering my very life, as the lawsuit details and the FBI's criminal negligence and cover-up thereof, has caused me extensive damage as well. Madonna, through her staff, famous producers, associates and friends, keeps contacting me and harassing me.

Marcia G. Cook (center)

As many of you know, I sued Madonna/Sony in 2005 and the case was corrupted by her. It was thrown out without being read, by Miami Judge and George W. Bush appointee, Marcia G. Cook (the magistrate judge was Stephen Brown).

She is the same judge that violated the Constitution to aid Bush, who for the first time in U.S. history, held a man in prison for years, without charging him for a crime. 400 years of painstaking law was thrown out the window, marking a profound low in the Judiciary's history.

Cook further stated the case, which involved assault and death threats against me was, "Amusing." Yes, really. That's the word she inexcusably used in her ruling, while stating pop stars could not have broken the law. She reminds me of verbally abusive, Judge Kent, who was recently impeached.

She threw it out, clearly without reading it, the same day she received it, according to the court's case transfer sheet. My case was not the only one she had that day, as she had dozens. Therefore, she could not have possibly read the 60 pages of the lawsuit, 200 pages of evidence exhibits and Gigabytes of comparative data illustrating infringements.

In short, she committed fraud. People do not pay their taxes and court filing fees, for their cases not to be read and reviewed correctly. That spits in the taxpayers faces, who pay judges salaries and is a violation of the judicial canons.

She also stated something in her ruling, that was riddled with misspellings and misapplied law, that I was instructed to cut the case down to 50 pages, when I was told to cut it down to "60 pages" by her colleague, who was the judge that had the case first, Cecilia Altonaga.

Cecilia Altonaga

Madonna and her cohorts kept stealing items from my preexisting Copyrighted Catalog and Altonaga ignored the motion for an injunction to bar her from stealing anything else, which I thought was strange.

Then, she and the Defendants called me into court for a hearing in December 2005, where she basically treated me the victim, like a criminal and the lawbreaking Defendants' lawyers, like royalty.

She even sarcastically told me to "Try state court" which is absolutely the wrong venue for a copyright case, as copyrights pertain to federal law and federal court. I've seen other copyright cases dismissed from state court with the court stating it is the wrong venue. I can't imagine as a judge, Altonaga did not know this. I politely requested in a motion that she recuse herself.

She was acting in the Defendants' best financial interest, not in the interest of justice and truth. Turns out, Altonaga's child had been given stock in the Defendants' company (Sony) and her husband works for the law firm, Holland and Knight as a partner and Sony is one of their biggest clients. That's a multi-million dollar account. So they put food on her table and as such, she ruled in their favor.

R. Allen Stanford was arrested a few months ago for running a ponzi scheme

It's this same sort of thing that allowed R. Allen Stanford to win a case in Miami he should not have. It's a shame, as had integrity prevailed in the case years ago, when a man formally sued and accused him in court, of running a ponzi scheme, providing proof thereof, investors in America, Britain and the Caribbean, would have saved billions of their hardearned life savings.

This year it was revealed, the FBI also knew since 1998, what Stanford was doing in running a ponzi scheme, but kept silent, allowing it to continue, instead of arresting him and stopping the financial damages a decade ago, which grew to terrible proportions over the last 10 years.

The case against Stanford was dismissed and the innocent, truth telling Plaintiff, was ordered to pay that crook Stanford $300,000 in court costs and damages. Talk about corrupt. Read about it by clicking here. Stanford's chief financial officer has now pled guilty, disclosing their criminal misconduct.

As stated above, Obama promised "change" and "transparency" in government. So, let's see if things have changed regarding the government, court system and corporate America or if my rights will be corruptly violated again in court.

It will also be a bellwether to you, the business owner and the domestic/global investor, as to the true state of things in the corporate and court sector.

I filed the case in the appropriate jurisdiction, under the appropriate laws, it is formatted according to the rules of federal procedure and I have successful proved access and misconduct that are a proximate cause of the clear cut damages I sustained.

The case has been assigned to judge Jose Martinez. However, the magistrate judge providing oversight, is the same one from the 2005 Madonna case, judge Stephen Brown (18 magistrate judges and I get the same one again). However, once again, I'm going to act in good faith.

I will post all the details of the case as it transpires, every single aspect, on the Judiciary Report and its affiliated sites. I'm also asking you to forward the lawsuit link to as many people as possible, to create awareness about the case.

The more people that know about it, the less inclined those Hollywood Kabbalah loons should be, in continuing to harass and terrorize me.



Your Ad Here