Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Clinton: Obama Should Be Getting Us Coffee


A new book entitled "Game Change" is set to expose racism within the U.S. Democratic Party. Thus far, excerpts from the book have greatly damaged the names of Senator, Harry Reid and former President, Bill Clinton.

Usually, one would have to give this sort of lecture to a few Republicans in Congress. But between Harry Reid's "light skinned and doesn't use Negro dialect" comment about U.S. President, Barack Obama and now the revelation former President, Bill Clinton stated of said incumbent, "A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee" it's abundantly clear, there are white Democrats who are going through some sort of race crisis that has no place in the world.

U.S. President Barack Obama

It's pretty messed up that Bill Clinton believed a black lawyer with a Harvard degree should be getting him coffee. Both Reid and Clinton have damaged race relations. But anyone who believed there isn't racism in Congress is naive or just doesn't know better.

A number of prominent black scholars, politicians and civic leaders, have denounced the aforementioned racially tinged statements by the two well-known Democrats.

'Game Change': New Book Reveals 2008 Campaigns' Messy Moments

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, called on Reid, the Senate majority leader from Nevada, to step down, issuing a statement saying: "In 2002, Democrats expressed outrage at Sen. [Trent] Lott and called on him to step down as leader. That same standard should be applied to Sen. Reid and his embarrassing and racially insensitive statements."...

Former president Bill Clinton received flak from his comment that Obama's campaign was "the biggest fairy tale I've ever seen." But he made an even more dismissive comment about Obama in private with the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, according to the book. "A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee," Clinton reportedly said.

http://abcnews.go.com

Paterson: Reid's comments on Obama 'reprehensible'

Last updated: 1:10 p.m., Monday, January 11, 2010 - ALBANY -- David Paterson said remarks about Barack Obama attributed to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., in a newly published book are "...

Some Republicans, including Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, have called for Reid to resign over the comment. Steele, like Paterson, is African-American.

http://www.timesunion.com

Court: Obama's DOJ Lacking Transparency

U.S. President Barack Obama

President Barack Obama's Department Of Justice has been fined in federal court for its lack of transparency. A Kansas court found the Department of Justice, headed up by Obama pick, Eric Holder, "Deliberately refused to provide answers during discovery."

Obama's campaign promise regarding "transparency" is now coming across like fraud, as I and others can attest and it gives the appearance of corruption and willful lawlessness, in attempting to hide the truth from the public. That's not how you get reelected. That's how you go home early.

The Judiciary Report is of the belief, Obama is getting some very bad advice and following it, knowing in the back of his mind it is questionable. However, the Obama administration should bear in mind, corruption never resonates well with the public. You need to change course before the FBI/DOJ's madness consumes your presidency and political career.

DOJ lacks transparency

1/11/2010 7:20:00 - A federal court has fined the Obama Justice Department for its lack of transparency.

The housing section of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division (CRD) had filed a discrimination lawsuit in Kansas, but a federal district court has imposed attorneys' fees on the individual DOJ lawyers in the case, including Steven Rosenbaum and Loretta King, because they refused to provide answers during discovery in the lawsuit. Rosenbaum heads the CRD's housing section and King was once acting assistant attorney general.

Hans von Spakovsky "It's very similar to what's going on in the New Black Panther case where the Justice Department is refusing to comply with subpoenas from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which is trying to get an explanation of why in the world they dismissed that voter-intimidation case," explains Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation.

He adds that the DOJ is not the only part of the Obama administration lacking transparency.

"They're basically hiding the compromise and conferencing that's been going on in that healthcare bill, despite the fact that the president eight different times during his campaign said that [process] would be completely transparent," von Spakovsky notes...

http://www.onenewsnow.com

EDITORIAL: Obama Justice Department sanctioned

There needs to be a housecleaning at the very troubled Justice Department, and the top echelons of the Civil Rights Division is the right place to start. Its division chief - a presidential appointee - and its highly politicized senior career employees promote liberal ideology more than they enforce the law.

The latest imbroglio concerns two of the division's top career lawyers, the ones whom the Obama team chose to run the division until controversial nominees Thomas Perrelli and Thomas Perez could be confirmed. The two officials, Loretta King and Steven H. Rosenbaum, were heavily involved (along with Mr. Perrelli) in dropping an already-won voter-intimidation case against several members of the New Black Panther Party in Philadelphia, and both were responsible for other, questionable race-based decisions. On Dec. 30, a federal district court in Kansas sanctioned them for misconduct.

The misconduct involved a failure to be "fully responsive" to earlier court filings. Significantly, the judge - himself a liberal who formerly served as counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union - held the Justice Department attorneys personally and "solely responsible for paying the monetary sanctions." ...

Rep. Frank Wolf, the Northern Virginia Republican who has energetically questioned the Justice Department about the Black Panther case, responded to the report of the newest sanctions against department lawyers. "This revelation," he said, "further calls into question the judgment of those responsible for the inexplicable dismissal of U.S. vs. New Black Panther Party. The pattern of withholding information is troubling - especially in light of the office's refusal to cooperate with congressional inquiries and subpoenas from the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights." ...

http://washingtontimes.com

FBI Lawsuit Update - Part 2

Obama Administration Violating Transparency Promise On White House Website

If It Continues The Judiciary Report Will Not Vote For Or Support Obama In 2012

U.S. President Barack Obama

This article is in relation to the Aisha v FBI lawsuit, which President Obama was sent a copy of, along with a letter, in July 2009, which the U.S. Postal Service provided delivery confirmation attesting they received. The lawsuit was filed on August 31, 2009 and Obama's FBI and Department of Justice, headed by Eric Holder, continue to stonewall me, in unlawfully refusing to release Freedom of Information Act files I have formally requested.

In essence, they have discredited the Freedom of Information Act and are currently challenging the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964 via the unconscionable written motions of their legal representation, Department of Justice lawyer, Carole M. Fernandez.

Judge Jose E. Martinez (left) a former Department of Justice employee is presiding over the case Aisha v. FBI/Department of Justice. The FBI, DOJ and Robert S. Mueller are currently trying to get Judge Martinez to make a precedent setting ruling that the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not give black people equal rights under the law, equal access to law enforcement services and does not apply to the FBI, DOJ and its employees, claiming they are exempt from the legal consequences of violating the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which they have done at my expense.

I sued under the Freedom of Information Act, The Civil Rights Act, The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fourth Amendment. Defendants Robert S. Mueller, the FBI and DOJ have not denied they've wiretapped me, scanned my email boxes and used the FBI's CIPAV software trojan on my computers, violating my Fourth Amendment rights, which led to me breaking the story about their conduct in December 2006, which was proven true and correct 3 months later in the Inspector General's official report.

However, the are challenging the Civil Rights Act in the case, via attorney, Carole A. Fernandez, claiming the FBI, DOJ and their employees are exempt from observing it, which is offensive, racist, legally unsound and reprehensible (I will post the legal documents in another update tomorrow so you can read it for yourself).

Carole M. Fernandez's legal premise should alarm the 40 million black people in America and 100 million minorities in the United States as well. Following her offensive legal premise, if the FBI, DOJ or any of its counterparts wish to harass, terrorize, assault, beat or harass you, invade your privacy, bring back slavery, deny you entrance to restaurants, gyms or schools and block you from receiving law enforcement services, in violation of the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to her, due to the fact they work for the U.S. government, they can violate said the Civil Rights Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964, as it does not apply to them. Let that sink in.

Obama's Attorney General, Eric Holder, is head of the Justice Department, is aiding FBI Director Robert S. Mueller in hiding incriminating Freedom of Information Act documents

The judge presiding over the case is Jose E. Martinez, who according to biographical information was the regional director of the Office for Drug Abuse Law Enforcement of Defendant the Department of Justice from 1972 to 1974.

Carole M. Fernandez, is attempting to get Judge Jose E. Martinez to rule according to this unlawful premise, which would in essence, make it case law that the FBI, DOJ and its employees are exempt from observing and following the Civil Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

It's bad enough I sustained a life threatening, unprecedented brain hemorrhage thanks to the FBI's criminal negligence in the case, in allowing Madonna to rob me of copyrights and engage members of her sick Miami Kabbalah cult, located in Eastern Shores (Miami), to stalk, approach, harass and assault me.

When I denounced the FBI's criminal negligence online, an FBI employee contacted me by email and phone and harassed and threatened me, in tandem with her co-worker. I had the brain hemorrhage shortly after, as that's when it dawned on me they had no intention of bringing justice in the case.

And this is after I furnished the FBI with credible information in writing and verbally in 2005, that was used during the Anthony Pellicano trial to help secure a conviction. Words from what I wrote was used verbatim in the trial.

The FBI vowed three times to me they are investigating the Madonna case and would issue a report on it, which is standard in said investigations, but they lied and I almost died as a result. That should let the public know the FBI can't be trusted and their word means nothing, so be careful about telling them anything, as their promises are worthless. They are treacherous and dishonorable.

When you see a law enforcement agency repeatedly sued by its own agents for racism and retaliation against minority agents, as the FBI has been, watch out, they are racist and hateful towards minority victims of crime as well.

Robert S. Mueller - tried to hide behind the government's "Immunity Shield" in the lawsuit, for unlawfully wiretapping me, scanning my emails and using the FBI's software Trojan CIPAV to gain access to my computer documents

Currently, I'm still struggling with the lingering effects of the unprecedented brain hemorrhage and due to medication that I was prescribed by Jackson Memorial Hospital, for the terrible headaches and head pains associated with the hemorrhage, Topamax, I developed another life threatening medical issue, known as Metabolic Acidosis, which sent me to the emergency room on November 25, 2009. I have discontinued the medication.

However, rather than do the honorable thing, via making amends for their misconduct and releasing the Freedom of Information Act files I am entitled to under the law, Obama's FBI and Justice Department decided while I'm sick is the time to strike and antagonize me with deceitful, roundabout motions, stonewalling a physically sick person.

Never mind, I'm still being harassed and stalked by Madonna's Kabbalah kooks and the copyright infringement has not desisted, therefore the FBI/DOJ have deliberately failed to do their jobs. There was another incident on New Years Eve, in the afternoon, where a crazy Kabbalah member I have seen before, stalked me for three blocks when I went for a walk in my neighborhood, then charged at me with her menacing dog. If I hadn't quickly crossed the street I would have been attacked.

The FBI has no excuse. I even entered into court evidence last week, a DVD disc of cell phone photos of Miami Kabbalah members that have stalked, approached and harassed me. One recently followed me into a bank and harassed me in the presence of my mother. She said she is a member of the Miami branch of Kabbalah and had the red string bracelet on. These Kabbalah members should not be following and coming up to me, as it is illegal.

Obama Violating Campaign Promise On Transparency

Obama and his Department Of Justice have been under fire recently for their blatant lack of transparency. They stonewalled the U.S. Congress in the aftermath of Fort Hood. They stonewalled Alan Keyes in his lawsuit to determine Obama's citizenship status, via violating the Freedom of Information Act in improperly withholding incriminating documents. That case is scheduled for a hearing this month. Obama's Department Of Justice was sanctioned by a Kansas Court this week for lack of transparency and a refusal to answer questions during discovery.

Now they are stonewalling me on the Freedom of Information Act files I properly requested and now sued for, even though my life is at stake, which under Department Of Justice rules, is a reason FOIA files must be released.

My life is at stake two fold - if I sustain another hemorrhage, which can occur due to harassment and undue stress (like Madonna and Kabbalah are still doing), it has a high probably of being FATAL. In addition, Kabbalah members are still stalking, harassing and trying to attack me at Madonna's behest - a cult whose members have been in murderous confrontations with innocent people (Fiona Davis, Gideon Busch and others).

If Obama's DOJ, FBI and Robert S. Mueller, along with their legal representation, Carole M. Fernandez, continue to deprive me of my rights in court, the FOIA documents I'm entitled to and what I am due under the law as a result of the FBI, DOJ and Robert S. Mueller's misconduct, I SHALL NOT BE VOTING FOR OBAMA IN THE 2012 ELECTION AND SHALL ADVISE THE MILLIONS OF PEOPLE THAT READ MY WEBSITES NOT TO VOTE FOR HIM EITHER. THIS SITE WILL SUPPORT OBAMA NO LONGER.

My life has been placed in jeopardy and I am an innocent person. I will not tolerate it. You can't ask for a worst example of government corruption than stonewalling and depriving a physically sick person of their rights in court.

FROM THE WHITE HOUSE WEBSITE (OBAMA):

Freedom of Information Act

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Act

A democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires transparency. As Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, "sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants." In our democracy, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which encourages accountability through transparency, is the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government. At the heart of that commitment is the idea that accountability is in the interest of the Government and the citizenry alike.

The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve. In responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies (agencies) should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public.

All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open Government. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA.

The presumption of disclosure also means that agencies should take affirmative steps to make information public. They should not wait for specific requests from the public. All agencies should use modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by their Government. Disclosure should be timely.

I direct the Attorney General to issue new guidelines governing the FOIA to the heads of executive departments and agencies, reaffirming the commitment to accountability and transparency, and to publish such guidelines in the Federal Register. In doing so, the Attorney General should review FOIA reports produced by the agencies under Executive Order 13392 of December 14, 2005. I also direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to update guidance to the agencies to increase and improve information dissemination to the public, including through the use of new technologies, and to publish such guidance in theFederal Register.

This memorandum does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

BARACK OBAMA

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/FreedomofInformationAct

U.S. Job Situation Deemed "Terrible"

Christina Romer

U.S. President Barack Obama's Council of Economic Advisers chief, Christina Romer, described the job situation in America as, "Terrible." She stated, "In the first quarter of 2009, when we first came in, we were losing on average 691,000 jobs per month. With these new numbers in the fourth quarter, we were losing 69,000 jobs. It's still terrible. We're still losing jobs, and we absolutely have to go from losing any jobs at all to adding them at a robust rate."

Muslims Blow Up Christian Churches In Malaysia

"The Religion Of Peace"?

Once again, whilst claiming to be "The Religion Of Peace" a large group of Muslims in Malaysia blew up Christian churches, because the courts ruled Christians can use the world "allah."

Churches Attacked in Malaysian ‘Allah’ Dispute

Published: January 8, 2010 - KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — Three Christian churches were attacked with firebombs Friday as tensions rose in a dispute over whether Christians could use the word “Allah” in this largely Muslim nation...

http://www.nytimes.com

Google & Islam

Google is being accused of eliminating "offensive" search terms regarding Islam. They are also being accused of promoting offensive search terms about Christianity, via its suggested items.

Google 'censors its website so anti-Islam searches fail to appear'

Last updated at 2:16 PM on 10th January 2010 - Search engine Google has been accused of censoring its results after users discovered it never suggests search terms when it comes to Islam.

In a time-saving feature the internet phenomenon, whose motto is 'don't be evil', helpfully suggests common searches as people type in what they are looking for.

For example, if you type in 'Christianity is' in the search bar a whole range of options flash up including controversial suggestions such as 'Christianity is fake' and 'Christianity is a cult'.

But anyone typing in a similar phrase which replaces Christianity with Islam gets no suggestions at all...

A Google spokesman claimed the strange absence of results was a software problem. He said: "This is in fact a bug and we're working to fix it as quickly as we can.'...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Tiger Woods' Mistress: We Had Sex Over The Holidays

Tiger Woods: No, she didn't!

Gold digger, Rachel Uchitel, is apparently determined to sink the career of golfer, Tiger Woods, as she recently told the press she is still having an affair with the married athlete.

Rachel Uchitel

This comes after Woods told the world, via his website, that he is taking time off to work on his personal life, namely his marriage and family, after revelations of infidelity caused his fall from grace. Uchitel has basically destroyed his apology with these statements that have gone unchallenged.

Superstud Tiger Wood's sex, cash Xmas romp with Rachel Uchitel

January 11, 2010 06:31am - SHAMED Tiger Woods' No1 mistress has revealed how the golf rat enjoyed a secret sex romp with her on Christmas Day.

Party hostess Rachel Uchitel - whose fling with the star sparked his car crash row with wife Elin - said he gave her "lots of cash and hours of sex" as a present.

The billionaire sports legend has not been seen in public for more than a month since revelations broke of his cheating.

But Rachel has told a friend how they met for several passionate encounters mainly after dark at a pal's mansion in Florida over the festive period - with the beauty wearing a ski mask to avoid being spotted.

"He took care of me really good," the 34-year-old brunette says in Britain's News of the World newspaper. "It was amazing and delicious.

"Tiger and I have been sneaking around for the last few days. It's been really hard - we have a condo at Palm Beach where we go." ...

http://www.news.com.au

Megan Fox, Her House & Mickey Rourke

Actor Mickey Rourke and actress Megan Fox. Do they use the same Botox and collagen guy?

Hollywood's most hated actress, Megan Fox, recently purchased a new home in Los Angeles, California. In 2009, she called off her engagement to actor, Brian Austin Green, so as not to upset Michael Bay, the man who has been lusting after her since she was 15-years-old. Now, she has her own place, thanks to Bay making her a star.

Michael Jackson Estate Loses $20 Million Judgment

Michael Jackson

The estate of the late pop star, Michael Jackson, lost a $20 million dollar award the singer previously won in court, against XtraJet. The company secretly and criminally recorded Jackson and his lawyer, Mark Geragos, when the singer leased a private jet from their now defunct company.

In secretly recording the duo, without their knowledge, permission or consent, they violated voyeur laws and attorney client privilege. A California appeals court has now ruled, the judge was being "excessive" and has given Jackson's lawyer, Mark Geragos, the option of accepting $750,000 in lieu of the $20 million judgment or retrying the case.

I find it amazing how lightly some take criminal invasion of privacy, which is a disgusting, perverted violation of the Fourth Amendment. It's amazing how some deem their fictitious right to know other people's business, trumps the law of the land.

MJ Attorney -- Now Ya See $20 Mil, Now Ya Don't

Posted Jan 11th 2010 5:50PM by TMZ Staff - In a stunning reversal of fortune, a California appeals court has overturned a massive judgment against the jet company that secretly videotaped Michael Jackson and his lawyer, Mark Geragos, as they were flying to Santa Barbara in 2003 when Jackson turned himself in to cops.

Geragos had sued the now-defunct XtraJet and the owner of the company, and the famed lawyer won a whopping $20 million judgment.

But the appeals court ruled the judgment was excessive and is now giving Geragos two choices -- either take $750,000 or retry the case...

The former owner of XtraJet, Jeff Borer, tells TMZ, "Hopefully the courts will come to their senses and see there is no real harm done. Shame on Mark Geragos for trying to take advantage of a nothing situation."

P.S. Borer pled guilty to conspiracy in connection with the taping. Not so "nothing."

http://www.tmz.com

Yale Needs To Give Peru Its Property Back

Yale

In a very disappointing move, Yale University, in the state of Connecticut, located in the North Eastern part of the United States, is in unlawful possession of items from the nation of Peru's famed Machu Picchu site and is refusing to give back the priceless pieces. The government of Peru sued and Yale has requested the judge dismiss the lawsuit.

Yale is citing the three year statute of limitations that exists under U.S. law, as an excuse to steal Peru's national artifacts. However, the University is acting in violation of Peruvian law and U.N. law. Therefore, this is in effect stealing, not to mention raping another nation of its heritage and culture. Not a good look domestically or worldwide.

Yale asks dismissal of lawsuit over Peru artifacts

Monday, January 11, 2010 - Added 1h ago - NEW HAVEN, Connecticut — Yale University asked a court to dismiss a lawsuit by Peru seeking the return of thousands of artifacts from the famed Machu Picchu site, saying the claims were filed years too late.

Peru rejects the argument, saying Yale never owned the Incan artifacts that were taken from the South American nation nearly a century ago.

Yale filed court papers Friday arguing that the Peru’s lawsuit, filed in December 2008, should be dismissed because of a three-year statute of limitations under Connecticut law. Peru argues that under its own law, its claims are not subject to a statute of limitations.

The artifacts were gathered by a Yale scholar, Hiram Bingham III, between 1911 and 1915. Yale says it returned dozens of boxes of artifacts in 1921 and that Peru knew it would retain other artifacts.

"In the twenty-first century, long after everyone with any personal memory of the expeditions had died, Peru claimed that Yale had not returned enough of the artifacts," Yale’s attorneys wrote.

But Peru says objects of "immense cultural and historical importance" were never returned and says the trove included human remains, objects in bronze and gold, utensils, ceramics and art objects. Yale describes the artifacts as "primarily fragments of ceramic, metal and bone."...

http://news.bostonherald.com